|
|
Return-Path: Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 04:52:11 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks97up-digest To: fordtrucks97up-digest Subject: fordtrucks97up-digest V1 #17 Reply-To: fordtrucks97up Sender: owner-fordtrucks97up-digest fordtrucks97up-digest Thursday, March 5 1998 Volume 01 : Number 017 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1997 And Newer Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks97up-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: Mileage ["Stanley D. Wainwright" ] Re: Mileage [Kenn Robinette ] Mileage [Wayne Shunamon ] info please ["Jan Lane" ] Re: info please [Robert Hill ] Re: info please ["Dale A. Secord" ] Re: Mileage [Ryan Gajeski ] poor milage [kathryn phillips ] ADMIN: Decision on advertising on the lists [Ken Payne RE: poor milage ["Beaman, James" ] Re: info please [Rod Loewen ] Re: Mileage [Jim Clementz ] ADMIN: Opinions/feedback on web site [Ken Payne ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 07:17:11 -0500 From: "Stanley D. Wainwright" Subject: Re: Mileage George, I have a 98 F-150 Supercab, 2x4, 4.6 V8, 3.55 rear axle, and get 17 mpg city - 19 mpg highway. Stan Wainwright >>> "George Jeffers" 03/03 8:51 PM >>> I have a 98 F-150 and am a little disappointed in my mileage. Wondered if anyone out there could let me know if they are getting anything significantly different. 98 F-150 Supercab 2X4 4.2 V6 Automatic 3.55 rear axel 15 mpg I know I didn't get a Geo, but I did expect at least 17-18. George Jeffers +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1997 and Newer --------------+ | Send posts to fordtrucks97up | List removal instructions on the website. | +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 08:26:06 -0600 From: Kenn Robinette Subject: Re: Mileage I am about to buy a '98 F-150 and with regards to George's mileage, has anyone else had the same experience with the 4.2 or (with that kind of mileage) should one not opt for the V-8? Hhhmmm. Kenn Robinette George Jeffers wrote: > I have a 98 F-150 and am a little disappointed in my mileage. Wondered if > anyone out there could let me know if they are getting anything > significantly different. > > 98 F-150 Supercab > 2X4 > 4.2 V6 > Automatic > 3.55 rear axel > 15 mpg > > I know I didn't get a Geo, but I did expect at least 17-18. > > George Jeffers > > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1997 and Newer --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks97up > | List removal instructions on the website. | > +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 08:54:56 -0600 From: Wayne Shunamon Subject: Mileage George, I have a 97 F-150 Supercab 2x4, 4.2 V6, Automatic 3.55 rear axel Bought in June 1996 We got about 16 mpg the first 15 thousand miles or so. Then it started to get better. In Oct 97 we went on a trip (3000 miles) and got 19.8 all the way. Now ay 40,300 miles we are steadily getting just a tick over 20 mpg. I think they get better with age. Wayne Shunamon ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 08:58:33 -0600 From: "Jan Lane" Subject: info please Dear Members, Has anyone had experience towing a fifth wheel camper? I own a '97 F250 shortbox Ford. Interested in towing a 35' fifth wheel. I would appreciate any info on the ability of this truck to do so. Thanks.....Rich ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 10:09:29 -0600 From: Robert Hill Subject: Re: info please I have a 97 F250 Supercab Short box and pull a 31 foot fifth wheel camper. What specifically do you need to know? BTW, I think a 35' may be a little much for that truck. Bob Jan Lane wrote: > Dear Members, > > Has anyone had experience towing > a fifth wheel camper? > > I own a '97 F250 shortbox Ford. > Interested in towing a 35' fifth wheel. > > I would appreciate any info on the > ability of this truck to do so. > > Thanks.....Rich > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1997 and Newer --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks97up > | List removal instructions on the website. | > +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 08:35:03 +0000 From: "Dale A. Secord" Subject: Re: info please From: "Jan Lane" To: "fordtrucks97up" Subject: info please Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 08:58:33 -0600 Reply-to: fordtrucks97up Dear Members, Has anyone had experience towing a fifth wheel camper? I own a '97 F250 shortbox Ford. Interested in towing a 35' fifth wheel. I would appreciate any info on the ability of this truck to do so. Thanks.....Rich Rich, you may be heading for trouble. Check the tow rating of the F250 and compare against the GVW of the 5th wheel. Also consider any payload weight, beyond the dry weight of the 5th wheel. You should consider not only the ability to pull a 35' fifth wheel but the ability to stop it coming down long steep grades. You might want to post your question to rv-talk additional thoughts. This is an RV mail list. Good Luck Dale Secord Sacramento ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 12:39:31 -0600 (CST) From: Ryan Gajeski Subject: Re: Mileage I have the 95 351 v-8 and I still get about 18 miles to the gallon. Everyone that I talk to with a v-6 seems to get not that great of milage. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 17:32:45 -0500 From: kathryn phillips Subject: poor milage i am new to the list and i love it !!!!!! i have a 98 f-150 x-cab v6 5 speed 3.55 gears 17-18 per gal. also i believe it is the gears, my work truck is 97 reg. cab long bed v6 auto loaded with elect. parts gets better milage than my wifes truck only 2-3 miles but thats alot some times. mike phillips ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 17:51:03 -0500 From: Ken Payne Subject: ADMIN: Decision on advertising on the lists I'd like to thank everyone for all the responses I've received so far. I plan on putting them together into one text file, posting them to the web and emailing the URL to the lists this evening. The number of responses has been high and I don't want to flood the lists with them. Everyone deserves to know the opinions expressed so they will be on a web page (which won't have any external links so your comments are kept private). Although so far there hasn't been a landslide in either direction, some very compelling reasons for not advertising have been brought to my attention. 1. Where do I draw the line? If we open the door to this, what's to stop me from putting an ad on the bottom of **each** post? 2. Doesn't this go against the charter? If we modify the charter or ignore this portion of it doesn't it invalid the entire reason for having one? 3. What happens if a user has problems with the advertiser? Can he openly complain about it without fear of getting on my "hit list?" 4. What happens if an advertiser has a problem with a user? Right now, the advertisers know that web advertising is completely unrelated to the lists. 5. Mailing lists have, for the most part, been the oasis free from advertising on the Internet. 6 Can I remain unbiased? I would like to think so but I'm only human. Since reading many opinions, especially those from long time members, I would have a very difficult time looking members in the eye (virtually and at the Pigeon Forge show) who have donated money to keep the lists going. One person even sent $100 this past summer after we got our (expensive) domain name. I normally put things like this to a vote, but in this case I won't. The principle of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" seems to apply. The lists work, they work well and they certainly aren't broken. I think that once you read the opinions you'll agree. Ken Payne Admin ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 17:10:22 -0600 From: "Beaman, James" Subject: RE: poor milage Mike Phillips wrote: > i am new to the list and i love it !!!!!! > i have a 98 f-150 x-cab v6 5 speed 3.55 gears 17-18 per gal. also > i believe it is the gears, my work truck is 97 reg. cab long bed > v6 auto loaded with elect. parts gets better milage than my wifes > truck only 2-3 miles but thats alot some times. > mike phillips > Welcome to the list, Mike. I hate to post this to a new member but I decided to let you know that posts with no capitalization where appropriate and run on sentences are difficult to follow. There is another regular poster on the list who neglects capitalization and every time I read one of his posts, a little annoyance bell goes off in the back of my head even though I appreciate his knowledge and contribution to the group. I think posts such as these would carry more weight with me if they used correct capitalization and punctuation. Just wanted to get that off my chest. I have been debating about whether to mention this in the past and just chose you as the poor soul to tee off on. I must be getting old for this to bother me. Again, welcome. James Beaman james.beaman Houston, Texas ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 16:53:46 -0800 From: Rod Loewen Subject: Re: info please I pull a 32' 5th. wheel patio hauler with my 97 PSD 4X4 with 5spd. Also a short box, which limits how far I can "jacknife". We usually run arond 10 to 12 tons depending on the toys we're hauling and the truck handles great. Just go slow and easy down long hills. Average about 13 mpg loaded. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 20:54:52 -0500 From: Jim Clementz Subject: Re: Mileage George: I too have a 98 F-150 extended cab with the 4.6L, Automatic and 3.55 gears in back. Most of my driving is around Virginia Beach where everything is flat and the lights are timed perfectly (hit them all red around here). I'm getting a very steady 13.5mpg around town and on one trip to Ohio got 17.5. So far, only put a K&N on it (always use them) but soon will be putting a Gibson cat back single 3" exhaust so I'll see if it makes any difference. If gas gets expensive again, I'll get a 4 banger econobox for about a grand. I never did expect fuel economy out of this beast! ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 21:40:58 -0500 From: Ken Payne Subject: ADMIN: Opinions/feedback on web site.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|