|
|
From: owner-97up-list-digest
To: 97up-list-digest Subject: 97up-list-digest V2 #253 Reply-To: 97up-list Sender: owner-97up-list-digest Errors-To: owner-97up-list-digest Precedence: bulk 97up-list-digest Monday, September 20 1999 Volume 02 : Number 253 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1997 and Newer Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe 97up-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: FTE 97up - The crack FTE 97up - Crack is a safety issue FTE 97up - Chassis Lubrication-97 F150 4X4: Please help! Re: FTE 97up - 5 th wheel trailer questions Re: FTE 97up - Chassis Lubrication-97 F150 4X4: Please help! FTE 97up - F150 Sheetmetal Cracks Re: FTE 97up - F150 Sheetmetal Cracks Re: FTE 97up - F150 Sheetmetal Cracks FTE 97up - discovery ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 08:56:35 -0400 (EDT) From: dlsipe Subject: FTE 97up - The crack For Terry and those of you who don't yet know where to make your complaint: First complain to your dealer, then to Ford Customer Service, then you can file a complaint with the NHTSA at dot.gov NHTSA is the gov't agency dealing with automotive safety and defect issues. I can definitely see Ford fighting this all the way, saying that it's not a safety issue but, working with the NHTSA may be the only chance of getting this resolved at the rightful expense of FOMOCO. If you haven't filed a complaint with the NHTSA, I highly reccomend you do so. Brandon-I know a lot of this is repeat information, but some people are obviously just finding out about it. I appreciate you offer of distributing flyers on the issue to Ford owners. I would like to see this done as well. I would be glad to make a flyer, but I only have a webtv unit which in incapable of document production. Good luck! Darin == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 08:22:31 -0500 From: "Allemand, Andre'" Subject: FTE 97up - Crack is a safety issue The crack we are all talking about IS a safety issue as well as a cosmetic one. Any compromise in structural integrity could leave the occupants prone to additional injury. As we travel down the highway the "safety cage" is the only barrier protection between us and other vehicles. For an example, take an empty aluminum soda can. Grab it on the top and bottom and twist. The can should crumple evenly into a smaller cylinder. Now take another can and cut or create a small "crack" in it. Do the same twisting motion, the can will tear. Take these findings and relate them back to a multiforce accident in your truck. Get the picture..? Boomer == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 19:08:28 -0400 (EDT) From: dlsipe Subject: FTE 97up - Chassis Lubrication-97 F150 4X4: Please help! My 97 4X4 has developed some serious squeaks in the driver's side front end in the last 2 days. I went under today to take a look for anything obvious, and to lube the pivot points. The only obvious thing I found was the lack of grease fittings. There were none anywhere on the ball joints or steering linkage. How is one supposed to get grease into the joints? Darin == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 19:49:59 -0400 From: "Bill Wood" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - 5 th wheel trailer questions The term "fith wheel" dates back to the horse and buggy days. There was a pivot pin and bearing in the center which was hard bolted together. Then there was a circle shaped load bearing ring (or plate) located on the wagon frame. Below this , on the axle was another ring (or wheel), which the load rested on. This permited the front axle to turn under the wagon ,provide the draw point and support the load. As most wagons had four wheels on the ground, this was refered to as the "fith wheel". As autos replaced horses, adapter plates were bolted to the frames of early trucks, in place of the wagon axle. A very good example of this can be seen in antique fire apparatus. Many steam pumpers and ladders were converted from horse drawn to auto drawn. Even early "semi" trucks were permanent mount. Then a quick detach system was devloped to enable one "horse" to haul many different wagons (today's fith wheel). Over time, many different plate/pin and ball/hitch systems which are usually mounted over the truck axle are refered to as "fith wheel hitches for this reason. Trailers which use these methods of attachment are refered to as "fith wheel" to tell them apart from "bumper bangers". - ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Friday, September 17, 1999 11:55 PM Subject: Re: FTE 97up - 5 th wheel trailer questions > i know where it hooks up to. but why is it called a fifth wheel trailer? > that's what i wanna know > > > Bill > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 19:01:47 -0500 From: "Mike Fairleigh" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Chassis Lubrication-97 F150 4X4: Please help! One isn't. This is yet another great design innovation of the late 20th century, "maintenance-free" suspension components. It probably also explains why my '98 F150 SC had to have the pittman arm replaced at 12,000 miles. Mike Fairleigh mikef ...Always remembering our veterans. - ----- Original Message ----- From: Darin Sipe To: Sent: Sunday, September 19, 1999 6:08 PM Subject: FTE 97up - Chassis Lubrication-97 F150 4X4: Please help! > My 97 4X4 has developed some serious squeaks in the driver's side front > end in the last 2 days. How is one supposed to get grease into the > joints? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 19:15:04 PDT From: "Scott Matus" Subject: FTE 97up - F150 Sheetmetal Cracks Now that we have established that the problem is real and affects both doors, lets get this planned/coordinated. I would be willing to make and distribute fliers on the problem. We must first use this medium to determine the direction of the complaints. I mean what entity will have the largest impact in the customer compliant campaign. Is it Ford directly (there will be zero press on this route)? Government agency (I suspect that we would need LARGE numbers here to get impact)? Press directly (It may be difficult to get initial press, secondary press is possible)? Independent Agency ( This would involve some $ - anyone willing to open pockets?)