|
|
From: owner-perf-list-digest
To: perf-list-digest Subject: perf-list-digest V2 #279 Reply-To: perf-list Sender: owner-perf-list-digest Errors-To: owner-perf-list-digest Precedence: bulk perf-list-digest Saturday, October 30 1999 Volume 02 : Number 279 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe perf-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: FTE Perf - Q jet intake FTE Perf - What year 460? FTE Perf - Hey Bronco Guys! (and other "stabilizer bar" installers) Re: FTE Perf - Hey Bronco Guys! (and other "stabilizer bar" installers) FTE Perf - Re: what year 460's ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 05:43:42 -0400 From: "Gerald Ash" Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Q jet intake Arzie, Write me ga1998 Thanks Gerald - ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 1999 3:49 PM Subject: FTE Perf - Q jet intake > > > Dan Shade writes: >> I think this is a 429CJ intake, but am really > not sure. Next question, who makes a good adapter to use a holley > flange on the Q-Jet bolt pattern, I saw in Summit one that was ported, > and one that wasn't, can anyone help me out here as to what the > difference is? > > It would be a '70 model from the P/N(D00E), and that would indicate one of the > very few that did use the Q-jet. They also made one in later years that is > spreadbore but not Q-jert compatabile. It uses the Motorcraft spreadbore > pattern which is different from the Rochester and Carter pattern. > > Where you located???? I might be interested in a swap. I have a > squarebore(Holley) and a spreadbore(Motorcraft) - both factory. > > Azie > Ardmore, Al. > > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 08:11:45 -0400 From: j arnold Subject: FTE Perf - What year 460? Gotta comment here. Sleddog and Bogginf350 both seem to know a lot more about 460's than I do, so I'm really enjoying reading all the posts. Please continue the exchange if you can leave the personal insults out. I've got 4 f250's, from 73 to 84, all with 460's I've rebuilt and I really love the info. I don't compete with others, I just love to make my own equipment operate better each time I work on it. I do get a charge from the looks of bow-tie people, and lately, the pretty new D*dge drivers when I hook up to a 15,000# goose-neck load of hay or an 18,000# travel trailer, get on the freeway and run 80mph with them, windows up, A/C wide open, and no movement of temp gauges (Radiator or Trans), all in a 20 year old Ford truck. Both of you guys seem to have a heck of a lot of knowledge, so please continue to enlighten everybody. I know you're both proud of what you've built and I'm sure they are both geat machines. Think about it and respect each others accomplishments. You seem to have different approaches to building the power, that's great, compare and learn, and let the rest of us continue to pick out good tips from each to make our own a little better next time. Picking up this kind of info is why I joined these lists in the first place and continue to sift through 100's of e-mails each day. Remember, in the end they are both Ford's, running what is now a dicontinued engine. stoney PS- Question: new fords with the 7.3 diesel have a 6-speed/overdrive standard transmission available. How old is this transmission? Was it available in 98 with a 460 gas engine? Is it made with a standard 460 bell housing? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 08:59:25 -0500 From: "William S. Hart" Subject: FTE Perf - Hey Bronco Guys! (and other "stabilizer bar" installers) Okay guys, hopin for some help on this one ... I've got the sway bars for my truck all ready to go on, just gotta get some bolts at the store today and *cringe* drill some holes in the frame to mount it ... My question is how did the factory deal with the boxed frame ? really long bolts all the way through or what ? maybe I'll get lucky and find a welded nut in there somewhere ... Anyway just wanted to find out how your links were attached to the frame ... Just my $.02 wish 96 Mustang GT 4.6L 73ish F100 4x4 6.4L http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 15:29:12 -0700 From: Adam McLaughlin Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Hey Bronco Guys! (and other "stabilizer bar" installers) Are you talking small of large here? This morning I had my anti-sway bars down and I was installing dual shock hoops on the front. Getting them to line up after you pull down the anti-sway bar is quite a challenge. This was on a 1988 B II. 3" James Duff Lift. I had to drill five holes in the frame to mount everything, three on the passenger side and two on the driver's side. Adam "William S. Hart" wrote: > Okay guys, hopin for some help on this one ... I've got the sway bars for my > truck all ready to go on, just gotta get some bolts at the store today and > *cringe* drill some holes in the frame to mount it ... > > My question is how did the factory deal with the boxed frame ? really long > bolts all the way through or what ? maybe I'll get lucky and find a welded > nut in there somewhere ... > > Anyway just wanted to find out how your links were attached to the frame ... > > Just my $.02 > wish > > 96 Mustang GT 4.6L > 73ish F100 4x4 6.4L > http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 13:00:25 -0600 From: nightcrawler Subject: FTE Perf - Re: what year 460's Re: what year 460's For good solid info on various Ford 460 heads , Go to (Super Ford Magazine) , and request past articles dealing with Ford 460's. Jan 95 Stock Dove Head Flow Numbers LIFT Intake CFM Exhuast CFM EX/IN% .50 34.46 27.35 .80 .100 68.01 56.26 .83 .150 103.94 91.33 .88 .200 138.48 104.72 .76 .250 174.70 118.10 .68 .300 207.28 128.18 .62 .350 230.97 136.37 .59 .400 245.77 141.41 .58 .450 257.61 143.61 .56 .500 268.27 144.56 .54 .550 275.97 145.82 .53 .600 281.30 145.82 .52 These numbers are from SUPER FORD MAGAZINE and are at 28 inches of water. To determine horse power with air flow data taken at 28 inches of water, multiply the flow numbers by .257 then by the number of the cylinders. This is a good base number for what the engine will produce, hp/torque. > > > +--------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance ----------------+ > | Send posts to perf-list > | List removal information is on the web site. | > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ End of perf-list-digest V2 #279.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|