|
|
Return-Path: From: fordtrucks-digest-request Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 00:56:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: t3.media3.net: lof set sender to fordtrucks-digest-request Subject: fordtrucks-digest Digest V97 #127 X-Loop: fordtrucks-digest X-Mailing-List: archive/volume97/127 X-Distributed-By: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.lofcom.com/ To: fordtrucks-digest Reply-To: fordtrucks ------------------------------ Content-Type: text/plain fordtrucks-digest DigestVolume 97 : Issue 127 Today's Topics: Re: Ok here's my theroy.... ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: gauges, P.S. ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] gauges [John Strauss gauges [billjhs ] Re: gauges ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: gauges ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: gauges [sdelanty Re: gauges ["Terry R Sherman" Re: disc brake problems... fixed (so [rick Re: Ford rears ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] thanks [DC Beatty Re: Reverse/Neutral switch ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: 48 F1 F1 F1 F1 Overheating [JRFiero Re: Ford rears [mcat Re: Ford rears ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: 56 Front Grill Wanted [JSanc82344 Re: 1967 330 engine and 4spd trans [OldTrux Re: Ok here's my theroy.... [Daver ] Re: thanks [Ken Payne ] Re: Ford rears [Daver ] Administrivia: ____________________________________________________________________ Message distributed via http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.lofcom.com/ For help send mail with subject "HELP" to:fordtrucks-digest-request Comments and suggestions are welcome, use: kpayne ____________________________________________________________________ ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 08:19:31 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: Ok here's my theroy.... Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 07:45:18 -0500 > From: Daver > Subject: Re: Ok here's my theroy.... > Sportsman class, if memory serves me correctly, allows NOS and also > allows additives in the fuel and the cars you are talkinig about I > assume is the NHRA sportsman class. Let me explane how this works. Sorry, I should have been more clear. I was talking about circle dirt track like Oak Shade or Toledo. I don't have first hand informantion or experience, this was told to me by one who is currently campaigning one. I can see how you can get a rich engine to run cooler but what about preignition or spark knock? -- Gary Peters -- (Mine)78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6 (Mine)78 Bronco, 4wd, 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's (Daughter's)92 Tempo (Daughter's)92 T-Bird (Wife's)94 T-Bird (Son's)90 F-150, I6 (Son's)76 Blue Bird School bus All mine to work on, maintain etc.. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 08:51:31 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: gauges, P.S. Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 07:58:56 -0500 > From: Daver > Subject: Re: gauges, P.S. > If I am not mistaken 6v systems run higher amperage so will simple > deviding the voltage w/o raising amps lead to an accurate reading on > the gauges? What makes things work with electricity is actually the result of both called "Wattage". More voltage CAN push more amperage through a given resistance (load) to ground which produces more heat etc. but this effect can be controlled with resistance. A rough example might be a 6v motor uses a certain size wire and so many wraps and a 12v motor uses half the diameter wire size and twice as many wraps to do the same job which requires the same "Wattage" regardless. Since watts(W) = volts(E) * amps(I) and E = IR(resistance) if you increase the resistance the amperage will fall unless you increase the voltage since I = E/R. The bottom line is that the ballast resistor must be capable of handling the amperage the load will impose on it regardless of voltage, in this case the guages which I speculate will draw considerably less than the ignition system it was designed for. -- Gary Peters -- (Mine)78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6 (Mine)78 Bronco, 4wd, 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's (Daughter's)92 Tempo (Daughter's)92 T-Bird (Wife's)94 T-Bird (Son's)90 F-150, I6 (Son's)76 Blue Bird School bus All mine to work on, maintain etc.. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 07:53:46 -0500 From: John Strauss To: Ford Trucks List Subject: gauges Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Does anyone know a good way to use 6v gauges on a 12v system. I have NO experience with this but couldn't you hook 2 of the gauges in series? _ _| ~~. John Strauss \, _} jstrauss \( Texas Fight! ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 09:27:05 -0400 From: billjhs To: fordtrucks Subject: gauges Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I have seen many responses to the gauge question but what values would be suited for the 12v to 6v conversion for the gauges??? billjhs 1951 F-1 ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 10:06:48 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: gauges Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT > Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 07:53:46 -0500 > From: John Strauss > Subject: gauges > >Does anyone know a good way to use 6v gauges on a 12v system. > > I have NO experience with this but couldn't you hook 2 of the gauges > in series? In theory it would cut the amperage in half it would also reduce the voltage to the second gauge in the series by the resistance of the first one so it would not function correctly. I've played with resistors some and discovered they heat up in direct proportion to the amount of work they have to do to reduce the amperage and voltage input so heat sinking them will get the job done up to a point. Choosing the right type of resistor is important as well. One advantage of the ballast resistor is that it is a ferrite wound coil which has the added advantage of reducing or "Choking" harmonic noise which should help with the gauges operation. -- Gary Peters -- (Mine)78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6 (Mine)78 Bronco, 4wd, 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's (Daughter's)92 Tempo (Daughter's)92 T-Bird (Wife's)94 T-Bird (Son's)90 F-150, I6 (Son's)76 Blue Bird School bus All mine to work on, maintain etc.. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 10:36:46 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: gauges Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT > Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 09:27:05 -0400 > From: billjhs > Subject: gauges > Hi, I have seen many responses to the gauge question but what > values would be suited for the 12v to 6v conversion for the > gauges??? Tom Cloud on our bronco list would be much better at answering this one but if I were to do it I'd hook it up to the battery with the engine running and see what comes out the other end (to ground) with a multimeter. If I got between 6 and 8 volts with the engine reved up a bit I'd be happy I think. -- Gary Peters -- (Mine)78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6 (Mine)78 Bronco, 4wd, 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's (Daughter's)92 Tempo (Daughter's)92 T-Bird (Wife's)94 T-Bird (Son's)90 F-150, I6 (Son's)76 Blue Bird School bus All mine to work on, maintain etc.. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 09:17:38 -0700 From: sdelanty To: FORDTRUCKS Subject: Re: gauges Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" The question is asked: >Does anyone know a good way to use 6v gauges on a 12v system. Its a 1951 >f-1 ford and the gauges are bi-metallic. I tried a solid state >regulator, but the gauge burned it out.Any ideas???? Thanks Bill There are several ways, depending on how much current Your gauges draw. First, what regulator did You burn out? Did it have adequate heat sinking? Input and output capacitors to protect it from volt spikes? For gauges that draw a *total* of less than 1 amp, a 7806 should be O.K. For gauges that draw less than 1 amp each but more than 1 amp total, You can use one 7806 on *each* gauge. (4 gauges uses 4 regulators..) or: You can build a simple high current regulator from a zener diode, a high current darlington transistor, a resistor and 2 capacitors. There's other methods as well, including building a nice switching regulator (efficient, but complex) or using a resistor to drop voltage (cheap and dirty) I can't really recommend the resistor method since V = I*R and so the voltage varies with current load. They work O.K. for some things, but are my *last* choice by a long shot.... For bimetalic style gauges, I would probably build the zener/darlington regulator. It's a very simple circuit and can be built to handle 10 amps or more. (with adequate heat sinking) I've used this circuit many times on VW 6 to 12v conversions. (to run the 6v wiper motor) I will describe or draw it for You if You want but my ASCII art skills are pretty poor, so be warned... There's 3.415 BTU's in a watt-hour and You will likely be dissipating 5 to 15 watts so whatever method You choose will generate considerable heat. (except the switching regulator) A decent heat sink and input/output protection capacitors are a must for the electronic regulators. If You want more info about any of these methods, just ask. Happy motoring, Steve Delanty 1971 F100 shortbox, FE390, T-18 4-speed ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 11:23:12 -0500 From: "Terry R Sherman" To: Subject: Re: gauges Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hooking them in parallel will half the wattage, hooking them in series will half the voltage. If you get a 12v to 6v transformer... I think you understand... Thank You, Terry Sherman terbear '76 Ford Highboy... ---------- > From: John Strauss > To: Ford Trucks List > Subject: gauges > Date: Friday, July 25, 1997 7:53 AM > > >Does anyone know a good way to use 6v gauges on a 12v system. > > I have NO experience with this but couldn't you hook 2 of the gauges in series? > > > _ > _| ~~. John Strauss > \, _} jstrauss > \( Texas Fight! > > > ____________________________________________________________________ > Message distributed via http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.lofcom.com/ > For help send mail with subject "HELP" to:fordtrucks-request > Comments and suggestions are welcome, use: kpayne > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 12:02:06 -0500 (CDT) From: rick To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: disc brake problems... fixed (sort of) Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ken, > I've checked out the page. Not bad! You want a link to your > pages on our links page? No. It is kind of refreshing *not* to read about Mustangs :-). rick '66 Mustang coupe '71 F100 daily driver -- Rick Larson rick