Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 
....


To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts

Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are not registered, click here to register.
If you are already registered, you can login here.

If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.




Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.




Please do not repost, forward or otherwise publish messages
contained in these archives without consent from the respective
author(s). These archives may not, in whole or part, be stored on
any public retrieval system (FTP, web, gopher, newsgroup, etc.) by
individuals or companies, without consent of the respective authors.

Received: with LISTAR (v0.128a; list perf-list); Fri, 18 Feb 2000 10:20:20 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 10:20:20 -0500 (EST)
From: Ford Truck Enthusiasts List Server ford-trucks.com>
To: perf-list digest users ford-trucks.com>
Reply-to: perf-list ford-trucks.com
Subject: perf-list Digest V2000 #6
Precedence: bulk

==========================================================
Ford Truck Enthusiasts Performance, Hot-Rod and Custom
Truck Mailing List

Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com

To unsubscribe, send email to: listar ford-trucks.com with
the words "unsubscribe perf-list" in the subject of the
message.
==========================================================

------------------------------------
perf-list Digest Wed, 16 Feb 2000 Volume: 2000 Issue: 006

In This Issue:
Truck bed mess
Frame
Re: 429 engine numbers
Re: 429 engine numbers
compression ratio
Re: compression ratio
Re: Frame
Re: compression ratio
Carb for an 1984 302 HO
body changing

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: galaxie63 juno.com
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 19:29:49 -0600
Subject: Truck bed mess

> From: L7514 aol.com
> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 19:05:53 EST
> Subject: looking for a good truck bed
> Hi, I have a rust free bed with few minor dents that I got through a
purchase
> of another truck.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------
Lance, unless he really hacked the floor up, I'd stay with that rust free
bed. Changing out the sides is a BIG job, not for the faint of heart. If
YOU can't fix the holes, have a bodyman do it. You / he might be able to
use peices from your old floor, (just cut a peice with a cutoff wheel,
weld it in, and make new holes) If the repairs aren't pretty, just put a
bed mat over it. You can also buy a whole bed floor, but they sure aren't
cheap. Saw a NOS one at Indy this summer for $600. (67-72)
Good luck, Phil ( puting new floor in 64 F-100...now)
________________________________________________________________





------------------------------

From: "Joel Thomas" prodigy.net>
Subject: Frame
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 18:41:18 -0600


I am looking to buy a 88 f250 frame for my big truck project.
it has the full floating HD rear axle stock.
it is a diesel with a c6.
and 2wd

how hard would it be to bolt on my 1984 f150 cab
351W/T-18/NP208
and make the frontend(2wd)
to a 4wd
i think they are just leaf springs on the front end
so couldn't i just put and axle under there then run the
driveshaft and make it 4wd
are the 2wd frames different than 4wd
and also how do i know if this is a strong f250 frame
becuase i have been told there are three different f250s

a light duty with heavyduty rear springs and more heavier one
then the heavydutiest one which would this be???


thanks
Joel Thomas
Little Rock,AR


------------------------------

Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 02:35:50 +0100 (MET)
From: Bas van der Veer dds.nl>
Subject: Re: 429 engine numbers



Op Mon, 14 Feb 2000, George Miller schreef:

> I believe the 462 is totally different and prior to the 429/460 385
series. I know production of the 429 started for Ford vehicles in '68 but
am not sure about Lincoln's start date. Maybe the wrong owner's manual?
Get a head casting number and you can be sure of what it is.

Just found out a little more about the 462-460 issue. Ford started mfg of
the 460 in '68, but used up their remaining stock of 462s. There were
~7700 continentals built, not sure how many had the 462. But that
explains why my manual says 462. But since my engine says 460 on it, I'm
pretty sure that's what it is. Besides, my mechanic ordered a 460
crankshaft seal for it and it fit. Thank god! Don't want a motor that's
been taken out of production 32 years ago.

Question: what is the compression ratio and horsepower rating of those
early (68) 460's? My engine says 10 deg btdc timing, can I safely set that
and still run pump gas?


> There are still a bunch of original 429/460 T-Birds and Lincolns with
11.3:1 C/R running around on pump gas. I'd think that if the timing had
been retarded, it wouldn't idle as smoothly as you describe.

Sure hope that's the case Whow 11.3:1 should give some awesome power &
gas mileage.

> The best source for this ID would have been The Ford V-8 Workshop
website, but the owner recently took it off the web.

Too bad. I should get a good manual to start with.


------------------------------

From: Sleddog epix.net>
Subject: Re: 429 engine numbers
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 21:03:48 -0500

Well, I sure am happy 460 parts are more available around my area. Not