|
|
From: owner-97up-list-digest To: 97up-list-digest Subject: 97up-list-digest V2 #214 Reply-To: 97up-list Sender: owner-97up-list-digest Errors-To: owner-97up-list-digest Precedence: bulk 97up-list-digest Thursday, August 12 1999 Volume 02 : Number 214 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1997 and Newer Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe 97up-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: RE: FTE 97up - 35" tires on 99 Superduty FTE 97up - Superchip report FTE 97up - "Super" Duty? FTE 97up - Superchip report -Reply RE: FTE 97up - Superchip report -Reply RE: FTE 97up - Superchip report FTE 97up - 99 f-150 4.6L RE: FTE 97up - Superchip report -Reply FTE 97up - PSD Fuel Filter Re: FTE 97up - PSD Fuel Filter Re: FTE 97up - 35" tires on 99 Superduty Re: FTE 97up - Superchip report Re: FTE 97up - "Super" Duty? Re: FTE 97up - Superchip report -Reply Re: FTE 97up - Superchip report -Reply Re: FTE 97up - Superchip report Re: FTE 97up - 35" tires on 99 Superduty FTE 97up - re: about to go insane Re: FTE 97up - re: about to go insane Re: FTE 97up - Superchip report -Reply Re: FTE 97up - re: about to go insane Re: FTE 97up - Superchip report -Reply Re: FTE 97up - re: about to go insane Re: FTE 97up - Superchip report -Reply ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 06:17:44 -0500 From: "Strukel, Mike" Subject: RE: FTE 97up - 35" tires on 99 Superduty Mike, You may be able to fit 35" tires on your Superduty if you shim you front bumper out an inch to inch and a half. I am running 35x12.50 BFG Mud Terrains on mine, but I installed the 2" Superlift in the front. If they don't fit, an alternative would be the 295/75R16 BFGs. They are 33.5x10.50s. I have seen these on a few Superduties and they look pretty good. Mike Strukel 99 F250 SD SC, v10, 2"Superlift, 35x12.50 BFG Mud Terrains, Superchipped V10 - -----Original Message----- From: Mike Ruth [mailto:xplorit Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 1999 8:31 PM To: 97up-list Subject: FTE 97up - 35" tires on 99 Superduty Howdy all! Has anyone put 35x12,50x16.5 tires on their stock 99 f-250/350 4X4??? I want to know if I really need to raise the front or can I hold off awhile untill the funds build back up. I do have the heavy service front end and/or the snow plow pkg, which has the heavier springs(I believe). Any input would be great! Thanks for all the other informative posts too. See ya. Mike (Baltimore, MD) P.S. Any other truck owners in the immeadiate area? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 06:29:50 -0500 From: "Strukel, Mike" Subject: FTE 97up - Superchip report last weekend, I installed my Superchip in my 99 F250 V10. I was a little skeptical about spending that kind of money on a performance chip, but I did quite a bit of research on it and decided to give it a try. So.....After the 1st 3 days and 1st tank of gas, I would have to say that it was money well spent! the power increase was VERY noticeable. Before the Superchip, I was unable to spin the tires on pavement (remember I have 35" Mud Terrains) and now I can easily do that! Acceleration was significantly increased at all speeds. I will be towing my boat this weekend ( about 4000lbs) so I will see what kind of a difference it makes. I also checked my mileage on this 1st tank and I got 13mpg in town! I always get 11 - 11.5 in town, and 13 - 14 on the highway. So I did see the 2 mpg increase that I was told to expect! So far, I am quite satisfied. In fact, In a month or two, I may order a Superchip for my wifes 98 Explorer too. Mike Strukel 99F250 SD, SC, 2 " Superlift, 35x12.50 BFG Mud Terrains, Supechipped V10 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:11:31 -0400 From: "Simons, Clayton" Subject: FTE 97up - "Super" Duty? Vaughn, While these trucks are strong, there are some weak points that unfortunately are in the front of the vehicle. Unless you have a custom underbelly guard installed up front there are a number of things exposed to protruding objects between the tires. For instance, the drag link is on the front side of the axle and has no protection, I'll bet you hit this and that would definitely cause steering wheel realignment. This is a hefty piece of equipment though and that stump/tree would've had to be quite heavy. Also note that there are cooling lines that come from the radiator area just under the bumper. These puppies are very vulnerable so when "crawling" over stuff bear that in mind. Hope this helps. Clayton 99' 250XLT SD PSD SC 4x4 I own a 99 F250 SD SC SB XLT 4X4 5.4. But I also drive one as my work vehicle ( Township Parks Dept.). Its a 99 F350 standard cab 4X4 7.3 PSD. One day we were "offroading" in one of the parks on a trail that goes way back in the boonies and we hit a log laying in the trail end on. Now we were going approx. 