Minneapolis ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 14:34:03 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" To: fordtrucks Cc: bigbroncos com Subject: Re: Ford rears Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Just got the following reply from TSM in response to a question about OEM adapters for the rear disk brakes so all OEM parts with the exception of the mount frame or backing plate could be used. Here is their reply: > Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 13:30:13 -0400 (EDT) > From: TSMMFG > To: gpeters3 > Subject: Re: Ford rears > TSM MFG. CO. INC. > 4321 E. WILLOW CREEK ROAD > CASTLE ROCK CO 80104-9766 > (303) 688-6882 FAX (303) 660-4660 > > ...YOU CAN SEE OUR CATALOG ON WWW.MIRACLEMILE.COM Look under Coming > Attractions!... > > Gary, > Thank you for your E:Mail inquiry. In answer to your > questions We > have 3 different kits for the same Ford 9" axle because there are > three different bearing ends. Our kit uses a G.M. Caliper. > Unfortuneately, we have no idea what Ford backing plates would fit > on those housings. > > Sincerely, > Cliff > Jones > President > And I'm still looking for some info on my plan to use FORD parts, not GM for my rear brake conversion! Anybody got any clues? -- Gary Peters -- (Mine)78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6 (Mine)78 Bronco, 4wd, 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's (Daughter's)92 Tempo (Daughter's)92 T-Bird (Wife's)94 T-Bird (Son's)90 F-150, I6 (Son's)76 Blue Bird School bus All mine to work on, maintain etc.. ------------------------------ Date: 24 Jul 97 23:08:25 EDT From: DC Beatty To: "'FORD TRUCKS'" Subject: thanks Message-ID: I would like to say thanks to everyone on the list who helped me out with my questions, etc. I have my '67 up and running. It still has quite the stuck lifter noise, but I'm driving it around as my regular vehicle. Thanks all!! I am still having trouble with the backup lights though. If the backup light switch is integral with the neutral safety switch, is replacing this switch the most likely cure? All the wiring looks okay. Thanks again for the help, DC Beatty 1967 F-100 352 1974 Maverick 302 ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 15:05:26 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: Reverse/Neutral switch Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT > Date: 24 Jul 97 23:08:25 EDT > From: DC Beatty > Subject: thanks > I am still having trouble with the backup lights though. If the > backup light switch is integral with the neutral safety switch, is > replacing this switch the most likely cure? All the wiring looks > okay. Not sure about that old a vehicle but that's probably true. You can check out the switch if you have a test light with battery by disconnecting it at the plug and checking for continuity between the pins on the switch side of the plug with the shifter in park and again in one of the gears other than neutral. First use a 12v, non powered tester to find the hot wire on the truck side of the plug so you know how to test the switch by using it in circuit with the other two pins etc.. Something I find often is that the socket the bulb goes into has a brass tab on the inside to ground the bulb which gets corroded and falls out. You can miss this little gem if you're not specifically looking for it, I have :-( Other things that go wrong are the spring that pushes the contact against the bottom of the bulb. Since these sockets are exposed to lots of junk in spite of their relatively protected enclosure these are high on my list to inspect. With the same test light and a piece of wire the length of the truck you can also check the wire continuity. Also, Ford uses a lot of rubber, supposedely self sealing plugs which cause no end of trouble. I've found that silicone grease liberally applied to both sides of the plugs often helps. -- Gary Peters -- (Mine)78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6 (Mine)78 Bronco, 4wd, 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's (Daughter's)92 Tempo (Daughter's)92 T-Bird (Wife's)94 T-Bird (Son's)90 F-150, I6 (Son's)76 Blue Bird School bus All mine to work on, maintain etc.. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 17:57:12 -0400 (EDT) From: JRFiero To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: 48 F1 F1 F1 F1 Overheating Message-ID: I deleted all the earlier posts already, but this is about the '48 F1 (not F100) which overheats on the road. Some good ideas already, 'specially about the collapsed lower hose - that can happen on the flathead V8s, too. Assuming its a V8 - a large part of what makes a flathead V8 hard to keep cool (I supposed its true of any flathead) is the amount of exhaust passage in the block - something like 8' in the 239. If you have a particularly restrictive exhaust, prolonged high rpm running heats things up past the capability of the cooling system. These puppies were never intended to run 60 out on the highway (mine sounds scary at 50). An old flathead trick was to put a divider between the exhaust valves of the middle two cylinders, held in basically by the head bolts. Not an easy task to install, but it reduced reversion for those middle cylinders, and supposedly got the exhaust flowing better. Free horsepower, and cooler running to boot. Someone asked if the fan shroud was in place - that would help a low speed, to keep the fan pulling air through the radiator instead of just pushing the air around in the engine compartment, but it doesn't matter