? We need to have each of these mediums (or others I've missed) investigated. I think that with our large readership, we should have very good coverage. I propose to anyone with experience dealing with the methods listed above, Investigate it now! Then report back to the list with answers to the following questions: What complaint numbers are required to get this agency/medium to assist? What specifically can they offer in engineering, spreading the word, government assistance, or applying pressure to Ford? Once we have the agency/medium(s) online, then we can begin to distribute fliers to all F150s that ALL FTE membership may come in contact. We must make tis a coordinated effort, or it will fail. Please send the scathing e-mails if I'm off base here. We can make the fliers into a one page "crack.pdf" file to distribute to the redership that wants to help out. Scott. ______________________________________________________ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 22:05:28 -0500 From: tvsjr Subject: Re: FTE 97up - F150 Sheetmetal Cracks However, you have big numbers. Multiple people on this list own fleets of these trucks- someone mentioned owning 100+. I suggest a multipronged attack. Get everything together. Have every person get photos of their cracks (no pun intended ;-) and write up a brief description of what is wrong. Get one person (preferably a lawyer on here somewhere) to organize each complaint and the photos that go with it. Go make copies of the entire thing and bind it some way. Call Ford and tell them what's wrong. Send them the information. They'll review it and probably tell you to screw off. Then, call the feds. Give them the information. They'll be forced to seriously investigate the problem. While they are working on that, hit Ford where it hurts- the pocketbook. Each person should call every media outlet in their city. If a person gets a response, and the media organization wants the documentation, whoever is organizing the info should send it PROMPTLY out. If all else fails, a class-action lawsuit MIGHT be feasible. Only three things are going to make Ford take care of this: A. Feds crawling over the entire design layout for the F-150 trucks. B. Multiple TV/radio stations/newspapers/etc. calling and asking questions, and then running stories making the problem public, which will affect their profits (hopefully). C. Pure annoyance. If enough people complain about the crack, Ford might eventually give up. Couple the three together, and we can make Ford take care of this. Don't get me wrong: There will be money spent to make all of this work, but it CAN be done. Of course, these are just my suggestions. I don't even own an F-150. Terry At 07:15 PM 09/19/1999 -0700, you wrote: >Now that we have established that the problem is real and affects both >doors, lets get this planned/coordinated. I would be willing to make and >distribute fliers on the problem. We must first use this medium to >determine the direction of the complaints. I mean what entity will have the >largest impact in the customer compliant campaign. > >Is it Ford directly (there will be zero press on this route)? > >Government agency (I suspect that we would need LARGE numbers here to get >impact)? > >Press directly (It may be difficult to get initial press, secondary press is >possible)? > >Independent Agency ( This would involve some $ - anyone willing to open >pockets?)? > >We need to have each of these mediums (or others I've missed) investigated. >I think that with our large readership, we should have very good coverage. > >I propose to anyone with experience dealing with the methods listed above, >Investigate it now! Then report back to the list with answers to the >following questions: > >What complaint numbers are required to get this agency/medium to assist? > >What specifically can they offer in engineering, spreading the word, >government assistance, or applying pressure to Ford? > >Once we have the agency/medium(s) online, then we can begin to distribute >fliers to all F150s that ALL FTE membership may come in contact. We must >make tis a coordinated effort, or it will fail. > >Please send the scathing e-mails if I'm off base here. We can make the >fliers into a one page "crack.pdf" file to distribute to the redership that >wants to help out. > >Scott. > >______________________________________________________ > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 23:28:01 EDT From: CERESJohnG Subject: Re: FTE 97up - F150 Sheetmetal Cracks You know folks, I think that Ford can and will ignore you beyond the warranty period regardless of the amount of h--l raising you do. They have sold the vehicle with a specific warranty. Beyond that, quite frankly if the truck simply safely collapsed on the highway you legally have no recourse. The only avenue open to you is bad publicity and embarrasing the company sufficiently that they will do something. Let's face it, the US Manufactureres almost didn't survive the lousy design issues that popped up in the 60's and 70's. Remember those neat ones that started to rust on the showroom floor? The small car disasters that simply looked cheap while the Japanese somehow always made beige vinyl interiors look passable. Vega's were a classic but most US vehicles suffered from rust problems and relaibility problems The payback was the mass exodus to Asian vehicles whose engineers did and still do their homework. The Asian vehicles are complex, a bear to repair and parts are expensive BUT they generally keep running and don't need a lot of work if they are maintained,. They get a lot of performance out of small packages something the US manufacturers have Just started to figure out. For large truck owners, Asia's not an option, Toyota ain't there yet and the rest are not close but if Ford see's this finally as a reliability issue that will cost them sales Then they may decide to retrofit. Otherwise they will fix the problem on new ones to shut down further complaints and leave the rest of you out of warrenty folks hanging. They are repairing under warrenty so they are meeting the letter of their legal obligation. Beyond that someone will have to set up a rather hardnosed publicity campaign and hope. Good luck, glad I'm not faced with the problem. John G == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 23:34:08 -0500 From: Stan Wright Subject: FTE 97up - discovery I installed new speakers in the doors of my 1999 F250 Super Duty crew cab XLT. I had to remove the red reflector on the door to get to a screw to remove the door trim. I noticed a light socket with no bulb. I put a bulb in and the light came on. It's part of the courtesy light system. Same for the passenger door. I'm guessing the Lariat package.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|