|
|
pre61-list-digest Saturday, June 6 1998 Volume 02 : Number 160 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1960 and Older trucks and vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe pre61-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: FTE Pre61 - Silicon Brake Fluid RE: FTE Pre61 - DOT 5 and other brake fluids RE: FTE Pre61 - Cover for '53 Re: FTE Pre61 - Silicon Brake Fluid Re: FTE Pre61 - '58 Parts Re: FTE Pre61 - 1958 parts needed Tom Nickolson RE: Rear End 52 F1 12 volt system 12 volt system Self-adjusting Brakes Re: FTE Pre61 - Re: Flathead V-8 RE: FTE Pre61 - DOT 5 and other brake fluids driving my dream truck - reality or pipe dream? ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 06:01:00 -0500 From: "Mike Morton " Subject: FTE Pre61 - Silicon Brake Fluid After readind the article at www.muller.net I still think I'll stay with DOT 5. I'm runnng everthing new in the brakes so I shouldn't have any problem switching to it. Everybody have a good day. Mike M. = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: pre61-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe pre61-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 08:41:09 -0400 From: Alec Fernandez Subject: RE: FTE Pre61 - DOT 5 and other brake fluids > -----Original Message----- > From: Ray Cardogno [SMTP:abcinc > Sent: Friday, June 05, 1998 2:43 AM > To: pre61-list > Subject: Re: FTE Pre61 - DOT 5 and other brake fluids > > > > >DOT 5 fluid>> > > You''ll find an excellent discussion of silicone fluid (DOT 5) and > others at > >http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.muller.net/karting/docs/technical/brfluid.html. Stick > with the HD > >DOT 3 or DOT 4. > > You mean I should have saved the money and time spent on DOT 5 and > done > better things? :o > > I'm gonna stick to the original brakes on my next F-100 truck and > maybe get > a centrifugal clutch instead :-) > > Sorry, I shan't say another word about how wonderful my relationship > has > been with DOT 5. > > Ray C [Alec Fernandez Says:] Ray, I've got a buddy who replaced his brake fluid with vaseline and claims it works great! %^).... Tough crowd huh? The only knock on Dot 5 fluid is that is more compressible at very high temps. This is not an issue with drum brakes. Your brakes would be gone long before you reached such high temps. This is only an issue for race cars (obviously with disk brakes). Anybody who's ever seen a NASCAR race at night knows what I mean because you can see the rotors glowing various shades from magenta to pink depending on how much the driver is pushing the envelope. I must admit the silicon resin in the engine cylinders is a little scary but only if you have leaky vacume assisted brakes. In my mind the fact that it doesn't absorb water is a HUGE plus on these open brake systems that outweighs the cost factor. Plus you don't have to worry if you spill some on the floorboard. Ray, when I looked at my wheel cylinders after 5 years to replace the shoes I saw no pitting at all, it was like the day I put them in. Is that your experience as well? What I can't understand is why nobody manufactures a screw on master cylinder lid with the telescoping rubber seal. I've thought about adapting a telescoping seal to my master cylinder lid. Anybody done anything like this? Thanks, Alec > P.S. It is better, though... > > > = Ford Truck Enthusiasts > ============================================== > Send posts to: pre61-list > Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo > "unsubscribe pre61-list" in the message body. > ====================================================================== > = = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: pre61-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe pre61-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 12:03:22 -0400 From: "Tarnoff, Howard" Subject: RE: FTE Pre61 - Cover for '53 California Car Cover Company 800-423-5525 Make Certain to tell them if you have bumpers and or mirrors > ---------- > From: Maciazek, John[SMTP:John_Maciazek > Reply To: pre61-list > Sent: Thursday, June 04, 1998 4:23 PM > To: 'pre61-list > Subject: FTE Pre61 - Cover for '53 > > Anyone know of a place to get a "car cover" type thing made for a '53 > F100?? > > > Thanks in Advance > > = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== > Send posts to: pre61-list > Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo > "unsubscribe pre61-list" in the