|
|
From: owner-perf-list-digest To: perf-list-digest Subject: perf-list-digest V2 #204 Reply-To: perf-list Sender: owner-perf-list-digest Errors-To: owner-perf-list-digest Precedence: bulk perf-list-digest Saturday, August 14 1999 Volume 02 : Number 204 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe perf-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: FTE Perf - RE: FTE 61-79 - Timing is everything Re: FTE Perf - 300 for sale Re: FTE Perf - Re: 300 performance Re: FTE Perf - 300 Performance Mods? and Preventative Maintenance suggestions? Re: FTE Perf - Re: 300's Kick-butt?what am i missing? FTE Perf - Looking For Specs. ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 10:23:02 -0500 From: "William S. Hart" Subject: FTE Perf - RE: FTE 61-79 - Timing is everything We get a lot of questions here about what my timing should be, and how far is enough, and all kinds of stuff. Then we also have to try and explain the advantages of advancing the timing and all that neato stuff ... well I just found a web page that covers an install of a Steeda Timing Adjuster in a 4.6L motor. This is so you can set the timing manually, just like the old motors. If you are wondering what advancing the timing can do for you on the power side, here's a chart from the bottom of the page (1/4 mile times in Mustang GT) 10° (Stock) 16° 1st Run 14.696 2nd Run 14.667 3rd Run 14.674 Average 14.679 Improvement -0.159 Seconds +1.05 MPH Anyway I think you can see that adjusting the timing can have a pretty good effect on performance. The report he gave also said that the low end torque is way better, so for those of you looking for some 4.6 parts this might be one to look into, for others wondering why to advance the timing, now you know :) Also according to this report that 1mph he gained means the car gained almost 8hp from this one mod ... neat :) Anyway I have no associations with Steeda or the guy writing the article (other than reading the article and some posts on a Mustang bored) Just my $.02 wish 96 Mustang GT 4.6L 73ish F100 4x4 6.4L http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 22:01:55 EDT From: WJeff43 Subject: Re: FTE Perf - 300 for sale It really depends on what you're plans for the truck are. The 300 is a workhorse, but hop-up parts for it are not plentiful. The 302 probably won't have the grunt of the 300, but has about a million times more hot rod potential. Everybody and their brother makes hop-up parts for the 302. A good friend of mine put about $3000.00 into his 302 and had the thing putting out nearly 500 horsepower. If you're hauling lots of heavy cargo, the 300 might be a better choice. If you only haul stuff once in a while, I'd probably go for the 302. Bill Jeffreys == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 22:06:15 EDT From: WJeff43 Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Re: 300 performance When I pulled mine out, there was about 1/2 an inch clearance in the back, and about 1/2 an inch clearance in the front. I could have removed the front frame bracket the radiator mounts to, but the 1/2" was enough. Please remember the back of the engine is actually well to the rear of the hood opening when the engine is sitting in the truck. Bill Jeffreys == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 22:09:48 EDT From: WJeff43 Subject: Re: FTE Perf - 300 Performance Mods? and Preventative Maintenance suggestions? My 300/6 had 20 years of service and roughly 300 thousand miles on it when I replaced it. It still ran just fine, always started. The only problem with it was that it threw oil everywhere. Didn't burn it, just kept the road well oiled. (I couldn't park the thing in my driveway, either). Bill Jeffreys == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 22:13:12 EDT From: WJeff43 Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Re: 300's Kick-butt?what am i missing? Very good advise. Something else to look at too. My 300/6 has two sets of timing marks. There is a set of marks on the timing gear cover, and another set on the other side of the harmonic balancer that is bolted on. Ignore the ones on the timing gear cover and use the ones that are bolted on. Bill Jeffreys == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 21:36:07 -0700 From: Robert Hiebert Subject: FTE Perf - Looking For Specs. Does anyone know where I can find the following information? - -Compression ratio, torque, and horsepower curves for the '95 4.9L EFI, (300 six ). - -Compression ratio, torque, and horsepower cuves for the '92, '93, '94, '95, '96 7.5L EFI, ( 460 V8 ). Thanks, Robert Hiebert, Gibsons,BC,Can. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ End of perf-list-digest V2 #204 ******************************* +--------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance ----------------+.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|