3-5 mph. When we hit said log the truck came to an abrupt stop while spinning the steering wheel out of my supervisors hand. After which the steering wheel "spokes" that were at 3 and 9 o'clock are now at 1 and 7 o'clock. I can't believe a fairly minor hit would knock the steering off that much if at all. What actually spun or got jared from its stock position?? Thanks Vaughn == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:58:13 -0400 From: GEORGE CROLL Subject: FTE 97up - Superchip report -Reply Keep the review coming. Sounds like something I might try if it tows well. George Croll EPA-OAR-ARD (202)564-0162 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:30:21 -0500 From: "Strukel, Mike" Subject: RE: FTE 97up - Superchip report -Reply For those of you with Diesels, you may want to consider this Superchip. I have a friend who installed one and it really made a big differenece on that truck. The gain is 50hp and 100ft/lbs torque! That is a huge gain. The dealer that I bought my truck from is installing a ton of the Superchips even before they deliver the trucks. his words were "You are a fool if you do not take advantage of this on the diesel" For info, take a look at www.superchips.com Mike Strukel - -----Original Message----- From: GEORGE CROLL [mailto:CROLL.GEORGE Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 1999 7:58 AM To: 97up-list Subject: FTE 97up - Superchip report -Reply Keep the review coming. Sounds like something I might try if it tows well. George Croll EPA-OAR-ARD (202)564-0162 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:36:39 -0500 From: "Don Marsee" Subject: RE: FTE 97up - Superchip report Good to hear from another V10 owner with a Superchip. I installed mine this past weekend as well. So far so great. The improved shifting and better acceleration are what I can report to this point. I haven't used a tank of gas yet - I'll find some reason to use the gas this weekend - and then I'll report any MPG changes. Take Care, _________________________________________________________________________ Don in Nashville '99 F-250 SuperDuty SuperCab w/ 8' box, Woodland Green, V10, Auto, 4WD ORP, Towing Pkg. & Mirrors Additions: Superchip, Chrome Nerf Bars, LINE-X bedliner, Ventvisor Window deflectors, Bugflector II Coming Additions: Toolbox, K&N filters, Exhaust??, ... == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 09:48:15 EDT From: TRITON46L Subject: FTE 97up - 99 f-150 4.6L Hey, how is everyone. I just got back from omaha, nebraska this weekend. finally got married. we took my new 99 f-150 4.6L v-8 sc 3.55 open axle. with just over 3,000 mi, this truck runs great. i ran the trip up there going between 75-90, a pretty big speed difference, through the traffic. the truck was awesome, like any new truck should be, but i thought maybe something may go wrong if it is the first time it's going 1000 mi at th speed i went at. no problems at all. i think that the trip actually broke the engine and drivetrain in even better. before it wouldn't spin the tires on pavement, but now i can turn the truck almost sideways if i stab the gas. not that i want a sports car image of truck, but i like to know i have the power there. the truck has the sport package, p275/70r16 i think. they're goodyear gt II they say it's a soft rubber tire and it won't squeel on pavement because it's meant for traction, but they'll squeel now. thanks for the time to read this Bill == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:55:24 -0500 From: "Don Marsee" Subject: RE: FTE 97up - Superchip report -Reply Here is great resource for Superchip info. He is a distributor and he will work with you. Mike Troyer Performance Products, Inc. National Distributor of Superchips (540) 862-9515 Email: mailto:mtroyer Ask him about discounts and he'll tell you what you need to do. Later, _________________________________________________________________________ Don in Nashville '99 F-250 SuperDuty SuperCab w/ 8' box, Woodland Green, V10, auto, 4WD ORP, Towing Pkg. & Mirrors Additions: Superchip, Chrome Nerf Bars, LINE-X bedliner, Ventvisor Window deflectors, Bugflector II Coming Additions: Toolbox, K&N filters, Exhaust??, ... == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 09:29:39 -0500 From: "Alex Levinson" Subject: FTE 97up - PSD Fuel Filter Can anyone tell me how often you have to service the fuel filter on a PSD? Should it be drained or replaced (If you can drain it)? I'm trying to build my