Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 13:41:08 -0500 (EST) To: fordtrucks-digest lofcom.com
From: digest-proc lofcom.com
Subject: fordtrucks Digest v97 n0004
Reply-To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

Volume 97 Number 0004 fordtrucks Digest

Today's Topics:

Re: Home for master cylinder etc.
Re: 88 Bronco Paint
Re: 88 Bronco Paint
Re: 88 Bronco Paint
'88 Bronco Paint
1964 F100 Grille
Re: '74 F-250 - Some Questions and my '61 F100 -Reply
Re: New to the list w/93 Ranger
Re: New to the list w/93 Ranger
Re: New to the list w/93 Ranger
re:Digest format now available!
RE: New to the list w/93 Ranger
Re: New to the list w/93 Ranger
'61 grill and tranny questions
Re: Digest format now available!
Antique parts suppliers?
Re: The 4.6L Ford
Re: '47 Panel Van info request
Question Re: Digest format
Re: '61 grill and tranny questions
Vacuum hoses and emmisions control
F-Series Truck Suppliers
Re: New to the list w/93 Ranger
re:F-Series Truck Suppliers
Re: '74 F-250 - Some Questions and my '61 F100 -Reply -Reply
re:Digest format now available! -Reply
'61 grill and tranny questions -Reply
Question Re: Digest format -Reply
F-Series Truck Suppliers -Reply


* PLEASE DO NOT QUOTE THE ENTIRE DIGEST IN REPLIES TO THE LIST! *

--------------------------------------------------

>From bigric mail.utexas.edu Wed Feb 19 21:55:21 1997 From: bigric mail.utexas.edu (Richard Cherico) Subject: Re: Home for master cylinder etc.
To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

>If your looking for a good home for your master cylinder, valve and booster
>I am considering a
>brake conversion on by 56 F-100. It needs a bit of an update from the
>original system it still has
>and I would like to put a set-up on the firewall, as your would be. Let me
>know if your looking to part with it.

Well, I'm probably going to keep my current setup at least for another 2-3 months, if you're still interested by then. I do, however, have a leaky master cylinder that I pulled out of the '68 if you want it to rebuild.
When I replace my setup, I'll have available a booster (that's only 1 month old), a master cylinder (15 months) and the original valve. Just as a note, the booster/cylinder setup goes in a '72, but fits at least back to '67.

It's wierd. I got the booster/cylinder from a '72 in a yard and put them in my '67. Then the cylinder went out, so I replaced it. Then I put that setup in my '68 and the booster had developed a bad leak while it took a 9-month siesta. So now I've got a brand new booster, too. Looks like I get to scrap all of that in a few months though! Let me know if you're interested in that old '68 cylinder and if you might want the other in a few months.

bigric mail.utexas.edu
'68 Ford F100 Custom Cab Stepside 360
bigric mail.utexas.edu



------------------------------
>From kpayne mindspring.com Wed Feb 19 21:55:58 1997 From: Ken Payne Subject: Re: 88 Bronco Paint
To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

At 09:41 PM 2/19/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Hey Fordoholics-
>
>I'm brand new to the list -- first, are the archives available so that I
>can find out what discussions have already been covered?
>

I'm working on it. Should have archives by the end of the week.

>Secondly, and most importantly, my 88 Bronco paint is now peeling
>terribly. It just really got started looking nasty about 6 months ago
>and guess what Ford's reaction was: There WAS an informal recall in
>effect (and still is) for trucks with bad paint but there is a 5 year
>old cutoff period. Therefore, if your paint has started peeling, and
>your truck is less than 5 years old, SPEED to your Ford dealer and then
>INSIST that Ford repaint your truck.
>
>Anyway, for the rest of us, has anyone else had paint trouble?? My 88
>is an EB model, Dark Blue metallic/Tan. If so, did Ford help you out
>recently?? Any ideas on how to force Ford to repaint the truck??
>
>Any replys welcome-
>
>Rick
>88 EB Bronco 302 AOD
>

This topic was discussed earlier, you'll find it in the archives when they're up. In the meantime, anyone care to comment? I can't, my truck is 30 years old!


