|
|
Return-Path: From: fordtrucks-digest-request Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 08:56:24 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: t3.media3.net: lof set sender to fordtrucks-digest-request Subject: fordtrucks-digest Digest V97 #95 X-Loop: fordtrucks-digest X-Mailing-List: archive/volume97/95 To: fordtrucks-digest Reply-To: fordtrucks ------------------------------ Content-Type: text/plain fordtrucks-digest Digest Volume 97 : Issue 95 Today's Topics: Re: F150 Hesitation ?? [JIM HURD ] Re: Unidentified subject! [JIM HURD ] Re: Badge wars, honey homily [JRFiero Re: '77 F-150 gear ratio [sdelanty Pigeon Forge show coming up [Ken Payne ] Re: 56 F100 power steering [Dan Wentz ] Re: Survey results ["Jim" ] RE: Getting better gas mileage PCV ( [Eric Houkal ] RE: Badge wars, honey homily [Eric Houkal ] sdelanty RE: DRL module ["Jesse Marcellus" Re: Getting better gas mileage PCV ( [Chris North ] Re: 454 in an Econoline????? [Chris North ] RE: DRL module [doggfarm Axle Tag Numbers [Kevin Lindstedt Re: Axle Tag Numbers ["Jim" ] Re: Axle Tag Numbers [Kevin Lindstedt Re: Axle Tag Numbers ["Jim" ] Re: DRL module ["Henry Van Dyke" Administrivia: ____________________________________________________________________ Message distributed via http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.lofcom.com/ For help send mail with subject "HELP" to:fordtrucks-digest-request Comments and suggestions are welcome, use: kpayne ____________________________________________________________________ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 05 May 1997 21:35:46 -0500 (EST) From: JIM HURD To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: F150 Hesitation ?? Message-id: Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Phil, You can use the diagnostic capabilities of the EEV-IV to help you identify the part that is causing the problem so you can "swap it out" if that is necessary. For a basic diagnostic check I don't *think* you need any special instrumentation. At least I don't on the '92 Topaz. I just connect a jumper wire between the SRP (Signal return pin) and the STI (Self-test input) terminal of the EEC-IV connector. With this connection, the MIL (Malfunction Indicator Light - better know as the "check engine light") will flash the trouble codes when you run the KOEO (key-on, engine-off) diagnostic routine. When you run the KOEO test, you will hear the EEC-IV cycle the cooling fan, click numerous selinoids, check various sensors, and then the MIL will flash a code for any thing that it finds out of spec. If you get a flash-flash-flash (code 111) it passed all the tests. After a pause, it will then flash any "continuous memory" codes. These are codes of any problem(s) that the EEC-IV had found in the past while you were driving the vehicle. Again, if you get the flash-flash-flash (code 111), it didn't have any stored codes. The EEC-IV is pretty smart too, cause if it stores a continuous memory code and it doesn't find that problem again after 80 start cycles (you start the engine 80 times) it will clear the code from continuous memory. There is an ER (engine Running) set of tests where the EEC-IV will shut down each fuel injector and measure the rpm drop to identify any cylinder that is not up to snuff. (In the old days, we used to call this a cylinder balance test). It will also ramp the injectors way rich and way lean to check your O2 (Oxygen sensor) to see if it is responding correctly. But now I am getting carried