|
|
From: owner-perf-list-digest To: perf-list-digest Subject: perf-list-digest V2 #187 Reply-To: perf-list Sender: owner-perf-list-digest Errors-To: owner-perf-list-digest Precedence: bulk perf-list-digest Wednesday, July 28 1999 Volume 02 : Number 187 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe perf-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: FTE Perf - Edelbrock and old throttle linkage FTE Perf - NEW 460!--but no power? Re: FTE Perf - NEW 460!--but no power? FTE Perf - Poppet valve Re: FTE Perf - Edelbrock and old throttle linkage Re: FTE Perf - Poppet valve Re: FTE Perf - Thermostats ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 06:36:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Subject: FTE Perf - Edelbrock and old throttle linkage Quick question: Anyone hooked up an Edelbrock (or Carter) to the old straight rod throttle linkage that comes on older trucks like my '64? Edelbrocks Ford linkage kit states for '68 and newer (I assume that is when the switched to cables). I am not concerned about the kickdown linkage for the C4.. I am not above engineering an adaptor, but would be easier if someone has done it before (short of changing to a cable) and has some pointers. I haven't bought an Edelbrock yet, just weighing my options. Thanks, Bill in Texas 1964 F100 Shortbox (351W/C4) _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 07:34:14 PDT From: "Jeremy Taylor" Subject: FTE Perf - NEW 460!--but no power? I just finished overhauling the 460 (FI) in my 88 F-250. (wow that's a big engine to pull!) Thanks to all the individuals who helped me along the way. I'm trying to take care of all the loose ends before I take my truck to the Silver Lake Sand Dunes this weekend. The biggest problem is that I'm not getting full throttle. The butterfly only opens 1/4 of the way when the pedal is to the floor. I never checked it before the rebuild but it is supposed to open all the way, right? What could cause this? Routing of the cable? I can move it open all the way by hand but not with the pedal. Thanx in advance for all the help you guys can offer. Jeremy 88 F-250 460,C-6,4.10's _______________________________________________________________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.msn.com == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 10:12:31 -0500 From: William S Hart Subject: Re: FTE Perf - NEW 460!--but no power? >the Silver Lake Sand Dunes this weekend. The biggest problem is that I'm >not getting full throttle. The butterfly only opens 1/4 of the way when the >pedal is to the floor. I never checked it before the rebuild but it is >supposed to open all the way, right? What could cause this? Routing of the >cable? I can move it open all the way by hand but not with the pedal. >Thanx in advance for all the help you guys can offer. > Sounds like maybe something slipped either where the cable attaches to the throttlebody(should be a snap thing isn't it ?) or maybe where the pedal attaches, is there a way the sheathing got moved, it sounds like the cover is too long all of a sudden ... Just my 2cents wish Links http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish/links.html '73 1/2 ton 4x4 Ford http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish/truck.html '96 Mustang GT http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish/mustang.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 11:45:53 -0400 From: am14 Subject: FTE Perf - Poppet valve George Miller writes: >>This is the most comprehensive and informative site I've found on performance and stock cooling systems. They recommend drilling 3 - 3/16" holes in the poppet valve for maximum efficiency, especially when using hi-volume water pumps. I ask !! ! ! ! What is a "poppet valve" ???????? Are they referring to the T'stat??? Azie Ardmore, Al. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 10:11:23 -0700 From: Don Grossman Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Edelbrock and old throttle linkage Bill wrote: > Quick question: Anyone hooked up an Edelbrock (or Carter) to the old > straight rod throttle linkage that comes on older trucks like my '64? > Edelbrocks Ford linkage kit states for '68 and newer (I assume that is > when the switched to cables). I am not concerned about the kickdown > linkage for the C4.. > > I am not above engineering an adaptor, but would be easier if someone > has done it before (short of changing to a cable) and has some > pointers. I haven't bought an Edelbrock yet, just weighing my options. > > Thanks, > > Bill in Texas > 1964 F100 Shortbox (351W/C4) Did so in my 63. The carb and the rod lined up really well, only had to make a few small new bends in the rod. if your current rod is working on the 351W it should be real close with the Edelbrock. A new rod could also be made if needed. It's just a small bend in each end. I was going to replace mine with a rod and two heim joints one of these days. Laters - -- Don Grossman duckdon 99 Contour 63 F-100 4x4 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 16:25:52 -0700 From: George Miller Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Poppet valve am14 > > George Miller writes: >>This is the most comprehensive and informative site > I've found on > performance and stock cooling systems. They recommend drilling 3 - 3/16" > holes in the poppet valve for maximum efficiency, especially when using > hi-volume water pumps. > > I ask !! ! ! ! What is a "poppet valve" ???????? Are they referring to the > T'stat??? Yes. I didn't know what it was until i read the info. Great site. George miller == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 20:12:51 -0500 From: Buck Shoff Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Thermostats George Miller wrote: > > http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.stewartcomponents.com/techtip3.htm > > This is the most comprehensive and informative site I've found on > performance and stock cooling systems. They recommend drilling 3 - 3/16" > holes in the poppet valve for maximum efficiency, especially when using > hi-volume water pumps. Anybody out there have any experience with that? I tried that once. It was on a box stock 89 Ranger with a 2.9. I was trying to stabilize a fluctuating thermostat, not trying to increase cooling capacity. One 1/8" hole solved the fluctuation problem completely. However the engine never did come up to operating temperature on a 30-40 degree day. That probably wouldn't be a problem around here today, though. If the rest of the cooling system was clean and tight, I think it will run somewhat cooler. Why don't you try it? T-stats are cheap and easy to change. If you do try it, I would like to know the results. Buck Shoff == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ End of perf-list-digest V2 #187.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|