|
|
Please do not repost, forward or otherwise publish messages contained in these archives without consent from the respective author(s). These archives may not, in whole or part, be stored on any public retrieval system (FTP, web, gopher, newsgroup, etc.) by individuals or companies, without consent of the respective authors. Received: with LISTAR (v0.128a; list offroad-list); Fri, 03 Mar 2000 05:32:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 05:32:56 -0500 (EST) From: Ford Truck Enthusiasts List Server To: offroad-list digest users Reply-to: offroad-list Subject: offroad-list Digest V2000 #18 Precedence: bulk ========================================================== Ford Truck Enthusiasts Offroad and 4x4 Truck Mailing List Covering the Ranger, Explorer, Bronco 2 and Aerostar. Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe offroad-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== ------------------------------------ offroad-list Digest Thu, 02 Mar 2000 Volume: 2000 Issue: 018 In This Issue: Fw: Stop OHVs? Over my dead body Re: Bronco II buildup C:\CoolProgs\Pretty Park.exe Re: [perf-list] C:\CoolProgs\Pretty Park.exe Re: [BII vs. Ranger roll over] Re: [Re: Bronco II buildup] Re: [Re: Transmissions, BIIs and Gas Prices] Re: [ Gas Prices] Re: [ Gas Prices] gas price Re: [perf-list] C:\CoolProgs\Pretty Park.exe Re: [perf-list] C:\CoolProgs\Pretty Park.exe Re: [ Gas Prices] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 09:47:31 -0500 From: James Oxley Subject: Fw: Stop OHVs? Over my dead body Maybe more of us could place a pro ORV call March 9th. Lets try and even up the odds here. Randy Peterson Randy Peterson - ----- Original Message ----- From: The Bond's .Subject: Fw: Stop OHVs? Over my dead body > >> Message from "The Bond's" > > SLO 4 Wheelers > We should call in on the 9th > Jim-- > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Kelita Svoboda > To: Rob Rasor > > Cook > Cc: Dana Bell > Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 2:28 PM > Subject: Fw: Stop OHVs? Over my dead body > > > > FYI... > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: WillieSut > > To: undisclosed-recipients:; > > Date: Friday, February 25, 2000 4:17 PM > > Subject: Stop OHVs? Over my dead body > > > > > > >Why not contact these wonderful folks and tell them what you think about > > >their idea? Or maybe we should have a "Pro-OHV call in day the same day > > they > > >are calling in to stop us? Man, this really sucks! > > >********* > > >> To: All Activists > > >> From: Melanie Mayock, Recreation Campaigner > > >> Date: February 24, 2000 > > >> > > >> OFF-ROAD VEHICLE CALL-IN DAY MARCH 9TH > > >> Tell the Forest Service to Properly Manage ORVs to Protect Natural > > >> Resources > > >> > > >> Off-road vehicles (ORVs) are one of the fastest growing threats to our > > >> nation's public lands. Motorcycles, snowmobiles, and other vehicles > > >> erode soils, damage vegetation, harass wildlife, pollute our air and > > >> water, and destroy the recreational experience of hikers, sportsmen, > > >and > > >> others. The Forest Service, however, has largely ignored the > > >> environmental damage and user conflicts created by ORVs > > >> > > >> To remedy this problem, over 100 conservation organizations (led by the > > >> Wilderness Society and the Wildlands Center for Preventing Roads) > > >> petitioned the Forest Service in December to develop a comprehensive > > >> policy to address the environmental impacts of ORVs on National Forest > > >> lands. > > >> > > >> The petition calls on the Forest Service to adopt regulations to: > > >> 1) Limit ORV use to designated roads and trails; > > >> 2) Designate ORV routes only where it has been shown that use of a > > >route > > >> will not cause adverse environmental impacts; > > >> 3) Allow ORV route and facilities designation, construction, and > > >> upgrading only following analysis under NEPA; > > >> 4) Prohibit ORV use unless monitoring and enforcement are fully funded > > >> and implemented; > > >> 5) Prohibit ORV use in proposed wilderness areas, inventoried roadless > > >> areas, and other areas with roadless values except on roads for which > > >> their use has been formally designated. > > >> > > >> These changes are the minimum steps necessary to safeguard the > > >> environmental quality of our National Forest lands from damaging ORV > > >> use. The Forest Service, however, is already facing strong pressure > > >> from the well-funded ORV lobby against the President's roadless > > >> initiative. Clearly the Chief needs to hear from conservationists as > > >> well! > > >> > > >> Help turn up the pressure on the Forest Service to properly manage ORV > > >> use by participating in a national call-in day to Chief Dombeck on > > >March > > >> 9th. Call Chief Dombeck at (202) 205-1661 (8:15 am to 4:45 pm Eastern > > >> Time) and urge him to protect the natural resources of our National > > >> Forests by approving the ORV rulemaking petition. The fax number is: > > >> (202) 205-1765. > > >> > > >> For more information, contact Melanie Mayock, American Lands' > > >Recreation > > >> Campaigner, at (202) 547-9267, mailto:mmayock > > >> ------------------------------ From: "Graulau, Victor" Subject: Re: Bronco II buildup Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 16:47:21 -0500 Has anyone done any Transmission work on a 96 Ford Explorer ? I have some problems with it sticking in 2nd and 3rd gears.