|
|
97up-list-digest Thursday, February 25 1999 Volume 02 : Number 053 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1997 and Newer Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe 97up-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: RE: FTE 97up - Lifting the F-250 SD -Reply Re: FTE 97up - Best F-250 V-10 Crew 4x4 Short Box Dealer? FTE 97up - F150 Pix Re: FTE 97up - EPA -Reply FTE 97up - Re: EPA Re: FTE 97up - speed limiter(long and off topic). FTE 97up - Re: EPA RE: FTE 97up - speed limiter. Re: FTE 97up - Best F-250 V-10 Crew 4x4 Short Box Dealer? Re: FTE 97up - speed limiter(long and off topic). Re: FTE 97up - speed limiter(long and off topic). Re: FTE 97up - speed limiter(long and off topic). FTE 97up - fan clutch failure Re: FTE 97up - speed limiter(long and off topic). FTE 97up - 99 SD fuel gauge way off Re: FTE 97up - 99 SD fuel gauge way off RE: FTE 97up - 99 SD fuel gauge way off Re: FTE 97up - 99 SD fuel gauge way off FTE 97up - Signal mirrors FTE 97up - SuperDuty 3" Front Spring Replacement Lift Kit Re: FTE 97up - EPA Re: FTE 97up - SuperDuty 3" Front Spring Replacement Lift Kit FTE 97up - Tire Mileage FTE 97up - After Market Air Filter Opinions Re: FTE 97up - SuperDuty 3" Front Spring Replacement Lift Kit Re: FTE 97up - speed limiter(long and off topic). Re: FTE 97up - Lifting the F-250 SD Re: FTE 97up - Signal mirrors Re: FTE 97up - After Market Air Filter Opinions Re: FTE 97up - SuperDuty 3" Front Spring Replacement Lift Kit ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 06:28:06 -0600 From: "Strukel, Mike" Subject: RE: FTE 97up - Lifting the F-250 SD -Reply Yesterday I also found out that Trailmaster now has a 3" Front end leveling kit which started shipping at the end of January. It uses the stock leafs in the front with extended shackles, drop brackets, and shocks. The price is steep though... $795! Superlift also has a similar kit which runs about $550. Skyjacker has a kit too, but they use add a leafs in the front. This kit is cheaper, but you will sacrafice ride quality. I am going to call Rancho this morning to see if they have something available. I also found out that the wheel selection has grown considerably. A couple months back, Weld(big $$$) was about the only choice in wheels, but now many options are available. Mike Strukel 11 weeks and still waiting for my SD > -----Original Message----- > From:Keith Veren [SMTP:Spectrum-EHS > Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 1999 8:37 PM > To:97up-list > Subject:Re: FTE 97up - Lifting the F-250 SD -Reply > > I hope to get the truck back tomorrow. The new springs really looked > well-made so hopefully they won't result in a "go-kart" suspension. In > addition to the 3.5" lift (which, by the way, is not a huge amount) I am > installing all new shocks. With the lift you have to install new front > shocks because of the new length, so I decided to put new ones on the back > also. I am not trying to make it look like Bigfoot (although that would > be > fun!!), just level it out a little, which the 3.5" should do perfectly > (hopefully). Have not considered new wheels and tires yet because I > usually > try to get some wear on the originals so I feel like I got my money's > worth! > Eventually, I do plan to put bigger (taller and a little wider) tires on, > but the current wheels are OK. The only change I might do in the interim > is > try to find some nice chrome lug-nuts like you see on the front of new > and/or custom tractor-trailer rigs. I am not really fond of the > plastic-looking "hubcap" and prefer the look of shiny lugs contrasted by > black axle hubs. > > Keith > > > -----Original Message----- > From: GEORGE CROLL > To: 97up-list > Date: Tuesday, February 23, 1999 5:46 PM > Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Lifting the F-250 SD -Reply > > > >Thanks for the info Keith, I am looking forward to your evaluation of the > lift. > > > >BTW are you putting on bigger tires and if not how does it look with the > stock tires and the 3.5 inch lift. I am > >concerned with ride quality because when I lifted my 76 chevy it went > from > a reasonable ride to a very unforgiving > >ride due to the extremly stiff springs in the rough country lift I > bought. > I would not want a repeat when I lift my SD. > >My understanding is that the better lift kits sold today sacrifice very > little in ride quality. > >George Croll > >EPA-OAR-ARD > >(202)564-0162 > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 08:08:30 EST From: CERESJohnG Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Best F-250 V-10 Crew 4x4 Short Box Dealer? Dave Smith also does Chevrolets. The dealership is a most unusual sight. Kellogg isn't a huge town. It's like a lot of old industry towns that events have passed by when the core reason for existing (mining) has gotten smaller or gone away. They are looking at new things to bring in business, skiing, tourism, Dave Smith???) Basically it's got more infrastructure than it needs today. There area lot of vacant lots scattered all over town. Almost every one is filled up with Dave Smith inventory. Everywhere you go around town there are lots filled with Dodges and Chevrolets. Bizarre John G == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 