|
|
fordtrucks-digest Wednesday, April 8 1998 Volume 02 : Number 095 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1960 And Older Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To remove yourself for our list send email to: fordtrucks-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: Alternator tickler [Andy Montebello ] Re: Alternator tickler [billjhs ] Oil Bath [Rich Garber ] Questions on Rims and Tires for a 51 F1 ["Vierra, William BGI SF" Re: Fenders for 1951 F-1, Bruke Wills [Chief2658 ] converting to electronic ignition [Jesus Cardoso Re: clevelands and chevy motors [Cathy Greenlaw ] Re: Radio for '48 to '51 F Series [JRFiero ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1998 06:32:36 -0600 From: Andy Montebello Subject: Re: Alternator tickler Ray Cardogno wrote: > > >Subject: Re: Alternator > > > >>Now, does anyone know why my alternator on my 83 302 won't kick in until > >>I rev the motor a bit, say 2000 rpm. After I do that it kicks in and > >>stays on and charges the battery fine, until I shut it down, then I have > >>to rev it again to get it back on. I changed the voltage regulator and > >>checked the wires, seems OK. > > > I can't speak with total authority on that particular alternator, but you > >might not have a problem. Back when I still had my flathead I put a GM 1 > >wire alternator on it and to excite the thing (i.e. make it start charging) > >you had to rev it to 2000 rpm. It wasn't a quirk or anything, that's just > >what you had to do--it was designed that way. If a 1 wire alternator had a > battery-excited field, that circut would constantly be draining the battery > when the motor is off because the wire goes directly to the battery. > Therefore the field of a one-wire alt has to be excited like Dan said > electromagnetically by spinning the winding past a permanant magnet. I bet > that's what your seeing at 2-G's. Bought a one wire alternator to put on an old tractor. I also needed a wide belt pulley so I got to talking to the guy about putting it on a tractor. He put a wire on the back of the alternator to make it work at lower RPMs. Has worked great, you might ask about it. > ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1998 09:18:36 -0400 From: billjhs Subject: Re: Alternator tickler To all who wrote on the Alternator: Everyone is right, but I found the problem after some careful research. The Voltage regulator has an extra wire labled I (which is the indicator circuit to a light on the dash) Well this needs to be hooked up even if you are not using the idiot light. It "tickles" the alternator before you start it to get the field "excited" and start producing. Thanks for all the input Bill Ray Cardogno wrote: > >Subject: Re: Alternator > > > >>Now, does anyone know why my alternator on my 83 302 won't kick in until > >>I rev the motor a bit, say 2000 rpm. After I do that it kicks in and > >>stays on and charges the battery fine, until I shut it down, then I have > >>to rev it again to get it back on. I changed the voltage regulator and > >>checked the wires, seems OK. > > > I can't speak with total authority on that particular alternator, but you > >might not have a problem. Back when I still had my flathead I put a GM 1 > >wire alternator on it and to excite the thing (i.e. make it start charging) > >you had to rev it to 2000 rpm. It wasn't a quirk or anything, that's just > >what you had to do--it was designed that way. > > > >If you feel bold, and have no fear, take the alternator apart and check the > >brushes, there's a good chance they are worn and sticking, especially if the > >alternator is origional. It's realy not a bad job unless the 3 body bolts > >are frozen and break. > > I also have a couple of pennies worth of input on this one. Some > alternators have more than 1 wire so that a wire can be used to excite the > field when the ignition is turned on. If a 1 wire alternator had a > battery-excited field, that circut would constantly be draining the battery > when the motor is off because the wire goes directly to the battery. > Therefore the field of a one-wire alt has to be excited like Dan said > electromagnetically by spinning the winding past a permanant magnet. I bet > that's what your seeing at 2-G's. > > Ray C. > > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1960 and Older --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks > | site. | > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1998 08:16:49 -0500 From: Rich Garber Subject: Oil Bath >Hello All, > >Well, I cleaned all that goup out of the oil bath, Its amazing >what all that stuff hides. It appears that it leaked, it was brazed >and a poor job at best. It also has some pin holes, so it would never >hold oil. So I decided to try to convert it over to a paper filter. >After about 30 min. its almost done! I took alot of pictures and I >think its a good solution. It sits as orginal, in fact at this time >I'll pat myself on the back. > >Does anyone have a good, 54 223 6cly, oil bath they don't want? Now >that I have a solution, I'm ready to cut up a good one. > >While I'm at it, does any one have a 223 laying around? I need the >heat raiser spring and shroud. > >As soon as I get the pictures back of the conversion and put it >together so it makes sense, I'll let you know. > >Thanks, > >Rich >54 F100 > > > ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1998 