away. Just start off with the KOEO test and see what the EEC-IV tells you. Jim in Central NY '79 F-150 (302!) '92 Topaz (3.0l) ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 05 May 1997 22:00:47 -0500 (EST) From: JIM HURD To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: Unidentified subject! Message-id: Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Douglas, The Holly 0-1850 is a model 4160, non-emissions, universal calibration (1964 & earlier), manual choke, single feed/side hung float bowls, vacuum secondaries, 600CFM. Jim in Central NY '79 F-150 (302!) '92 TOpaz (3.0l) ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 22:05:16 -0400 (EDT) From: JRFiero To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: Badge wars, honey homily Message-ID: I think Ann Landers used to say you could catch more flies with honey than with vinegar, which I intuitively believed. I'm not sure about your 'honey than sh*t,' though. But, I haven't tried it. Better ask Harry. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 19:15:25 -0700 From: sdelanty To: FORDTRUCKS Subject: Re: '77 F-150 gear ratio Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >We received our Ford build sheet today and it said our truck came with a >3.50 conventional rear axle. We are still not very well educated on axle >ratios so could someone explain what this means and if it is considered >high or low? It takes 3.50 turns of the driveshaft to cause one full turn of the wheel. Rear wheel torque is also multiplied by 3.50 (vs. driveshaft torque) conventional rear axle means it's not traction lock. As far as high or low, 3.50 is kind of middle of the road. >Also, we use this truck as a daily driver and light off road. What would >be a better ratio to have? It's all a big trade-off between engine rpm and rear wheel torque. Ideal ratio can depend on *so* many variables, including engine torque curve, vehicle weight, tire size, intended vehicle use, driver preference, phase of the moon, etc. A higher numerical ratio gearset (say 3.73) will usually increase acceleration, and may give better #'s in the 1/4 mile and get You on the freeway faster. It will give You more torque to pull a trailer or heavy loads. It will also make the motor spin faster for a given freeway speed, and may kill some fuel economy and motor longevity. It may also make long trips more obnoxious with the motor spun up faster. A lower numerical ratio (3.25) will do the opposite, slowing down the motor for a given road speed, maybe gaining economy/longevity/long drive comfort in trade for acceleration and pulling power. I rather like the 3.50's in my '71 F100 w/FE390 and T-18 trans. I thought a little about trying some 3.25's to get the RPM's down a little more at freeway speed, and too be able to use 3rd gear to a little higher MPH, but some taller tires helped some in that respect and I lost the urge. Do You feel some need for change? What would You like to accomplish by changing gearsets? Happy motoring, Steve Delanty (sdelanty ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 05 May 1997 22:46:50 -0400 From: Ken Payne To: fordtrucks Subject: Pigeon Forge show coming up Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Someone requested this info: F-100 Nationals in Pigeon Forge, Tennessee This is a fairly large show. Last year over 700 trucks were on display. Many vendors attended the show. The 1997 F-100 Nationals will be held on May 15-17 at the Grand Hotel in Pigeon Forge, Tennessee. For