|
|
From: owner-pre61-list-digest
To: pre61-list-digest Subject: pre61-list-digest V3 #248 Reply-To: pre61-list Sender: owner-pre61-list-digest Errors-To: owner-pre61-list-digest Precedence: bulk pre61-list-digest Wednesday, September 1 1999 Volume 03 : Number 248 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1948 - 1948 truck and vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe pre61-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: FTE Pre61 - Re: ignition timing FTE Pre61 - knowwhatImean? FTE Pre61 - 59 F-100 4x4 RE: FTE Pre61 - Brake Systems Re: FTE Pre61 - Highway speed FTE Pre61 - Bolt info FTE Pre61 - Fwd: (No Subject) Re: FTE Pre61 - Highway speed Re: FTE Pre61 - Highway speed FTE Pre61 - Re: Highway speed FTE Pre61 - 51 parts ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 06:39:16 MST From: "Jeff Thomas" Subject: Re: FTE Pre61 - Re: ignition timing Hi, Dan, as far as timing for your 302, you would do best to pick up a Chiltons/Clymers/Haynes shop manual. Those have all of the specs for your engine. A nine-inch will not have a bolt-on rear cover. If you look under the back of your truck, you will see a smooth cover if it's a 9. If you see bolts around the differential pumpkin, you may have the stock rear. There are more details to positively identify rears. Check a local Barnes & Noble or other big bookstore for reference books. Good luck, and have fun! Jeff T 56 (390)F-100 >From: MilFam3 >Reply-To: pre61-list >To: pre61-list >Subject: FTE Pre61 - Re: ignition timing >Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 22:44:26 EDT > >to whom it may concern, my 56 f-100 has a stock 302 with 2 barrel carb, >electronic >ignition. does someone out there know what the correct timing should be set >at to >get the most preformance out of it? the only thing eles i know was it came >out of a >71 mustang.also i hear you guys speak alot about 9 inch rearends.can >someone >explain how to determine what to look for to see if i also have one? i hope >that wasn't >a dumb question?! and to all you great people who've already answered many >of >my other questions i thank you all!! DAN >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ______________________________________________________ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 09:24:08 -0700 (PDT) From: shane san miguel Subject: FTE Pre61 - knowwhatImean? notice but most, especially those who had contact with the old trucks look with admiration. Y'all know what I mean, right? Mike in Indy. Yeah, Mike. We know what you mean. My truck isn't blazing fast and it looks like crap but people still turn their heads and ask questions wherever I go. It's the exhaust that gets their attention and the classic lines (even with all that needed bodywork) that keeps their attention. Thanks for the smile, Shane 55 F100 5.0 15.51 289 pinto __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 12:40:46 -0500 From: Troy McClung Subject: FTE Pre61 - 59 F-100 4x4 Does anyone know of a disc brake conversion for my 59 F-100 4x4? Troy == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 12:00:28 -0500 From: Mike Morton Subject: RE: FTE Pre61 - Brake Systems Dusty, I've got a 9 inch with discs in the back and disc brakes on the stock spindles in the front. I can't say how well it will work as I am still working on the truck as I get time. I have talked to several other guys that did similiar setups and they were all happy with how their's stopped. I drove one without the power and didn't even know it till we got back to the house. Mike, 55 F100/460 > -----Original Message----- > From: A. D. Dodge [SMTP:dustymtn > Sent: Monday, August 30, 1999 5:05 PM > To: Ford Trucks Email > Subject: FTE Pre61 - Brake Systems > > Mike - do you have stock drum brakes with your new dual reservoir master > > cylinder? Does your truck stop well enough and easily enough that a > power booster isn't needed? I'd really like to convert to a dual master > cylinder on my '55 100 but wasn't sure if I should consider a booster in > addition to the new master to get it to stop > quickly when necessary without having to stand on the pedal with both > feet. Thanks for your help! > > Dusty > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 11:42:29 -0700 From: Dan Wentz Subject: Re: FTE Pre61 - Highway speed > > I took my 52 F-2 out on a highway this weekend after primarily driving on the > > city streets here in Indianapolis. My Flathead V8 runs really well but > seemed most comfortable running around 45. I pushed it up to 50 mph but the > I felt better letting off the gas to around 45. Will faster highway > driving harm the engine? That's your rear end slowing you down. With 3.91 gears your top speed will be pretty low, and your engine RPM's will be quite high. I tried keeping up with freeway traffic back when I had the flathead in my 50 and it wasn't very fun--60 mph at about 3500 rpm. With the oiling system being what it is on those things I decided I'd stick to surface streets. The other problem with driving a stock truck on the freeway is, as you pointed out, the bias ply tires. Even with radials I often felt like a strong wind could blow me across 2 lanes. Then if you've got the slightest big of slop in your suspension you start having to chase your front wheels around with the steering wheel (did that makes sense? If you've done it you know what I mean). And suppose you have to slam on the brakes all of a sudden! I've done it and I'm lucky to be alive. ~Dan 1950 F1 351C--Edelbrock Manifold #2750 please. 