|
|
From: owner-perf-list-digest
To: perf-list-digest Subject: perf-list-digest V2 #223 Reply-To: perf-list Sender: owner-perf-list-digest Errors-To: owner-perf-list-digest Precedence: bulk perf-list-digest Thursday, September 2 1999 Volume 02 : Number 223 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe perf-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: RE: FTE Perf - v-10 comment & question FTE Perf - Filters RE: FTE Perf - oil filters FTE Perf - RE: oil filters FTE Perf - ADMIN: 2001 Ford Explorer Sport Trac specifications ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 09:07:12 -0500 From: "William S. Hart" Subject: RE: FTE Perf - v-10 comment & question > I was giving up torque on the bottom for a slight upper rpm hp increase. > Didn't leave it that way long enough to test the mpg. I then > fabricated a 4" > diameter tube out of sheet metal and cut back the filter housing > so that it > matched the 4" tube. > This is a big problem with the mods on the lighter vehicles, Mustang guys are notorious for getting rid of tons of low end, just to have one or two more on the big side ... but since their cars are light they don't care so much ... > I'm now thinking of installing a shift kit/improver and am looking for > advice, suggestions on which product would be best. B&M has a > "shift plus > electronic shift improver" which plugs into the wiring harness > and does not > involve dropping the pan or anything like that. There are also several > settings that can be made using a rocker switch placed in the > cab. I like > the ease of installation feature since I'm not sure I'm ready to > actually > dig into the mechanical parts of my new truck yet. However, I'm > not sure of > how the merits of this sort of shift improver would compare to the > traditional shift kit. Is anyone familiar with this sort of > product? If a > traditional shift kit is better, who seems to have the best one? > Now to totally reverse what I just said above, it seems like the auto guys on the stang board are very happy with it...there was an issue with it a few months ago, but I think the new versions have fixed the problem (don't even remember what it was, it wasn't good though)... Just my $.02 wish 96 Mustang GT 4.6L 73ish F100 4x4 6.4L http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 10:12:05 -0400 From: am14 Subject: FTE Perf - Filters Has anyone done a cut open on the AutoZone "Deutsche"(sic) filters????. I've been using them for several years and been meaning to open one up and do a comparison, but just never got around to it. Who makes them?? Azie Ardmore, Al. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 08:56:15 -0600 From: "Miska, Richard L (Rick)" Subject: RE: FTE Perf - oil filters I work supporting mainframe computer systems, the computer systems that fill football field sized rooms. Seimens corporation makes a printer that uses silicone as part of the hot fusion of print to the paper, and they have filter that filters that silicone. Well to make and already long story short, that filter is super high quality, and also happens to be set up just like the ford style oil filter. They worked well, but we sold off the support of that printer, now I dont get them anymore. Has anybody used the STP double oil filter? Colorado Rick - -----Original Message----- From: David Claflin [mailto:davida Sent: Monday, August 30, 1999 3:56 PM To: perf-list Subject: FTE Perf - oil filters The Wix/NAPA are made by the same outfit, so there is no comparison. As far as what is ugly about the fram is the actual filter is about the size of a coke can; whereas the WIX is about as large as will fit in the filter housing. This means there is a lot more filtering capacity, plus the filter media has a metal cap on each end instead of being glued to a piece of cardboard at each end like the fram. I only use the motorcraft/purolater if I can't get a WIX/NAPA filter, which hasn't happened in a long time. Supposedly the AC/Delco are good also but I can't bring myself to put a GM part on my FORD. Super Dave == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 09:42:20 -0700 From: "Vierra, William BGI SF" Subject: FTE Perf - RE: oil filters One of the Fram's I took off that had the black grip stuff on it. Well sort of, it had bubbled and pealed and flaked off when I removed the filter. Worked for putting it on but worthless and caused a mess of black flakes when coming off. IMHO it just further demonstrates the lack of quality of that filter. As far a putting the filters on when I worked at doing that years ago the shop owner was adamant that we never use a wrench to put the filter on. We did a fleet of cars and trucks for the phone company as well as other customers. In using this method I have never had a filter leak problem. I did and sometimes still have to use a filter wrench to get them off for two reasons one is they are hot and the second is they are stuck. I wish that shop was still in business the owner was very contentious, he always had in stock spare oil pan plugs just incase someone came in with one that was rounded off. We replaced them free of change only in the hope of making our jobs easier on return business. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 22:44:11 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: FTE Perf - ADMIN: 2001 Ford Explorer Sport Trac specifications Check out the news section of the web site for 2001 Ford Explorer Sport Trac specifications. Ken Payne Admin == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ End of perf-list-digest V2 #223 ******************************* +--------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance ----------------+.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|