reservations call 1-800-362-1188. Lots of fun and Pigeon Forge is not an expensive town to lodge in. Recommended. I wish I could go this year but my 8 month pregnant wife would not be happy if she had to waddle around the show. -Ken Payne 1967 Ford F100 Custom Cab, 390 FE V8 List maintainer, send me comments and suggestions. Visit the Ford Truck Enthusiast List Web Page (unsubscribe form is there): http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.mindspring.com/~fordtrucks ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 05 May 1997 19:33:54 -0700 From: Dan Wentz To: FORDTRUCKS Subject: Re: 56 F100 power steering Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >What are my chances of finding the right stuff to convert my 56F100 >to power steering? Chances are very good actually :) > I'm just not >certain where I'd find steering boxes and pumps and brackets, >etc. How about "in a junkyard"? ;) Seriously though, I know of 2 ways to do power steering on your truck (apart from an IFS setup). On my 50 F1 I'm in the middle of installing a GM setup (65-75 Saiganaw box). It's a little problematic, and I think if I had to do it over I'd use a Toyota 4x4 box. I have details on both of these setups on my webpage (see sig.) ~Dan 1992 Ford Mustang LX 1950 Ford F1, 351C-2V Check out my F1 page: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.GeoCities.com/MotorCity/3623 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 19:26:32 -0700 From: "Jim" To: Subject: Re: Survey results Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit What ones have the original engines? Oh, is this to much to ask? Will just take a min. wouldn't it? Just Kidding! Thanks for the info! Jim Strigas jstrigas '73 Ford F100 (302 2bbl C4 Auto Ford 9" 3.25. Daily driver) '83 Yamaha XJ900RK (Best Gift of my life! From my best friends! RSCL) '86 Honda GoldWing GL1200 (OK, this part goes here, and this... this... I think goes on the truck.) '77 Buick EstateWagon (Beast of Immense Magnitude!) These are "The Good Old Days"! Be Cool Daddy-O B-)> ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 21:48:04 -0500 From: Eric Houkal To: "'fordtrucks Subject: RE: Getting better gas mileage PCV (The Right Stuff!) Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="---- =_NextPart_000_01BC599F.E7B80440" ------ =_NextPart_000_01BC599F.E7B80440 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ---------- From: Harry Jennings[SMTP:hjennings Sent: Monday, May 05, 1997 6:24 PM To: FORDTRUCKS Subject: Re: Getting better gas mileage PCV (The Right Stuff!) > A felony is anything that is punishable for more than one year in prison. It is NOT a felony to 'tamper' with emissions! No I am not that familiar with FEDERAL laws, only STATE laws. Were I live we have no inspections. Harry. I see. So if you don't get caught it's not a crime. Why does this not surprise me? ____________________________________________________________________ ------ =_NextPart_000_01BC599F.E7B80440 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 eJ8+IiYDAQaQCAAEAAAAAAABAAEAAQeQBgAIAAAA5AQAAAAAAADoAAENgAQAAgAAAAIAAgABBJAG ACQBAAABAAAADAAAAAMAADADAAAACwAPDgAAAAACAf8PAQAAAEkAAAAAAAAAgSsfpL6jEBmdbgDd AQ9UAgAAAABmb3JkdHJ1Y2tzQGxvZmNvbS5jb20AU01UUABmb3JkdHJ1Y2tzQGxvZmNvbS5jb20A AAAAHgACMAEAAAAFAAAAU01UUAAAAAAeAAMwAQAAABYAAABmb3JkdHJ1Y2tzQGxvZmNvbS5jb20A AAADABUMAQAAAAMA/g8GAAAAHgABMAEAAAAYAAAAJ2ZvcmR0cnVja3NAbG9mY29tLmNvbScAAgEL MAEAAAAbAAAAU01UUDpGT1JEVFJVQ0tTQExPRkNPTS5DT00AAAMAADkAAAAACwBAOgEAAAACAfYP