|
|
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 1997 14:37:59 -0500 (EST) To: fordtrucks-digest From: digest-proc Subject: fordtrucks Digest v97 n0012 Reply-To: FORDTRUCKS Volume 97 Number 0012 fordtrucks Digest Today's Topics: Re: looking for stuff Re: Question on 370 truck motor. Re: Ford reps Re: looking for stuff Re: looking for stuff Re: looking for stuff Re: looking for stuff Re: FOMOCO Reps? -Reply Re: Electronic Ignition for FE Series? Re: Electronic Ignition for FE Series? Re: Electronic Ignition for FE Series? Re: FE and motor sizes Re: 460 Fuel Economy?! FUEL ECONOMY Re: FUEL ECONOMY Re: FE and motor sizes -Reply Re: Ballast Resistor -Reply Re: looking for stuff Ignition ballast resistor Original or easy ride Re: FUEL ECONOMY Re: Ballast Resistor -Reply Re: Ballast Resistor -Reply Re: Ballast Resistor -Reply -Reply Re: Ballast Resistor -Reply -Reply Re: 46 pickup? Re: Original or easy ride * PLEASE DO NOT QUOTE THE ENTIRE DIGEST IN REPLIES TO THE LIST! * -------------------------------------------------- >From marko Subject: Re: looking for stuff To: FORDTRUCKS >Here is a comparison of the Holly #0-6916 and the #0-80453: > >Carb Part No. #0-6919 #0-80453 > Model No. 4160 4160 > CFM 600 600 > Mains #62 #63 > Secondaries #69 #69 > Power Valve 125-206 125-208 > 1st stage 12.5"Hg 10.5"Hg > 2nd stage 5.5"Hg 5.5"Hg > Pump nozzle size .031" .031" > Secondaries Vacuum Vacuum > Spring color black black > Venturi size > Primary 1 1/4" 1 1/4" > Secondary 1 5/16" 1 5/16" > Throttle bore > Primary 1-9/16" 1-9/16" > Secondary 1-9/16" 1-9/16" > Fuel Feed Single Single > Floats hung Side Side > >The two carbs seem *very* similar. The 6919 is one jet size >leaner on the primary, and opens the 1st stage of the power >valve quite early (12.5"Hg). That could impact fuel mileage, >especially in a heavier vehicle or one with tall gears. Aha!! My truck has an rv cam, so it all makes perfect sense. The rv carburetor opens the 2daries earlier to supply pulling power. Also, since the rv cam tends to reduce vacuum at idle, that would delay the throttle opening a bit. btw, I have a slight problem with the carb at temps between 32 and about 40. As u know, it's quite damp here in vancouver, so the carb tends to idle rough until it warms up fully (icing). The choke has been reset and the fast idle fixed up some, which sort of cures the problem, but I'm wondering if a heated 4bbl spacer is the trick. I have an open air cleaner, and ideally the stock a/c with a manifold intake valve would be the answer, but in the absence thereof, is there anything else I can do? Would running methyl hydrate (gasline antifreeze) help to cure this problem? marko in vancouver 71 F2504x4 >Jim in Central NY >'79 F-150 (302!) >'92 Topaz (3.0l) > >____________________________________________________________________ >Message distributed via http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.lofcom.com/ >To send mail to fordtrucks, use the address: fordtrucks >For help send a message with "HELP" in the body to:list-request >Comments and suggestions are welcome, use: kpayne > > ------------------------------ >From HURDJ X-VMS-To: IN%"FORDTRUCKS X-VMS-Cc: HURDJ To: FORDTRUCKS Jon, My '79 Truck Shop Manual lists the 370 CID and the 429 CID together. It refers to them as "Lima" engines with the same basic design and structure. The 370 was available with either a two-barrel or four-barrel carburetor. The 429 was only available with a four-barrel carb (4180). The 370 has a 4.05" bore and a 3.59" stroke. The 429 is 4.36" X 3.59" Here is the manuals description of these engines: "The cylinder block of these engines is gray iron with extended cylinder barrels. The crankshaft has five main bearings and is cast-nodular iron on the 2-V engines and is forged steel on the 4-V engines. The pistons on these engines are aluminum alloy tin plated and feature a cast- iron top ring insert which is metalurgically bonded to the aluminum." "Induction hardened exhaust valve seats