|
|
Return-Path: From: fordtrucks-digest-request Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 09:14:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: t3.media3.net: lof set sender to fordtrucks-digest-request Subject: fordtrucks-digest Digest V97 #75 X-Loop: fordtrucks-digest X-Mailing-List: archive/volume97/25 To: fordtrucks-digest Reply-To: fordtrucks ------------------------------ Content-Type: text/plain fordtrucks-digest Digest Volume 97 : Issue 75 Today's Topics: Re: 97 F350 pulls [LenJG RE: Engine sizes. [mcat Re: Engine sizes. [mcat auto tranny [yhtlines Re: 351M Mileage Master (20+ mpg) [LenJG HUH?!? [Charlie Allison Advice for rebuilding 360 [bigric Re: 351M Mileage Master (20+ mpg) [thelambs Re: Two 9" Rear Questions [Dan Wentz ] Re: 76 360 info [LenJG Re: 2 Questions [LenJG Re: '88 Bronco II (XLT) Wiring Diagr [LenJG Re: Engine sizes. [MLawing616 RE: auto tranny [DC Beatty Re: Backup lights don't work [LenJG Re: backup lights don't work [LenJG Re: Engine sizes (all years) [Karl Cunningham ] PowerStroke Break-In [Jay Chlebowski ] Re: Two 9" Rear Questions -Reply [Don Grossman ] Ford tech address ["Erik J. O'Daniel" Re: Engine sizes. [mcat Re: PowerStroke Break-In [Michael Fischer Re: F-250 w/302? [pmm2 Re: PowerStroke Break-In [Larry Wiandt ] 93 F150 Xcab Driveline Vibration ["Levesque, Andy" engines [Stuart Varner Administrivia: ____________________________________________________________________ Message distributed via http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.lofcom.com/ For help send mail with subject "HELP" to:fordtrucks-digest-request Comments and suggestions are welcome, use: kpayne ____________________________________________________________________ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 22:16:20 -0400 (EDT) From: LenJG To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: 97 F350 pulls Message-ID: Just a thought, you might have a cracked or broken leaf in the spring pack. That can sometimes happen to even a new spring if it wasn't properly heat treated. Another thought that comes to mind is the U-bolts that attach the spring to the TTB might be loose which would allow the axle to move around a bit on the spring and cause it to pull to one side.This is a little food for thought that might point you in the right direction.Good luckand keep us posted on what you find out. Len ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Apr 97 21:11:11 PDT From: mcat To: fordtrucks Subject: RE: Engine sizes. Message-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Randy, Your right, I forgot the boss351c, and Ieven own one , must have been that mind fart thing! 377 should have been 370. Da forgot the 312 supercharged. Flatheads were221-239-255 and a linclon flatty 300something found in F5&6&7s. Garry --- On Mon, 28 Apr 1997 16:48:12 -0700 Randy Collins wrote: >I would also include the 351 Boss, CJ and H.O. The 429 S.C.J.. Wasn't there also a 370 or was that the same as a 377? >Ken >Try this for engine sizes, 221-260-289-302-351w, 239-272-292-312, 351c,351m-400, 332-352-352hp-360-361edsel-390-390hp-410-427-427tp-427sohc-428-428cj-scj-33 0hd-330md-359-361-389-391FEs. Mel series383, 462 477 534. 385 series, 429 429cj,460, 377trk, 429trk, Boss429.I belive the Mel series may include more but I can't find one of my books. The 6s also include 144, 170, 240,300 allgood motors in there own place. > > >Randy Collins >Boise, Idaho >rcollins > >1975 Ford Supercab Longbed Muscle Truck (mostly in pieces) >Soon to have the following Randy installed options: >F250 4WD 460 C-6 > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: mcat >Sent: Monday, April 28, 1997 3:40 PM >To: fordtrucks >Subject: RE: Engine sizes. > > -----------------End of Original Message----------------- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Name: Garry E-mail: mcat Date: 4/28/97 Time: 9:11:11 PM 427 Fe powered 56 F-100 Wild by design ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Apr 97 21:28:26 PDT From: mcat To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: Engine sizes. Message-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii Ford Performance by Pat Ganahl Has one section that details Sohc. Old Hot Rod mags. Check public libary. Old OHO manual has specs and tuning info. These were hellish motors and would run the pants off the Hemi.Too bad nascar outlawed them, but they proved themselves in drag racing. Garry --- On Mon, 28 Apr 1997 17:56:29 +0000 Don Grossman wrote: >Where can I find more information on the 427 sohc ? >-- >Don Grossman >duckdon > >It's hard to do 90 on a speed limit budget....... > >65 Ford F-150 4x4 (soon to be 72 Mustang) >63 Ford F-250 4x4 > > >____________________________________________________________________ >Message distributed via http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.lofcom.com/ >For help send mail with subject "HELP" to:fordtrucks-request >Comments and suggestions are welcome, use: kpayne > > -----------------End of Original Message----------------- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Name: Garry E-mail: mcat Date: 4/28/97 Time: 9:28:27 PM 427 Fe powered 56 F-100 Wild by design ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 19:38:51 -0700 From: yhtlines To: fordtrucks Subject: auto tranny Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Recently acquired an 88 4X F150, with a 302 and auto for my son. Once we got through the frozen fan clutch (jeez, those fans really make a lot of noise when they're locked and running!) I realized that it was shifting hard into 3rd under part throttle acceleration or after accelerating upward and letting off the gas. I mean very hard. I plan to take it to a shop for fluid change and adjustment ( if any available). Any ideas, as in bad vacuum modulator etc (what ever that is!). Or did I get a bad deal and have a bad tranny? (125,000 