(Automatic Transmission), plus I would like to know about some peformance kits for 4.0L Pushrod v6, I know that this engine has been used in Explorer's mountaineers and Ranger PU's. I want to see if I can get some more get up and go on that V-6. -----Original Message----- From: Adam McLaughlin [mailto:kd6poc Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 7:35 PM To: offroad-list Subject: [offroad-list] Re: Bronco II buildup Hi David, David Wilkins wrote: > The whole reason I got onto this list is just to find out what others have done, learn more, and make educated guesses for what I want. Curious though, why go to an auto tranny if you like a clutch so much. To save the +$2,000 it would be to keep it a manual transmission. > From the offroading that I have done, I prefer clutches to auto's. I have driven both, and just don't feel like I have the same control over the truck with the auto. I like chosing when to shift! I also like the car not deciding when to jump gears on me! Makes for an unstable vehicle when you don't know what's going on. > > David > > P.S. I live in Raleigh NC, so it would be kinda hard for me to get up with your friend and see his work. > Rats, ah well. Maybe some day I'll get my hands on another digital camera. > > ;-) > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:20:07 -0800 > From: Adam McLaughlin > Subject: Re: Bronco II buildup > > Hi David, > > You're right. If I were you, I would only throw away bad money. :-) > > If my Ranger gets her 5.0, it'll be backed with a AOD or a C4. I too love the > grunt of the clutch, but I have to be financially realistic. > > The best things to do are to see what others have done, and use their ideas, > modified to your own purpose to create your own. > > Where do you live? > > If you're in sonoma county, I'd introduce you to a freind of mine. He's got a > 1990 5.0 HO coupled to an AOD in a 1983 Ranger. (Wanna race??) You could see > what he's done, and then take some ideas back to your garage. > > Adam > > ========================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe offroad-list" in the body of the message. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 17:35:30 -0500 From: "Mike McPhillips" Subject: C:\CoolProgs\Pretty Park.exe Test: Pretty Park.exe :) Mike McPhillips -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Listar -- -- Type: application/octet-stream -- File: Pretty Park.exe ------------------------------ From: tvsjr Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 17:33:41 -0600 Subject: Re: [perf-list] C:\CoolProgs\Pretty Park.exe Mike, you have the Pretty Park trojan horse! Go to www.norton.com or another reputable site and get info and something to kill it with. Luckily, Listar stripped the binary so no one else became infected. In short, this virus, once run, sends itself to everyone in your address book. For those that have extensive address books (me, with about 700 entries) this can cause problems in a hurry. Terry At 05:35 PM 03/02/2000 -0500, you wrote: >Test: Pretty Park.exe :) > > Mike McPhillips > > >-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Listar -- >-- Type: application/octet-stream >-- File: Pretty Park.exe > > >========================================================== >To unsubscribe, send email to: listar >the words "unsubscribe perf-list" in the body of the >message. ------------------------------ Date: 2 Mar 00 19:25:26 EST From: Tim Turner Subject: Re: [BII vs. Ranger roll over] Rebel4dMan > Scientifically, a Bronco II should deffinitly roll over easier than a Ranger. > Same frame, same suspension, same ride height, etc. Shorter wheelbase though if that changes anything in the equations.. > but the BII has more > weight up top giving it a higher center of gravity. Mostly glass and thin sheet metal; probably not as much weight as you might think. I'd guess no worse than adding a cap to the bed of the Ranger. > So under the same > conditions, a BII would roll before a Ranger. I'd tend to agree; I'll push a Ranger harder into a turn than my B-II. OTOH during the evacuation from Hurricane Floyd I had to make a sharp evasive move to avoid an idiot trying to merge into highway traffic (and not hit the rapidly approaching Honda in the left lane!) The B-II handled it well, but I'll admit to doing it quickly but SMOOTHLY.. had I just yanked the wheel hard left the Honda, but that's