AQAAAAQAAAAAAAAD0jcBCIAHABgAAABJUE0uTWljcm9zb2Z0IE1haWwuTm90ZQAxCAEEgAEANgAA AFJFOiBHZXR0aW5nIGJldHRlciBnYXMgbWlsZWFnZSBQQ1YgKFRoZSBSaWdodCBTdHVmZiEpALoR AQWAAwAOAAAAzQcFAAUAFQAwAAQAAQAoAQEggAMADgAAAM0HBQAFABUALgA3AAEAWQEBCYABACEA AAAwRjFDREFBRThCQzVEMDExQjMwRDQ0NDU1MzU0MDAwMAAIBwEDkAYAVAQAABIAAAALACMAAAAA AAMAJgAAAAAACwApAAAAAAADADYAAAAAAEAAOQCgA5vrx1m8AR4AcAABAAAANgAAAFJFOiBHZXR0 aW5nIGJldHRlciBnYXMgbWlsZWFnZSBQQ1YgKFRoZSBSaWdodCBTdHVmZiEpAAAAAgFxAAEAAAAW AAAAAbxZx+uTrtocEMWLEdCzDURFU1QAAAAAHgAeDAEAAAAFAAAAU01UUAAAAAAeAB8MAQAAAA8A AABlcmljdHdAbWNzLmNvbQAAAwAGEGXSPWMDAAcQiQEAAB4ACBABAAAAZQAAAC0tLS0tLS0tLS1G Uk9NOkhBUlJZSkVOTklOR1NTTVRQOkhKRU5OSU5HU0BIT1RNQUlMQ09NU0VOVDpNT05EQVksTUFZ MDUsMTk5NzY6MjRQTVRPOkZPUkRUUlVDS1NATE9GQ08AAAAAAgEJEAEAAAC9AgAAuQIAAB0FAABM WkZ1hQJvt/8ACgEPAhUCqAXrAoMAUALyCQIAY2gKwHNldDI3BgAGwwKDMgPFAgBwckJxEeJzdGVt AoMzdwLkBxMCgH0KgAjPCdk78RYPMjU1AoAKgQ2xC2DgbmcxMDMUUAsKFFE1C/JjAEAgCoUKi2xp CDE4MALRaS0xNJ40DfAM0BzTC1kxNgqg6wNgE9BjBUAtHvcKhx2r6wwwHnZGA2E6H/4edgyChCBI CsByeSBKCfADAwAZEHNbU01UUMg6aGokJUBoHpAAwOUDEC4FoG1dH58grQZgFwIwId8i600CIGRh eUYsBdAqsCAwNSrQMQA5OTcgNjoyNJggUE0mXyCtVG8onwEi60ZPUkRUUlXwQ0tTQBWgEWADcCYC 8yw/J251YiUAHsAuXyLrVFJlM/BHEcB0JFEgRmI2IQSQIGdhBCBtIQMQZWFnZSwAQ1YQIChUaDeg UmlnkmgoMXR1DdAhKRr/eRwDMzYddxpFHnY5LD6hCoVBIGZlFaBuI/DFBAAgAHB5dGg2Uj5wpmEF QD4RcHUDAHMRgP8CYDegAhAFwARgFhA+wgOg+wIgN6B5N3AFwAuAP0AFEGJzAiAuIEk/AwqFTgxP VD4wPZZ0byAnyQGQbXAEkCcgA/A+cJYgE+AEAWkCIHMhB7DFQ9BJPjBtIG4ekD7EPmZEEAMQBzAF wESDRkVgREVSQUwa5gtgdxZzKtACIGwj8FNUQexURUhTQgBXBJA3oEWw9RwwdjegdzegEYBKYUYA 3UFhc0QwHsBFIi45LCOzX0v9Gc8a0EWhEbBlQgBTzUshZkEQCGAgZAIgQ/DDNvARwCBjYXU4ckSQ ficEIEYCQzAFAQeASbFo3yPwUHAHkT5xUbRzCHBBots3oAeAPzq/O8tfVm9Xf39Yj1meOSw5nzqv O7wVMQABXsAAAAADABAQAAAAAAMAERBEAAAAQAAHMEDWOMLHWbwBQAAIMEDWOMLHWbwBHgA9AAEA AAAFAAAAUkU6IAAAAADDMA== ------ =_NextPart_000_01BC599F.E7B80440-- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 22:00:17 -0500 From: Eric Houkal To: "'fordtrucks Subject: RE: Badge wars, honey homily Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="---- =_NextPart_000_01BC599F.EE6E2800" ------ =_NextPart_000_01BC599F.EE6E2800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ---------- From: JRFiero Sent: Monday, May 05, 1997 5:05 PM To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: Badge wars, honey homily I think Ann Landers used to say you could catch more flies with honey than with vinegar, which I intuitively believed. I'm not sure about your 'honey than sh*t,' though. But, I haven't tried it. Better ask Harry. Yes, but Woody Boyd said if you really wanna catch flies nothin' beats dead squirrels ____________________________________________________________________ Message distributed via http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.lofcom.com/ For help send mail with subject "HELP" to:fordtrucks-request Comments and suggestions are welcome, use: kpayne ------ =_NextPart_000_01BC599F.EE6E2800 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 eJ8+IjEDAQaQCAAEAAAAAAABAAEAAQeQBgAIAAAA5AQAAAAAAADoAAENgAQAAgAAAAIAAgABBJAG ACQBAAABAAAADAAAAAMAADADAAAACwAPDgAAAAACAf8PAQAAAEkAAAAAAAAAgSsfpL6jEBmdbgDd AQ9UAgAAAABmb3JkdHJ1Y2tzQGxvZmNvbS5jb20AU01UUABmb3JkdHJ1Y2tzQGxvZmNvbS5jb20A AAAAHgACMAEAAAAFAAAAU01UUAAAAAAeAAMwAQAAABYAAABmb3JkdHJ1Y2tzQGxvZmNvbS5jb20A AAADABUMAQAAAAMA/g8GAAAAHgABMAEAAAAYAAAAJ2ZvcmR0cnVja3NAbG9mY29tLmNvbScAAgEL MAEAAAAbAAAAU01UUDpGT1JEVFJVQ0tTQExPRkNPTS5DT00AAAMAADkAAAAACwBAOgEAAAACAfYP AQAAAAQAAAAAAAAD0jcBCIAHABgAAABJUE0uTWljcm9zb2Z0IE1haWwuTm90ZQAxCAEEgAEAHQAA