|
|
Return-Path: Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 03:50:24 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks-digest To: fordtrucks-digest Subject: fordtrucks-digest V2 #18 Reply-To: fordtrucks Sender: owner-fordtrucks-digest fordtrucks-digest Thursday, January 22 1998 Volume 02 : Number 018 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1960 And Older Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To remove yourself for our list send email to: fordtrucks-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: F-250 & 9" rear ["Jim Shedlauskas" ] Re: F-3 Springs [Edward Sedgwick ] Re: fordtrucks-digest V2 #17 [RJC988 ] Hubcaps ["Paul T. Clegg" ] Re: 53-Fuel Gage Prob. [Ray Cardogno ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 07:07:48 -0600 From: "Jim Shedlauskas" Subject: Re: F-250 & 9" rear Don, Why would you want to remove the 3/4 ton rear to install a 9"? Typically the 9" was used in 1/2 ton trucks/broncos and passenger cars. The 3/4 tons that I've seen ('70's through late 80's) all had Dana 60 rear axles, 1 ton trucks used a Dana 70. Some of the newer ones use a Ford (10"?) rear axle. I don't think the 9" would meet your needs for the 3/4 ton capacity. Jim > > Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 06:33:55 -0500 > From: "Don & Teresa Neighbors" > Subject: As long as we're talking about rear ends.... > > I've asked before about putting a 9" rear end underneath Grover, by '54 > F250. Do any of you ou there know what ratios were available for F250 rear > ends? A 1/2 ton rear end is not an option, since I intend to maintain the > truck's 3/4 ton capabilities. > I missed out on the chat party Sunday, but I already complained about the > fact I would. If it was as active as it has been in the past when I've been > on, I bet it was a blast! > > Don N. > '54 F250 Named Grover ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 20:48:09 -0500 From: Edward Sedgwick Subject: Re: F-3 Springs Three different front springs used: 21C-5310-B 8 leaf, F-1 21Y-5310-A 8 leaf, F-2, F-3, optional on F-1 21Y-5310-B 9 leaf, F-2, F-3 Listing is for 1948-52 ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 21:54:48 EST From: RJC988 Subject: Re: fordtrucks-digest V2 #17 In a message dated 98-01-21 05:52:18 EST, you write: From: "Paul G." Subject: 55 Ford mods Howard, saw the picture of your truck; just got the magazine in today's mail. I put front discs and power steering on my 55 panel (rest of front end is stock) and I love it. I basically drives like a "new" truck, except it leans a lot in corners due to front suspension. I imagine lowering the front a bit with different springs would help. I wanted to keep the front end basically stock, and what I have done has satisfied me, since you can now drive the truck wherever you want. The parts I used were from SoCal, but are available from others. Paul G. Waynesboro, Va. >> Paul , Howard, and anybody else, I saw Howards truck in Custom Classic as well. This is my favorite. Custom Classic Trucks is a close second. I have subscriptions to both as well as Custom Auto Restorer. Stay away from the later. It has very few pages, no color pictures, hardly nothing to do with trucks, and of the 3; it is the most expensive!!! Paul did you have any unusual problems with you IFS conversion? Was it a kit specially made for you year truck? I want to put one on my 57 F-100, but not many for that year. By the way, I stayed in your town on the way to Promise Keepers in DC this fall. Beautiful country. Let us know when there is a truck show in your parts. Glenn in Memphis ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 12:06:58 -0700 From: "Paul T. Clegg" Subject: Hubcaps Hello All, I received my second set of stock hubcaps, (for my 48 F-1), yesterday and they fit! I tried some from Mac's Antique Auto Parts in December and they poped off. They did not engage far enough. This second set from Wheel Vintiques Inc. (209-251-6957), fit much better on my old riveted (origianal?) rims. I hope this may help someone else. Paul Clegg ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 00:51:43 -0400 From: Ray Cardogno Subject: Re: 53-Fuel Gage Prob. >Subject: 53-Fuel Gage Prob. > >I've got a '53 F-100, Stock, w/ 12v conversion. I just put in a new >fuel sending unit, and added a voltage reducer to the gauge feed off >of the ignition switch. Now the gauge does not work? When I put a >meter on the resistor,I had 12v going in but the needle was bouncing >up and down between 2-3v and 6-8v on the other side. The truck was >off so it should have been straight DC power from the battery going >in. Does this sound like a bad resistor? What should I see coming >out of it? 6v right? The strange thing seemed to be that the oil and >temp worked fine??? > >What and where would you nice Truck people suggest I do or go to get >a good voltage drop resistor?? (Please be nice when you tell me where >to go!!!) > >Thanks in advance, > >Tom Happel > Tom, JC Whitney has some gauge regulators available in their catalog. They regulate themselves to 6 volts regardles of the resistance load applied to them within their rated wattage. These should work regardless of how much gas you have. Luxurious, No? ray c ------------------------------.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|