|
|
Return-Path: Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 03:50:26 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks-digest To: fordtrucks-digest Subject: fordtrucks-digest V1 #93 Reply-To: fordtrucks Sender: owner-fordtrucks-digest fordtrucks-digest Monday, December 29 1997 Volume 01 : Number 093 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1960 And Older Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To remove yourself for our list send email to: fordtrucks-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: fordtrucks-digest V1 #86 [TNickolson ] Re: '54 F-100 [Don Grossman ] Re: Chat Party! [Ken Payne ] Re: fordtrucks-digest V1 #92 [My59f100 ] Re: Merry Christmas ! ["R. Garber" ] Re: '54 F-100 ["R. Garber" ] RE: '54 F-100 [Ethan Vos ] Re: Merry Christmas ! [JRFiero ] Are you a hightech redneck? ["Don & Teresa Neighbors" ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 28 Dec 1997 13:16:25 EST From: TNickolson Subject: Re: fordtrucks-digest V1 #86 I hate to tell you guys this, but my brother in law and I went for a Christmas Day drive along the ocean. and it was a 76' and sunny. Sorry Tom ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 28 Dec 1997 11:28:33 -0800 From: Don Grossman Subject: Re: '54 F-100 Earl T. Ingram, IV wrote: > > Hello. I just joined the list. I am considering buying a 1954 F-100. I > was wondering if someone on the list could help me with a few questions. > First, was a 4x4 F-100 produced that year? What engine combination was > avialable? A flathead is installed, and I thought 1953 was the last year > for the flathead. It is possible that a mistake was made somewhere in > titling the truck. Is there any way of determining the origin of this truck > by tracing the VIN? If so, where do I start? Is this truck a 4x? If it is it was either done by Marmon-Herrington or Napco, if it is stock. Someone could have added the 4x drivetrain later. I would make sure that it is still stock. If it is one of the conversions very few were made and even fewer are left. People could walk into a Ford dealer and order a truck with the 4x option. You would pick out the truck you wanted and Ford would ship the truck to MH or Napco and they would do the conversion then ship to the dealer. Look at the transfer case and the front axle. The transfer case will have a little metal ID tag on it and the front axle should have some stampings on the axle tubes. > The truck that I am considering has a nearly perfect body, and very little > rust (just a little in the corner of the floorboard). However, it has a > late-model (70's) grille, cedar running boards and tail gate. I would like > to return the truck to "original" condition. Are the parts going to be hard > to find? If this is and "origional" 4x than you are off to a good start already. How in the world did someone put a 70's grill in the front of this truck? > Any information is greatly appreciated. I love the look of the fat-fendered > Ford Trucks. I really want this truck, but I don't know if its worth the > hassle. I wouldn't turn this truck into a street rod if it is an "origional" 4x. > Thanks again > Earl > eingram Where are you and and do you have any pics of the truck? - -- Don Grossman duckdon 63 Ford F-100 4x4 67' 390, t-98, Spicer 24, Dana 60, Dana 44, power steering, power brakes, and now ON BOARD AIR! ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 28 Dec 1997 16:05:39 -0500 From: Ken Payne Subject: Re: Chat Party! At 10:54 PM 12/27/97 -0800, you wrote: >Hey! >Saturday night was fun. There was actually more than one person in the >chat room! I hope this happens again sometime. Maybe we should plan more >"chat parties." Anyway, for those of you who are following my interest in >a 59 F100, I haven't bought it, but I am going to talk it over with a >local mechanic who is restoring a 58 F100 (if I can find him). Thanks for >all the info and advice. >"See" you all next Saturday night at 10pm eastern, 7pm PST, etc. >Nick I think it'll just take some time before it really starts to catch on. Same type of pattern happens for new lists. Ken ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 28 Dec 1997 16:01:00 EST From: My59f100 Subject: Re: fordtrucks-digest V1 #92 In a message dated 97-12-28 05:53:23 EST, you write: Date: Sat, 27 Dec 1997 21:44:11 -0800 From: jc& terry Subject: [none] in need of several parts for my 1959 F-100 custom cab: >> Horn ring try Jack Timm Des Moines Iowa Ph:515-243-0665 I met him in Hershey . He has real clean stuff . DOUG MY59F100 ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 28 Dec 1997 18:49:58 -0600 From: "R. Garber" Subject: Re: Merry Christmas ! ! If anyone remembers, I be the guy >going to rebuild a 1950 F2 flatbed/flathead in Fairbanks Ak. However the >block was cracked between the cyl. and valves very badly and in two places. >Boat anchor. >Every tiny part it had the old script Ford and 1949 written on it, a true >original. So, of to the shop for boil-out & magnafluxing. Alas, cracks down >by the oil pan thru from the water jacket. Boat anchor #2 according to the >wrench at the garage. Tony, I had a guy repair a exhaust and intake manifold that was cracked and now you can't tell. He also had a block that had a hole in it the size of your fist(threw a rod) I saw it before and after. Perfectly repaired. If you are going back to orignal keep the block, have it repaired, keep the numbers together. You'd be suprised at what can be fixed. Rich 54 F100 PS: The ford garage said mine could'nt be fixed ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 28 Dec 1997 18:43:19 -0600 From: "R. Garber" Subject: Re: '54 F-100 I am considering buying a 1954 F-100. IMOP best year to obtain, Least produced, Least common restored. >First, was a 4x4 F-100 produced that year? Can't