preferable to plowing into an LTD or flipping into the median! :-) > I'm certian (after driving a BII) that if my Ranger was a BII I would > have rolled it. Hopefully not.. The rear windows in the B-II are expensive buggers! > Don't ever do what I did, it scared the sh!t out of me and > the guy sittin' next to me. And anybody watching! Tim ____________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://webmail.netscape.com. ------------------------------ Date: 2 Mar 00 19:54:39 EST From: Tim Turner Subject: Re: [Re: Bronco II buildup] "David Wilkins" > > Curious though, why go to an auto tranny if you like a clutch so much. The extra adapters are expensive! Plus the trannies are a bit weak for V-8 use.. :-( One of the reasons I'll stay with the V-6 in my B-II. (that and the weird a$$ emission laws here..) > From the offroading that I have done, I prefer clutches to auto's. I have driven both, and just don't feel like I have the same control over the truck with the auto. Amen brother! Sometimes in mud or sand the truck slows quickly during the shifting, but I'll take that annoyance over an unwanted downshift that breaks my traction... Plus I can replace a lot of clutches myself for what a professional tranny overhaul costs. > > David > > P.S. I live in Raleigh NC, so it would be kinda hard for me to get up with your friend and see his work. Since the 5.0 was never offered in the B-II it wont pass NC inspection if the inspector's a tight-nose. Makes no sense to me.. a FI 5.0 would have to be cleaner emission-wise than my rich running carb'd 2.8 but I didn't make the laws.. P.S. If you happen to vacation at the beach in Wilmington NC and see a B-II with a tire carrier reading "Manic Mechanic" honk the horn and give me a wave! :-) Tim Turner Custer Auto Repair Wilmington NC ____________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://webmail.netscape.com. ------------------------------ Date: 2 Mar 00 20:22:14 EST From: Tim Turner Subject: Re: [Re: Transmissions, BIIs and Gas Prices] Adam McLaughlin > Why do the Rangers Roll? I have a 1988 Bronco II with 3" James Duff Suspension, > 2" James Duff body lift and 31" tires, and I have never gotten into a dangerous > situation. I was always told that the BIIs have a tendency to get tipsy... I've > never seen it. > It's only in abrupt cornering especially of the back & forth type. Probably wouldn't be an issue if Consumer Reports had never seen a Suzuki Samurai! Rolls are a part of off-roading that we accept but do our best to avoid. Llike snake bites or sink holes.. crap happens.. and often it's largely our own fault. The only time I ever lifted a tire on my B-II I was doing three stupid things at once. (A: BAC was way too high, B: I was mad, C: Driving into corners like I was in the Capri due to A & B.. Glad I and the truck survived my OOC jaunt.) Tim ____________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://webmail.netscape.com. ------------------------------ Date: 2 Mar 00 20:37:26 EST From: Tim Turner Subject: Re: [ Gas Prices] Adam McLaughlin > Gas is up to $1.83 here today. (Premium chevron) The BII usually gets 12.8 MPG, > but the F-250 about 8. > > How much are you paying for gas? Self serve regular U-lead is $1.38-1.50 today (3-2-00); was a nickle less yesterday; add about 15-20 cents for premium depending on the brand. I may re-think my usual 2000 Mile round trip to Maine this summer if the prices keep going up. Tim Wilmington NC ____________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://webmail.netscape.com. ------------------------------ From: DenBadAxe Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 21:02:23 EST Subject: Re: [ Gas Prices] gas in mass is 1.69 for super Mobil ------------------------------ From: DenBadAxe Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 21:03:38 EST Subject: gas price and the old 47 cj2a with a 69 boss mustang 302 with about 350 hp gets about 4 miles to the gallon, think i am going to get the bike out ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 22:20:19 -0500 From: Ken Payne Subject: Re: [perf-list] C:\CoolProgs\Pretty Park.exe At 05:33 PM 3/2/00 -0600, you wrote: >Mike, you have the Pretty Park trojan horse! Go to www.norton.com or >another reputable site and get info and something to kill it with. Luckily, >Listar stripped the binary so no one else became infected. > >In short, this virus, once run, sends itself to everyone in your address >book. For those that have extensive address books (me, with about 700 >entries) this can cause problems in a hurry. > >Terry I take virus protection very seriously. Mike has be temporarily unsubscribed until he cleans his system. Ken Payne Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts ------------------------------ From: tvsjr Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 23:09:28 -0600 Subject: Re: [perf-list] C:\CoolProgs\Pretty Park.exe >I take virus protection very