|
|
fordtrucks-digest Monday, March 2 1998 Volume 02 : Number 057 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1960 And Older Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To remove yourself for our list send email to: fordtrucks-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: Truck retirement villas, information? ["Chris Hedemark" derusting ["Jim Shedlauskas" ] RE: Derusting -chemical, electrolysis ["Goodwrench" ] RE: 7.3L Diesel Engine and cavitation ["Goodwrench" ] Rotten gas tank [Wesley Ashworth ] Re: Rotten gas tank [Robert Hill ] Re: Truck retirement villas, information? ["KENNETH D MARTY" Naming things... ["Paul G." ] Re: Naming things... ["Chris Hedemark" ] More answers to Chris [RJC988 ] Brian and his crew! [RJC988 ] Re: More answers to Chris ["Chris Hedemark" ] A few corrections [Rich Garber ] Chevy Definitions [Ken Payne ] Re: More answers to Chris [JRFiero ] Power Steering Brackets [FRD56F100 ] '51 vs. '52 ["Chris Hedemark" ] Re: '51 vs. '52 [Scott ] messages [jc & terry ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 06:32:54 -0500 From: "Chris Hedemark" Subject: Re: Truck retirement villas, information? >I used to live in the South Raleigh area (I'm in Atlanta now), and I can >tell you that there are several salvage yards for you to look in for old [snip] Jay you just saved me a lot of legwork!!!! Thank you very much for passing this along! >By the way, There's a shop in Durham that deals just in old F-100 parts. >I don't remember the name of the place, but I do know they are on Greer >St. in Durham. You may want to that a drive over there! Thats only like 15 minutes away. I seem to remember seeing a listing for a shop called "Carolina Classics" but didn't know that they specialized in Ford Trucks. Now I definitely have to get over there. :-) Thanks again, Chris Hedemark Yonder Way http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.yonderway.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 07:29:44 -0600 From: "Jim Shedlauskas" Subject: derusting I've tried the electrolysis mentioned on the home page you listed, it works very well. I used a 12V battery charger for my power supply and washing soda for the elctrolyte. I havn't tried baking soda, but I've heard it doesn't work nearly as well. My experience has been with rusty old tools, but I'm going to try truck parts soon! Anyone know where I can get vent window frames for my '49 F-4? I can find seals and glass, but no frames. Jim ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 08:29:31 -0600 From: "Goodwrench" Subject: RE: Derusting -chemical, electrolysis To All, The Stationary Engine list carried what looks to be a good summary of removing rust by the electrolysis method recently. I will reproduce what was said below: It consists of one man's summary and another's additional comments. I haven't tried it yet, but I plan to. Just this week, I bought a gallon of the Naval jelly type rust remover. So far I have only tried it on striped front fender of my 1941 half ton. I will also be trying it where the rear of the X member attaches to the frame. This is area that commonly accumulates rust, and it can't be fit into an electrolyte bath. >> Time to respond to the items about electrolysis "causing pits" and acid >> treatments. Acid will remove rust (and iron) and leaves a characteristic >> "pickled" look. For antique tools the value is essentially destroyed. >> Electrolytic cleaning, done right, is by far the best technique, removing >> no sound metal and leaving an attractive surface, especially on tools >> that have been heavily rusted. >> >> Electrolysis is a standard technique in the artifact restoration business. >> I wrote this up for the Chronicle of the Early American Industries >> Association a few years back. Most of the tool collectors around here use >> it: A plastic tub; a stainless steel or iron electrode, water and washing >> soda (NOT baking soda!!) and a battery charger. About a tablespoon of soda I use TSP or tri sodium phosphate; available at hardware stores. 