-Ken Payne
1967 Ford F100 Custom Cab, 390 FE V8
List maintainer, send me comments and suggestions.
Visit the Ford Trucks List Web Page (unsubscribe form is there): http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.mindspring.com/~kpayne/ford



------------------------------
>From bigric mail.utexas.edu Wed Feb 19 21:58:03 1997 From: bigric mail.utexas.edu (Richard Cherico) Subject: Re: 88 Bronco Paint
To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

>Secondly, and most importantly, my 88 Bronco paint is now peeling
>terribly. It just really got started looking nasty about 6 months ago
>and guess what Ford's reaction was: There WAS an informal recall in
>effect (and still is) for trucks with bad paint but there is a 5 year
>old cutoff period. Therefore, if your paint has started peeling, and
>your truck is less than 5 years old, SPEED to your Ford dealer and then
>INSIST that Ford repaint your truck.

Are you aware if the '92s were covered? I've got a forest green '92 Bronco XLT that just might need repainting.

bigric mail.utexas.edu
'68 Ford F100 Custom Cab Stepside 360
bigric mail.utexas.edu



------------------------------
>From canzus techline.com Wed Feb 19 22:59:20 1997 From: Steve & Rockette Subject: Re: 88 Bronco Paint
To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

>This topic was discussed earlier, you'll find it in the archives when
>they're up. In the meantime, anyone care to comment? I can't, my
>truck is 30 years old!
>
>
>-Ken Payne

Hell... mine is 40 years old... and needs paint... do you think???
Just kidding....
Steve & Rockette...Lifes a beach
'57 F100 Shorty
'63 F100 Longbox



------------------------------
>From gypsybill usa.net Wed Feb 19 23:09:49 1997 From: "William Rotureau" Subject: '88 Bronco Paint
To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

>This topic was discussed earlier, you'll find it in the archives when
>they're up. In the meantime, anyone care to comment? I can't, my
>truck is 30 years old!
>
>
>-Ken Payne

>>Hell... mine is 40 years old... and needs paint... do you think???
>>Just kidding....
>>Steve & Rockette...Lifes a beach
>>'57 F100 Shorty
>>'63 F100 Longbox

Mine's 33 years old and got so much paint on it that it can't remember what color it started life as :-))

Sorry this is not a "helpful" reply, but it looks like help is being given by others

Bill R..
'64 F100 Shortbox

BTW - I like Bronco's in any color...







------------------------------
>From gypsybill usa.net Wed Feb 19 23:16:35 1997 From: "William Rotureau" Subject: 1964 F100 Grille
To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

New guy again.

I buried this question deep in another reply earlier, so I thought I would make it one of it's own.

I am looking for a reasonably priced grille (preferrably chrome) for my '64. I have found them in a couple of catalogs for around $200. Is this about right? Junks yards that I have searched have had nothing. I have a good '63 grille that was on the truck when I bought it. If anyone is looking for one, I will part with it when I can find a '64 (need it to hold the headlights up :-))

Bill R.

'64 F100 Shortbox


------------------------------
>From rick adc.com Wed Feb 19 23:20:03 1997 From: rick adc.com (Rick Larson)
Subject: Re: '74 F-250 - Some Questions and my '61 F100 -Reply To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

Ken,
>
> If you've used any of the pictures on the Ford Trucks List pictorial
> page ( http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.mindspring.com/~kpayne/ford/pictorial/ford.htm )
> as a reference ---- don't! I cannot vouche for any of them other
> than the 67-72 models. I have a spotters guide but in my infinate
> laziness I didn't use it. The only ones I know for sure without
> the guide are 67-72.

Want a pic of a '71 F100 Custom? Past farm truck, ugly two tone (original) green paint, two wheel drive. I could go out to the parking lot and snap a pic and email it to you.

rick
--
Rick Larson rick adc.com Minneapolis


------------------------------
>From lumstruk interaccess.com Thu Feb 20 00:24:48 1997 From: "Scott Hogue" Subject: Re: New to the list w/93 Ranger To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

> Greetings to all.
>
> I am new to this list. I have a 1993 Ranger STX 4.0. So far I've lifted the
> front 2" and am presently running 11.50x32 Dunlop Radial Rovers on factory
> wheels and loving it. I 've noticed the list seems primarily interested in
> older vehicles...where are the folks with newer product? Lets hear from
> you!

Hello hello. I am also new to the list, and in about 10 days I should receive my screaming yellow `97 Splash.

Am leaning towards getting a Rhino spray in lining. I've heard all the positives, but are there any NEGATIVES with getting it done? How do they look after 5-6 years?