08:43:56 -0500 From: ryana Subject: FTE 97up - F150 Pix For those interested or looking for something new on the web, please feel free to visit my home page (link below), select "My Vehicles, Old & New" from the first drop down list, to view the pix of my new '99 F150 4x4! She's a beauty! Cheers, Ryan Intranet Specialist Intranet Development Team (IDTeam) Allen Systems Group http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.asg.com ## Please visit my Personal Page ## ## http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.gate.net/~airwolf ## == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 09:16:44 -0500 From: GEORGE CROLL Subject: Re: FTE 97up - EPA -Reply Here is my very unofficial EPA view of auto emissions. first look at what kind of regulations we currently have on vehicles. Most states now have vehicle inspection and maintenance programs (IM). this usualy means a smog check. The smog check is based on having a low concentration of pollutants in the exhaust for CO, hydrocarbons and NOx. What does it mean to have a low concentration? It means that a big clean burning engine can meet the same emissions standard as a small clean burning engine. The difference is that the bigger engine is pumping out 3 or four times as much polluted air as the smaller engine and in reality three or four times as much pollution. what does this mean to EPA. It means they also need a way to limit mass emissions. That is probably the reason we have the CAFE standads. Used in conjunction these regualtions limit the total emissions from vehicles. There is another approach. Why not limit vehicle mass emissions. In essence auto manufactuers could build any engine they wanted so long as it met the mass emission standard. A mass standard could be expressed in pollution per mile driven at 55 mph or something. In reality we would have small engines with moderate emission controls and larger engines with more effective controls. From an engineering point of view more effective controls are certianly possible but they obviously would be more expensive. So you can have your big powerful engine you just have to pay for the extra emission controls to have it. It's a reasonable tradeoff, and the consumer is only limited by having to pay for doing his/her part to keep the environment clean. People should also know that environmental regulations are often decided in court by people who know little about the "reality" of what makes sense both in terms of money spent and environmental protection. The EPA may know what the right thing to do is, but might also know that they cannot win in court with that approach. So what you get is a bunch of lawyers arguing in court for a position they think they can win on irregardless of whether it makes any sense. In short EPA takes what it can get in terms of protecting the environment even if it is not the "best" solution. Please do not forward my "opinions" to my superiors as these could give me big problem. Thanks George Croll. Engineer, EPA Acid Rain Division 99 SD V-10 4x4 XLT 66 CJ-5A, buick V-6, t-18 4 spd, locked, lifted, and ready for summer to get here George Croll EPA-OAR-ARD (202)564-0162 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 08:26:41 -0600 From: "Bud Feuless & Miki Magara" Subject: FTE 97up - Re: EPA Keith and some others have raised some really good points about the EPA and what happens when politics takes over where science should rule. Maybe EPA should just regulate the total emissions or air/water/soil content of certain pollutants and then let local and state decide how to split that up amongst the user groups. This is an approach that I have seen work in fisheries management, where commercial, recreational, and Native American user groups are usually at each other's throats politically over regulation of the resource. In areas where we manage by politics, nothing happens or it happens too late (swordfish). In areas where we manage by science first and then leave the politics to local groups (Pacific Halibut Commission), we have been very successful. Although not all user groups are happy in this scenario (not everyone can be), science is served and the environment is protected first and foremost. In our case, this could allow those of us who have real needs for large trucks to get some sort of emissions allocation that allows us to use our vehicle. The overall break-up of the scientifically dictated quota would be based, however, on local decisions, allowing us each to be involved in how our quota should be distributed on a local basis. Just wanted to bounce this off folks and take my own advice of trying to offer a positive solution. I probably won't post on this anymore, however, as I'm afraid I may be getting a bit off-topic. Regards, Bud == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 08:40:41 -0600 From: "Christopher T. Patrick" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - speed limiter(long and off topic). At 09:55 PM 2/23/99 -0500, you wrote: >I believe some of the after market chips you can plug into your computer >wiring harness (takes just 20 minutes or so) will not only add a little >"kick" but re-set the speed limiter to a higher number yea, I know about the chips.. but since its a 6 