message body. > ======================================================================= > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 05 Jun 1998 12:16:20 -0400 From: 47 Fred Subject: Re: FTE Pre61 - Silicon Brake Fluid > Everybody seems to be having so much fun with brake fluid, that I just > have to weigh in. I converted a 79 Mustang over to the stuff, mainly > because I acquired a free sample of it. I used mostly all new lines, > flushed the rest and cleaned or replaced all the wheel cylinders and put > in a new master cylinder. I never had one bit of trouble thereafter until > I sold the car. The new owner broke one of the flex lines to a front > wheel, replaced it and dumped in Dot 3 fluid to refill. He asked me later > what I used for fluid, 'cause the new stuff just settled to bottom of the > reservoir, like water in oil. It took me a few minutes to remember I'd > used the silicon, and made me think that in the future if I did a job like > that I'd put some kind of a tag on the master cylinder to remind me (or a > new owner) that it's DOT 5 in there. 47 Fred ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 17:15:04 EDT From: TNickolson Subject: Re: FTE Pre61 - '58 Parts Try "Mack Products" Hwy 24 West , Box 856 Moberly, Missouri, 65270 816-263-7444, Fax 816-263-4403 This is a good place for all sheet metal related bed parts. Tom Nickolson 52 F1 Flathead ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 05 Jun 1998 16:36:32 -0600 From: Ryan Dorman Subject: Re: FTE Pre61 - 1958 parts needed I realize that oem is next to imposible to find and that I coulda had a tailgate years ago, but I want a oem tailgate, the truck is not all oem, the stearing is being replaced right now, along with brakes and I'm thinking of dropping a 429 in her this winter, but I just decided that all of the body needed to be oem (my alltime favorite year of body, and I will not stray 1 iotta from oem in that aspect). If I didn't live a couple of thousand miles from Pigeon Forge I would most likely have attended. I have so many hobbies that all have major events in the spring it is very hard to muster the resources required to go to an event farther than 500 miles away. So I have to spend my free time wich is almost nonexistant (construction season starts up full bore in the spring, would be nice if some of these events were in winter when I'm not working) reading and hearing about all of the events I miss out on (I work 6 days a week till fall then 2 or 3 a week thru the winter)... - -- 58 F-100 292 sb 2wd 85 Bronco 300 IL6(not for long) 4x4 97 F-150 4.6 sb ext cab 4x4 (and several others in progress) - -- KC7YPJ, Ryan Dorman QTH: Victor ID, grid# DN431c ICQ #3834602 kc7ypj http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.geocities.com/Baja/Dunes/5496 ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 05 Jun 1998 17:45:29 -0500 From: "wild.bunch" Subject: Tom Nickolson RE: Rear End 52 F1 Tom: I could answer the 53-56 question because I have a 54 F100 and have done research on the issue of axles for F100s of that series. As far as F1s, I don't really know anything except the following: According to my Hollander Manual, your F1 came with a Dana 44 that is similar to the 53-56 and 59 - up locking Dana 44s, except for the spring perches. Hollander says that the Dana 44s can be swapped between F1s and 53-56 F100s if the spring perches are moved. I would interpret this to mean that the hub to hub distance is the same, so you could use a 57-60 9" Ford F100 axle if you moved the spring perches, following the information in my previous post. If you have the same upper shock mounting as 53-56, you can use the 57-60 spring seat caps and U bolts, too. If not, there's a fabrication point. Also, I can't tell you about driveshafts, but this is a fairly straightforward issue. All I can say is that some work with a tape measure in a junkyard is probably your best bet, but this info should give you a start as far as what to look for. Personally, after weighing the whole business, I opted to keep the Dana 44. Going to a highway ratio means getting a 3 series carrier (all of the stock truck axles use a 4 series carrier). Ford and Merc cars used the Dana 44 thru 1956 as a heavy duty axle, so carriers and ring-pinion sets are the same for 51 Merc Merc-O-Matics, early 50s Ford and Merc station wagons, and 55-56 TBirds. You can get 3.54 and 3.31 ratios from these axles, plus the 3 series carrier. Additionally, ring -pinion sets from some 50s Hudsons and Studebakers will swap, offering a 3.07 ratio. I picked up the 51 Merc set in 3.31, which I plan to install this year. I know this seems crazy, but I picked up a pair of nice dial indicators at a swap meet for $25. Also got a depth guage for $30. I figure that I have enough to do the change myself, so I'm gonna give it a shot. If you see a green 54 at the side of the road in New Mexico or Texas with the axle busted, please stop and give me a lift, OK? tim ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 05 Jun 1998 19:09:37 -0500 From: Janet Woods Subject: 12 volt system Does anyone know what year ford changed to a 12 volt system? I heard that the first year for that was 57 . ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 05 Jun 1998 19:56:07 -0800 From: rmeier Subject: 12 volt system Janet Woods writes: "Does anyone know what year ford changed to a 12 volt system? I heard that the first year for that was 57 ." Janet, Close but not quite, it was actually in 56 for both cars and trucks. They changed to a 6 v negative ground system in 55 (54 and earlier were 6 V positive ground), then in 56 went to a 12 V neg ground system that is still in use today. Regards, Roger Meier ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 22:08:19 -0400 From: "Don & Teresa Neighbors" Subject: Self-adjusting Brakes Alec wrote "Speaking of brakes, anybody done anything with converting over to self adjusting brakes? Like anybody know which backing plates will work for a '53-'56?" Alec, I'm glad you asked that, because I have the same question! When I found that Grover's front brakes were powered by a single-piston wheel cylinder up front, I began wondering if there is not a backing plate with a more modern wheel cylinder that would fit on the front. As for the self-adjusting brakes, I am considering getting the self-adjusting hardware from a mid-60s F250 and installing it. The only difference between self-adjusting brakes and crawl underneath and do it by hand is the adjuster assembly, the pawl, and the actuating cable. The problem is, which one will work? No, I didn't answer your question, Alec, but I want to know too! Don Neighbors '54 F250 Named Grover ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 23:02:27 EST From: "James H. Boyd" Subject: Re: FTE Pre61 - Re: Flathead V-8 ** Reply to note from Edward Sedgwick Thu, 04 Jun 1998 19:33:49 -0700 Edward, >From all that I've been able to find in the documentation I have at hand, 1953 is the last year for the 239 Flathead V-8, although I have heard reports that there were a few 54's with the flattie prior to the OHV moving into production. For URL's to look at for more definitive information, surf on over to: THE FORD FLATHEAD V-8 http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.agt.net/public/bboogaar/flathead.htm Flathead-- The Ford V-8 Engine Workshop http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.wrljet.com/engines/flathead.html Flathead Ford V8 History PAge http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://members.fullnet.net/mulligan/fmain.htm Write back if you need more info... Regards, Jay Boyd 53 F-100 Panel Hotrod Flathead V-8 (no name yet...I'm thinking about Frankenstein, ya know with a flathead and re-animated from dead sheet metal. :-}) ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 23:20:45 -0500 From: Ray Cardogno Subject: RE: FTE Pre61 - DOT 5 and other brake fluids > I've got a buddy who replaced his brake fluid with vaseline and >claims it works great! %^).... Tough crowd huh? > No, No, That is for the oil pump! ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 23:41:25 EDT From: Filzdad Subject: driving my dream truck - reality or pipe dream? Quick reality check for me - I've been reading the list for a couple months now and reading up as much as I can, but I have the itch bad and want to get your opinions. I am interested in getting a '37-'42 pick-up, ideal being a '41 flathead 6 (tall order - I'm dreaming, okay?). Right now I'm looking for a rebuild, not a restoration. I want to drive this beauty, and don't have the time or money to do a restoration right now; hopefully later. I can do basic repairs and maintenance, and have access to shop space and people with the brains, and all of you (I'll thank you now...). My question: is this realistic, getting a driver pick-up of that era that.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|