------------------------------
>From silent.bob juno.com Thu Feb 20 00:38:56 1997 Subject: Re: New to the list w/93 Ranger From: silent.bob juno.com (Silent Bob)
To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

Well, I have a 95 Ranger XLT I4 2.3L Soon to be a 5.0 oops!!! Excuse me, thats 302.


On Wed, 19 Feb 1997 20:55:31 -0500 (EST) doggfarm erols.com (John) writes:
>Greetings to all.
>
>I am new to this list. I have a 1993 Ranger STX 4.0. So far I've
>lifted the
>front 2" and am presently running 11.50x32 Dunlop Radial Rovers on
>factory
>wheels and loving it. I 've noticed the list seems primarily
>interested in
>older vehicles...where are the folks with newer product? Lets hear
>from
>you!
>
>John
>
>
>
>____________________________________________________________________
>Message distributed via http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.lofcom.com/
>To send mail to fordtrucks, use the address: fordtrucks lofcom.com
>For help send a message with "HELP" in the body
>to:list-request lofcom.com
>Comments and suggestions are welcome, use: kpayne mindspring.com
>
>


------------------------------
>From doggfarm erols.com Thu Feb 20 05:59:52 1997 From: doggfarm erols.com (John)
Subject: Re: New to the list w/93 Ranger To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

>Am leaning towards getting a Rhino spray in lining. I've heard all the
>positives, but are there any NEGATIVES with getting it done? How do they
>look after 5-6 years......

Don't know much about the Rhino spray, although the magazines seem to like it.
I have a Penda liner because I tend to haul a lot of loose material (ie: dirt, gravel, plants, etc.).
If you go with a bed liner IMO the Penda is the only way to go.
It hasn't warped or shifted and has a huge lip that covers the bed rails that prevents scratches.

John




------------------------------
>From andyrose nortel.ca Thu Feb 20 07:30:46 1997 Sender: "Andy Rose" From: "Andy Rose"
Subject: re:Digest format now available!
To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

In message "Digest format now available!", you write:


:BTW, check out the web site, the following has changed in the :last two days:
:
:1. graphics have changed
:2. 49 Merc truck added to pictorial

Ken,

Would it be possible to set the pictorial up as an HTTP with links to each of the images? It'd take a lot less time to view the pics individually by choice rather than viewing the whole thing.

Thanks ...

Andy

:3. parts wanted page added
:4. Canadian F100/Merc show added to events :5. two suppliers added to supplier page :6. link for Chevy owners added (humorous) :
:



------------------------------
>From Dan_Dusing-EENG01 email.mot.com Thu Feb 20 07:43:59 1997 From: "Dan Dusing-EENG01" Subject: RE: New to the list w/93 Ranger X400-Mts-Identifier: [ /P=MOT/A=MOT/C=US/ ; m\il02n\970220064351b ] To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

The Rhino Linings is tops.

The good thing about it is that it is permanent. The bad thing about it is that it is permanent. I would not go with a drop in bed liner. They may not warp or bend, but they tend to collect water under them with resultant rusting of the bed over time. They definitely will not outlast a Rhino Linings or other top quality sprayed-in lining (if there are other good quality sprayed-in linings on the market).

Just a well satisfied customer.

Regards,
Dan
'95 Power Stroke F-250HD
________________________________________________________ To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com INTERNET
From: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com INTERNET on Thu, Feb 20, 1997 6:21 AM Subject: Re: New to the list w/93 Ranger

>Am leaning towards getting a Rhino spray in lining. I've heard all the
>positives, but are there any NEGATIVES with getting it done? How do they
>look after 5-6 years......

Don't know much about the Rhino spray, although the magazines seem to like it.
I have a Penda liner because I tend to haul a lot of loose material (ie: dirt, gravel, plants, etc.).
If you go with a bed liner IMO the Penda is the only way to go.
It hasn't warped or shifted and has a huge lip that covers the bed rails that prevents scratches.

John




------------------------------


------------------------------
>From kulige vitro.bloomington.in.us Thu Feb 20 09:23:36 1997 From: "Erickson" Subject: '61 grill and tranny questions To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

Hey Bill, Ken, Jesse, and all,

Thanks for everyone's responses on my '61 questions....
It was such a beautiful day here in So. Indiana yesterday that I went after work out to tinker on the truck. In doing so, I found evidence that my grill assembly had been tinkered with at some previous time. :- (

>From Bill's email, it looks like my '61 has a '63 grill!

>
>I have a '64 that has a '63 grill - It has 4 horizontal bars with painted vertical
>separators.

