|
|
perf-list-digest Friday, February 5 1999 Volume 02 : Number 029 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe perf-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: FTE Perf - Gearing and Lockers Re: FTE Perf - Gearing and Lockers Re: FTE Perf - Gearing and Lockers RE: FTE Perf - Gearing and Lockers Re: FTE Perf - Gearing and Lockers RE: FTE Perf - Strange Story (was: Gearing and Lockers) Re: FTE Perf - Strange Story (was: Gearing and Lockers) RE: FTE Perf - Strange Story (was: Gearing and Lockers) RE: FTE Perf - Gearing and Lockers RE: FTE Perf - Gearing and Lockers FTE Perf - Re: Edelbrock shocks for 97 up FTE Perf - Hi-po Ford Truck FTE Perf - LL products Re: FTE Perf - Gearing and Lockers ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 07:17:25 EST From: FLR150 Subject: FTE Perf - Gearing and Lockers OK gang...new dilemma. I am ready to start the next phase of my build up and I have hit another wall. I am trying to decide what type of rear end gearing to go with. Presently I have the one-wheel push 8.8" rear with the 3.55 gears. I am planning on going with the Trac-lok locker and possibly C-Clip eliminators. I have been told that I should probably just keep my 3.55 gears and just try it with the locker first. They say that the locker will make such an improvement that I probably wont need the gears. I am looking to keep my highway manners as much as possible, but I still want the OOMPH off the line that only 3.73 or shorter gears can give me. What do you think? I value all of your opinions and any input would be appreciated. Thanks Wayne Foy '94 Flareside Supercab "Hazardous Material" Wayne's Flareside Page == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 10:31:36 EST From: JUMPINFORD Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Gearing and Lockers Well buddy, If yur problem is wheel spin off the line, then yes a locker will help, but if yur not spinnin very much, maybe just a chirp, then go with a 3.73. And as far as the C-Clip eliminators, my understanding is that the only folks who need those are off roaders who put a LOT of side-strain on an axle, say by highly off-camber crawling, or mud derbying. Anybody else support this? Darrell Duggan 74 F-350 "Tweety" == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 Feb 99 08:11:00 PST From: "Doug Ridder" Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Gearing and Lockers if this truck has a new motor in it I would suggest you try it without = changing the gears first. The noticable difference between 3.55's and = 3.73's is going to be minimal at best. unless you have allready torn thi= s baby apart I would probably just try like it is first and see how you = like it, you can always come back latter and put the locker and necessary= gears in it in the same operation. The new gear set is likely to cost = $200.00 dollars or more and if you don't need it all the better. Doug - ---------- > Well buddy, > > If yur problem is wheel spin off the line, then yes a locker will help,= but if > yur not spinnin very much, maybe just a chirp, then go with a 3.73. = And as > far as the C-Clip eliminators, my understanding is that the only folks = who > need those are off roaders who put a LOT of side-strain on an axle, say= by > highly off-camber crawling, or mud derbying. Anybody else support this= ? > > Darrell Duggan > 74 F-350 "Tweety" > =3D=3D FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq= .html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 12:04:27 -0500 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: FTE Perf - Gearing and Lockers personnally, i don't like the idea of an axle parting from my vehicle no matter what i am doing. an axle can break on the street too. to me, piece of mind is worth as much as performance usually. also, i'd rather have an axle come out at low speed, such as rock crawling, then at freeway speeds. sleddog - ---------- From: JUMPINFORD Sent: Thursday, February 04, 1999 10:31 AM To: perf-list Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Gearing and Lockers Well buddy, If yur problem is wheel spin off the line, then yes a locker will help, but if yur not spinnin very much, maybe just a chirp, then go with a 3.73. And as far as the C-Clip eliminators, my understanding is that the only folks who need those are off roaders who put a LOT of side-strain on an axle, say by highly off-camber crawling, or mud derbying. Anybody else support this? Darrell Duggan 74 F-350 "Tweety" == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 11:30:33 -0600 From: Steve Randa Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Gearing and Lockers I've always heard that C-clip eliminators are a no-no for anything other that straight line duty. The CCE do not like lateral movement that well since they're