|
|
Return-Path: Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 03:50:42 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks-digest To: fordtrucks-digest Subject: fordtrucks-digest V2 #72 Reply-To: fordtrucks Sender: owner-fordtrucks-digest fordtrucks-digest Wednesday, March 18 1998 Volume 02 : Number 072 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1960 And Older Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To remove yourself for our list send email to: fordtrucks-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: 1951 F/S in NC [Chris Hedemark ] Re: Chrome vs. Gold [A62Unibody ] Re: carb reply [sdelanty ] 1957 F250 Crewcab (no kidding) [Ken Payne ] 302 and F/I [billjhs ] liters [jc & terry ] IFS for bigger trucks [Ben Thompson ] 1939 Production Numbers [Wes Wigginton ] Re: 302 and F/I ["Greg Charney" ] Re: 302 and F/I [A64F100 ] 300 6 Cylinder [Ray Cardogno ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 09:14:53 -0500 From: Chris Hedemark Subject: 1951 F/S in NC Howdy folks, I was combing through the papers today and found: FORD PICKUP "51, Fiberglass fenders, running boards, $1800. 836-9451 From the N&O 3/15/98. The ad *looked* like a whole truck with fiberglass parts & all, as it was not listed under PARTS but under TRUCKS. I called the fellow up and asked if it ran and such (I need to get a running truck ASAP as the wife's car is just about dead). Turns out that's what he is selling the fiberglass parts for :-( Anyway he said that the truck was running and has a 429 in it right now. He says he'd be willing to part with the truck sans engine and the fiberglass for $1800. From what he says the rest of the truck is in great shape. This is in the vicinity of Raleigh, NC and the area code if you wish to call him is 919. Just passing this on. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 11:09:37 EST From: A62Unibody Subject: Re: Chrome vs. Gold Scott, Just remember Chrome dont get ya home but it sure looks good broke down on the side of the road! A62Unibody Randy ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 09:51:17 -0800 From: sdelanty Subject: Re: carb reply >Terry, >Thanks for the response. The engine is a 4.9L aka 300ci six. My engine >building buddy says to avoid the Holley and for dependability use the Carter. Having had both a Holley and an Edelbrock (same as Carter AFB) on my FE, I can wholeheartedly agree with Your Buddy! Some say that the Holley makes better top end power which may be true, but for good part throttle response, reliability, and ease of tuning the Edelbrock/Carter wins hands down. I guess I'm just partial to carbs that don't leak by design and that You can change jetting without spilling a cupfull of fuel on the manifold every time... Happy motoring, Steve Opportunity may knock only once, but temptation leans on the doorbell. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 20:43:40 -0500 From: Ken Payne Subject: 1957 F250 Crewcab (no kidding) Someone sent me a picture of a 1957 F250 Crewcab. This is very rare. The picture is rather old, the truck problably doesn't exist anymore. Too bad. Anyways, I'll announce it when its on the web site. I just thought some of you might be interested. Ken Payne Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts http://www.ford-trucks.com ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 22:24:29 -0500 From: billjhs Subject: 302 and F/I Hello to all, I've seen a few postings on swapping out motors and just wanted to add my few pennies here. I just got finished putting a 1983 Mercury Cougar 302 with F/I in my 1951 F-1. It wasn't as easy as everyone says but it was by no means very difficult either, the results are also very gratifying. I haven't had it on the road long enough to tell you what kind of gas mileage I am going to get, but it sure is real smooth and very easy to work on. I would also suggest the book by Probst called Ford fuel injection and electronic engine control. It is very helpful when it comes to figuring out a problem when it arises. And don't worry about the wiring and stuff. All you have to do is take the computer and its harness, that takes care of all the wiring for the fuel injection. All you really have to do is tie that harness into your trucks harness for the starter and sending some sigs to the computer, all very easy. Well I have rambled enough here, if anyone wants or needs help with a 302 and F/I swap, its still fresh in my cranium and I would be glad to give you help. The only problem I am having now is that my AOD won't shift out of 1'st gear, anybody got any suggestions. (It hasn't worked since I put it in the truck) See ya's Bill 1951 f-1 ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 20:14:43 -0800 From: jc & terry Subject: liters The truck is to be as simple yet viable as can be and if need be driven anytime / anywhere, sort what we call a 'Not Rod' or N.O.S. (not old stocker). Thanks again and keep up the answers and entertainment. Gary O. 47 1/2 Panel called "HD" aka Hipster Dufus. thanx for getting me strait gary. i flunked metric class but i think it was because the didn't sell beer in liters. the only way i know how to figure them was the 66 ford 7liter was a 428 and i divide by that then round to the nearest engine size i've heard of. this is what's known as pre-calculator or napkin math. as i said the 60 i know with the 300 six is a hog. daily driver and excellent workhorse. he says if he babies it he can get 17mpg but he never does that. he did add a 4speed minus the granny and, if i remember, it has 4:11 nine inch. not a quarter miler but quick on red lights. that big six is impressive and VERY viable. let us know how you make out. T-bird Terry ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 20:13:11 +0000 From: Ben Thompson Subject: IFS for bigger trucks I've been reading all the recent posts regarding IFS with increasing interest. I have a 1956 f350 9-ft express sitting in my driveway waiting for me to get around to reinstalling my newly-rebuilt 292. So naturally I'm wondering, "do any or all of these IFS solutions apply to a bigger, heavier truck? ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 22:11:51 -0600 From: Wes Wigginton Subject: 1939 Production Numbers I am the new owner of a 1939 Ford 1/2 ton Stake Bed Pickup. I understand the production numbers were rather low on this particular configuration. Does anyone know how many of these might have been produced? Or can someone give me some direction on doing the research myself? This is my first posting so please be easy on me. :>) Wes Wigginton technicalSCOUTS, Inc. Manager of Technical Recruiting 13492 Research Blvd. Suite 120-171 Austin, Texas 78750 512-331-7756 off. 512-335-1899 fax. wow ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 22:25:22 -0600 From: "Greg Charney" Subject: Re: 302 and F/I Are you sure of the year on that Cougar? I thought that fuel injection started on the 86 model. Did the tranny come from the same car? Don't worry your mileage will increase when you final find the other gears!! ;) - -----Original Message----- From: billjhs >I've seen a few postings on swapping out motors and just wanted to add >my few pennies here. I just got finished putting a 1983 Mercury Cougar >302 with F/I in my >1951 F-1. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 00:45:20 EST From: A64F100 Subject: Re: 302 and F/I In a message dated 98-03-17 22:42:26 EST, you write: gear, anybody got any suggestions. (It hasn't worked since I put it in the truck) >> I'm not sure but I think It' s an electronically controlled tranny... maybe chhcek the brain and wiring.. later, Scott L *Keep It Ford Blue* ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 01:20:36 -0400 From: Ray Cardogno Subject: 300 6 Cylinder >T-bird Terry wrote: >and the 300-6 is a stump puller too. Terry & All, I have been considering purchasing a 53 step-van with a 6 cylinder motor with a 4-speed/2-speed axle. The seller says he THINKS it is about a 300ci. My trucks have always had Y-blocks. I don't know nuthin from 6-cylinders, but it seemed odd that they may have had more cubes than most of the 8's. Are these motors any good? Seems most of these utility type vehicles have 6's in them from what I have been finding in my search for a F-100 Milk truck (which I have not found yet). Did they use them because they were better? cheaper? mostly used around town? nobody could see'em anyways? ? ? I would much appreciate any feedback... Ray C P.S. Speaking of feedback, I have a friend who uses a camaro interior for.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|