|
|
perf-list-digest Thursday, January 7 1999 Volume 02 : Number 002 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe perf-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: FTE Perf - 302 or 351 ? FTE Perf - 385 Series Factory Pushrods Re: FTE Perf - 385 Series Factory Pushrods ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 09:39:39 -0600 From: William S Hart Subject: FTE Perf - 302 or 351 ? I know I usually have tons of quesitons about FE's, but now I have one about the Winsor family. Usually I can adlib this stuff since we have a couple 70 302's and 69 351W's and just go look, but this is a bit newer. My sister's truck lost oil pressure, and by the time I shut it down the lifters were clicking. A dealership restarted it and claimed that the motor was "hammering" Since this is my sister's truck (91 F250HD 4x4), Dad's gettin antsy and wants to be sure she won't have any problems with it on the road when she gets it back. She's got a 5.0 in it, its nice enough, gets decent mileage and has enough power to move at an okay clip. But I tend to think its a bit underpowered, especially when compared with my 73 w/360. Obviously since its a 91 its got all the EEC and multiport fuel injection on it. Now for the real question ... what would it take to swap a 351 in place of the 302 (assume longblock switch)? I'm pretty sure intake (lower), but what about the oil pan? Heard rumors that those need changed. Computer module ? Sensors? To add to the mess we've got a 69 Cougar with a 351 that dad just re did ... it is a 69 351 also ... how big of a pain to swap this long block for the 302 ? Probably a much bigger pain, but just interested in seeing how much work it would be. Thanks to anyone who can help me out, I'm sure my sister will appreciate it too :) Bill == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 19:24:40 -0800 From: George Subject: FTE Perf - 385 Series Factory Pushrods Tom Monroe's Book 68-69 8.70 69-72 8.67 73-80 8.62 CJ, SCJ, Police, 460 Police 70-72 8.55 73-74 8.55 75-78 8.67 Deck height and CC changes dictated the valve geometry. When I rebuilt my first 429 with parts from PAW, I used the wrong length and shorted the cam lift and it's durations. I knew the block's deck height, piston stroke and head CC. Like most back yard mechanics, my primary goal was to get it together so I could stand on it. Took me awhile to discover the valve train is the most important consideration in a quest for easy HP. Thanks to the lists and some further experience, I won't put any more money into a performance engine without using a measurable pushrod and ordering them cut to size. George Miller == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 21:39:25 -0800 From: "Dave & Debby Anderson" Subject: Re: FTE Perf - 385 Series Factory Pushrods >Tom Monroe's Book > >68-69 8.70 >69-72 8.67 >73-80 8.62 > These are listed backwards, aren't they? As deck height increases, I would think the pushrod's gotta be longer to reach (assuming the heads aren't made shorter). Dave == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ End of perf-list-digest V2 #2 ***************************** +--------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance ----------------+ | Send posts to perf-list To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|