attached externally of the axle tube as opposed to the the inner stock location. I installed CCE on my Mustang for strip and they require you to remove some of the axle tube (at least Moser's kit). They don't ride on much support and this configuration's strength relies quite a bit on the hardware to which it's mounted. But the convenience of not having to open the housing cover to remove your axles is a nice luxury. Steve Randa JUMPINFORD > Well buddy, > > If yur problem is wheel spin off the line, then yes a locker will help, but if > yur not spinnin very much, maybe just a chirp, then go with a 3.73. And as > far as the C-Clip eliminators, my understanding is that the only folks who > need those are off roaders who put a LOT of side-strain on an axle, say by > highly off-camber crawling, or mud derbying. Anybody else support this? > > Darrell Duggan > 74 F-350 "Tweety" > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 10:31:06 -0700 From: "Giddens, Scott" Subject: RE: FTE Perf - Strange Story (was: Gearing and Lockers) sleddog wrote: > > i'd rather have an axle come out at low speed, such as rock crawling, than > at freeway speeds. > I was going down the highway the other day and saw a Bronco with the right rear wheel slowly leaving the truck at about 65 MPH. At first I thought he lost a wheel and the truck was riding on three wheels. Then I noticed the axle was sliding out with it, bending as it reached about 2-3 feet out of the side of the truck! Evidently the clip that holds the axle into the differential had came off. I was not sure if I should hit the brake and save myself or drive around and warn him to slow down. Very quickly he slowed down and pulled over with the wheel and axle sliding back in place when he hit the shoulder. I can't help but think how sad it would have been for him if it came out all the way at that speed. Scott == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 09:51:27 -0800 From: "Bill Beyer" Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Strange Story (was: Gearing and Lockers) Yep that's one of the problems with semi-floaters. In the 9 inch there aren't any clips in the diff. The axle/wheel assembly is held in place by the interference fit of the wheel bearing. That's one of the reasons why I'm a big fan of full floaters like the Dana 60. - -----Original Message----- From: Giddens, Scott To: perf-list Date: Thursday, February 04, 1999 9:37 AM Subject: RE: FTE Perf - Strange Story (was: Gearing and Lockers) > I was going down the highway the other day and saw a Bronco with the >right rear wheel slowly leaving the truck at about 65 MPH. At first I >thought he lost a wheel and the truck was riding on three wheels. Then I >noticed the axle was sliding out with it, bending as it reached about 2-3 >feet out of the side of the truck! Evidently the clip that holds the axle >into the differential had came off. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 11:36:44 -0700 From: "Miska, Richard L (Rick)" Subject: RE: FTE Perf - Strange Story (was: Gearing and Lockers) Ok, here is my dumb question. I am replacing the 9inch rear in my bronco this coming week. Is there such a thing as a full floater dana60 five lug rear? I remember something awhile back about a semifloater dana60 in five lug, I think Colorado jeff had one. colorado Rick > ---------- > From: Bill Beyer[SMTP:bbeyer > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 1999 10:51 AM > To: perf-list > Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Strange Story (was: Gearing and Lockers) > > Yep that's one of the problems with semi-floaters. In the 9 inch there > aren't any clips in the diff. The axle/wheel assembly is held in place by > the interference fit of the wheel bearing. That's one of the reasons why > I'm > a big fan of full floaters like the Dana 60. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Giddens, Scott > To: perf-list > Date: Thursday, February 04, 1999 9:37 AM > Subject: RE: FTE Perf - Strange Story (was: Gearing and Lockers) > > > > I was going down the highway the other day and saw a Bronco with the > >right rear wheel slowly leaving the truck at about 65 MPH. At first I > >thought he lost a wheel and the truck was riding on three wheels. Then I > >noticed the axle was sliding out with it, bending as it reached about 2-3 > >feet out of the side of the truck! Evidently the clip that holds the axle > >into the differential had came off. > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 13:41:13 -0500 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: FTE Perf - Gearing and Lockers the basic idea of c-clip eliminaters that a broken axle will not part ways with the car. the axle breaks but stays retained to the housing so that control of the vehicle is still possible. stock c-clip