|
|
From: owner-perf-list-digest
To: perf-list-digest Subject: perf-list-digest V2 #287 Reply-To: perf-list Sender: owner-perf-list-digest Errors-To: owner-perf-list-digest Precedence: bulk perf-list-digest Sunday, November 7 1999 Volume 02 : Number 287 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe perf-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: FTE Perf - pinging FTE Perf - Spark plug gap Re: FTE Perf - Spark plug gap Re: FTE Perf - 79 f100 stearing FTE Perf - Pinging problem ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 06 Nov 1999 07:52:03 -0500 From: "Thomas J. Teixeira" Subject: Re: FTE Perf - pinging At 10:10 PM 11/05/1999 -0600, Joel Thomas wrote: >I have a 351W >when the engine warms up it has a very bad pinging noise in 3rd and 4th >gears [stuff deleted] >the headers do have bad leaks in the gaskets would that cause it?? Yes, it could. An exhaust leak does sound like a ping. And since you say you have taken the carpet and floor covering out, everything is going to sound extra louds. Tom Teixeira '35 pickup http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://world.std.com/~tjt/35Pickup.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 09:42:51 -0500 From: Paul M Radecki Subject: FTE Perf - Spark plug gap In an attempt to track down an electrical gremlin, I've replaced most of my ignition system (it turned out to be the TFI module). As a result, I now have an aftermarket coil (MSD Blaster) and wires (Jacobs) installed. The literature I received from Jacobs said that, given a hotter coil and better wires, I would realize better mileage and power if I increased my plug gaps over factory spec. Is this BS? Is it something that will only benefit a 500hp pro-street car? Or is anyone out there in the real world benefitting from a bigger spark? The engine is a '94 300ci, fuel injected, speed density metered, mostly stock except for a K&N filter and the aforementioned ignition parts. Since I don't have access to a dyno (nor the inclination to do lots of trial and error testing on a truck that will never be raced) does anyone have a ballpark recommendation? lordjanusz '94 F150 300ci '73 F100 FE in pieces '98 VT1100 Aero riding season almost over :-( ___________________________________________________________________ Get the Internet just the way you want it. Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month! Try Juno Web: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 06 Nov 1999 07:17:26 -0800 From: George Miller Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Spark plug gap I don't know what the factory spec gap is but rule of thumb for electronic ignitions is .045. Then try larger smaller in .002 increments to see what your engine likes. George Miller Paul M Radecki wrote: > > In an attempt to track down an electrical gremlin, I've replaced > most of my ignition system (it turned out to be the TFI module). As a > result, I now have an aftermarket coil (MSD Blaster) and wires (Jacobs) > installed. The literature I received from Jacobs said that, given a > hotter coil and better wires, I would realize better mileage and power if > I increased my plug gaps over factory spec. Is this BS? Is it something > that will only benefit a 500hp pro-street car? Or is anyone out there in > the real world benefitting from a bigger spark? The engine is a '94 > 300ci, fuel injected, speed density metered, mostly stock except for a > K&N filter and the aforementioned ignition parts. Since I don't have > access to a dyno (nor the inclination to do lots of trial and error > testing on a truck that will never be raced) does anyone have a ballpark > recommendation? > > lordjanusz > '94 F150 300ci > '73 F100 FE in pieces > '98 VT1100 Aero riding season almost over :-( > ___________________________________________________________________ > Get the Internet just the way you want it. > Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month! > Try Juno Web: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj. > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 15:23:53 -0500 From: "msaur" Subject: Re: FTE Perf - 79 f100 stearing Thanks I will have that checked. msaur == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:48:01 -0600 From: "Joel Thomas" Subject: FTE Perf - Pinging problem thanks everybody for their help but problem is now solved. thanks I had the timing set at 10BTDC factory set up and I have minor mods so i took out the distributor and rotated the gear and put it back in(because there was no adjustment left it was hitting the intake manifold) and adjusted to 9BTDC and the pinging went away and the truck drives a lot better which is wierd it usually drives worse to retard the timing more. so thanks for your help but the problem it fixed even running 87 octane now. thnaks again == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ End of perf-list-digest V2 #287 ******************************* +--------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance ----------------+.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|