|
|
perf-list-digest Friday, September 11 1998 Volume 01 : Number 085 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe perf-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: FTE Perf - Shock Absorber replacement Re: FTE Perf - Marine Engines FTE Perf - 514 crate engine/C6 FTE Perf - Galling and spinning FTE Perf - Shocks Re: FTE Perf - Shock Absorber replacement RE: FTE Perf - Marine Engines RE: FTE Perf - Shock Absorber replacement RE: FTE Perf - Shock Absorber replacement RE: FTE Perf - 514 crate engine/C6 FTE Perf - Tires RE: FTE Perf - 514 crate engine/C6 FTE Perf - shock absorber replacement Re: FTE Perf - Tires ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 08:03:39 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Shock Absorber replacement From: Andrew Chung Subject: FTE Perf - Shock Absorber replacement Date sent: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 20:11:43 -0700 > I'm looking to replace all four shock absorbers on my '98 Explorer. The > body sways too much in turns and the rebound from the factory shocks is > too stiff. I haul a lot of people around during trips and rides around Does it have both anti-sway bars? Body roll is usually not controlled by the shocks but by the springs and sway bars. Shocks have an effect when dips and uneven spots in the road come along as to how far it will go and how quickly it will return which can be affected by rebound for sure but if it's wollowing in turns then I'd upgrade the sway bars first or stiffen the springs. Another option would be air shocks which give you some adjustability. The advantage of shocks like the bilsteins is that they are custom built and can be changed to suit differing applications or terrain but they are very expensive. The RS-9000's are adjustable but not separately like the bilsteins. RTC can probably answer this but I believe the adjuster only controlls compression. Remember that after market shocks are one size (or rating) fits all where as OEM shocks are carefully tested and fited to the application in very specific ways and are generally good quality. (we used to manufacture them here). The general rule is springs control compression and shocks control rebound so most shocks have very little compression damping. If rebound is a problem and you have wollowing in turns then the springs are very suspect IMHO :-) 78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6, 235's "The Ex-Black Hole" 78 Bronco 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's "The Black Hole" 78 LIncoln Continental, 460, C-6, 19.5' long! "The Future.." :-) 9000#, in ground vehicle lift, Woooo Hoooo! - -- Gary -- == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 08:09:43 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Marine Engines Date sent: Wed, 09 Sep 1998 19:17:56 -0500 From: "wild.bunch" Subject: FTE Perf - Marine Engines > Oil control is also a problem if the pan is not baffled correctly. It's a 455 Ol** engine and my first thought is oil control since he's both spinning bearings and galling pistons and developing blow by (which of course can be improperly fit rings or honning of cylinders too). This guy is rather eccentric but seems to be well read on the subject, just not sure of his "inherent" mechanical ability or intuition so it's hard to read between the lines when he trys to describe a problem. He also tightens his aluminum water cooled exhaust manifolds as tight as he can so they won't leak. I tried discussing this with him too but.........:-( He gets the bolts so tight they embed the heads in the aluminum :-) 78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6, 235's "The Ex-Black Hole" 78 Bronco 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's "The Black Hole" 78 LIncoln Continental, 460, C-6, 19.5' long! "The Future.." :-) 9000#, in ground vehicle lift, Woooo Hoooo! - -- Gary -- == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: 10 Sep 1998 09:44:37 -0400 From: John.L.Johnson Subject: FTE Perf - 514 crate engine/C6 How difficult would be it be to swap the 514 into my 76 F350 with 460/C6; any adapters req'd to interface with the C6?; how about PS, alt. and A/C brackets? Any discussion of pros and cons re. this swap would be appreciated. John in N. VA == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 10:19:25 -0400 From: am14 Subject: FTE Perf - Galling and spinning Gary writes: >> A work associate is having trouble spinning bearings and galling pistons at 4500-5500 rpm. That doesn't seem right to me? I will say it's not a ford but I'm just curious what would cause this? Lack of oil - Lack of oil - Lack of oil !.!.!. Can't say it enough - Lack of oil.. Either insufficient oil volume or too tight clearances. These are the only things I am aware of that will cause either of the problems your associate is experienceing. All the spun bearings I've seen seized 1st (lack of oil) then spun. Galled pistons are merely too tight for the amount of oil supplied. I'd say he probably has an oil passage restriction somewhere in his engine since he is experiencing both, or a bad oil pump(and surely he checked the pump/guage pressure). Azie Ardmore, Al. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 10:27:18 -0400 From: am14 Subject: FTE Perf - Shocks Andrew Chung writes: >>I'm looking to replace all four shock absorbers on my '98 Explorer. The body sways too much in turns and the rebound from the factory shocks is too stiff. You might want to try a rear stabilizer bar. This is the best method of keeping the vehicle from "swaying". Will stiffen the ride even more though!.!.!.!. Azie Ardmore, Al. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 10:48:08 +0000 From: Garr&Pam Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Shock Absorber replacement Andrew Chung wrote: > > I'm looking to replace all four shock absorbers on my '98 Explorer. The > body sways too much in turns and the rebound from the factory shocks is too > stiff. I haul a lot of people around during trips and rides around town > and they have started really noticing the bad shocks. I've looked at a few > brands but I would like to get some advice from people who have done shock > replacements about which brand/model and why they chose the shock they did. > I'm not gong to be towing a large amount of cargo. Mostly city/highway > driving and carrying 4 people around. I do take trips to Tahoe and > Yosemite and I plan on some more road trips in the future. I also plan on > doing some light off road driving, nothing extreme. > I've looked at the Edelbrock IAS shocks, Monroe Sensatrak shocks, and > Rancho 9000s. A friend has also recommended either Bilstein or OME. Any > help would be appreciated. For your application I would go with the Edelbrocks! Bilsteins if I was looking for handling over ride but I think Edelbrocks offers the best combination of both! Chris == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 10:27:21 -0400 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: FTE Perf - Marine Engines overrev is easy to cure. almost all ignition aftermarket companies have rev limiters, and any good aftermarket ignition for high performance has one built in. oil control is harder to deal with, and as for #1, there ain't nothing to do about that! but, even with rev control the engine is saved when the prop gets air, but when it hits the water again it is hard on all the componants from the prop to the damper. sleddog - ---------- From: wild.bunch[SMTP:wild.bunch Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 1998 8:17 PM To: perf-list Subject: FTE Perf - Marine Engines Marine engines work in a very tough world for two reasons: 1. They require continuous power, like aircraft, not intermittent power like cars. 2. They over rev very easily when the prop comes out of the water. Oil control is also a problem if the pan is not baffled correctly. tim == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 10:35:20 -0400 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: FTE Perf - Shock Absorber replacement i am partial to the rancho 9000. i use them on my last pull truck (no $$$ for them on new one yet) and on my street truck that i use for long trips, heavy cargo, towing close to the 20,000# cgvw, and some off road, etc. the adjustability is nice. i find i have 3 positions i use on my street truck. position 3 all round for my general driving. positon 2 all round for taking SWMBO for trips, and 3 front, 4 back for towing. on my 77 f150 w 6" lift the rancho's 9000 in front made it handle and ride like a new truck. ran position 3 or 4 on street, 5 for pulling (also pos 5 on street truck when it pulled the sled) i find adjustability important, as a shock tht is good for me, may not be for someone else. sleddog ps-never experienced any kind of shock fading or such even with fenderwell headers running VERY close o them. - ---------- From: Andrew Chung[SMTP:acchung Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 1998 11:11 PM To: 'fordnatics Cc: 'perf-list Subject: FTE Perf - Shock Absorber replacement I'm looking to replace all four shock absorbers on my '98 Explorer. The body sways too much in turns and the rebound from the factory shocks is too stiff. I haul a lot of people around during trips and rides around town and they have started really noticing the bad shocks. I've looked at a few brands but I would like to get some advice from people who have done shock replacements about which brand/model and why they chose the shock they did. I'm not gong to be towing a large amount of cargo. Mostly city/highway driving and carrying 4 people around. I do take trips to Tahoe and Yosemite and I plan on some more road trips in the future. I also plan on doing some light off road driving, nothing extreme. I've looked at the Edelbrock IAS shocks, Monroe Sensatrak shocks, and Rancho 9000s. A friend has also recommended either Bilstein or OME. Any help would be appreciated. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 10:45:23 -0400 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: FTE Perf - Shock Absorber replacement mine *feel* like they stiffen both directions. and they also DONOT have any preload. (ie they stay where you put them, not springing out after you compress them.) in fact i think the display at OK 4wd had one with a handle on it to move it, and they got stiffer in both comp, and rebound. sleddog - ---------- From: Gary, 78 BBB[SMTP:gpeters3 Sent: Thursday, September 10, 1998 4:03 AM To: perf-list Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Shock Absorber replacement The advantage of shocks like the bilsteins is that they are custom built and can be changed to suit differing applications or terrain but they are very expensive. The RS-9000's are adjustable but not separately like the bilsteins. RTC can probably answer this but I believe the adjuster only controlls compression. - -- Gary -- == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 10:54:05 -0400 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: FTE Perf - 514 crate engine/C6 easy as pie! pulle the 460, drop in the crate engine, hook up the carb, ignition, fill with fluids, prime it, start it, enjoy it! ok, maybe i siplified it but basically the crate engine is a truck 460 with really good parts. so, the only thing i am unsure of really is the oil pan that it comes with. that may need changing along with the oil pump pickup then too. you also need some front end parts like pulleys and such i think. all accesories should bolt up no problem AFAIK the aluminum heads have the stock mounting locations. PROS: easy big torque and power and extremely high testosterone levels associated with showing the above to eveyone. looks stock to most people, noone knows it ain't a 460, and even the CJ heads could be hidden if you wish. CONS: costs more than a 460cid build. will use alot of high test gas. sleddog - ---------- From: John.L.Johnson Sent: Thursday, September 10, 1998 9:44 AM To: Reply requested Subject: FTE Perf - 514 crate engine/C6 How difficult would be it be to swap the 514 into my 76 F350 with 460/C6; any adapters req'd to interface with the C6?; how about PS, alt. and A/C brackets? Any discussion of pros and cons re. this swap would be appreciated. John in N. VA == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 07:31:53 -0800 From: Alex Subject: FTE Perf - Tires Help !!!! Can anyone give me the part number for an owners manual for a '79 F-250 Supercab........and does anyone know what the largest size tires I can put on the same stock afore mentioned 2 wheel drive truck ??????? Alex Cline Fairbanks, Alaska '79 F-250 Supercab, 460,C-6 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 11:47:00 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: RE: FTE Perf - 514 crate engine/C6 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: FTE Perf - 514 crate engine/C6 Date sent: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 10:54:05 -0400 > CONS: > costs more than a 460cid build. will use alot of high test gas. There's no testosterone boost from doing the work yourself :-( and researching all the parts and......and.......:-( This is the part I like, driving it is like the icing on a very rich, self supporting cake (one that doesn't need any icing that is). I only need to drive it once and I'm ready for the next project :- ) 78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6, 235's "The Ex-Black Hole" 78 Bronco 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's "The Black Hole" 78 LIncoln Continental, 460, C-6, 19.5' long! "The Future.." :-) 9000#, in ground vehicle lift, Woooo Hoooo! - -- Gary -- == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 08:57:39 PDT From: "Michael Krause" Subject: FTE Perf - shock absorber replacement Andrew- Don't go with the Monroe Sense-a-traks. I put them on my '91 Explorer a little more than a year ago and am not pleased with the overall ride after installing them. I couldn't tell the difference between the new Monroe's and the old original shocks. I should have paid the extra 50 bucks and gotten a set of Bilsteins. That's what I'm planning on doing in a few months. If you need a place to look for them I know that Auto Zone now carries them though I don't know what they want for them. A company called IPD(www.ipdusa.com) sells them for pretty cheap and they are really good. I've dealt with them before when I got my sway bars and they are really cooperative and have great customer service. If you need any other information e-mail me direct. Hope this helps. Mike Krause sharktooth_76 ______________________________________________________ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 21:33:41 -0400 (EDT) From: DUBCO To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|