axles when they break may fly out of the housing and that can't be good! sleddog - ---------- From: Steve Randa[SMTP:sranda Sent: Thursday, February 04, 1999 12:30 PM To: perf-list Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Gearing and Lockers I've always heard that C-clip eliminators are a no-no for anything other that straight line duty. The CCE do not like lateral movement that well since they're attached externally of the axle tube as opposed to the the inner stock location. I installed CCE on my Mustang for strip and they require you to remove some of the axle tube (at least Moser's kit). They don't ride on much support and this configuration's strength relies quite a bit on the hardware to which it's mounted. But the convenience of not having to open the housing cover to remove your axles is a nice luxury. Steve Randa JUMPINFORD > Well buddy, > > If yur problem is wheel spin off the line, then yes a locker will help, but if > yur not spinnin very much, maybe just a chirp, then go with a 3.73. And as > far as the C-Clip eliminators, my understanding is that the only folks who > need those are off roaders who put a LOT of side-strain on an axle, say by > highly off-camber crawling, or mud derbying. Anybody else support this? > > Darrell Duggan > 74 F-350 "Tweety" > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 12:37:14 -0700 From: "Giddens, Scott" Subject: RE: FTE Perf - Gearing and Lockers Using c-clips is a very poor design even though they are an improvement over the axles held in by just a press fit (BTW which I have only seen in the cars) C-clips are not designed to take side loads at all, they are just there to retain the axle in the housing. I have always wondered if the c-clips would eventually wear thin from rubbing against the non-rotating housing and wear through or break. Also any wear on the axle bearings produces more side to side play in the axle shaft and gives the axle more room to build up enough inertia to pop the c-clip out of the groove. I have never seen the c-clip eliminator before and would be interested in knowing more about it (like where to buy it and how much it costs) I assume it uses a split clamp with screws to hold the two halves around the shaft with a ridge to sit in the c-clip groove. What a worthwhile and simple (and inexpensive?) thing to add to your off-road Ford this would be. I would prefer the axle was re-designed to use pre-loaded tapered roller bearings on the inside (and out) that would handle bi-directional side loads better and reduce overall friction, but it would cost too much for Ford to re-design them. scott > -----Original Message----- > From:Sleddog [SMTP:kevkem > Sent:Thursday, February 04, 1999 11:41 AM > To:'perf-list > Subject:RE: FTE Perf - Gearing and Lockers > > the basic idea of c-clip eliminaters that a broken axle will not part ways > > with the car. the axle breaks but stays retained to the housing so that > control of the vehicle is still possible. stock c-clip axles when they > break may fly out of the housing and that can't be good! > > sleddog == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 20:32:31 -0500 From: Tim Turner Subject: FTE Perf - Re: Edelbrock shocks for 97 up I remember a while back somebody posted about Edelbrock shocks for a new Ford, but I dont recall which list. I just got the '99 catalog and they do list as new #'s for 2/4WD applications including some lifted/lowered. If you need more info give me a mail/post. :-) Tim Turner/Manic Mechanic Custer Auto Repair Wilmington NC PS: for the small list; Ranger through '99 but no B-II listing. :-( TT == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 02:18:59 GMT From: cdailey Subject: FTE Perf - Hi-po Ford Truck Hi all. Ran across this little ditty on one of the drag racing NG's. Look near the bottom of the page for the truck, pretty cool. http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.horsepowerheaven.com/hhccracing.html Chad == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 Feb 99 18:41:53 PST From: "Doug Ridder" Subject: FTE Perf - LL products Does anyone know the number to LL products? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 22:43:52 -0500 From: Tim Turner Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Gearing and Lockers Sleddog wrote: > > personnally, i don't like the idea of an axle parting from my vehicle no > matter what i am doing. an axle can break on the street too. to me, piece > of mind is worth as much as performance usually. also, i'd rather have an > axle come out at low speed, such as rock crawling, then at freeway speeds. Quite so.. many years ago I was delivering pizza in a '70(?) Capri and it stopped moving as I came up to the apartment; closer inspection.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|