|
|
From: owner-perf-list-digest To: perf-list-digest Subject: perf-list-digest V2 #190 Reply-To: perf-list Sender: owner-perf-list-digest Errors-To: owner-perf-list-digest Precedence: bulk perf-list-digest Saturday, July 31 1999 Volume 02 : Number 190 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe perf-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: FTE Perf - Re: FTE Perf- 4.6 performance Re: FTE Perf - Re: FTE Perf- 4.6 performance Re: FTE Perf - fuel line FTE Perf - wanted used cowl hood Re: FTE Perf - fuel line Re: FTE Perf - fuel line Re: FTE Perf - fuel line Re: FTE Perf - 300 Cams ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 06:17:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Ryan Reinke Subject: FTE Perf - Re: FTE Perf- 4.6 performance Hey! Does anyone on the list have experience with performance parts on the 4.6? And I seem to hit a road block in finding a K&N to replace the factory air box or are the counter guys just smucks? Thanks, Ryan _____________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 08:45:39 -0500 From: William S Hart Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Re: FTE Perf- 4.6 performance >Does anyone on the list have experience with >performance parts on the 4.6? A little, but mostly in 'stang applications. Steeda (www.steeda.com) and some others (sean hyland (www.seanhylandmotorsport.com) expensive usually, but has lots of stuff) ... have branched into the truck side of things as well as the 'stang side ... you can learn lots about what works for the 4.6 from the 'stang boards, but remember they're just trying to show off their dyno runs and get lots of HP, most of them don't even mention their peak torque. Fortunately these modulars have a very flat torque curve, so once revved up a bit (2000+) it will have about the same amount of torque without the peakiness that you get from some high powered motors... >And I seem to hit a >road block in finding a K&N to replace the factory air >box or are the counter guys just smucks? > You want the performace pak ? where it replaces the air box ? Hmm...don't know that I've seen them listed, but you should be able to find part numbers for such a thing from Steeda I would think ... or email k&n directly and see if they have one yet ... Just my 2cents wish Links http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish/links.html '73 1/2 ton 4x4 Ford http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish/truck.html '96 Mustang GT http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish/mustang.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 08:52:22 -0700 (PDT) From: shane san miguel Subject: Re: FTE Perf - fuel line braided stainless is what I would use. Shane 55 F100 5.0 15.51 - --- Donald Paauw wrote: > > > > Sensible solution.. Just want to point out to > *NOT* use copper for > > lines; it will over time 'work harden' and crack. > > > > > Tim > > Hmm. I was going to use copper tubing for my oil > pressure guage because > I was worried about the nylon tubing being near the > exhaust. Would the > nylon be better, with careful routing? > > -- Don > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info > http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > _____________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 20:15:10 EDT From: MrVFR Subject: FTE Perf - wanted used cowl hood Anyone want to sell a cervini hood Dennis == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 17:44:12 -0700 From: George Miller Subject: Re: FTE Perf - fuel line Donald Paauw wrote: > > > > > Sensible solution.. Just want to point out to *NOT* use copper for > > lines; it will over time 'work harden' and crack. > > > > Tim > > Hmm. I was going to use copper tubing for my oil pressure guage because > I was worried about the nylon tubing being near the exhaust. Would the > nylon be better, with careful routing? This was discussed on another list, actually beaten into the ground with experience, and the concensus of probably 40 posts was to use braided stainless. Lots of satisfactory testimony for the nylon and also many horror stories about broken nylon lines shooting 200 degree oil on legs. Most of the failures were from coming off at the gauge. It's not a true compression joint. Don't use it if your oil pressure is above 80psi or the line is exposed to header heat. Gets brittle and cracks. I've used one on a 460 for over ten years with no replacement. The sender end is at the back of the block and goes right into the engine compartment, so that's probably the reason I've been fortunate. All say no on the copper for the reasons already mentioned. Converting to braided stainlees is high on my to do list. There were some nasty experiences with broken nylon lines. George Miller == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 18:22:44 -0700 From: don Subject: Re: FTE Perf - fuel line OK, I'm convinced. Now, does braided stainless require special connectors or can I use it in the compression joint that came with the guage? Also, is it easily available, or will I need to get some catalogs? - -- Don > Donald Paauw wrote: > > > > > > > > Sensible solution.. Just want to point out to *NOT* use copper for > > > lines; it will over time 'work harden' and crack. > > > > > > Tim > > > > Hmm. I was going to use copper tubing for my oil pressure guage because > > I was worried about the nylon tubing being near the exhaust. Would the > > nylon be better, with careful routing? > > This was discussed on another list, actually beaten into the ground with > experience, and the concensus of probably 40 posts was to use braided > stainless. > > Lots of satisfactory testimony for the nylon and also many horror > stories about broken nylon lines shooting 200 degree oil on legs. Most > of the failures were from coming off at the gauge. It's not a true > compression joint. Don't use it if your oil pressure is above 80psi or > the line is exposed to header heat. Gets brittle and cracks. I've used > one on a 460 for over ten years with no replacement. The sender end is > at the back of the block and goes right into the engine compartment, so > that's probably the reason I've been fortunate. > > All say no on the copper for the reasons already mentioned. > > Converting to braided stainlees is high on my to do list. There were > some nasty experiences with broken nylon lines. > > George Miller > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 18:39:21 -0700 From: George Miller Subject: Re: FTE Perf - fuel line Summit should have all you'll need. Other than engine oil lines, I have no experience with it. I'm going to measure the length I need, take the tee fitting on the block (I kept my original factory gauge) and the compression fitting from the gauge to the local speed shop. They know that stuff. George Miller Donald Paauw wrote: > > OK, I'm convinced. Now, does braided stainless require special connectors > or can I use it in the compression joint that came with the guage? Also, > is it easily available, or will I need to get some catalogs? > > -- Don > > > Donald Paauw wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Sensible solution.. Just want to point out to *NOT* use copper for > > > > lines; it will over time 'work harden' and crack. > > > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > Hmm. I was going to use copper tubing for my oil pressure guage because > > > I was worried about the nylon tubing being near the exhaust. Would the > > > nylon be better, with careful routing? > > > > This was discussed on another list, actually beaten into the ground with > > experience, and the concensus of probably 40 posts was to use braided > > stainless. > > > > Lots of satisfactory testimony for the nylon and also many horror > > stories about broken nylon lines shooting 200 degree oil on legs. Most > > of the failures were from coming off at the gauge. It's not a true > > compression joint. Don't use it if your oil pressure is above 80psi or > > the line is exposed to header heat. Gets brittle and cracks. I've used > > one on a 460 for over ten years with no replacement. The sender end is > > at the back of the block and goes right into the engine compartment, so > > that's probably the reason I've been fortunate. > > > > All say no on the copper for the reasons already mentioned. > > > > Converting to braided stainlees is high on my to do list. There were > > some nasty experiences with broken nylon lines. > > > > George Miller > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 00:40:36 EDT From: SpyderLv81 Subject: Re: FTE Perf - 300 Cams Look at Clifford stuff also. They make stuff just for the 4 and 6 cylinder engines. I bought a cam, intake manifold, and headers from them. Just to let you know their headers are split for dual exhaust which is nice if you want to open up the engine. I can't say if they help or not because I am still building the engine..... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|