are employed on the 370 2-V engines. All H.V. engines have hi-nickel alloy exhaust valve seat inserts. All valve stems are chrome plated. Sodium cooled exhaust valves are used on the 4-V engines." The manual indicates that these engines apply to the B-, F-, L-, and C-Series Trucks. Jim in Central NY '79 F-150 (302!) '92 Topaz (3.0l) ------------------------------ >From JLINETT Subject: Re: Ford reps To: FORDTRUCKS >>>> Nick Finney 02/27/97 10:19pm >>> >Any one here know of an offical representative from Ford that would be >interested in participating in this newsgroup? Maybe. I'll give him a call and invite him, if I heareth no objections thereto. Regards, Jon in Houston ------------------------------ >From HURDJ X-VMS-To: IN%"FORDTRUCKS X-VMS-Cc: HURDJ To: FORDTRUCKS Marko, No, your rv cam doesn't open the secondaries earlier. That is controled by the secondary diaphram spring (black, in your carb.). But what your rv cam does is lower the vacuum a *little* at idle and lower rpm, (which may *delay* the opening of the secondaries) but more importantly it opens your power valve to early. It may run great, but it is also running rich and that can have a big impact on your mpg. What is your vacuum in "Hg Jim in Central NY '79 F-150 (302!) '92 Topaz (3.0l) ------------------------------ >From HURDJ X-VMS-To: IN%"FORDTRUCKS X-VMS-Cc: HURDJ To: FORDTRUCKS Marko, You are correct that a closed air cleaner with a pre-heater on it will help your cold driveability problem (and it will also help your mpg), but I think that you can improve the situation by checking/adjusting the vacuum brake. I don't know if your carb has the internal vacuum brake or an external pull-off. By trying different combinations of choke adjustment and vacuum brake, you should be able to dial that carb in for your local environment. Jim in Central NY '79 F-150 (302!) '92 Topaz (3.0l) ------------------------------ >From marko Subject: Re: looking for stuff To: FORDTRUCKS >Marko, > No, your rv cam doesn't open the secondaries earlier. That is controled >by the secondary diaphram spring (black, in your carb.). But what your rv >cam does is lower the vacuum a *little* at idle and lower rpm, (which may >*delay* the opening of the secondaries) but more importantly it opens your >power valve to early. It may run great, but it is also running rich and >that can have a big impact on your mpg. > So, do you figure I should change the powervalve to correspond with the recommended one? Maybe I will try that.... > What is your vacuum in "Hg > >Jim in Central NY >'79 F-150 (302!) >'92 Topaz (3.0l) > >____________________________________________________________________ >Message distributed via http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.lofcom.com/ >To send mail to fordtrucks, use the address: fordtrucks >For help send a message with "HELP" in the body to:list-request >Comments and suggestions are welcome, use: kpayne > > ------------------------------ >From marko Subject: Re: looking for stuff To: FORDTRUCKS >Marko, > No, your rv cam doesn't open the secondaries earlier. That is controled >by the secondary diaphram spring (black, in your carb.). But what your rv >cam does is lower the vacuum a *little* at idle and lower rpm, (which may >*delay* the opening of the secondaries) but more importantly it opens your >power valve to early. It may run great, but it is also running rich and >that can have a big impact on your mpg. > > What is your vacuum in "Hg Wow. Where were you when I was first trying to set the thing up! Anyway, as I said in my other mail, shd I switch the power valve, and change the jets to set it up as the carb recommended (0-8***)? I will check vacuum next week, no time left today. > >Jim in Central NY >'79 F-150 (302!) >'92 Topaz (3.0l) > >____________________________________________________________________ >Message distributed via http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.lofcom.com/ >To send mail to fordtrucks, use the address: fordtrucks >For help send a message with "HELP" in the body to:list-request >Comments and suggestions are welcome, use: kpayne > > ------------------------------ >From nfinney To: FORDTRUCKS Erickson wrote: > > Ken, Nick, et al, > > > No, but that certainly would be interesting. It would be nice to get > > feedback from them about the directions Ford is taking with their > > Fxxx & Exxx series. Would also be nice if we could give them > > input. > > > > If everyone is ok with this I'll pursue the matter. > > Fantastic idea, guys!....maybe they'll have someone who's familiar with the > "older ones" whose brain(s) we can pick, too... > ;-) > > Eric > I have actually been trying to find some Ford Rep's email address and see if we could get some input here, but I can't seem to locate it so I posted the idea here. -- Nick Finney nfinney "Ya see its not the speed that kills son its the sudden stop" ------------------------------ >From nfinney To: FORDTRUCKS jayvanv > 2 piece distributor caps? I have a 76 390 and it has the plain old single > cap. Care to elaborate a little? The two piece cap has a lot of space between the terminals, this helps to prevent crossfire etc... that can occur with a high energy ignition system. They are easy to locate (It's a stock replacement part). -- Nick Finney nfinney ------------------------------ >From nfinney To: FORDTRUCKS marko maryniak wrote: > > >If you want a Ford electronic distributor for the FE motor just run down to > the local discount parts house or salvage yard. You will be looking for a > distributor from a Ford truck 1975 or later with a 360 or 390. While you > are there buy the Ford ignition module it will plug right in. Also in an > effort to minimize misfiring the later models used the two piece distributor > > cap. If you don't have a service manual I can probably dig up a wiring > schematic for the input wires. > Hey THANKS! I really appreciate the info. I can actually aquire OEM Ford parts at a wholesale price (heh heh heh) so I shouldn't be paying too much for the ignition module. I wasn't aware that Ford was still putting the FE into trucks when they started using elctronic ignition. I would actually prefer to use the Ford vs. the Aftermarket anyway. -- Nick Finney nfinney First On Race Day! ------------------------------ >From nfinney To: FORDTRUCKS marko maryniak wrote: > > Something else I forgot to mention: > > 1. No, I don't work for Wal-mart > > 2. Motor oil is dirt cheap there, 75cents cdn per quart. > > 3. If the distributor you pull out already has the spacer and flat cap, > then of course buy the flat cap and the appropriate wires. Chances are it > won't, tho. > > Do you have a fax number? If so email it to me at marko > fax you the manual's wiring diagram plus a handwritten one with color codes, > next week. Sorry No Fax, But don't worry I can locate the EWD in the later factory service manual. -- Nick Finney nfinney "Ya see its not the speed that kills son its the sudden stop" ------------------------------ >From JKruse007 Subject: Re: FE and motor sizes To: FORDTRUCKS I have a 1977 F100 with a 300 6 cylinder with a three on the tree. I am averaging around 13 - 15 mpg. I don't know if this is the general average or not. I would like to know what the average is for the 300. I tried to findout my rear end gear ratio, but the code I have listed (47) is not list in the Chilton's manual for my year. I have no idea what the ratio is. Any Info would be helpful! John '77 F100 300 six ------------------------------ >From paul To: FORDTRUCKS At 12:26 AM 2/28/97 -0500, bigric >I got 10mpg from my '75 460 when I tuned it up. Had quite a few miles on >it, too. Not bad. I'm only getting 12 mpg from my '97 F-150 4x4 with the 5.4 liter engine. I got 15 on one tankful but that could have been a fluke. I'm hoping for something better after it breaks in a bit. We run 460's on all of our delivery trucks and they get in the 8 to 9 range..... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. |