seriously. Mike has >be temporarily unsubscribed until he cleans his >system. > >Ken Payne >Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forgive the cross-posting, but I thought that this would be of interest to both lists. First of all, Ken, thanks for having everything configured nicely where Listar trashed the binary file - you probably saved a few people some headaches! And, for those that have the worm, here is the Norton Anti-Virus information: PrettyPark.Worm Detected as:PrettyPark.Worm, W32.PrettyPark.C.Worm, W32.PrettyPark.D.Worm Aliases:Trojan Horse, W32.PrettyPark, Trojan.PSW.CHV, CHV, W32/Pretty.worm.unp Known Variants:W32.PrettyPark.C.Worm, W32.PrettyPark.D.Worm Infection Length:37,376; 17,081 (C variant); 60928 (D variant) Area of Infection:C:\Windows\System, Registry, email attachments Likelihood:Common Detected as of:June 1, 1999; February 2, 2000 (C variant); February 18, 2000 (D variant) Characteristics:Worm, PrettyPark.EXE, Files32.VXD Norton AntiVirus users can protect themselves from this virus by downloading the current virus definitions either through LiveUpdate or from the Download Virus Definition Updates page. Description This worm program behaves similarly to Happy99 Worm. It was originally spread by email spamming from a French email address. The original report of this worm was submitted through our exclusive Scan&Deliver system on May 28, 1999 from France. When the attached program file, PrettyPark.exe, is executed, it may display the 3D pipe screen saver. It also creates a file called files32.vxd in the Windows\System directory and modifies the following registry entry value from "%1" %* to files32.vxd "%1" %* without your knowledge: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Classes\exefile\ shell\open\command Once the worm program is executed, it tries to email itself automatically every 30 minutes (or 30 minutes after it is loaded) to email addresses registered in your Internet address book. It also tries to connect to an IRC server and join a specific IRC channel. The worm sends information to IRC every 30 seconds to keep itself connected, and to retrieve any commands from the IRC channel. Via IRC, the author or distributor of the worm can obtain system information including the computer name, product name, product identifier, product key, registered owner, registered organization, system root path, version, version number, ICQ identification numbers, ICQ nicknames, victim's email address, and Dial Up Networking username and passwords. In addition, being connected to IRC opens a security hole in which the client can potentially be used to receive and execute files. Repair Information To remove the PrettyPark worm: On the Windows taskbar, click Start > Run. Type REGEDIT, then click OK. Modify the following Registry value: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Classes\exefile\ shell\open\command and change files32.vxd "%1" %* to "%1" %* For clarity, these seven characters are the following: double quote, percent sign, the numeral one, double quote, space, percent sign, and asterisk. Don't forget the space. Delete the PrettyPark.exe file. Restart your computer. Delete the \Windows\System\Files32.vxd file. Safe Computing Because of Worms and Trojan Horse programs, you must practice safe computing. Be suspicious of executable file attachments (for example, .exe, .shs, or MS Word, or MS Excel files), especially ones from newsgroups or unknown sources. For continuous protection, always run Norton AntiVirus Auto-Protect and use LiveUpdate to make sure you have the latest virus definitions. Source: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/prettypark.worm.html Terry ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 05:34:48 -0500 From: J Cope <88biixlt Subject: Re: [ Gas Prices] Where in Mass are ya? My permanant address is in Westford, but I go to school at UMass Dartmouth. JCJC '88 BII XLT 10k tow hooks 40ch CB K&N > Light bar Headlight Stone Guards 30x9.5 BFG A/T TA KOs http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://88biixlt.web.com/ -----Original Message----- From: offroad-list-bounce [mailto:offroad-list-bounce DenBadAxe Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2000 9:02 PM To: offroad-list Subject: [offroad-list] Re: [ Gas Prices] gas in mass is 1.69 for super Mobil ------------------------------ End of offroad-list Digest V2000 #18 ************************************ ---------------------------------------------------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts Offroad and 4x4 Truck List Send posts to offroad-list If you ever want to remove yourself from this mailing list, send an email to: listar with the words "unsubscribe offroad-list" in the subject ofthe message. Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com ---------------------------------------------------------- .... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. |