12 volts works OK. >> to a gallon of water. The iron electrode works best if it surrounds the >> object to be cleaned, since the cleaning is "line of sight" to a certain >> extent. The iron electrode will be eaten away. SOME stainless steels will >> work fine and not be eroded. The electrode is connected to the positive >> (red) terminal and the object to the negative. Submerge the object, >> making Stick with good old iron sheet for electrode. If you use Stainless, you'll end up with a solution with chrome in it which is bad for the environment (and I think Al Gore is the largest turd in the whole bowl) ! At least the TSP and iron can be disposed of in clear conscience. >> sure you have good contact, which can be difficult with heavily rusted >> objects. >> >> Turn on the power. Fine bubbles will rise from the object. Go away and >> come back in a few hours. Usually takes overnight to a day or two. Occasionally remove and brush off the schmutz off the electrode and part. If you do this indoors, MAKE SURE THE AREA IS WELL VENTILATED SO HYDROGEN DOES NOT ACCUMULATE. >> Rub the object under running water with a plastic pot >> scrubber. (What comes off is one of the blackest substances known-you may >> want to wear gloves and don't spatter good clothes.) Depending on the >> amount of original rust you may have to re-treat. The clean object will >> acquire surface rust very quickly, so wipe it dry and dry further in a >> warm oven or with a hair dryer. >> >> The polarity is important!! The surface rust is being converted to >> metallic iron, so the process is totally self limiting. I have left things (by >> mistake) for several days: the water was largely gone, by electrolysis, >> but the object was fine. Reverse the polarity and your object will be eaten >> away!!! The rust will go along with it, but that's not what you had in >> mind, is it?? >> >> There are lots of variants: suspending an electrode inside to clean a >> cavity in an object; using a sponge with a backing electrode to clean >> spots on large objects or things that shouldn't be submerged (like with lots of >> wood) >> >> The surface is left black. Rusted pits are still pits. Shiny unrusted >> metal is untouched. >> >> For electrodes, you can use junk iron, or I buy cheap stainless spoons >> at the flea market for treating small stuff in a dishpan. Large things are >> treated in my trashcan bath with an iron bar bent around the inside as an >> electrode. >> Try it--it beats any other method, especially for antique tools. >What is washing soda? Is it TSP (trisodium phosphate) or Borax or sodium >bicarbonate, or is it any alkaline solution?. Should the surface be >lightly wire brushed before the electrolysis? Goodwrench = Jim Pfrommer Central Texas goodwrench Check out Goodwrench's CyberRanch: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.easy.com/goodwrench/ - -----Original Message----- On Behalf Of JRFiero Sent: Saturday, February 28, 1998 8:24 AM Subject: Derusting -chemical, electrolysis Mornin' - - ---------------- snip ----------- Drain cleaners. Haven't tried them yet. Anyone? Electrolysis. There was a URL in a post back in September, http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.physics.adelaide.edu.au/~awilkins/wood/electrolysis.html, which, with its links, details a safe-looking electrolysis method of rust removal. Has anyone tried this? I'll get around to it. Looks promising for large parts, like a completely rust covered fan shroud I have waiting. - --------------- snip -------------- I've come to the conclusion that for ordinary nuts and bolts, I'm just going to go buy the stainless equivalent. All this cleaning and plating just isn't worth it. So what does everybody else do? ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 09:53:50 -0600 From: "Goodwrench" Subject: RE: 7.3L Diesel Engine and cavitation This topic is addressed on the Powerstroke owners club page. The main address for the page is: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.aslci.com/psocindx.htm The topic of cavitation is specifically mentioned at: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.aslci.com/psocindx.htm The additive Motocraft FW-15 should be added to the cooling system every 15,000 miles as specified in Ford's Maintenance Schedule. This stuff is also sold as Fleetguard DCA4 There is a whole specific web page and message board dealing with this cavitation problem, and it can be found from the Maintenance Tips, Cooling system additives section of the Powerstroke Owners Club page. Goodwrench = Jim Pfrommer 1941 pickup named Truckster 1996 F350 dually with Powerstroke turbo diesel named Gus Central Texas goodwrench Check out Goodwrench's CyberRanch: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.easy.com/goodwrench/ - -----Original Message----- From: On Behalf Of WACWR Sent: Sunday, March 01, 1998 2:04 PM To: fordtrucks Subject: 7.3L Diesel Engine I recently received from Ford a notice that the 7.3L diesel engine may develop cavitation erosion in the cylinder wall resulting in catastophic leakage to the engine. I wonder if anyone knows of anyone experiencing this problem. I'm trying to estimate the odds of it happening to me. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 15:45:16 -0600 From: Wesley Ashworth Subject: Rotten gas tank What's the best solution for a gas tank that's been sitting up for 10-13 years? I've replaced two fuel filters already. Should I keep messing with filters, or be better off replacing? Thanks, Wesley ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 15:59:56 -0600 From: Robert Hill Subject: Re: Rotten gas tank If your tank has been sitting for 10-13 years, it is probably rusty inside at best and any remaining gas would have varnished. These scenarios can cause havic when trying to get a vehicle running. My suggestion is to remove the tank, visually inspect it and if it looks usable, take it to your local radiator shop and have it boiled, etc to cleanse the inside. Then use some Bill Hirsch gas tank prep and after a day or two, it should be ready to be used again. Bob Wesley Ashworth wrote: > What's the best solution for a gas tank that's been sitting up for > 10-13 years? I've replaced two fuel filters already. Should I keep messing > with filters, or be better off replacing? > > Thanks, > > Wesley > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1960 and Older --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks > | site. | > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 18:28:04 -0500 From: "KENNETH D MARTY" Subject: Re: Truck retirement villas, information? Chris the phone # is 919 682-4211 for Carolina Classics In Durham. Give them A call, real nice guys. Another place I deal with is hear in Charlotte, Dennis Carpenter the # is 704 786-8139 I hope this helps Kenneth Marty 1955 F100 - -----Original Message----- From: Chris Hedemark To: fordtrucks Date: Monday, March 02, 1998 6:36 AM Subject: Re: Truck retirement villas, information? >>I used to live in the South Raleigh area (I'm in Atlanta now), and I can >>tell you that there are several salvage yards for you to look in for old > >[snip] > >Jay you just saved me a lot of legwork!!!! Thank you very much for passing >this along! > >>By the way, There's a shop in Durham that deals just in old F-100 parts. >>I don't remember the name of the place, but I do know they are on Greer >>St. in Durham. You may want to that a drive over there! > > >Thats only like 15 minutes away. I seem to remember seeing a listing for a >shop called "Carolina Classics" but didn't know that they specialized in >Ford Trucks. Now I definitely have to get over there. :-) > >Thanks again, >Chris Hedemark >Yonder Way >http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.yonderway.com > > >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1960 and Older --------------+ >| Send posts to fordtrucks >| site. | >+---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 18:59:01 -0500 From: "Paul G." Subject: Naming things... I'm still searching for a good one for my 55 panel; like "Grover", but it's taken...my 79 Bronco used to be called "Brownco" (yes, it is), but is now "Bullwinkle", because my daughter's 86 s10 Blazer is called "Rocky", and they both sit behind each other in front of the house. Rocky, as in "like a rock..." Paul Gayda ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 19:12:05 -0500 From: "Chris Hedemark" Subject: Re: Naming things... >I'm still searching for a good one for my 55 panel; like "Grover", but >it's taken...my 79 Bronco used to be called "Brownco" (yes, it is), but >is now "Bullwinkle", because my daughter's 86 s10 Blazer is called >"Rocky", and they both sit behind each other in front of the house. >Rocky, as in "like a rock..." How about "Boris"? Or if you want a feminine name for the truck you could go for "Natasha". Either way, it sticks with the established theme and leaves a spare name for your next truck. Chris Hedemark Yonder Way http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.yonderway.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 20:21:42 EST From: RJC988 Subject: More answers to Chris Boy you really got things going on the list. I like this. The F-100 Supernationals have been in Pigeon Forge for at least 3 or more years. I'm sure the dodge Ram seat will not fit in the '52. Most catalogs I have, you can build a '52 from the ground up without no original parts. The grill is the only difference between a '55 and a '57 (and maybe the 6 volt system?) I think 55 was the last year for the Flathead V8. Vintage Air is suggesting going with the r-134a system. R-12 is out of production. The latest issue of Custom Classic Trucks has a truck value buyers guide! It lists "approximate" pricing of different trucks. In this and other magazines, I have found many parts suppliers in NC! Looks like you are doing this at a very good pace. You are sure to make a good decision. Good luck, Glenn in Memphis (3-31 will be Bartlett!) ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 20:29:05 EST From: RJC988 Subject: Brian and his crew! How did you do that (look at his pictorial! ) Glenn in Memphis ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 21:02:22 -0500 From: "Chris Hedemark" Subject: Re: More answers to Chris >Boy you really got things going on the list. I like this. Sorry if I end up asking a lot of newbie questions, but I can't find this stuff anywhere else on the web. I've been directed to a few web sites with some great pictures and very sketchy details at best about what a small handful of people are doing to their trucks. I'd like to learn a little more about the how and the why involved with the different steps. I've gotten some private messages on this, which I certainly appreciate, but I wonder if some of the replies would better serve the subscribers as a body? I got a couple of messages regarding different IFS options and it would be nice to see a discussion on the merits and tradeoffs with the different systems. >The F-100 Supernationals have been in Pigeon Forge for at least 3 or more >years. OK so I shouldn't feel too bad if I can't make it this year. :-) >I'm sure the dodge Ram seat will not fit in the '52. Dang. Is the cab on a 52 especially narrow? Keep in mind I only know the truck from photos. Basically I want to have comfortable seats with a nice center console that can fold back into a middle seat. The Dodge Ram has done this very well. Should I be looking at smaller trucks like a Ford Ranger or something to get seats from? What kind of car would be on the proper scale? >Most catalogs I have, you can build a '52 from the ground up without no >original parts. This is encouraging. Once I get the truck I'll definitely start hitting you guys up for recommendations on different parts. :-) >Vintage Air is suggesting going with the r-134a system. R-12 is out of >production. Yeah and where you can get it, it's godawful expensive. I have the license to buy it but still it's pretty much into the stratosphere pricewise these days. R-134A systems work, but I haven't found one yet that really gets *frigid*. My 96 Mustang has 134a and gets "cool". My 95 Ram took even longer, and on the hottest days could almost get to "cool". Dagnabbit on those sweltering southern days you want something that is downright frosty!! I love the way my 1971 Mustang used to cause condensation outside of the car. :-) >The latest issue of Custom Classic Trucks has a truck value buyers guide! It >lists "approximate" pricing of different trucks. In this and other magazines, >I have found many parts suppliers in NC! Yeah I've gotten a lead on a place about 15 minutes from here over in Durham and a few places within 1-2 hour drive between here and Charlotte. Very encouraging indeed! >Looks like you are doing this at a very good pace. You are sure to make a good >decision. Well we've been going over the $$$ situation and made further decisions. It will cause a slight delay in the purchase of the truck but will free up the truck from daily driver duties so that I can do the buildup properly and won't be "rushed" to get stuff together before work on Monday. There is a mid sixties F100 in Person County that's been up for grabs for a LOOOONG time and has been labelled at $1,200. The thing runs because I've seen the guy driving it, and I never noticed any smoke coming from it. It sounds as good as it possibly could with one of those dual exhaust kits that looks like little tiny 1" diameter outlets on it. I figure I can pick up that truck and put it into daily work duty, use it to get to work, haul parts, etc. It will delay my purchase of an old F1 by several months but I won't be pressured into getting a running truck or even one with an engine. So I can probably get into a *cheaper* F1 with no engine or trans which is no big deal since I was going to replace all that anyway. This mid-sixties F100 will likely just be "maintained" and the most customization I'll likely do is replacing that godawful exhaust with a proper 2-1/2" system. When I get that F1 though I am gonna RUN YOU GUYS RAGGED with questions. :-) The cool thing is I have a digital camera and a web server so I can document the project with *great detail* as I go. You guys have been great help and encouragement. Thanks again! Chris Hedemark Yonder Way http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.yonderway.