From: owner-97up-list-digest ford-trucks.com (97up-list-digest)
To: 97up-list-digest ford-trucks.com
Subject: 97up-list-digest V2 #256
Reply-To: 97up-list ford-trucks.com
Sender: owner-97up-list-digest ford-trucks.com
Errors-To: owner-97up-list-digest ford-trucks.com
Precedence: bulk


97up-list-digest Wednesday, September 22 1999 Volume 02 : Number 256



=======================================================================
Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1997 and Newer Trucks and Vans
Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe, send email to:
majordomo ford-trucks.com
with the words "unsubscribe 97up-list-digest" in the body of the
message.
=======================================================================
In this issue:

Re: FTE 97up - question about the new gmc and silverado compared with ford
Re: FTE 97up - Re: Door cracks

=======================================================================

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 00:10:41 -0400
From: Jean Marc Chartier
Subject: Re: FTE 97up - question about the new gmc and silverado compared with ford

TRITON46L aol.com wrote:
>
> has anyone here test drove the 99 gmc or silverado trucks, light duty or
> whichever. i keep hearing that these trucks are far superior to ford in
> every way.
> i just wanna know what the truth here is, i know it's a lot of opinion
> too.
> the cab of the chevys and gmc does "look" bigger. but I'm 6'6" i don't
> think an inch or two or three in the ext Cab would matter much with my
> height.
> But I guess small children or average height people would have more room
> back there.
> But aside from the cab b.s. what about these new engines? they make
> their torque at such a high rpm. i am not the best mechanic in the world,
> but i would think that in a truck u would want your peak torque at a low rpm,
> like 1500-3000. or somewhere in that range.
> i';ve also heard that torque at a high rpm is better because u can take
> advantage of gearing. i don't know what the hell to believe. if anyone has
> any answers to clarify this, please help!!!
> all i know is that i have a 99 f-150 supercab 4.6L triton v-8 4 spd
> auto. 3.55 reg axle. 4x2. without a towing package.
> On Monday i towed a 7,000 LB trailer out to lake eufaula in eastern
> Oklahoma.
> true Oklahoma is flat. much flatter than my home state of Pennsylvania. but
> out I-40 east bound in okla it does get kind hilly.
> i towed this trailer with my bumper, rated at 5,000lbs. i towed it no
> problem at all. eng temp remained normal, my tach read between 2800-3200
> rpms. i averaged between 75-85 mph. it didn't get the best gas mileage, but
> i didn't expect that it would.
> oh by the way, my overdrive was obviously off.
> i talked to a guy last night who told me he tows his bass boat with his
> 98 gmc 2500 vortech 454 at 4000 rpm with overdrive on. he said his redline
> was 6000 rpm and he got about 16 miles per gallon. i told him i thought he
> was full of horse poo (pardon my foul language :)).
> then again i may be wrong.
> so if anyone on this list who tows a lot can educate me on this stuff, i
> would appreciate your time.
>
> sorry for writing a book.
> Thanks Bill
> == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

Bill,

The best thing is to go out and look at one yourself to
see. Now, you are comparing a 454 cu in to a 283. You have
about 62% of their engine. You have a 150 and his is
equivalent to a 250. Who is the winner? BTW you were 100
lbs over the trailer limit for your truck's configuration.
If you want to compare apples to apples go try an F-250 SD
with a V10. No insult intended to the F-150 ( I have a 4x4
on order) but it is really unfair to compare an F150 to a
GMC 2500.

Regards

Jean Marc Chartier
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 00:14:31 -0400
From: Jean Marc Chartier
Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Re: Door cracks

"Ron,Marge,Ted" wrote:
>
> HI,
> Did I miss something about the torsion bars?? Don't remember seeing any
> posts about torsion bars.
> Ron

Ron,
A while back on another list a few people complained about
Torsion bars snapping. 4x4s were the only trucks affected.

Regards

Jean Marc Chartier
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

End of 97up-list-digest V2 #256
*******************************

+------ Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1997 and Newer Trucks and Vans ------+
| Send posts to 97up-list ....


To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts

Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are not registered, click here to register.
If you are already registered, you can login here.

If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.




Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.