|
|
From: owner-perf-list-digest
To: perf-list-digest Subject: perf-list-digest V2 #317 Reply-To: perf-list Sender: owner-perf-list-digest Errors-To: owner-perf-list-digest Precedence: bulk perf-list-digest Friday, December 10 1999 Volume 02 : Number 317 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe perf-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: FTE Perf - tires RE: [RE: [RE: FTE Perf - almost 360]] Re: FTE Perf - Sick 460 Re: FTE Perf - Sick 460 Re: FTE Perf - Timing chain FTE Perf - need a part Re: [RE: [RE: FTE Perf - almost 360]] FTE Perf - ADMIN: New Ford trucks ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 08:34:52 -0600 From: "William S. Hart" Subject: FTE Perf - tires > Actually I was talking about the 'warning zone' the tire gives you before > giving up it's traction. ;-) > Quite right ... if they are overinflated too much you don't need to worry about that though 'cause they are always giving up traction :) (PPPUUUUSSSHHH!!!) > Quite true... just meant it to reinforce what diference it can > actually make > when dealing with fractions of seconds for lap times. I agree > with you that > we don't need to obsess over tire pressure; as amatuers we can > probably gain > more time with technique than tire pressure unless we're way out of the > ballpark on the air. > Wow, I totally misread your original message didn't I? Sorry about that :) > Amen! 1st or last I'll still get a dash plaque; sure trophies are nice, > but... it's not CASH! :-) :-) Bragging rights do have their value though; > just not enough for me to deter the fun of thrashing the vehicle > with too much > thought about every little detail. > you get plaques? I'm jealous :( I'm supposed to have about 3 trophies but none of them have shown up yet (including a Fast time of the Day in my "slow" F-stock :) Cash would sure be an incentive though. At this point I'm content with just the learning aspect, you can learn so much through trial and error and not have to worry about damaging the car too badly if at all ... also it makes some of your "panic" maneuvers when the idiot in front of you in traffic screws up a bit more managed and controllable. Just my $.02 wish 96 Mustang GT 5spd 4.6L 73ish 1/2ton 4x4 6.4L http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 08:55:36 -0600 From: "William S. Hart" Subject: RE: [RE: [RE: FTE Perf - almost 360]] > And GM lost a court battle over that too. Ol' boy was mad that > his Olds had a > non Olds engine. Wow, I didn't know that ... that's weird ... > I was in Tech school when that 5.7 diesel came > out; whew.. > what fool engineer thought a gas engine block would hold up under > that much > extra compression? By the end of the year we had a pile of 'em > with broken > cranks/blocks. > hehehehe ... I've only seen a half dozen of those in my life, I always figured that was the reason too :) > I "thought" there had been one but couldn't place it.. even thought about > re-wording the sentence to 'mass produced 5.8' or some such but I > knew someone > would set me straight if so. No problem :) > > I think we all wish we had the deflation problems in our hp figurings :) > Or at least the insurance rate figurings!! > Woohoo, just got my insurance bill for the next 6mo ... its about $300 lower than the last one :) (25th is at the end of the month, guess which vehicle :) Just my $.02 wish 96 Mustang GT 5spd 4.6L 73ish 1/2ton 4x4 6.4L http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 15:46:22 +0100 From: Bas van der Veer Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Sick 460 >worried about fuel mileage just as long I get around 10 >mph, I'd like something with some rumble but still I'm sure the 460 will make you go 10 mph while idling :-) == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 10:10:37 -0700 From: William Whited Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Sick 460 I meant 10 mpg sorry about that Bas van der Veer wrote: > >worried about fuel mileage just as long I get around 10 > >mph, I'd like something with some rumble but still > > I'm sure the 460 will make you go 10 mph while idling :-) > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 11:49:03 -0600 From: "Robert F. Davis" Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Timing chain At 09:48 PM 12/07/1999 -0600, you wrote: >Does any one know if the newer EFI 460s use the same timing change as >the older ones that have a carb? The reason I have a 1970 F-250 with a >transplanted 460. Driving down the road its pretty mean. but when hooked >to a pulling sled it just wont open up. The man that built the motor >before I bought the truck said he used the new model timing chain. I was >telling a friend about this and he said the new chain could be my whole >problem. because the valve timing is about 4 deg. different. > > Any help would be great!!!! > Dave > >Dave, IT AIN'T THE CHAIN. It's the sprocket (erroneously called a gear). In fact it's the crank sprocket only!! The later 460's from about 1973 (I think) run the cam RETARDED approximately 8 degrees, or about half a tooth. Find you an earlier crank sprocket and it will improve your performance greatly. The earlier sprockets are easy to spot because the timing "o" lines up with a tooth (and key way). The later (emission sprocket) "o" lines up with the space between the teeth. Federal-Mogul performance parts catalog shows 4 different timing sets; each w/3 key ways, & 1 set w/9 key ways. I'm sure other manufacturers. have the same. "Beater" Bob >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 12:57:50 -0600 From: "Joel Thomas" Subject: FTE Perf - need a part I am looking for the tranny cover that bolts to the floorboard that covers that tranny and transfer case that would fit a 1984 F-150 the thing that you bolt the boots to. thanks reasonably priced and not hacked up or anything perfectly normal. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 18:00:07 -0800 (PST) From: canzus Subject: Re: [RE: [RE: FTE Perf - almost 360]] At 11:39 PM 8:12:99 EST, Tim Turner wrote: >And GM lost a court battle over that too. Ol' boy was mad that his Olds had a >non Olds engine. I was in Tech school when that 5.7 diesel came out; whew.. >what fool engineer thought a gas engine block would hold up under that much >extra compression? By the end of the year we had a pile of 'em with broken >cranks/blocks. Actually , the blocks held up fine. The problem was the cranks. I worked for an outfit that did a lot of conversions from Diesel to gas, and *all* the engines I took apart were crank failures. The blocks we took out we usually turned into gas runner 350's, usually bomber class circle track motors. Swap the cam for a "legal" piece, swap the intake for a stock 2BBL from a Omega, and sell them for $1700, after a quicky rebuild with a reground crank, nearly 320HP. We rarely had to bore them.... Steve & the Rockette 68 F100, 390cid, FMX 63 F100, 292cid, 3speed 72 Capri 2000, hers 73 Capri 2600,tube frame going in..... 73 MGB GT, Our Toy 94 SHO, SWMBO's 98 Contour SVT, Mine, Mine, All Mine.... == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 00:23:33 -0500 From: Ken Payne Subject: FTE Perf - ADMIN: New Ford trucks Check out the news section of the web site. Several Ford Motor Company press releases have been added about the 2000 F150s, including new models and also about the new Explorer Sport. Ken Payne Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|