miles). Dave Lampert ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 22:40:48 -0400 (EDT) From: LenJG To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: 351M Mileage Master (20+ mpg) Message-ID: To address your tire rollout question. This is how much ground the tire > covers with one complete revolution. To get tire rollout all you need is a tape measure and some sort of a marking device (i.e. a piece of shool board chalk) or something else that you can put a mark on the tire and on the ground with. what you do is put a mark on the tire sidewall close to the ground and a mark on the ground at the same spot. Then you roll the tire > forward one complete turn and put another mark on the ground were the mark on the tire meets the ground at the same relation as it was before. then you take your measureing device and measure between the two marks on the ground and this is what is called tire rollout. This information can be very helpful in determining a variety of things such as the right gear ratio to run with your given tire rollout or weather you should changed to a different tire > size to achieve the performance or fuel mileage that you are looking for with the gear ratio that you already have. I hope this answered your question. Len ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 22:00:46 -0500 (CDT) From: Charlie Allison To: fordtrucks Subject: HUH?!? Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Removing heads on an FE to change the intake? HUH? I just swapped two and got no closer to the heads than loosening the rocker shafts and removing push rods. Twenty MPG?!? HUH? M motor 14 mpg when dropped from C-130! Burning premium! '66 Mustang!?!?! HUH??? Just a few questions... ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 22:07:00 -0500 (CDT) From: bigric To: FORDTRUCKS Subject: Advice for rebuilding 360 Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Thanks to everyone who lent advice on the bearings for my 360. I've decided to go ahead with the rebuild, and I've got some plans as well as some questions. I plan to enlarge the oil passages for better flow, as well as put in a stronger oil pump and a windage tray. I'm probably going to do some porting on the heads and have hardened seats put in. Now for the questions -Does anybody recommend a good oil pump for the FEs? -Does anybody recommend a windage tray? -Does anybody recommend bearings? -Valve train components? I'm also considering using a 390 crank. Any pros/cons to either the 360 or 390 setups? bigric '68 Ford F100 Custom Cab Flareside 360 FE '66 VW Beetle 1300->1500 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 22:10:54 -0500 From: thelambs To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: 351M Mileage Master (20+ mpg) Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit LenJG > > To address your tire rollout question. This is how much ground the tire > > covers with one complete revolution. To get tire rollout all you need is a > tape measure and some sort of a marking device (i.e. a piece of shool board > chalk) or something else that you can put a mark on the tire and on the > ground with. what you do is put a mark on the tire sidewall close to the > ground and a mark on the ground at the same spot. Then you roll the tire > > forward one complete turn and put another mark on the ground were the mark on > the tire meets the ground at the same relation as it was before. then you > take your measureing device and measure between the two marks on the ground > and this is what is called tire rollout. This information can be very helpful > in determining a variety of things such as the right gear ratio to run with > your given tire rollout or weather you should changed to a different tire > > size to achieve the performance or fuel mileage that you are looking for with > the gear ratio that you already have. I hope this answered your question. > Len > > > ____________________________________________________________________ > Message distributed via http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.lofcom.com/ > For help send mail with subject "HELP" to:fordtrucks-request > Comments and suggestions are welcome, use: kpayne I have a 78 bronco with a new 351m auto what is the correct tire rollout for better mileage I now get about 12mpg ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 20:27:29 -0700 From: Dan Wentz To: FORDTRUCKS Subject: Re: Two 9" Rear Questions Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >I'll add a couple ideas here one I have a 49 f-100 you have a great >chunk with a 300:1; however, your housing is too wide. I think toy'll >find that this will be more that a simple shave so here is a solution. >Find a Junked uot shorty ranger or bronco the 5 foot long ones the 9" >housing and axles you need are there and are perfect size. Yeah, I've been told that 73-79 F100 rear ends are exactly right--spring perches are even in the right place. I was just asking because I already have the Torino rear end--if it was just a little off I'd use it to save a few bucks. If it's way off, then I'll get an F100 9". Thanks for the input. ~Dan 1992 Ford Mustang LX 1950 Ford F1, 351C-2V Check out my F1 page: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.GeoCities.com/MotorCity/3623 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 23:28:43 -0400 (EDT) From: LenJG To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: 76 360 info Message-ID: To answere your second question first any FE engine will bolt right in to your truck. The 390 is a good choice for power to fuel ratio since it gets about the same fuel mileage as the 360 with more power right form the get go. As for your first question, I did these thing to my '71 F-100 360 C6 combo and neted between 4 to 6 MPG. First I put a good set of equal length headers.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. |