|
|
perf-list-digest Saturday, May 29 1999 Volume 02 : Number 129 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe perf-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: FTE Perf - Burning points Re: FTE Perf - Gear lube FTE Perf - Re: FTE 80-96 - 89 351 surge problem, still, update FTE Perf - questions from a shade tree mechanic to the pros out there ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 09:12:37 -0400 From: am14 Subject: FTE Perf - Burning points Dennis writes: >>A friend of mine has a 70 Ranchero with a 351 Cleveland in it. He's having trouble with burning up points every 3 to 4 months. I told him maybe switching to a petronix unit would help. Any suggestions on what is wrong and a solution. Seems like I remember that an inoperative Capacitor (open - missing - too small) will do this. Also running all the time in the "start" mode (12V on primary) will do it. The Electronic Ign would definately stop this, but it can be prevented otherwise. Something is definately not right with his system. Azie Ardmore, Al. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 08:33:21 -0500 From: Steve Randa Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Gear lube Well I got the Tractech C-Locker and the 4.10s in and I love it. It doesn't make as much noise as I thought. Quieter than the Powertrax locker I had in it. I ended up using the studs and girdle off the Mustang too. Might as well, since I'll be unloading it for a 9" soon. Oh BTW, I just went ahead and used the synthetic lube. Steve Randa '84 F150 William S Hart wrote: > > > Also let me know what you decide, it feels like the detroit in the rear may > be comin up soon for my truck as well ... > > Just my 2cents > > wish > > Links http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish/links.html > '73 1/2 ton 4x4 Ford http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish/truck.html > '96 Mustang GT http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish/mustang.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 13:36:22 -0500 From: Steve Randa Subject: FTE Perf - Re: FTE 80-96 - 89 351 surge problem, still, update I've got an AOD in my '84 and need to change the speedo driven gear. Does anyone know if the tranny has a 7 or an 8 drive gear in it? Steve Randa '84 F150 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 16:50:48 PDT From: "Aaron Martin" Subject: FTE Perf - questions from a shade tree mechanic to the pros out there Today I spent some time tinkering with the truck(v-10 sc,lb), changing oil, cleaining up interior, etc. Anyway, as happens when I do that sort of thing, I start to look at things a wonder how they can be reingeneered for improvements. First of all, while I know what backpressure is, I only vaguely remember the explanation of why some is better than none. How will my hp and torque change as back pressure is reduced, and where will they go in reference to my rpms. Second, I was looking at the air intake and it appears as though a well placed hole behind the grill on the upper right hand side would help create a ram air effect. I'm sure I could expect more bugs in my air cleaner, but I'm more concerned about driving in a heavy rain. Could I suck in enough water to damage the engine? Besides the search for "free" power I am planning to add a K&N air filter, modify the exhaust, and likely add a chip. I'm tempted to transfer a spare bottle of N2O from the mustang (runs 11.20's) but realistically that probably wont happen. I'm open to all suggestions, my main restrictions are the thing still needs to tow 8,000 lbs around and appear stock (read that as no dual pipes out the back, or anywhere else). Also, any possible increase in mileage would be excellent. _______________________________________________________________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.msn.com == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ End of perf-list-digest V2 #129 ******************************* +--------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance ----------------+ | Send posts to perf-list To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|