Described exactly! Thanks for the info!

So now my search is on for a true '61 grill. Does anyone have one they'd be willing to part with?

>A '61 has two thick bars (one top and one bottom) with FORD inbetween them.

My '63 grill is pretty banged up, rendering the driver's headlight in a most downward angle. Depending on how my search goes for the correct '61 grill, I may be interested in your '63 grill, Bill (it would look much nicer in the interim.) I'll also let you know if I find a '64 grill while I search for my correct replacement.

I have another old truck question....(sorry newer truck guys!)

I have a '59 292 Y block with a 3-speed manual tranny on the floor.
My question pertains to the tranny. When driving, and putting a torque on the engine/tranny, the hump on the tranny where the gear shift attaches will twist a noticeable bit when observed in the cab.
I checked the two rubber tranny mounts yesterday, and the hardware was tight. The rubber itself seemed really soft and mushy, though, hence my twisting of the tranny. Does this seem correct? There was 36 years of oil soaked dirt encasing the entire tranny which I had to scrape off in order to see anything!

Thanx a bunch in advance,
Eric

1961 F100 Pick'em up Truck



------------------------------
>From silent.bob juno.com Thu Feb 20 09:50:54 1997 From: silent.bob juno.com
Subject: Re: Digest format now available!
To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

On Thu, 20 Feb 1997 07:30:46 -0500 (EST) "Andy Rose" writes:
>In message "Digest format now available!", you write:

>:6. link for Chevy owners added (humorous)

I loved that link so much, that I told a couple of real Chevy owners to go check it out!


.---. .-----------
/ \ __ / ------ fox icelair.com
/ / \(..)/ ----- fox unix.icelair.com
////// ' \/ ` --- http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.icelair.com
//// / // : : --- http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.icelair.com/~fox // / / /` '-- The Best Never Rest // //..\
=======UU====UU======[Free BiRD]=[silent.bob juno.com]======
'//||\`
''``


------------------------------
>From mmiller dryden.net Thu Feb 20 09:59:31 1997 From: "Mitch Miller" Subject: Antique parts suppliers?
To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

Mac's Antique Auto Parts in NY has a very large selection of parts. I found this place thanks to the WWW. But they don't have everything I need.
I'm sure there are lots of other parts suppliers out there, probably not on the web and hard to find. Still need some parts for the '47 Panel Truck (114 in. wheelbase).

Can you recommend other parts suppliers?


Thanks,

Mitch Miller
mmiller dryden.net

Site 102, Box 59, RR #1 home (807) 937-2764 Dryden, ON work (807) 937-7221 P8N 2Y4
Canada


------------------------------
>From JLINETT SYSUBMC.BMC.COM Thu Feb 20 10:06:58 1997 From: JLINETT SYSUBMC.BMC.COM
Subject: Re: The 4.6L Ford
To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

>Oh, and a reverse question to you. What is a 4.6 L, 8cyl engine in cubic
>inches? Is that a 292? I don't want to start the whole debate over again but
>Crown Vics and Mark VIIIs have them up here and I wondered what size engine
>that is in the States.

The conversion factor is 61.02 cubic inches/liter, so that would work out to 281 c.i.d. However, this may in fact be a metric engine. I don't know if it is or isn't. I have one in our new Crown Victoria, but because folks that buy those kind of cars generally aren't concerned about engine specs (at least that seems to be Ford's thinking) there's precious little info available. I would be interested in the bore and stroke if anyone has that handy.

I don't suggest that true metric engines should be converted to c.i.d. just for the marketing brochures, only that the designation should reflect the original design.

Regards,
Jon in Houston


------------------------------
>From BMiller326 aol.com Thu Feb 20 11:01:12 1997 From: BMiller326 aol.com
Subject: Re: '47 Panel Van info request To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

mitch i am to restoring a panel van ... it is a 48 maybe we can share the info


------------------------------
>From kulige vitro.bloomington.in.us Thu Feb 20 11:16:08 1997 From: "Erickson" Subject: Question Re: Digest format To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

Ken,

I hate to ask dumb questions, but could you explain to me (and maybe some others) what the "digest format" is. I thought it would be easier to ask before I actually went through and signed up....

> Digest format is now available! Thanks to those who tested it.
> Thanks to Charlie with L.O.F. for setting it up.

