|
|
pre61-list-digest Wednesday, September 2 1998 Volume 02 : Number 244 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1960 and Older trucks and vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe pre61-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: FTE Pre61 - ADMIN: Car Lounge Award FTE Pre61 - Torque tube drive Re: FTE Pre61 - ADMIN: Car Lounge Award FTE Pre61 - ADMIN: Anti-SPAM Re: FTE Pre61 - ADMIN: Car Lounge Award FTE Pre61 - ADMIN: More on spam... please read. Re: FTE Pre61 - 99 Pigeon Forge FTE Pre61 - Vent window rubber on a 56 ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1998 20:11:29 -0400 From: Jack Fleming Subject: Re: FTE Pre61 - ADMIN: Car Lounge Award Ken - I'm bummed - you know they only let you vote ONCE???!!! Jack Fleming '54 F100 Now on the Road! At 08:33 PM 8/30/98 -0400, you wrote: >Autumn Car Lounge Awards just came out. This time we got >10th place instead of 1st but I'm still pleased. Check it >out: > >http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://carlounge.com/topten/ttaut98.htm > >Thanks for the support on the vote, we really appreciate >it. Looks like FTE is really starting to get noticed! > >Ken Payne >CoAdmin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts >http://www.ford-trucks.com > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1998 19:24:38 -0500 From: "wild.bunch" Subject: FTE Pre61 - Torque tube drive Torque tube drive was a common method of locating rear axles up to the early 60s. The last major car to use torque tube drive was Buick, until 60 or so (they didn't use the wasp waist frame). Torque tubes did control axle wrap up, but had several disadvantages that caused them to loose favor in Detroit. These were: 1. Unsprung weight: the whole axle-tube assembly was very heavy, which, when cars became heavy, caused ride harshness due to excessive unsprung weight. 2. Limited spring options: The torque tube design almost always required the use of the "buggy spring" (transverse leaf as used by pre 49 Ford products) or coil springs. The increasing weight of cars made buggy springs impractical, and the parallel leaf spring was the way to go in the 50s: as in luxurious Lincolns and Imperials, or even torsion bars used in 50s Packards. None of these arrangements could be used with torque tubes. 3. Limited travel: This was also a ride quality and handling issue. The single cardan joint at the rear of the transmission allowed only a limited rear suspension travel, because cardan joints become very inefficient at angles much more or less than 180. They also impart angular acceleration/deacceleration at angles other than 180. Two or more cardan joints were a better solution to this problem, and many luxury cars used paired cardans (which tended to cancle angular velocity changes) as "constant velocity joints". You will note that Murray Fahnestack, noted Ford "T" expert, recommended lowering the "T" to gain a straight torque tube alignment. This would increase speeds by a very measurable amount, due to the inefficiency of running the cardan joint at an angle. Technology has solved some of these issues, and the later Camaros used something akin to the torque tube, but without the tube. Torque tubes were a great advancement over the cumbersome designs of the teens, including chain drive, and worked well for our hero, Henry. But, every dog has its day, and so did the torque tube. tim == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1998 20:47:11 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: Re: FTE Pre61 - ADMIN: Car Lounge Award At 08:11 PM 9/1/98 -0400, you wrote: >Ken - I'm bummed - you know they only let you vote ONCE???!!! > >Jack Fleming >'54 F100 Now on the Road! > I know. Can you believe who won the 1st place award? Some Korean auto company no one has heard of. I strongly suspect that company had all its employees vote for it. Ken == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1998 21:01:47 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: FTE Pre61 - ADMIN: Anti-SPAM A vendor has just recently cruised by our site and harvested email addresses from the pictorial and is sending unsolicited email (spam) to list members. They've just been chastised about it. If it continues, I'll announce who they are to the lists so you'll know who to stay away from. Last night, an automated web email address harvester hit our site and nearly brought it down. I fought with the stupid thing for 4 hours because it was stuck cycling through our shopping cart pages. The web logs were building up faster than I