help here. What engine combination 6-cyl 223, 8-cyl 239,256,279 and 317 A flathead is installed, and I thought 1953 was the last year 53 was the last year. . It is possible that a mistake was made somewhere in >titling the truck. One thing is sure, anything could have happened. Is there any way of determining the origin of this truck >by tracing the VIN? If so, where do I start? Books, post the vin and we can tell you what you need to know. (mine was assembled in St.Paul, July of 54, Motor&Trans. june of 54) > it has a >late-model (70's) grille, cedar running boards and tail gate. I would like >to return the truck to "original" condition. Are the parts going to be hard >to find? The parts missing are prob. the most expensive to obtain, however all are available. > > I really want this truck, but I don't know if its worth the >hassle. >Earl, any classic is worth it, If you decide not to prusue this let the list know. Be prepared to spend money, do it right, and ENJOY! Rich 54 F100 ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 28 Dec 1997 20:17:09 -0500 From: Ethan Vos Subject: RE: '54 F-100 I have a 55 F-500 with an original flathead in it. I think it's a late 54 and in Canada they apparently used flatheads until 54. Ethan - -----Original Message----- From: R. Garber [SMTP:rgarber Sent: Sunday, December 28, 1997 7:43 PM To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: '54 F-100 I am considering buying a 1954 F-100. IMOP best year to obtain, Least produced, Least common restored. >First, was a 4x4 F-100 produced that year? Can't help here. What engine combination 6-cyl 223, 8-cyl 239,256,279 and 317 A flathead is installed, and I thought 1953 was the last year 53 was the last year. . It is possible that a mistake was made somewhere in >titling the truck. One thing is sure, anything could have happened. Is there any way of determining the origin of this truck >by tracing the VIN? If so, where do I start? Books, post the vin and we can tell you what you need to know. (mine was assembled in St.Paul, July of 54, Motor&Trans. june of 54) > it has a >late-model (70's) grille, cedar running boards and tail gate. I would like >to return the truck to "original" condition. Are the parts going to be hard >to find? The parts missing are prob. the most expensive to obtain, however all are available. > > I really want this truck, but I don't know if its worth the >hassle. >Earl, any classic is worth it, If you decide not to prusue this let the list know. Be prepared to spend money, do it right, and ENJOY! Rich 54 F100 +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1960 and Older --------------+ | Send posts to fordtrucks | site. | +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 28 Dec 1997 21:30:04 EST From: JRFiero Subject: Re: Merry Christmas ! In a message dated 97-12-28 20:01:19 EST, you write: >>going to rebuild a 1950 F2 flatbed/flathead in Fairbanks Ak. However the >>block was cracked between the cyl. and valves very badly and in two places. >>Boat anchor. >>Every tiny part it had the old script Ford and 1949 written on it, a true >>original. So, of to the shop for boil-out & magnafluxing. Alas, cracks down >>by the oil pan thru from the water jacket. Boat anchor #2 according to the >>wrench at the garage. >Tony, >I had a guy repair a exhaust and intake manifold that was cracked and now you >can't tell. He also had a block that had a hole in it the size of your >fist(threw a rod) >I saw it before and after. Perfectly repaired. >If you are going back to orignal keep the block, have it repaired, keep the >numbers >together. >You'd be suprised at what can be fixed. >Rich >54 F100 >PS: The ford garage said mine could'nt be fixed >> Flathead blocks are getting hard to find, and it's damn near impossible to find one with no cracks anywhere. The cracks between the cylinders and the valves are the worst, and prohibitively expensive to fix, if they can be. The second situation you describe is probably fixable. As Rich said, 'You'd be suprised at what can be fixed.' Even it you don't want the blocks, somebody probably does. Re "keep the numbers together," U.S. flatheads didn't have block numbers, although Canadian ones did. Makes it virtually impossible to tell what year or what vehicle they came from. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 28 Dec 1997 23:34:58 -0500 From: "Don & Teresa Neighbors" Subject: Are you a hightech redneck? I know this doesn't say "Ford" anywhere in it, but I thohgt all you old truck owners (like me!) would get a kick out of it. Don > > > Howdy, > > > > > > This is a test. Only a test. Just set over yonder on the couch, away > > > from > > > 'Ole Bessie for a minute and see how you score. > > > > > > ****************************************************** > > > You might be a high tech redneck : > > > > > > If you have old computers up on blocks in the front yard. > > > > > > If your e-mail address ends in "over.yonder.com." > > > > > > If you connect to the World Wide Web via a "Down Home Page." > > > > > > If the bumper sticker on your truck says, > > > "My other computer is a laptop." > > > > > > If your laptop has a sticker that says, > > > "Protected by Smith and Wesson." > > > > > > If you wire your network with jumper cables. > > > > > > If you've ever doubled the value of your truck by > > > installing a cellular phone. > > > > > > If your deer rifle has laser-guided bullets. > > > > > > If your baseball cap reads "IBM" instead of "CAT." > > > > > > If your computer is worth more than all your cars and trucks combined. > > > > > > If your wife ever said either she or the computer had to go, > > > and you still don't miss her. > > > > > > If you've ever used a CD-ROM as a coaster to set your beer on..... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|