09:36:08 -0700 From: "Vierra, William BGI SF" Subject: Questions on Rims and Tires for a 51 F1 >As a new owner of a 51 Ford F1 I would appreciate some help on the issue >of tires. The truck currently has rims from a late model F-150 with >235-15 tires. This makes it particularly hard to steer. I would like >to go back to a more reasonably close to standard tire. From the documentation I >have the truck came with 16 x 4.5 rims and 15 x 5.5 as optional. The >question is which will perform better for driving the truck? Putting in >power steering is an option I would also consider if anyone knows a good >source of information (the truck has a 71 302). > >Also if anyone can tell me where the optional spare tire and optional >spare tire carrier went I would appreciate it. A place to purchase the >optional spare tire carrier would be great also. I would like to put >the spare on the drives side attached to the outside of the bed but I >have not been able to find any reference to the spare being there I >would like to know the correct location. The truck is not 100% original but I would like to keep it close to that. Finally I have found the names of the original colors for the truck but would like to know a good reference to actually see the colors. Thank you, William Vierra 51 F1 william.vierra > ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1998 12:55:12 EDT From: Chief2658 Subject: Re: Fenders for 1951 F-1, Bruke Wills Bruke Once again its Bone Yard trip time. I think there's a set on a 51' but they some rust on the inside by the bed wall, and a crunch on the back rear right side. Interested???????????? If so I'll take a look!!!!!!!!!! Chief2658 ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1998 16:37:52 -0500 (CDT) From: Jesus Cardoso Subject: converting to electronic ignition Howdy! I am considering converting my 292 Y-Block from points to electronic ignition. I have seen some kits in Hemmings and Classic Trucks Magazine. Has anyone had any good or bad experiences with the conversion kits? Thanks for you time. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jesus Cardoso, a.k.a. Chuy Graduate Research Assistant (Power System Automation Lab) Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843-3128 w: 409-845-4623, h: 409-775-0737, fax: 845-6259 Personal Address: P.O. Box 2214, College Station, TX 77841-2214 e-mail: cardoso ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1998 22:13:00 -0400 From: Cathy Greenlaw Subject: Re: clevelands and chevy motors jc & terry wrote: > fella asked the other night about the differences between a 351 c and the > 351 w+m . since i consider you to be very knowledgeable about the ford > motors i was requesting you give him the run down. > if you think yur motor is superior because of the letters on the valve > cover i'll be the first to admit that it's useless to argue with that kind > of logic. > T-bird Terry I think that question came thru at a time when I suffered writers cramp or something, which as you note I no longer suffer. I though I must have deleted it or missed it. I would have been glad to expound at some length on the subject, if anybody is still dying to know, and I promise stick to at the facts, as best I can. Who can be fully logical logical about a subject that most of us writing to this list are passionate about? There is a '47 Ford 1-1/2 ton truck running around up here that has a 350 truck 4 speed in it. The owner painted it Ford blue and put on a set of "Powered by Ford" valve covers with the letters picked out in white. I though the man was a little insecure, but nice job on the truck, you just had to like it. He used it to haul two old midget racers around. 47 Fred ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1998 22:43:47 EDT From: JRFiero Subject: Re: Radio for '48 to '51 F Series In a message dated 98-04-06 20:35:01 EDT, you write: I have always been told those radios were very rare because people did not put radios in their trucks. i am interested in one also >> The following applies to 51 and 52 only, I don't know whether they're the same as 48-50. They aren't that rare, and there are a couple models. I bought one last year at Carlisle for $8. Don't know if it worked or not, and it needed knobs, which really are the hard part. Don't quote me on the accuracy of this, but some have 8 tubes, some 12? Trucks had different pushbuttons and knobs from cars, but other than that they're the same radio. I saw pristine examples of the better ones for something like $120. Just so you know those aren't typos, that's $8.00 and $120.00. Take your pick. I have one in my 51 which may work, I don't know yet, it doesn't have a speaker. But if any of you have a spare left side on/off/volume knob (I have the inner tone ring), I'd sure appreciate it. Dennis Carpenter sells the pushbuttons, passable reproductions, and I have the right side (tuning). The $8 radio has a little story. One of the things on my Carlisle list was radio knobs. I saw this radio which I was sure was the right one for $10, but no knobs. Oh, well. Wandering earlier I had spoken to a guy with a '52 Panel for sale. Later I passed by again, and he was dickering with someone for a radio for mucho bucks. The radio seller left, so I told the Panel guy about the $10 radio. Turns out he really wanted to fill the hole in another '51 he.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|