|
|
From: owner-perf-list-digest
To: perf-list-digest Subject: perf-list-digest V2 #276 Reply-To: perf-list Sender: owner-perf-list-digest Errors-To: owner-perf-list-digest Precedence: bulk perf-list-digest Wednesday, October 27 1999 Volume 02 : Number 276 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe perf-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: FTE Perf - Q jet intake FTE Perf - Need 460 Upper Alternator Bracket FTE Perf - Finally! Re: [FTE Perf - 81 Ford truck carb] Re: FTE Perf - Finally! FTE Perf - towing help Re: FTE Perf - Finally! ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 15:49:33 -0400 From: am14 Subject: FTE Perf - Q jet intake Dan Shade writes: >> I think this is a 429CJ intake, but am really not sure. Next question, who makes a good adapter to use a holley flange on the Q-Jet bolt pattern, I saw in Summit one that was ported, and one that wasn't, can anyone help me out here as to what the difference is? It would be a '70 model from the P/N(D00E), and that would indicate one of the very few that did use the Q-jet. They also made one in later years that is spreadbore but not Q-jert compatabile. It uses the Motorcraft spreadbore pattern which is different from the Rochester and Carter pattern. Where you located???? I might be interested in a swap. I have a squarebore(Holley) and a spreadbore(Motorcraft) - both factory. Azie Ardmore, Al. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: 26 Oct 99 15:28:11 EDT From: Tim Turner Subject: FTE Perf - Need 460 Upper Alternator Bracket We've got an '87 F-350 mini-dump truck here at the shop that had an ori= gnal engine of unknown size and now has a 460 from a Lincoln installed (accord= ing to the former owner), but unknown what year. The upper alternator bracke= t has been replaced by a rig that isn't getting the job done and we'd like to f= ind a stock bracket for it; It's discontinued by Ford and no luck locally. :-(= Anybody got an extra one for sale? Tim Turner Manic Mechanic Custer Auto Repair 910-791-4440 Wilmington NC ____________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://webm= ail.netscape.com. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 14:53:57 -0700 From: "Bill Beyer" Subject: FTE Perf - Finally! Well P.A.W. was kind enough to replace my 2 piece cam with a 1 piece which finally arrived today along with the backordered intake and 4V adapter. Yay! I can finally get back to work on my 400. I do have a question about modifying the intake. I checked the intake ports on the manifold against the gasket and there is a significant difference, quite a bit more than there was on the heads. I don't think there's nearly enough metal to get the ports even close to the same size as the gasket or the heads. Any thought? Should I just smooth the ports out and open 'em up as much as I can? Has anyone ever worked on the Edelbrock Performer 400-EGR before? TIA Bill "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, riddle them with bullets" == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: 26 Oct 99 20:51:16 EDT From: Tim Turner Subject: Re: [FTE Perf - 81 Ford truck carb] "gene baker" wrote: > Hi all, > = > I've got a question for you inline 6 guys. A friend of mine has an 81 F= - -150 > with a 300 I-6 and a '1'?? barrell carb and wants to know if anyone mak= es a > replacement or an adapter, so he can put a 2 barrell carb on his truck?= > = I don't know of one, but depending on the budget an 'Offenhauser' 4-Bbl i= ntake would be a nice setup and a 4-2 adapter could be used if he's set on havi= ng a 2. ;-) Of course if he wants to go extreme 3 Weber 40 DCOE side-draft 2= - -Bbls would be interesting... (or 2 3Bbl Webers...). If all else fails a machi= ne shop (regular type, not an automotive one) could probably fabricate somet= hing that would work if you supply them with the differing gaskets. Tim Turner Custer Auto Repair Wilmington NC ____________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://webm= ail.netscape.com. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 21:51:28 EDT From: "Gerald Ash" Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Finally! Just send it back and get an Weidland. It will make plenty of off the throttle power but will sure give out on a higher RPM pull. ______________________________________________________ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 21:29:33 -0500 From: "Joel Thomas" Subject: FTE Perf - towing help I have a 1984 F-150 4x4 with 33" tires. my question is are the frames on 1/2 ton through 1 ton trucks that different I am considering putting the 10.25in rear end in my truck with the dual wheels and then adding the dually bedsides to add towing capability to my truck. will it bolt up and will it help, will the 1-ton springs bolt on good. Is the 1/2 ton frame pleanty strong for towing a 3horse trailer and firewood and also towing the occasional "Bobcat" bulldozer with an electric braked trailer?? I know of a lot of 80's F-250 's with 351W and t-18 trannies like mine so are they that different in power capability? And would a short wheelbase rig with dually wheels look okay or just very stupid?? Also my braking is very vague. And rather than looking into rebuilding my 1/2ton brakes is there an upgrade to a lot more heavier duty brakes?? that can brake a lot bigger and heavier load more efficiently?? thanks for taking the time to read this and hopefully help me. Joel Thomas Little Rock,AR == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 20:37:44 -0700 From: "Bill Beyer" Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Finally! Yes but Weiand doesn't make a smog legal manifold. "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, riddle them with bullets" - ----- Original Message ----- From: Gerald Ash To: Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 1999 6:51 PM Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Finally! > Just send it back and get an Weidland. It will make plenty of off the > throttle power but will sure give out on a higher RPM pull. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ End of perf-list-digest V2 #276.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|