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 19:41:15 -0600 From: Rich Garber Subject: A few corrections >Most catalogs I have, you can build a '52 from the ground up without no >original parts. I agree >The grill is the only difference between a '55 and a '57 (and maybe the 6 volt >system?) I think 55 was the last year for the Flathead V8. Sorry, 55 and 57 are a world apart. All the front sheetmetal is different. 53 was the last year of the flathead (except canada, they went to early 54) 55 was the last of the 6-volts. >just my .02 Rich 54 F100 (unnamed and all apart) ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 21:27:29 -0500 From: Ken Payne Subject: Chevy Definitions Someone emailed me a couple of funny Chevy/GMC definitions. Thought some of you might enjoy them. C heap H ardly E fflicent V ehicle R uns O n L uck E very T ime G M C..... got mechanic coming ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 22:43:35 EST From: JRFiero Subject: Re: More answers to Chris In a message dated 98-03-02 20:24:16 EST, you write: The grill is the only difference between a '55 and a '57 (and maybe the 6 volt system?) I think 55 was the last year for the Flathead V8. >> These two answers are close, but not correct. The 53-55s were distinguishable by the grills. 56 had several differences, including the windshield, doors, vent windows, front shock mounts, and perhaps others in addition to the grill. 57s are althogether different. It's possible that there were some flatheads in 54, but not likely. 53 is the accepted last year of the flathead in trucks, 52 in cars. There is some confusion because the Ford flathead was a 239 inch, and one of the first overhead V8s was also a 239. original parts.>> Basically true, but you'll go broke doing it, and grow several thousand gray hairs getting the repro parts to fit more or less like the originals. Why are you set on the 52 as opposed to the 51? ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 22:52:46 EST From: FRD56F100 Subject: Power Steering Brackets Perhaps I shouldn't be asking this here, but anyway......... I have a 350 Chevy in my 56 F-100 (Camaro Clip) with headers. The problem is that I always seem to have problems with the power steering pump brackets. Is there a particular year power steering pump and brackets that work best with headers? My problem is with the bracket that bolts to the exhaust manifold or header. I custom made one but it looks ugly and I wonder if other people have the same problem. Do anybody know of a company that sells this kind of stuff? I just want something that looks like it belongs there. Thanks in advance, Joe ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 22:55:26 -0500 From: "Chris Hedemark" Subject: '51 vs. '52 > Why are you set on the 52 as opposed to the 51? Good question. It's just that I've seen many pics of 52's that I like but no really good pics of a 51 from different angles. What are the main differences between 51 and 52? Chris Hedemark Yonder Way http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.yonderway.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 21:30:57 -0800 (PST) From: Scott Subject: Re: '51 vs. '52 - ---Chris Hedemark wrote: > > > Why are you set on the 52 as opposed to the 51? > > Good question. It's just that I've seen many pics of 52's that I like but > no really good pics of a 51 from different angles. What are the main > differences between 51 and 52? > > Chris Hedemark > Yonder Way > http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.yonderway.com The 51 has the V8 emblem on the center piece just above the grill where as the 52 has "FORD" there. The chrome on the side of the hood was a little different, more so in the delux cab. Take a look here: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.ualberta.ca/~rcolgan/f1_20.jpg this is a 51 and you can see the V8. This one has the "FORD" http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.ualberta.ca/~rcolgan/f1_23.jpg The pics are from Randall's F-Files page which is at: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.ualberta.ca/~rcolgan/home.html.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|