|
|
From: owner-offroad-list-digest To: offroad-list-digest Subject: offroad-list-digest V2 #154 Reply-To: offroad-list Sender: owner-offroad-list-digest Errors-To: owner-offroad-list-digest Precedence: bulk offroad-list-digest Thursday, June 17 1999 Volume 02 : Number 154 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Offroad Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe offroad-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: FTE offroad - Re: 4 spd/auto (long) Re: FTE offroad - auto vs manual FTE offroad - Transport Re: FTE offroad - auto vs manual Re: FTE offroad - auto vs manual Re: FTE offroad - auto vs manual Re: FTE offroad - Transport FTE offroad - Automaticallymanualtranz Re: FTE offroad - 4 speed for auto swap Re: FTE offroad - 4 speed for auto swap Re: FTE offroad - C6 in for NP435 in a 79 Re: FTE offroad - 4 speed for auto swap Re: FTE offroad - auto vs manual FTE offroad - 1999 superduty lift questions.. ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 17:02:50 -0700 From: John Elder Subject: Re: FTE offroad - Re: 4 spd/auto (long) Well said bro' At 08:27 AM 6/13/99 -0600, you wrote: >Here are a few points of comparison between manual and automatic >transmissions: > >Manual - Advantages >Manual - Disadvantages >- >Automatic - Advantages >Automatic - Disadvantages >Alan > John M Elder Senior Technical Training Specialist Globalstar Training S-204A Office: (619) 658-2003 Cell: (619) 254-0084 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 17:20:59 -0700 From: John Elder Subject: Re: FTE offroad - auto vs manual ok, my .02. Automatics are much smarter than manuals, i.e. they are much better at keeping you inside the torque curve of your powerplant. I've driven and raced just about all types. makes, and models of both worlds, and yes a stick is much more exciting and requires lots of activity in the cockpit and make it seem like you are going really fast and doing awesome things. However, even though you just put it in drive and go... I go a A LOT more places an evenly matched standard rig will never go. It's mainly a matter of smooth application of torque to the drive train. Shocking the tires or spining them is highly undesirable on a steep hill or a mud bog. Take a look around at the race day winners, and see what they have. I'd bet most of them drive autos and let their computer do the thinkin' about when to shift. But yes a stick SEEMs cooler..... But when one gets older and wiser.... and tireder is that a word. We like to arrive at the stop without breaking a sweat. At 01:54 PM 6/11/99 -0500, you wrote: >>> Why on earth would you want to switch TO a standard though? >> >>Well this is going to start a whole new thread! Why on earth do people >>buy automatics to begin with if they can master the fine art of >>clutching? > > >>I always thought of it as something for the lazy or incapable.. OK I'm >>a minority since something like 90% of new vehicles are automatics but I >>still snort in disdain when I see a nice truck or sporty car with an >>auto.. > >Amen ... the phrase "oh its an automatic" was heard quite often when I was >looking for a car. I really wanted a V6 'stang (yes a V6), but there were >none around with a 5spd (okay 1 that was 2yrs old with 83,000 on it). I >ended up "settling" for the V8 5spd. I love it to death, but the money I >could've saved by getting the V6, and the balance of the car would have >made it a ball ... of course now I look down my nose at those same cars >that I wanted so bad a year ago ... funny how attitudes change huh ? > > > Sort of off topic but the only fault I find with a Prowler is >>the unavailability of a 'real' transmission.. Auto Stick.. whoopee.. I >>can do that in a station wagon; just have to be more careful about >>moving the shift lever! >> >AMEN!!!!! The Lincoln LS is the same way! I love the idea behind the car, >and would like to drive one sometime, but dang can't you put a manual >behind it ?!?!?!? > > >Just my 2cents > >wish > >Links http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish/links.html >'73 1/2 ton 4x4 Ford http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish/truck.html >'96 Mustang GT http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish/mustang.html >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > John M Elder Senior Technical Training Specialist Globalstar Training S-204A Office: (619) 658-2003 Cell: (619) 254-0084 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 01:49:22 -0700 From: "J.S.H." Subject: FTE offroad - Transport "I'm offering anybody who has trailering experience $1,000 dollars to deliver this truck within the Ohio State borderlines, Period." Pick up a Hemmings Motor News.There are about a dozen transporter ads in there. I spent some time transporting classic cars and I know if you are not in hurry you can get that fine piece of automotive art(I may be biased as I own one) transported "stand by" for $1000. You would have to wait until they have a truck in the area to get the stand by rate.If they dispatch a truck to Montana just for your Ford the price goes way up. The problem with stand by is that they may have a truck on the way to Montana as we speak or it could be three months. BTW the company I worked for is no longer in business or I would personaly help you out. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 09:22:37 -0400 From: James Oxley Subject: Re: FTE offroad - auto vs manual John Elder wrote: > > ok, my .02. Automatics are much smarter than manuals, i.e. they are much > better at keeping you inside the torque curve of your powerplant. Unless you have full manual valve body, which most autos don't, you don't have exact control of your shift points. I can see auto's keeping you below an RPM where your torque curve may fall off, but this assumes that your torque curve indeed does fall off and/or that the manual driver knows zero about their torque curve and where to shift to to mazimize it. I've > driven and raced just about all types. makes, and models of both worlds, > and yes a stick is much more exciting and requires lots of activity in the > cockpit Sticks are usualy faster with an extra gear and/or less power loss. Now if your talking 600 Hp vs 630Hp, the power loss is not significant, but if your talking 150 vs 170, or something in that range, then the auto power loss becomes significant. > things. However, even though you just put it in drive and go... I go a A > LOT more places an evenly matched standard rig will never go. It's mainly > a matter of smooth application of torque to the drive train. Shocking the > tires or spining them is highly undesirable on a steep hill or a mud bog. Sorry, I don't agree on a mud bog. High wheel speed is many times the only thing allowing the tire to clean itself and not turn into a racing slick. I do agree that an auto is better in mud bogs (cause it can shift without stopping) and probably most hill climbs. BUT, if overall gear for rockcrawling is your concern, then older manauls win with a first gear on the order of 3 times the ratio of an automatic. I know, I've heard it all about how the torque converter gives you an infinate ratio way beyond what creeper gear in a manual gives you. It just doesn't seem to work without mucho bucks in an auto and torque converter. I've never driven an auto that has the throttle response that my stock, very low HP 351M and granny first has. stockish auto's are just not linear enough for me in throttle application vs power ouput to the wheels. > Take a look around at the race day winners, and see what they have. I'd > bet most of them drive autos and let their computer do the thinkin' about > when to shift. Probably, but a clutchless manual with compter controlled idle control would really be the way to go. Auto's can not match revs for a down shift entering a turn. > But yes a stick SEEMs cooler..... But when one gets older and wiser.... > and tireder is that a word. We like to arrive at the stop without breaking > a sweat. I agree, too bad it takes so much money to get an auto to the point of being acceptable in shift feel, shift points, manual control, throttle response.... OX == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 09:21:09 EDT From: JUMPINFORD Subject: Re: FTE offroad - auto vs manual In a message dated 6/16/99 1:25:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time, jelder better at keeping you inside the torque curve of your powerplant. >> I also have to disagree here, the auto in my truck shifts at approx 4000-4500. My engine however will turn approximately 6000-6500. Unless I manually shift, I cant even compete with a 305 bowtoy. about when to shift. >> My truck for sure doesnt have a computer. And the computer in all the 97 F-150s Ive driven really make downright crappy shifts if you've got the throttle pressed firmly on the carpet, taking a full 5-6 sec to shift. I know I can shift an old NP435 in about 2 even at most while at full throttle . Darrell Duggan 74 F-350 "Tweety" == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 07:56:54 -0700 From: John Elder Subject: Re: FTE offroad - auto vs manual At 09:21 AM 6/16/99 -0400, you wrote: >In a message dated 6/16/99 1:25:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time, >jelder > >better at keeping you inside the torque curve of your powerplant. >>> >I also have to disagree here, the auto in my truck shifts at approx >4000-4500. My engine however will turn approximately 6000-6500. Unless I >manually shift, I cant even compete with a 305 bowtoy. > But is it still making torque above 4500? A common strategy in drag racing is to short shift 2nd on wide ratio 4spds to stay in the torque/power band. > >about when to shift. >> > >My truck for sure doesnt have a computer. And the computer in all the 97 >F-150s Ive driven really make downright crappy shifts if you've got the >throttle pressed firmly on the carpet, taking a full 5-6 sec to shift. Sonds like they need some service. I >know I can shift an old NP435 in about 2 even at most while at full throttle . > >Darrell Duggan >74 F-350 "Tweety" >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > John M Elder Senior Technical Training Specialist Globalstar Training S-204A Office: (619) 658-2003 Cell: (619) 254-0084 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 11:37:44 -0400 From: Tony Marino Subject: Re: FTE offroad - Transport At 01:49 AM 6/16/99 -0700, you wrote: >"I'm offering anybody who has trailering experience $1,000 dollars to >deliver this truck within the Ohio State borderlines, Period." > >Pick up a Hemmings Motor News.There are about a dozen transporter ads >in there. > I spent some time transporting classic cars and I know if you are not >in hurry you can get that fine piece of automotive art(I may be biased >as I own one) transported "stand by" for $1000. > You would have to wait until they have a truck in the area to get the >stand by rate.If they dispatch a truck to Montana just for your Ford the >price goes way up. > The problem with stand by is that they may have a truck on the way >to Montana as we speak or it could be three months. > BTW the company I worked for is no longer in business or I would >personaly help you out. Ha ha ha-- yeah, I've been waiting about a month and a half now, and I realize the traffic going up that way isn't very substancial, and if I were.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. |