AFJFOiBCYWRnZSB3YXJzLCBob25leSBob21pbHkAwgkBBYADAA4AAADNBwUABQAWAAAAEQABAAYB ASCAAwAOAAAAzQcFAAUAFQA7ABYAAQBFAQEJgAEAIQAAADE0MUNEQUFFOEJDNUQwMTFCMzBENDQ0 NTUzNTQwMDAwAPcGAQOQBgCoBAAAEgAAAAsAIwAAAAAAAwAmAAAAAAALACkAAAAAAAMANgAAAAAA QAA5AEBluqDJWbwBHgBwAAEAAAAdAAAAUkU6IEJhZGdlIHdhcnMsIGhvbmV5IGhvbWlseQAAAAAC AXEAAQAAABYAAAABvFnJoLGu2hwVxYsR0LMNREVTVAAAAAAeAB4MAQAAAAUAAABTTVRQAAAAAB4A HwwBAAAADwAAAGVyaWN0d0BtY3MuY29tAAADAAYQI8OhIgMABxARAgAAHgAIEAEAAABlAAAALS0t LS0tLS0tLUZST006SlJGSUVST0BBT0xDT01TTVRQOkpSRklFUk9AQU9MQ09NU0VOVDpNT05EQVks TUFZMDUsMTk5NzU6MDVQTVRPOkZPUkRUUlVDS1NATE9GQ09NQ09NUwAAAAACAQkQAQAAACkDAAAl AwAAqAUAAExaRnUe4apG/wAKAQ8CFQKoBesCgwBQAvIJAgBjaArAc2V0MjcGAAbDAoMyA8UCAHBy QnER4nN0ZW0CgzN3AuQHEwKAfQqACM8J2TvxFg8yNTUCgAqBDbELYOBuZzEwMxRQCwoUUTUL8mMA QCAKhQqLbGkIMTgwAtFpLTE0njQN8AzQHNMLWTE2CqDrA2AT0GMFQC0e9wqHHavrDDAedkYDYTof /h52DIIQIEpSRgiRb0BhBQbwLgWgbVtTTVT0UDojvV0fnyCtBmACMAsh3yLrTQIgZGF5LCMF0Cpg IDA1KoAxOSA5NyA1OirgIFDmTSYPIK1UbyhPIusCEAELIHRydWNrc0A/FaARYANwJGIr7ycedWJO ah6xLg8i61JlM6BCwGFkZ2UgdxGRKoBaaAIgZSrANoBtAxB58xr/HAMzNh13GkUedjoxUEkgdGgL gGsUsG5dA6BMAHAEgQQgdRGwZFE6gG8gcyqxeQhgIIkFoHVsO+BjYXQRcP4gBGAWEC/QHDAHkQPw OpBfNnU6kABwCoU+I3YLgGX2ZwrAKoB3OqA9QTpwC4BEdHU+MGl2ZTcgIE5iQWAIkEFQZC46USf4 bSBuHpA8IAhwNgABoO8IYAVAPHEFwCc2gwqFPtLBPCBoKnQsJzowOpDpCGBnaEIhQkNQKoA6cPMR gEFQbicFQDAgCJA74J8+MEXSEcAT0AXAYXM60GJICsByeS4xPRpJIJZZB5AqgGJDUVdvBHCxKsBC b3k74DwwaUcxfmY8YxYQB0BBcTYgOwBh/z0FPcRCkTqhRUBBoD0gBCD3DbA10DwgcUEQSHBBYBMg 9zjvHqM3TF9SD1MfVC9VPt0KhU0HkDwwNfFkBABG8S9KsTvRP9BNEGgCQHA6qC8vd1igLjCYLwqF 6kYFsWhBYHA8IAnwO+AfAMADET4jQtAzUyAiSFBFTFAiO/E6L+gtVxYQTzAHkHQwjyAIUG3fB4AC MAQgO0FCwWc18BPAbmkCIF9RPZF3QWAkcWVXKoA7sTOgawqweTagQNs3ACpAcxNQC4BnMPli7y83 70/fUOkVMQBncAAAAAMAEBAAAAAAAwAREAAAAABAAAcwoDChf8lZvAFAAAgwoDChf8lZvAEeAD0A AQAAAAUAAABSRTogAAAAAAlQ ------ =_NextPart_000_01BC599F.EE6E2800-- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 20:23:00 -0700 From: sdelanty To: FORDTRUCKS Subject: Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Hey Steve, > >Isn't all this reasoning and logic stuff just great! Err, I dunno. it... makes my brain hurt. >Sure the HiPer ignition might work a *little* better, but you can upgrade the >stock ignition a little at a time and still save money. It is just SO EAST and >CHEAP. I think that was your point, I know it was mine! Yes cheap, easy and functional is often good. At the time, *CHEAP* and functional was very important. Easy was a fringe benefit, I hadn't expected it to be quite *that* easy. Adding an MSD6 box to it later was a breeze also. >That rebuild has >about 80,000 mi on it now and still gets GREAT mileage. (And still no oil leaks >from that disconnected PCV valve, but thats a whole 'nother story). Yes, I've heard. But I like having a functional PCV system. If everything else is working correctly, it shouldn't have any adverse effect on performance/economy. In addition to reducing the amount of hydrocarbons in the air we breathe, and reducing the possibility of oil leaks from engine seals, it also drastically reduces the amount of cumbustion byproducts/blowby that combine with the oil in the crankcase. Many of these byproducts combine with moisture (both from the atmoshere and from combustion) to form acids that attack bearings, degrade Your oils lubricating qualities, and cause sludge. A *good working* PCV helps keep Your motor clean and healthy. My FE and I love our PCV, but I'm glad Your system works for You too... Happy motoring, Steve Delanty (sdelanty ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 6 May 97 04:02:22 UT From: "Jesse Marcellus" To: fordtrucks Subject: RE: DRL module Message-Id: Hi John! I live up here in Canada and called a dealer with a 24 hour parts department. There is only one day time running light module and it has the eight female connections. I'm not sure what would plug in to that harness but if it is for DRL could it be for a different year truck like a 92 or 94. Does it serve any other purpose on your truck right now or is that it's sole purpose? Kristen 66 Ford F100 Custom Cab P.S. - Everyone should move up here! I run straight pipes and glass packs and only need to have my truck inspected once and I can drive it for life!! ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 01:59:46 -0500 (CDT) From: Chris North To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: Getting better gas mileage PCV (The Right Stuff!)-long Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I am suprised that all this discussion on the PCV system has not discussed the 'REAL' purpose of the PCV system. (I'm a little behind in my mail!) The blowby produced in an internal combustion engine contains many gasses, particularly water vapor and oxides of nitrogen (NOx). When NOx and H2O mix, you form acids (nitric, nitrous, etc...) With 'Passive' crankcase ventilation, *some* of these gasses will pass through the vent, but others will build up in the motor oil, producing sludge and corrosive acids, neither of which does any particular good for the internals of your motor. With 'Positive' crackcase ventilation, the crankcase is constantly swept with fresh air (while the oil is hot), greatly reducing the sludge and acid buildup in the engine oil. Some marine internal combustion engines, which do not have to meet as strict emissions standards vent the crankcase into the exhaust. This produces sufficient flow through the crankcase at high rpm. At low rpm (idle), it does not do as well, but marine engines don't typically idle much. With a strong engine that has good rings, the amount of blowby should be minimal compared to the amount of fresh air running through the system. And much of the blowby occurs on the compression stroke, before combustion, and more before combustion is complete (very little occurs during the exhaust stroke), so Yes, it does burn. In short, disabling the PCV system is a very bad thing (tm) for several reasons: 1) It's against the law 2) It supports the Eco-nazis claim that automotive enthusiasts are bad polluters 3) If it improves your MPG, then your engine is not operating efficiently anyway (most likely, rings shot and/or carb jetted wrong) and you will get even better milage by fixing your motor, and 4) your oil wears out much faster, futher contributing to the deterioration of the motor (downward spiral) With all you collage students, I am suprised you haven't read up on the workings of an internal combustion motor. The above discussion is covered in just about *every* Chilton's manual. Maybe todays colleges don't teach things like reading and comprehending anymore. Things must have changed since I was a student. Chris North | I always think I'm right although I know that | Metallurgist | I must be wrong sometimes, I think. | ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 02:15:44 -0500 (CDT) From: Chris North To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: 454 in an Econoline????? Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I worte: >>I could very well be wrong, but I don't think Ford put a 351M in any E-150, >>250, or 350 Vans in 1978. Small block 302 and 351W. Large block, what, a >>454? >> Then John Strauss wrote: >Arrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggghhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!! A 454 is a CHEVY damnit!!! I am >losing my mind and my patience with you people! 460. 460. 460. 460. >460. 460! > >OK, rant over. Happy, happy. Joy, joy. > I *did* say that I could very well be wrong ;^) One thousand apologies. I'm basically a MoPar man, so I don't know my Ford engines as well as I should. When I think of big blocks, I usually think of the 440 six pack or 426 (twin 4 bbl) HEMI. (ducking and running!) chris north ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 06:20:54 -0500 From: doggfarm To: fordtrucks Cc: "Jesse Marcellus" Subject: RE: DRL module Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Hi John! I live up here in Canada and called a dealer with a 24 hour parts >department. A 24 hour parts department? That's pretty cool. >There is only one day time running light module and it has the >eight female connections. I'm not sure what would plug in to that harness >but >if it is for DRL could it be for a different year truck like a 92 or 94. >Does >it serve any other purpose on your truck right now or is that it's sole >purpose? Thanks for calling your parts person...this is just the sort of response that makes this list so good.:-) The plug terminates just above the driver's side headlight and is plugged in to a plastic "dead man" receptacles that is held on to the radiator support by two screws. The idea is that the deadman is removed and the DRL module attaches in the same place. One then plugs the harness in to the module. According to everything I've read/heard there is only *one* module made (applicable to all models and years) and one type of wiring harness plug. I'm hoping that I'm not looking at the DRL plug as I believe and that it may be located somewhere else but everything I've read says *that* is where it should be....I'm not really sure what is going on. Where's the factory tech person when you need them? John ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 06 May 1997 06:35:34 -0500 From: Kevin Lindstedt To: fordtrucks Subject: Axle Tag Numbers Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Attention all you number decoders - ;^) I finally crawled under my truck to read the tag on the rear axle and wrote down the following: WDM-BR 86B 2 75 9 385B I figure the "2 75" is the ratio (good thing too - I got a thirsty 460) but can anyone tell me what the other numbers mean? Do they describe positraction or other such options? Thanks. Kevin Lindstedt 1978 F150 460/C6 Ranger Lariat ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 05:00:11 -0700 From: "Jim" To: Subject: Re: Axle Tag Numbers Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Are you sure that wasn't 3.75? Jim Strigas jstrigas '73 Ford F100 (302 2bbl C4 Auto Ford 9" 3.25. Daily driver) '83 Yamaha XJ900RK (Best Gift of my life! From my best friends! RSCL) '77 Buick EstateWagon (Beast of Immense Magnitude!) These are "The Good Old Days"! Be Cool Daddy-O B-)> ---------- > From: Kevin Lindstedt > To: fordtrucks > Subject: Axle Tag Numbers > Date: Tuesday, May 06, 1997 4:35 AM > > Attention all you number decoders - ;^) > > I finally crawled under my truck to read the tag on the rear axle and wrote > down the following: > > WDM-BR 86B > 2 75 9 385B > > I figure