diesel knowledge. Thanks, Alex == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 09:21:12 -0700 From: johny Subject: Re: FTE 97up - PSD Fuel Filter I drain mine every oil change (3,000 miles) and change the filter at 15,000 mile intervals. Have 22,000 so far. For Parts: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.dieselpage.com/ For boatloads of ford Diesel info: (forums sectio) http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.ford -diesel. com/ Alex Levinson wrote: > Can anyone tell me how often you have to service the fuel filter on a PSD? > Should it be drained or replaced (If you can drain it)? > > I'm trying to build my diesel knowledge. > > Thanks, > > Alex > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 10:03:55 -0700 From: johny Subject: Re: FTE 97up - 35" tires on 99 Superduty I have a friend with a 99 CC 4x4 XLT short bed. PSD. He runs 295/75/16 Goodrich AT on 16x8 weld wheels. It barely rubs on on the inner plastic fenderwell back by where the ABS connector is (if not used). He indicates, he could pull back the fenderwell to get more clearance if needed. The 295's are probably the max unlifted/unmodified. Here's a hard to see picture. http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.ford -diesel. com/photos/images/sd21.jpg Strukel, Mike wrote: > Mike, > > You may be able to fit 35" tires on your Superduty if you shim you front > bumper out an inch to inch and a half. I am running 35x12.50 BFG Mud > Terrains on mine, but I installed the 2" Superlift in the front. If they > don't fit, an alternative would be the 295/75R16 BFGs. They are > 33.5x10.50s. I have seen these on a few Superduties and they look pretty > good. > > Mike Strukel > 99 F250 SD SC, v10, 2"Superlift, 35x12.50 BFG Mud Terrains, Superchipped > V10 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Ruth [mailto:xplorit > Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 1999 8:31 PM > To: 97up-list > Subject: FTE 97up - 35" tires on 99 Superduty > > Howdy all! > Has anyone put 35x12,50x16.5 tires on their stock 99 f-250/350 4X4??? I > want to know if I really need to raise the front or can I hold off > awhile untill the funds build back up. I do have the heavy service > front end and/or the snow plow pkg, which has the heavier springs(I > believe). Any input would be great! Thanks for all the other > informative posts too. See ya. > Mike > (Baltimore, MD) > P.S. Any other truck owners in the immeadiate area? > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 16:37:30 4 From: "Vaughn (VDB)" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Superchip report What octane do you need after installing said chip? And is there going to be pinging problems like with some dodge engines I heard about? Vaughn == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 16:41:49 4 From: "Vaughn (VDB)" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - "Super" Duty? Hi Clayton, Actually the log was hit with the passenger side tire. (straight on) It never hit any suspension/steering parts. Which is why I thought it weird that it would knock it out so much. Thanks Vaughn Vaughn, While these trucks are strong, there are some weak points that unfortunately are in the front of the vehicle. Unless you have a custom underbelly guard installed up front there are a number of things exposed to protruding objects between the tires. For instance, the drag link is on the front side of the axle and has no protection, I'll bet you hit this and that would definitely cause steering wheel realignment. This is a hefty piece of equipment though and that stump/tree would've had to be quite heavy. Also note that there are cooling lines that come from the radiator area just under the bumper. These puppies are very vulnerable so when "crawling" over stuff bear that in mind. Hope this helps. Clayton 99' 250XLT SD PSD SC 4x4 I own a 99 F250 SD SC SB XLT 4X4 5.4. But I also drive one as my work vehicle ( Township Parks Dept.). Its a 99 F350 standard cab 4X4 7.3 PSD. One day we were "offroading" in one of the parks on a trail that goes way back in the boonies and we hit a log laying in the trail end on. Now we were going approx. 