> BTW, check out the web site, the following has changed in the
> last two days:
>
> 1. graphics have changed
> 2. 49 Merc truck added to pictorial
> 3. parts wanted page added
> 4. Canadian F100/Merc show added to events
> 5. two suppliers added to supplier page
> 6. link for Chevy owners added (humorous)

BTW, the web page is looking really good! I found additional suppliers that I plan to get catalogs from. I also especially liked all those pictures of the old trucks! ; )


Eric
'61 F100 Pick'em truck





------------------------------
>From karlc cnsii.com Thu Feb 20 11:16:12 1997 From: Karl Cunningham Subject: Re: '61 grill and tranny questions To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

At 09:23 AM 2/20/97 -0500, Eric wrote:
>I have a '59 292 Y block with a 3-speed manual tranny on the floor.
>My question pertains to the tranny. When driving, and putting a
>torque on the engine/tranny, the hump on the tranny where the gear
>shift attaches will twist a noticeable bit when observed in the cab.
>I checked the two rubber tranny mounts yesterday, and the hardware was
>tight. The rubber itself seemed really soft and mushy, though, hence
>my twisting of the tranny. Does this seem correct? There was 36 years
>of oil soaked dirt encasing the entire tranny which I had to scrape off in
>order to see anything!

Hi Eric --

Mushy tranny mounts could cause the engine/tranny to move too much.
However, some movement is ok. I would say that in low gear if it moves more than an inch or two, it's too much. The only problem this movement will cause is more stress on the wires & hoses to the engine, and the clutch linkage, unless something hits something it shouldn't.

I replaced the tranny mounts on mine once for the same reason.



Karl Cunningham
karlc cnsii.com
1960 F250 factory 4x4



------------------------------
>From sherwin expert.cc.purdue.edu Thu Feb 20 11:40:09 1997 From: Gregory Sherwin Subject: Vacuum hoses and emmisions control To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

I am currently replacing my 351W (because I threw a rod) with another long block. Are all the vacuum hoses really necessary and where can I find a good diagram showing where they all go. Will removing the emmisions control equipment affect the performance of the engine.

Greg
'84 F-150 4X4 351W auto


------------------------------
>From mvaugh acxiom.com Thu Feb 20 11:58:25 1997 From: mvaugh - Mark Vaught Subject: F-Series Truck Suppliers
To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

Let's talk about the suppliers listed on the webpage. Who have you used? Who's the best? Worst? Largest? Smallest? Who has free catalogs? Just call this the FORDTRUCKS Better Business Bureau...

-Mark


------------------------------
>From MRP1515 ritvax.isc.rit.edu Thu Feb 20 12:14:11 1997 From: Mike Subject: Re: New to the list w/93 Ranger To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

I don't know much about the Rhino spray either. I have a '88 Ranger with an under the rail Load-Lock bedliner. I love it, I can slide 2x4's (or 2xanything for that matter) down grooves that are molded into the liner. It is great in the winter, as I place 3 70 lb tube sand bags between a 2"x16" piece of wood and the tailgate for some extra traction. And then in the summer, I made these 'jigs' for lack of a better term and mounted them to the same 2"x16" piece of wood which allows me to carry up to three mountain bikes.

Just my two cents.

Mike in Rochester.


------------------------------
>From andyrose nortel.ca Thu Feb 20 12:43:00 1997 Sender: "Andy Rose" From: "Andy Rose"
Subject: re:F-Series Truck Suppliers
To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

My dad speaks very highly of Obsolete Ford Parts. The only thing I have ordered from them to date has been a couple of books. My dad has ordered lots of parts from them and they are prompt in delivery. They have a great catalog and send out regular updates. The catalogs are divided by years and models... so you have to call them and tell them what model car/truck you are working on and they'll send you a catalog for like $5 .. (Coupon good for $5 off first order was included with my catalog).

Andy


In message "F-Series Truck Suppliers", you write:

:Let's talk about the suppliers listed on the webpage. Who have you :used? Who's the best? Worst? Largest? Smallest? Who has free :catalogs? Just call this the FORDTRUCKS Better Business Bureau...
:
:-Mark
:
:____________________________________________________________________ :Message distributed via http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.lofcom.com/ :To send mail to fordtrucks, use the address: fordtrucks lofcom.com :For help send a message with "HELP" in the body to:list-request lofcom.com :Comments and suggestions are welcome, use: kpayne mindspring.com :
:


------------------------------
>From payne platinum.com Thu Feb 20 13:03:40 1997 From: Ken Payne
Subject: Re: '74 F-250 - Some Questions and my '61 F100 -Reply -Reply To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

Yeah, send it to my personnal email address: kpayne mindspring.com It'll go up on the web page.


