 |
|
|
|
|
|
Please do not repost, forward or otherwise publish messages contained in these archives without consent from the respective author(s). These archives may not, in whole or part, be stored on any public retrieval system (FTP, web, gopher, newsgroup, etc.) by individuals or companies, without consent of the respective authors. Received: with LISTAR (v0.128a; list perf-list); Mon, 22 May 2000 10:31:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 10:31:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Ford Truck Enthusiasts List Server To: perf-list digest users Reply-to: perf-list  ford-trucks.com Subject: perf-list Digest V2000 #66 Precedence: bulk ========================================================== Ford Truck Enthusiasts Performance, Hot-Rod and Custom Truck Mailing List Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com To unsubscribe, send email to: listar ford-trucks.com with the words "unsubscribe perf-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== ------------------------------------ perf-list Digest Fri, 19 May 2000 Volume: 2000 Issue: 066 In This Issue: Re: Carb Q Re: Carb Q Re: HO or NO?(351W) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: JUMPINFORD aol.com Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 20:53:48 EDT Subject: Re: Carb Q Id go with the 390, that will suit your needs best, as the 500 will allow for no torque, and the 600 is just too big. That lil 390 is a helluva carb, got one on my bros 300, works great, good cruise mileage too. Darrell Duggan 74 F-350 "Tweety" 460 4 speed ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 20:33:42 -0500 From: Buck Shoff Subject: Re: Carb Q Tim, I think it would be hard to get the 600 E-brock lean enough for the little 2.8. Just my 2 cents. Buck Shoff Tim Turner wrote: > > '85 2.8; beter to use a 390 4-V Holley (ugh..), retune a 600 4-V Edelbrock or > 500 2-V Holley for a stock to near stock engine that sees some use requiring > low RPM oopmh in the sand? ------------------------------ From: "wish" Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 14:31:47 GMT Subject: Re: HO or NO?(351W) >I have a 1987 351W in my 1984 F-150. >it is a fuel injected engine with all fuel injected and computer parts taken off. >it has a edelbrock600,mallory ignition and distributor,K and N filter. >would this engine be an HO with the slightly proted heads or what since it was an >fuel injected engine. I don't remember an HO Fuel Injected 351, unless you want to count the 95 Cobra R's as being HO's and not Cobras ... the only other "high performance" 351 really was the Lightning ... at least that I remember right now, there may've been a PI version in the Crown Vic's, but that was likely a very short lived motor ... > WAIT, i just though of something didn't the injected 351Ws not come out till later?? Define injected ... the throttle body injection system wasn't on the 351 that I've ever seen, but multi port came with all the others in 87 as far as I know ... > i know the 302 were in 84 i think but when were the windsors Uhm, the 302 is a Windsor and it didn't get multi-port until 86 in the Mustang's, maybe 85 in the trucks ... > and would a 87 be an HO becuase this motor will fly it had No, like I said before HO's were 302's, they had a different intake manifold and cam, you can identify them quickly by the firing order, if you put the wrong order on there it won't run quite right ... >84 351W 2V that was good but nothing like this motor. The 4V modification alone is probably making it run harder, if you changed the cam, there's your answer entirely ... also what shape is the new motor in compared with the older one, the compression ratio's might've even gone up a bit because of the addition of fuel injection ... all kinds of variables in here, and since you've added stuff you've really mixed the thing up ... Just my $.02 wish 96 Mustang GT 5spd 4.6L 73ish 1/2ton 4x4 6.4L http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish Ford Truck Enthusiasts http://www.ford-trucks.com ------------------------------ End of perf-list Digest V2000 #66 ********************************* ---------------------------------------------------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts Performance, Hot-Rod and Custom Truck List Send posts to perf-list ford-trucks.com If you ever want to remove yourself from this mailing list, send an email to: listar ....To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. 
|