could remove them. Due to these two recent episodes, I'm going to revert back to a policy I used to have on the web site: all email addresses on the site will now have *spam-remove* in the middle of the address. This will help prevent address harvesting. Regards, Ken Payne CoAdmin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts http://www.ford-trucks.com == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1998 21:04:41 -0400 From: Thomas Teixeira Subject: Re: FTE Pre61 - ADMIN: Car Lounge Award At 8:47 PM -0400 9/1/98, Ken Payne wrote: >I know. Can you believe who won the 1st place award? Some >Korean auto company no one has heard of. I strongly suspect >that company had all its employees vote for it. > >Ken Hmmm... Probably the same Korean company that spammed the flathead newsgroup... What a waste! Tom Teixeira mailto:tjt 94 Taurus SHO 5-speed NESHOC/SHO Registry '66 Mustang convertible (200 cid auto) http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://world.std.com/~tjt '35 Ford Pickup (flathead V8) == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1998 21:47:29 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: FTE Pre61 - ADMIN: More on spam... please read. I just did some investigation and found who hit our server last night. Check this out..... and read it all before you send any nasty email to the spammer if you're one of the recipients. Our logs indicated that IP 209.67.161.130 was the culprit. I did a lookup and that resolved to globalpac.com The spammer, John's F100s, was using kminet.net for the email server. Did a lookup on kminet.net and guess what? Its hosted by globalpac.com! Do not jump down John's F100s for this. They were, in many ways, a victim, just like Ford Truck Enthusiasts and many of the list members. The email address harvester from kminet.net caused major damage to my shopping cart database and its going to take a while to rebuild. Kminet.net is getting billed for all my time fighting off their attack. I just got done talking to Diana Wall, of John's F100s. She was pretty distraught. She was told by the marketers at kminet.net that the mailing list they provided contained addresses of people who had requested Ford truck products. As is sometimes the case, an innocent victim can have their reputation ruined by the deceit of a spam company. Diana had no idea that kminet.net just harvested the addresses from our site, and who knows how many other Ford truck sites. She didn't know it was spam, she thought the people wanted the emails. For the record, Diana extends her deepest apologies. She offered to email the people who were spammed but was afraid that it might make matters worse. John's F100 has a good reputation in the classic Ford truck community and I don't think this incident should change that. Please send complaints to kminet.net as they are the true culprits. I'm preparing an invoice right now to kminet.net for all the time I spent last night fighting this off. Regards, Ken Payne CoAdmin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts http://www.ford-trucks.com == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1998 20:42:10 -0600 From: boris Subject: Re: FTE Pre61 - 99 Pigeon Forge The Pigeon Forge F100 Super Nationals are sponsored by Truckin magazine. Jim 51 F5 COE 53 F100 panel - -----Original Message----- From: Paul To: pre61-list Date: Sunday, August 30, 1998 8:42 AM Subject: FTE Pre61 - 99 Pigeon Forge >Does anyone know who actually sponsers the May Pigeon Forge show? I am >trying to find out if it is going to be at the same location since I >understand the front area is going to be a construction hole for another >hotel. > >Thanks, Paul > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 18:02:41 -0400 From: Stephen Silverthorn Subject: FTE Pre61 - Vent window rubber on a 56 I bought myself the delux window channel kit and vent rubbers from Dennis Carpenter at Pigeon Forge and I'm just getting around to putting it in tonight. Everything came out fo the truck fine and the kit looks excellent. My problem is that when putting the vent window rubber on the vent window frame there are certain holes that need to line up, that allow it to swivel etc. Once I stretch the rubber around the frame I can't get the holes to line up on both sides. The rubber itself fits well and I think I have the left and right thing figured out. Any advice... Steve from Canada Black 56 Ford, F-100 http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.classicar.com/clubs/socp/socp.htm == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|