>>> Rick Larson 02/19/97 10:20pm >>> Ken,
>
> If you've used any of the pictures on the Ford Trucks List pictorial
> page ( http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.mindspring.com/~kpayne/ford/pictorial/ford.htm )
> as a reference ---- don't! I cannot vouche for any of them other
> than the 67-72 models. I have a spotters guide but in my infinate
> laziness I didn't use it. The only ones I know for sure without
> the guide are 67-72.

Want a pic of a '71 F100 Custom? Past farm truck, ugly two tone (original)
green paint, two wheel drive. I could go out to the parking lot and snap a pic and email it to you.

rick
--
Rick Larson rick adc.com Minneapolis


------------------------------



------------------------------
>From payne platinum.com Thu Feb 20 13:07:38 1997 From: Ken Payne
Subject: re:Digest format now available! -Reply To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

This is something I'm working on. Going to revamp alot of the web site on the weekend.

>>> "Andy Rose" 02/20/97 06:30am >>> In message "Digest format now available!", you write:


:BTW, check out the web site, the following has changed in the :last two days:
:
:1. graphics have changed
:2. 49 Merc truck added to pictorial

Ken,

Would it be possible to set the pictorial up as an HTTP with links to each of the images? It'd take a lot less time to view the pics individually by choice rather than viewing the whole thing.

Thanks ...

Andy

:3. parts wanted page added
:4. Canadian F100/Merc show added to events :5. two suppliers added to supplier page :6. link for Chevy owners added (humorous) :
:



------------------------------



------------------------------
>From payne platinum.com Thu Feb 20 13:10:48 1997 From: Ken Payne
Subject: '61 grill and tranny questions -Reply To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

The rubber on a tranny mount should be fairly stiff. You should barely be able to move it with your bare hands if you give it alot of pressure.
They're pretty inexpensive items and can be changed out in about 15-30 minutes if you have a floor jack to lift the tranny an inch while you slip in the new mount.


>>> "Erickson" 02/20/97 08:23am
>>>
Hey Bill, Ken, Jesse, and all,

-snip-

I have another old truck question....(sorry newer truck guys!)

I have a '59 292 Y block with a 3-speed manual tranny on the floor.
My question pertains to the tranny. When driving, and putting a torque on the engine/tranny, the hump on the tranny where the gear shift attaches will twist a noticeable bit when observed in the cab.
I checked the two rubber tranny mounts yesterday, and the hardware was
tight. The rubber itself seemed really soft and mushy, though, hence my twisting of the tranny. Does this seem correct? There was 36 years

of oil soaked dirt encasing the entire tranny which I had to scrape off in order to see anything!

Thanx a bunch in advance,
Eric

1961 F100 Pick'em up Truck



------------------------------



------------------------------
>From payne platinum.com Thu Feb 20 13:16:21 1997 From: Ken Payne
Subject: Question Re: Digest format -Reply To: FORDTRUCKS lofcom.com

Digest is one big email sent with several messages in it. Instead of getting 20 email messages from the list, you'd get one instead.
The digest is sent when approximately 40k of email builds up or after a certain amount of time expires, whichever comes first.
I'm not sure about the time limit but that shouldn't be a problem since we're hitting 40k daily.

The digest also has a table of contents showing you what the message topics are - this makes it very easy to just look at what interests you.

>>> "Erickson" 02/20/97 10:16am
>>>
Ken,

I hate to ask dumb questions, but could you explain to me (and maybe some others) what the "digest format" is. I thought it would be easier to ask before I actually went through and signed up....

> Digest format is now available! Thanks to those who tested it.
> Thanks to Charlie with L.O.F. for setting it up.

> BTW, check out the web site, the following has changed in the
> last two days:
>
> 1. graphics have changed
> 2. 49 Merc truck added to pictorial
> 3. parts wanted page added
> 4. Canadian F100/Merc show added to events
> 5. two suppliers added to supplier page
> 6. link for Chevy owners added (humorous)

BTW, the web page is looking really good! I found additional suppliers that I plan to get catalogs from. I also especially liked all those pictures of the old trucks! ; )


Eric
'61 F100 Pick'em truck





------------------------------



------------------------------
....


To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts

Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are not registered, click here to register.
If you are already registered, you can login here.

If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.




Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.