at road speeds. Belt condition and tension is critical on the V8. The faster the rpm, the more they want to slip; they don't contact that much of the circumference of the water pump pulleys; and a lot of people aren't patient enough to set up the two belts correctly. The fan belt is less important than the water pump/generator belt in this situation. I don't remember if you mentioned how you know its overheating. Just the guage? Or does it boil over or something? If I recall, 48 didn't have a pressure cap. They started in '51, with 4 measly pounds or so. When they went to the pressure cap, they changed the calibration of the variable resistance sending unit (one is variable, the other is on/off, for boiling warning). On later trucks it's common for an older (incorrect) sending unit to make the guage read too high - I can't quite figure a combination which would make a 48 read incorrectly, but its possible, I guess. Thats probably not the case if it reads OK most of the time. Mine reads pretty hot all the time, but its not. Even in DC's recent 95-100 degree days it only moved up a little from its normal, which made me pretty happy, although I personally was overheating. You're probably tired of hearing from everybody by now. To recap belts lower hoses timing (always an overheating suspect) exhaust sending unit/guage combo all the standard stuff - pumps, thermos, crud, radiator... ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jul 97 17:49:33 PDT From: mcat To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: Ford rears Message-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Gary, I believe that I might have the answer to your problem. I just made a 4 wheel disc swap on my 56 f-100. The rear was changed to a 67-72 9" truck rear years ago. But this winter I decided to go with disc all around. The front uses mustang caliphers and the rear uses 75-79 lincoln mark 5 caliphers. The swap is easy enough but some what lengthy fo the net. If you want give me a call at 716-326-6050. I`m in western NY I`llbe out for awhile tonight but should be home after 9:00pm. The swap uses all Ford parts on the rear! Garry --- On Fri, 25 Jul 1997 14:34:03 +0000 "Gary, 78 BBB" wrote: >Just got the following reply from TSM in response to a question about >OEM adapters for the rear disk brakes so all OEM parts with the >exception of the mount frame or backing plate could be used. Here is >their reply: > >> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 13:30:13 -0400 (EDT) >> From: TSMMFG >> To: gpeters3 >> Subject: Re: Ford rears > >> TSM MFG. CO. INC. >> 4321 E. WILLOW CREEK ROAD >> CASTLE ROCK CO 80104-9766 >> (303) 688-6882 FAX (303) 660-4660 >> >> ...YOU CAN SEE OUR CATALOG ON WWW.MIRACLEMILE.COM Look under Coming >> Attractions!... >> >> Gary, >> Thank you for your E:Mail inquiry. In answer to your >> questions We >> have 3 different kits for the same Ford 9" axle because there are >> three different bearing ends. Our kit uses a G.M. Caliper. >> Unfortuneately, we have no idea what Ford backing plates would fit >> on those housings. >> >> Sincerely, >> Cliff >> Jones >> President >> > >And I'm still looking for some info on my plan to use FORD parts, not >GM for my rear brake conversion! Anybody got any clues? > > >-- Gary Peters -- > >(Mine)78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6 >(Mine)78 Bronco, 4wd, 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's >(Daughter's)92 Tempo >(Daughter's)92 T-Bird >(Wife's)94 T-Bird >(Son's)90 F-150, I6 >(Son's)76 Blue Bird School bus >All mine to work on, maintain etc.. > > >____________________________________________________________________ >Message distributed via http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.lofcom.com/ >For help send mail with subject "HELP" to:fordtrucks-request >Comments and suggestions are welcome, use: kpayne > > -----------------End of Original Message----------------- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Name: Garry E-mail: mcat Date: 7/25/97 Time: 5:49:33 PM 427 Fe powered 56 F-100 Wild by design ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 18:28:27 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: Ford rears Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT > From: mcat > Date: Fri, 25 Jul 97 17:49:33 PDT > Subject: Re: Ford rears > 75-79 lincoln mark 5 caliphers. The swap is easy enough but some If you're still there, does this swap use stock Lincolin caliper frames or backing plates? I bet those calipers are the same ones they use on the trucks of those years? (I'm hoping anyway :-)) I'll try to call tonight but I have to go to the hospital to visit my wife's cousin's husband who is possibly dying of MS and related complications so I may wait till Tuesday to try to contact you. -- Gary Peters -- (Mine)78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6 (Mine)78 Bronco, 4wd, 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's (Daughter's)92 Tempo (Daughter's)92 T-Bird (Wife's)94 T-Bird (Son's)90 F-150, I6 (Son's)76 Blue Bird School bus All mine to work on, maintain etc.. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 19:26:40 -0400 (EDT) From: JSanc82344 To: fordtrucks cc: JSanc82344 Subject: Re: 56 Front Grill Wanted Message-ID: Yes I will, as soon as I find the 56 grill. I'll let you know. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 19:38:10 -0400 (EDT) From: OldTrux To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: 1967 330 engine and 4spd trans Message-ID: Is that 4 speed a New Process 435? Will it bolt right into my '66 F100 4x4? ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 09:12:52 -0500 From: Daver To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: Ok here's my theroy.... Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Sorry, I should have been more clear. I was talking about circle > dirt track like Oak Shade or Toledo. I don't have first hand > informantion or experience, this was told to me by one who is > currently campaigning one. > > I can see how you can get a rich engine to run cooler but what about > preignition or spark knock? > > -- Gary Peters -- I have a friend that runs a dirt circle in Memphis and you are correct they have heat problems. You have to keep in mind these are called stock classes but they are not. The are limited in the type parts they use but not nessesarily the machine work. These guys are hard to get to when asking about thier cars they do not usually give away thier secrets. Allow me to give you a "stock" combonation from the mini stocks keeping in mind this is an actual combo and the big boys aka sportsman use simular combo's. 2.3L 4 CYL (this is a Pinto engine) [block] leave the stock stroke polish and shot peen the crank. punch block .110 use 350 Chevy connecting rods with ARP rod bolts use AMC std bore 6L pistons (they check this by removig plug and looking in hole they see std stamped on top of piston but it's .110 over) use True seal gapless red head rings use main studs and straps from ARP. Balance and Blue Print [head] shave head .100 or to bottom of intake bolt holes which ever comes first. cc and match chambers flow and do full port job use bronze guides use the large stainless valves comp cam 294 solid and high pressure spings [intake and carb] use lower half of fuel injection manifold polished and ported with 2 BBL addapter and holly 600 cfm 2 BBL carb w/ pluged power valves, 50 cc pump and jets drilled out .125 [exhaust] equal leangth headers (tuned) there are a few other things but you get the idea. This is representitive of what is running at the oval and this little 4 banger is pulling +/- 300 HP at 8500 RPM and they run one gallon av gas with four gallons 93 Ammco (100 octane leaded). There is no pinging if you put enough fuel in wet and use a cold plug. The secret to this is start the fire at the top of the cylinder and let the fuel burn all the way to the bottom it pushes the piston down instead of slaping it down whitch produces horse power. When setting the engine up choose your cam calculate your loss of compression due to valve overlap then decide what compression ratio you need to actually want to run (dynamic compression) the calculate the static compression to allow your dynamic to be were you want it. Example if you calc that you'll loss 2 points of compression to valve overlap and you want to "run" a dynamic compression of 10:1 then your static compression will have to be 12:1. if dynamic comp is to high you get spontanious combustion aka desealing or a ping/preignition. BTW water or steam injection is a trick you can use to raise comp without ping by retarding or slowing the burn. Remember the high octane the slower the burn. There are two ways to figure octane the motor number and the research number. The research number gives the octain at 2000 RPM and does not take into account the higher RPM lean out so it rates at 100 but runs lousy; whereas, the motor number is octian from idle to 6500 RPM. ever notice the little sticker on the pump that says (M + R)/2=octain this means the octain is being calculated at an average of the two numbers. Now I hope I have'nt beat this to death. Sorry Ken no Ford truck spacific content. I'm gonna have to go lay down now. Molater Daver ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 22:27:15 -0400 From: Ken Payne To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: thanks Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 11:08 PM 7/24/97 EDT, you wrote: >I would like to say thanks to everyone on the list who helped me out with my >questions, etc. I have my '67 up and running. It still has quite the stuck >lifter noise, but I'm driving it around as my regular vehicle. Thanks all!! Have you considered some Marvel Mystery oil or engine flush to free up gummed lifters? Sometimes it does the trick. > >I am still having trouble with the backup lights though. If the backup light >switch is integral with the neutral safety switch, is replacing this switch the >most likely cure? All the wiring looks okay. > Yes. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 09:26:12 -0500 From: Daver To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: Ford rears Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Gary, 78 BBB wrote: > > Just got the following reply from TSM in response to a question about > OEM adapters for the rear disk brakes so all OEM parts with the > exception of the mount frame or backing plate could be used. Here is > their reply: > > > Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 13:30:13 -0400 (EDT) > > From: TSMMFG > > To: gpeters3 > > Subject: Re: Ford rears > > > TSM MFG. CO. INC. > > 4321 E. WILLOW CREEK ROAD > > CASTLE ROCK CO 80104-9766 > > (303) 688-6882 FAX (303) 660-4660 > > > > ...YOU CAN SEE OUR CATALOG ON WWW.MIRACLEMILE.COM Look under Coming > > Attractions!... > > > > Gary, > > Thank you for your E:Mail inquiry. In answer to your > > questions We > > have 3 different kits for the same Ford 9" axle because there are.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|