3-5 mph. When we hit said log the truck came to an abrupt stop while spinning the steering wheel out of my supervisors hand. After which the steering wheel "spokes" that were at 3 and 9 o'clock are now at 1 and 7 o'clock. I can't believe a fairly minor hit would knock the steering off that much if at all. What actually spun or got jared from its stock position?? Thanks Vaughn == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 17:32:48 -0600 From: "Daniel M. Richmeier" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Superchip report -Reply If these chips are so "super," why is it that FORD, with it's massive engineering and research capabilities cannot develop a chip with the same supposed improvements? Relatively speaking, what price might one pay for pulling more horsepower and performance out of a stock engine? Dan in Denver == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 17:03:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Gaudenti Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Superchip report -Reply I think one thing you have to pay for with the extra HP and torque is the higher price of 92 octane fuel the Superchip requires. You do get slightly higher MPG, but not enough to offset the higher cost of 92 octane. I'm sure Ford could set-up the engines for more power using 92 octane, but I think they would loose a good selling point (requires only 87 octane fuel) if everybody else's truck can run on 87. Danny > If these chips are so "super," why is it that FORD, with it's massive > engineering and research capabilities cannot develop a chip with the same > supposed improvements? Relatively speaking, what price might one pay for > pulling more horsepower and performance out of a stock engine? > > Dan in Denver > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 20:12:09 -0700 From: "Steve J. Hodson" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Superchip report Have you had to use 92 octane fuel with your chip V10's? The superchip web site I visited seemed to indicate this would be required - -----Original Message----- From: Don Marsee To: 97up-list Date: Wednesday, August 11, 1999 6:36 AM Subject: RE: FTE 97up - Superchip report >Good to hear from another V10 owner with a Superchip. I installed mine this >past weekend as well. So far so great. The improved shifting and better >acceleration are what I can report to this point. I haven't used a tank of >gas yet - I'll find some reason to use the gas this weekend - and then I'll >report any MPG changes. > >Take Care, > >_________________________________________________________________________ >Don in Nashville >'99 F-250 SuperDuty SuperCab w/ 8' box, Woodland Green, V10, Auto, 4WD ORP, >Towing Pkg. & Mirrors >Additions: Superchip, Chrome Nerf Bars, LINE-X bedliner, Ventvisor Window >deflectors, Bugflector II >Coming Additions: Toolbox, K&N filters, Exhaust??, ... > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 20:47:10 -0400 From: "Freddy" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - 35" tires on 99 Superduty That is one bad-ass looking truck! - ----- Original Message ----- From: johny To: Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 1999 1:03 PM Subject: Re: FTE 97up - 35" tires on 99 Superduty > I have a friend with a 99 CC 4x4 XLT short bed. PSD. He runs 295/75/16 > Goodrich AT on 16x8 weld wheels. It barely rubs on on the inner plastic > fenderwell back by where the ABS connector is (if not used). > > He indicates, he could pull back the fenderwell to get more clearance if needed. > > The 295's are probably the max unlifted/unmodified. > > Here's a hard to see picture. > http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.ford -diesel. com/photos/images/sd21.jpg > > Strukel, Mike wrote: > > > Mike, > > > > You may be able to fit 35" tires on your Superduty if you shim you front > > bumper out an inch to inch and a half. I am running 35x12.50 BFG Mud > > Terrains on mine, but I installed the 2" Superlift in the front. If they > > don't fit, an alternative would be the 295/75R16 BFGs. They are > > 33.5x10.50s. I have seen these on a few Superduties and they look pretty > > good. > > > > Mike Strukel > > 99 F250 SD SC, v10, 2"Superlift, 35x12.50 BFG Mud Terrains, Superchipped > > V10 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mike Ruth [mailto:xplorit > > Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 1999 8:31 PM > > To: 97up-list > > Subject: FTE 97up - 35" tires on 99 Superduty > > > > Howdy all! > > Has anyone put 35x12,50x16.5 tires on their stock 99 f-250/350 4X4??? I > > want to know if I really need to raise the front or can I hold off > > awhile untill the funds build back up. I do have the heavy service > > front end and/or the snow plow pkg, which has the heavier springs(I > > believe). Any input would be great! Thanks for all the other > > informative posts too. See ya. > > Mike > > (Baltimore, MD) > > P.S. Any other truck owners in the immeadiate area? > > > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > > > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > ________________________________________________________ NetZero - We believe in a FREE Internet. Shouldn't you? Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 19:18:42 -0600 From: "Randy Kindler" Subject: FTE 97up - re: about to go insane Original Message: I Just got rear ended again today. I got rear-ended last Friday by a VW Passat. He hit me really hard. He was doing 45 - 50 Mph, and I had just started moving. The fact that I had some forward momentum probably saved a lot of damage. Anyway, I looked in my mirror, and saw this VW just mashed, dripping fluids, and steaming. I got out and looked at my truck, and all that was wrong was my Billet Receiver cover was broken, and the bracket for the electrical connector for the trailer was bent. I just got off the phone with his insurance agent. The estimate for my truck was $480, which includes a new bumper. (It was scratched, but not bent). The damage to the VW was over $4500. I normally drive my Mystique to work, but it had a flat tire that day, so I drove my truck. I guess you are right about being unlucky to be rear-ended, but in my opinion, you were lucky to be rear ended in your truck. Sorry for the long post. Randy == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 21:33:40 -0400 From: CnC Subject: Re: FTE 97up - re: about to go insane Thanks for the story about your accident. It again reassures me that it is best that we drive in a heavy enough vehicle to ward off real harm/injuries from an accident like this one. At 07:18 PM 8/11/99 -0600, Randy Kindler wrote: >Original Message: I Just got rear ended again today. > > >I got rear-ended last Friday by a VW Passat. He hit me really hard. He was >doing 45 - 50 Mph, and I had just started moving. The fact that I had some >forward momentum probably saved a lot of damage. Anyway, I looked in my >mirror, and saw this VW just mashed, dripping fluids, and steaming. I got >out and looked at my truck, and all that was wrong was my Billet Receiver >cover was broken, and the bracket for the electrical connector for the >trailer was bent. I just got off the phone with his insurance agent. The >estimate for my truck was $480, which includes a new bumper. (It was >scratched, but not bent). The damage to the VW was over $4500. I normally >drive my Mystique to work, but it had a flat tire that day, so I drove my >truck. I guess you are right about being unlucky to be rear-ended, but in my >opinion, you were lucky to be rear ended in your truck. Sorry for the long >post. >Randy > > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 21:50:57 -0400 From: "Keith Veren" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Superchip report -Reply Come-on, this has been discussed many time before. Think about it, aftermarket chips change transmission shift points so gears engage "harder" and "quicker" something that I like and many enthusiast like, but the general population of Soccer Moms and Grandmoms do not want. Also, upgrading with a chip advances the timing more (can make engine run a tad hotter) requires high-octane gas, may not idle as smoothly, etc. Ford designs it's chip for the "middle of the road" standard-issue Mr. and Mrs. driver, NOT the "enthusiasts" that many of us are. Could Ford design a chip with more "pep"?? Of course the could! Will they?? Not for standard vehicles. On certain specialty vehicles, like the 150 lightning, I am sure the chips get "tweaked" for more performance. Same goes for any aftermarket performance item (headers, intake manifolds, air lockers, etc.) Keith - -----Original Message----- From: Daniel M. Richmeier To: 97up-list Date: Wednesday, August 11, 1999 7:44 PM Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Superchip report -Reply >If these chips are so "super," why is it that FORD, with it's massive >engineering and research capabilities cannot develop a chip with the same >supposed improvements? Relatively speaking, what price might one pay for >pulling more horsepower and performance out of a stock engine? > >Dan in Denver > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 22:29:58 EDT From: CERESJohnG Subject: Re: FTE 97up - re: about to go insane and that story is why the safety gurus, insurance companies,and the Feds are bitchin about those who can afford to drive big SUVs and Trucks and actually do that dastardly deed. The folks who bought into the small econo vehicle thing suddenly find themselves outgunned on the highway. Rollover/handling problems aside, I still want structure between me and the little pocket rocket that's weaving in and out of traffic while trying to talk on their cell phone and control a kid that wants out of that car seat. John G == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 00:04:59 -0400 From: "Craig Deman" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Superchip report -Reply Then here is a solution. Ford should make a truck with 2 or even 3 superchips have a button in the truck to select which road condition(s) favor which chip. If you plan to go off-roading then select the chip which performs on that condition. Have one set for economy highway driving and one for pulling... Seems to me it could be done... == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 02:39:18 EDT From: RSnovi Subject: Re: FTE 97up - re: about to go insane In a message dated 99-08-11 21:33:40 EDT, you write: no kidding on this one 2 chevy full size new body 1500 pickup and suburban the family has had, i got smacked at a light in mine(newbumper) by a escort about 25-30mph , her front clip was a mess. no injury to me, she was a bit messed up. the suburban was hit by a bonneville on a left turn. almost totaled the car. The burban got a bumper and grill. ahh... i will take a tank now, i mean a Excursion. RS Date: 99-08-11 21:33:40 EDT From: dixieviking Sender: owner-97up-list Reply-to: 97up-list To: 97up-list Thanks for the story about your accident. It again reassures me that it is best that we drive in a heavy enough vehicle to ward off real harm/injuries from an accident like this one. At 07:18 PM 8/11/99 -0600, Randy Kindler wrote: >Original Message: I Just got rear ended again today. > > >I got rear-ended last Friday by a VW Passat. He hit me really hard. He was >doing 45 - 50 Mph, and I had just started moving. The fact that I had some >forward momentum probably saved a lot of damage. Anyway, I looked in my >mirror, and saw this VW just mashed, dripping fluids, and steaming. I got >out and looked at my truck, and all that was wrong was my Billet Receiver >cover was broken, and the bracket for the electrical connector for the >trailer was bent. I just got off the phone with his insurance agent. The >estimate for my truck was $480, which includes a new bumper. (It was >scratched, but not bent). The damage to the VW was over $4500. I normally >drive my Mystique to work, but it had a flat tire that day, so I drove my >truck. I guess you are right about being unlucky to be rear-ended, but in my >opinion, you were lucky to be rear ended in your truck. Sorry for the long >post. >Randy > > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- Return-Path: Received: from aol.com (rly-za02.mail.aol.com [172.31.36.98]) by air-za04.mail.aol.com (v60.25) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 21:33:40 -0400 Received: from ford-trucks.com (ford-trucks.com [192.41.63.203]) by rly-za02.mx.aol.com (v60.25) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 21:33:19 -0400 Received: (fordtruc 11 Aug 1999 21:31:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pacs03.infoave.net (2144E69F [165.166.0.13]) by ford-trucks.com (8.8.5) id VAA27081; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 21:31:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dixieviking ("port 1263" by InfoAve.Net (PMDF V5.1-12 #23426) with SMTP id for 97up-list Wed, 11 Aug 1999 21:31:15 EDT Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 21:33:40 -0400 From: CnC Subject: Re: FTE 97up - re: about to go insane In-reply-to: X-Sender: dixieviking To: 97up-list Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-97up-list Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 97up-list >> == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 02:39:14 EDT From: RSnovi Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Superchip report -Reply In a message dated 99-08-11 19:42:53 EDT, you write: they want to keep warratny claims to a min, and plus someone else has to make money! RS Date: 99-08-11 19:42:53 EDT From: dan Sender: owner-97up-list Reply-to: 97up-list To: 97up-list If these chips are so "super," why is it that FORD, with it's massive engineering and research capabilities cannot develop a chip with the same supposed improvements? Relatively speaking, what price might one pay for pulling more horsepower and performance out of a stock engine? Dan in Denver == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- Return-Path: Received: from aol.com (rly-yd04.mail.aol.com [172.18.150.4]) by air-yd02.mail.aol.com (v60.25) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 19:42:53 -0400 Received: from ford-trucks.com (ford-trucks.com [192.41.63.203]) by rly-yd04.mx.aol.com (v60.25) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 19:42:43 -0400 Received: (fordtruc To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|