1992 Mustang --The Clutch From HELL! 1965 Mustang--Becoming less likely by the day. Visit my new improved 48-52 F1 Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://home.earthlink.net/~dwentz == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 14:43:31 -0400 From: Paul Subject: FTE Pre61 - Bolt info I might possibly do another chassis switch on my panel; the majority of the body bolts are, as in the pickup, through the wooden floor/bed. I would like to avoid tearing up the new carpet which is glued to this wood, which means that I would have to undo the bolts from the bottom only. Does anyone have any good ideas as to how I can do this without tearing up the threads? I have 2 decent ideas, but I wanted your opinions. These bolts are not carriage bolts, of course. Paul G. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 15:18:03 -0700 From: "Erik Matthew Anton" Subject: FTE Pre61 - Fwd: (No Subject) - -- - --------- Forwarded Message --------- DATE: Sat, 28 Aug 1999 06:41:20 From: "Erik Matthew Anton" To: "pre61-list-digest" Just a thank you note to the contributors of this list. I am in the middle of restoring a 56 F-100 and as the result of this sight I have: -learned how to adjust my steering box -learned more about setting my drivetrain angles -went back to using argon shielding gas and regular wire on my mig welder (what a difference) -will probably use EZ wiring when I get to electrical work -decided to buy a roof for my truck instead of patching holes at front - probably other things I'm not remembering Thanks again, Erik Anton If anyone is interested , I know of 2 restorable 56 F-100's in Maryland, both are c***y powered. Also , If you are near sotheastern Pa. , I found a salvage yard with many 40's, 50's & 60's Ford trucks.e-mail me at (antone Erik 56 f-100 390 & 4-speed overdrive CCNmail for your free web-based e-mail. http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.ccnmail.com - --------- End Forwarded Message --------- CCNmail for your free web-based e-mail. http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.ccnmail.com == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 18:57:56 -0400 From: "Thomas J. Teixeira" Subject: Re: FTE Pre61 - Highway speed At 11:42 AM 8/31/1999 -0700, Dan Wentz wrote: > >> >> I took my 52 F-2 out on a highway this weekend after primarily driving on the >> >> city streets here in Indianapolis. My Flathead V8 runs really well but >> seemed most comfortable running around 45. I pushed it up to 50 mph but the >> I felt better letting off the gas to around 45. Will faster highway >> driving harm the engine? > > >That's your rear end slowing you down. With 3.91 gears your top speed will be >pretty low, and your engine RPM's will be quite high. I've got 3.55 gears in my Flathead and 45 to 50 seems the most comfortable speed. Engine bolt-ons (dual exhaust and carburetors) did help the top-end and slower divided highways (55 to 60) don't seem quite as bad, but it still isn't a vehicle for the fast lane. I've just put on radials instead of bias-ply tires, but haven't driven around that much yet. These are 215/70R16 and are only a little wider than the 6.00-16's that were stock. Steering effort isn't noticably different, but I was hoping that the radials would drive better at 65 to 70. I'm not sure how to describe how it feels now, but it does seem like it's something in the front suspension that just isn't set up for higher speed. Note that I've got the stock transverse spring and solid axle and a 1939 steering box. I don't have anything like a Panhard bar. Tom Teixeira '35 pickup http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://world.std.com/~tjt/35Pickup.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 17:24:31 -0700 From: "cc" Subject: Re: FTE Pre61 - Highway speed Hi. I have a 56 f-100 longbed that my dad bought new and I restored. He said that the truck drove badly when he first bought it but a technician from Ford Motor Company told him to put 15" tires on it and it made a world of difference in the handling. As per the hard running, mine will cruse at 65-70 all day with no problem with the original 272 engine. David Original 56 longbed - -----Original Message----- From: Thomas J. Teixeira To: pre61-list Date: Tuesday, August 31, 1999 4:44 PM Subject: Re: FTE Pre61 - Highway speed >At 11:42 AM 8/31/1999 -0700, Dan Wentz wrote: >> >>> >>> I took my 52 F-2 out on a highway this weekend after primarily driving >on the >>> >>> city streets here in Indianapolis. My Flathead V8 runs really well but >>> seemed most comfortable running around 45. I pushed it up to 50 mph but the >>> I felt better letting off the gas to around 45. Will faster highway >>> driving harm the engine? > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 20:53:25 EDT From: TNickolson Subject: FTE Pre61 - Re: Highway speed I have done every thing possible to my old Flathead engine, but I did not change the suspension except for mono-leaf springs. I feel safe and comfortable in the mid 60's range. I am having a problem with the play in the steering. I rebuilt the original box but still have 1/8 turn play in the wheel and that causes a constant steering adjustment at slower speeds and especially when I must stop quick. Is this normal? By the way, I still have a great time driving around. Tom Nickolson == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 18:27:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Scott Subject: FTE Pre61 - 51 parts Just got an email from a guy who is parting out a 1951 F2. I think that there was someone looking for hub-caps on the list. Anyways, email me OFFLIST for more details. wm_69 To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|