the "2 75" is the ratio (good thing too - I got a thirsty 460) but > can anyone tell me what the other numbers mean? Do they describe > positraction or other such options? Thanks. > > Kevin Lindstedt > 1978 F150 460/C6 Ranger Lariat > > > _____________________________________________________________ _______ > Message distributed via http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.lofcom.com/ > For help send mail with subject "HELP" to:fordtrucks-request > Comments and suggestions are welcome, use: kpayne ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 06 May 1997 07:06:42 -0500 From: Kevin Lindstedt To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: Axle Tag Numbers Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 05:00 AM 5/6/97 -0700, you wrote: >Are you sure that wasn't 3.75? > Yeah, pretty sure, had to scrape off a lot of grease and gunk, but it sure looked like a 2! > > >Jim Strigas jstrigas >'73 Ford F100 (302 2bbl C4 Auto Ford 9" 3.25. Daily >driver) >'83 Yamaha XJ900RK (Best Gift of my life! From my best >friends! RSCL) > '77 Buick EstateWagon (Beast of Immense Magnitude!) > >These are "The Good Old Days"! > Be Cool Daddy-O B-)> > ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 05:27:20 -0700 From: "Jim" To: Subject: Re: Axle Tag Numbers Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit My Chilton shows the following for 1978 Rear axle codes and ratios. You can find the plate on your drivers door. The 9 means you have a 9" inch you should be vary happy! I see if I can find the rest! C8 3.73 D7 4.10 23 331 24 4.10 38 3.73 H4 3.25 H9 4.11 Jim Strigas jstrigas '73 Ford F100 (302 2bbl C4 Auto Ford 9" 3.25. Daily driver) '83 Yamaha XJ900RK (Best Gift of my life! From my best friends! RSCL) '77 Buick EstateWagon (Beast of Immense Magnitude!) These are "The Good Old Days"! Be Cool Daddy-O B-)> ---------- > From: Kevin Lindstedt > To: fordtrucks > Subject: Re: Axle Tag Numbers > Date: Tuesday, May 06, 1997 5:06 AM > > At 05:00 AM 5/6/97 -0700, you wrote: > >Are you sure that wasn't 3.75? > > > Yeah, pretty sure, had to scrape off a lot of grease and gunk, but it sure > looked like a 2! > > > > > > >Jim Strigas jstrigas > >'73 Ford F100 (302 2bbl C4 Auto Ford 9" 3.25. Daily > >driver) > >'83 Yamaha XJ900RK (Best Gift of my life! From my best > >friends! RSCL) > > '77 Buick EstateWagon (Beast of Immense Magnitude!) > > > >These are "The Good Old Days"! > > Be Cool Daddy-O B-)> > > > > > _____________________________________________________________ _______ > Message distributed via http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.lofcom.com/ > For help send mail with subject "HELP" to:fordtrucks-request > Comments and suggestions are welcome, use: kpayne ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 08:40:37 -0400 From: "Henry Van Dyke" To: Cc: "Jesse Marcellus" Subject: Re: DRL module Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On the '94 F-series the connector for the DRL is on the radiator support below the headlight assembly on the driverside. There is a shorting plug which needs to be removed and the module plugs directly in. The DRL module is available a select FORD dealers (near the canadian boarder). I tried to obtain the part here in NJ and had no luck, even with giving them the part number. LOU FUSZ 800-533-2175 carried the module, which cost around $35 plus shipping. Mention that you saw their ad in Car&Driver for the 25%.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|