|
|
perf-list-digest Sunday, February 14 1999 Volume 02 : Number 038 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe perf-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: FTE Perf - overheating??? Re: FTE Perf - overheating??? FTE Perf - Formerly overheating, now gauges Re: FTE Perf - Formerly overheating, now gauges FTE Perf - Re: Inline six performance ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 18:09:14 -0800 From: George Miller Subject: Re: FTE Perf - overheating??? I don't remember when ford went to the idiot light gauge (uses electrical current to move the needle) but they do go bad. I assume by this you mean electric gauge, not idiot gauge (mine would always read full then). I have never actually seen factory "engine turned" gauges other than the thermometer on the radiator of the old A's. So I think its safe to say that mine are electric. I guess I don't understand your references to "true" gauge and "idiot light" gauge ... I've heard the new oil pressure gauges referred to as idiot gauges because their voltage drop between 0 and max is less than 1 volt. I was being facitious about the complexity of electric guages. I consider mechanical oil/water gauges a good investment. It's two less things to worry about. George Miller == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 20:02:50 -0500 From: Tim Turner Subject: Re: FTE Perf - overheating??? George Miller wrote: > > I was being facitious about the complexity of electric guages. I > consider mechanical oil/water gauges a good investment. It's two less > things to worry about. Well.. when the tube to my oil gauge split and ruined brand new dress boots I kinda swore off (and AT!) mechanical gauges. :-) Tim Turner/Manic Mechanic Custer Auto Repair Wilmington NC == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 18:39:06 -0800 From: George Subject: FTE Perf - Formerly overheating, now gauges Split hose carriers do happen. Especially at the back of the gauge, where it's a compression, rather than a true flanged threaded connection. This was extensively discussed on the Fordnatics List. Using copper lines seems to be a superior alternative to the plastic lines supplied by the gauge manufacturers unless you're subjecting the rig to severe off-road or circle track racing. Then the stress factor of copper lines becomes an issue. Did yours split where it connects to the gauge? That's the most common failure with the plastic lines. George Miller George Miller George Miller wrote: > > I was being facitious about the complexity of electric guages. I > consider mechanical oil/water gauges a good investment. It's two less > things to worry about. Well.. when the tube to my oil gauge split and ruined brand new dress boots I kinda swore off (and AT!) mechanical gauges. :-) Tim Turner/Manic Mechanic == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 00:05:42 -0500 From: Tim Turner Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Formerly overheating, now gauges George wrote: > Did yours split where it connects to the gauge? That's the most common failure > with the plastic lines. Yes. It was a failure of the cheap lines/fittings supplied with the gauges. As you mentioned I wouldn't want to use copper tubing due to it's 'work hardening' properties so I'll stick with E- Gauges. TT == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 23:59:51 EST From: IRLobuck Subject: FTE Perf - Re: Inline six performance Here is three things you can do without gittin "inside". First, headers and a full dual 2 1/4" exhaust system. Use long glasspacks rather than turbo's, the sound is MUCH better and on a 6 they flow just as well. Second, if you want to loose the injection, go with a DUAL PORT 4v after-market intake with a 350 cfm PROGRESSIVE 2bbl Holley carb (both help keep the fuel/air mix movin well in the long runs to the outboard cylinders). If you want to keep it put a performance chip in the ecm. The next thing I would do is, if your stock cam is OK, change to some 1.76 roller tip rockers, this keeps your duration the same but increases the lift. Just the ticket for more bottom end. All three of these are weekend projects that will breathe some fire into your 6. LOBUCK == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ End of perf-list-digest V2 #38 ****************************** +--------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance ----------------+ | Send posts to perf-list To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|