cyl, if i had wanted more "performance" i woulda kicked in for the v-8. i dont mind the 5500 rpm rev limiter, i just dont like the top speed limiter. the truck is a 2wd, 275/60vr17 shod shortbed, running with the tow package. it handles VERY nice. was hoping NOT to put the chip in, as it voids the factory warranty. disabling a speedo sensor will void the warranty on that sensor.. but the computer chip will void the whole thing. >Remember, the energy received in a >crash increases as the [square] of velocity (a 60 MPH crash gives you 4 >times the "pain" of a 30 MPH crash, everything else being equal). i kinda figured someone would feel obliged to kick in the safety speech. crashing at 100 is equally abhorent to me as crashing at 70. either way, im in the hospital and with these federally mandated "crumple zones" the truck is totaled. when i was a kid 15 years ago, i got in an accident at 65 in my '73 eldorado convertable. i WAS wearing my seatbelt, but some putz felt obliged to park his (transam/camaro?) in the fast lane of the highway, lites off, and walk home.. or at least try to.. he was drunk. well long comes me after a hockey game, and for whatever reason i didnt even see the car (no i wasnt drinking). hit it at speed.. didnt even tap the brakes... anyways 1/4 mile later when i stopped, the other car was unrecognizable. I suffered bruised hips, a muscle pull in my back, and a bruised chest from hitting the hulahoop sized steering wheel. was in hospital for 3 hours and released. the car was towed to my parents house, where a week later i had fixed it. needed front end clip, radiator, fan, fanclutch. no frame damage, no major mechanical damage. got the front end from some pimp-mobile in a salvage yard, costed $600. todays cars and trucks are designed to fold on impact, probably saving lives, but definately improving the economy of insurance companies, and body shops. ========================================== http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.877pcparts.com http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.inlink.com/~cpatrick http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.jeepthing.com || CHRIS PATRICK | || \ 360 ci ______| _||___\____ Th400 (|==== |_____| ___ | |] SOA (>| = \___________/ = \____|= 4"lift *** '84 CJ-8 *** Dana44 ** **'98 F150 ** ** 35"x16.5 ** ** ** ** BOGGERS *** *** ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 07:02:27 -0800 From: Joe Zuk Subject: FTE 97up - Re: EPA I missed the orginal post so I am not sure if what the Feds are talking about is the same thing they are talking about here in Ca. (home of the eco-Nazis). When Ca. created the smog laws back in the 60s all cars and trucks up to GVW 8000Lbs (I think I got that number right) fell into one class that had to meet tight controls. Cars and trucks over that had to meet not as tight of controls. Well in the 60s that wasn't so bad since not that many people own these 'big' trucks. Now comes the 90s just about everyone wants a F150/D150/CK1500 or some kind of bigger SUV (Sub./Exp) these things are over the 8000lbs GVW and fall into the lighter smog rules. So here in Ca. they want to move up the cut off point from 8000lbs to 8500lbs. So now all these bigger SUV/Truck now have to meet tighter smog laws. But if you drive a new Ford whats this mean to you, not much. Ford came out and said that the new F150/Exp already meet these smog laws. The F150/Exp uses the same basic engines that are used in the big cars (LTDs). Now I don't know what this does to the Dodge and Chev. trucks. I think if your a Dodge fan you maybe in for some changes, since they have the oldest engine desgins. Just something to think about. Joe == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 07:15:10 -0800 From: "Sutton, Mike" Subject: RE: FTE 97up - speed limiter. I would strongly suggest that you do NOT unplug speedometer cables or try to "fool" the computer with an incorrect speedo calibration. You must remember that information from the speedometer is used by the transmission, ABS, etc. The only safe way, that I have heard of, to up the speed limit is to purchase an aftermarket chip. Regards, Mike Sutton mike.sutton (919) 549-1215 -----Original Message----- Christopher, I had Superchips program a chip to up the revlimiter to 6500 rpm and remove the speed limiter. If you unplug the speedo wires your cruise control will not work. You could change the speedo gear to fool the computer into thinking it was going slower. Regards Jean Marc Chartier == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 07:47:36 -0600 From: "Greg Gilmore" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Best F-250 V-10 Crew 4x4 Short Box Dealer? I agree with jerking around with some of the buying services out there. Here's one that I've had pretty good luck with http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.forddirect.com. For what its worth, good luck. - ---------- > From: Todd E. > To: 97up-list > Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Best F-250 V-10 Crew 4x4 Short Box Dealer? > Date: Tuesday, February 23, 1999 11:39 PM > > I bought my F-250 SD from Kern's Ford in Ohio. I got it at invoice, and did > the whole thing over the phone. They have some fly-out, drop shipment, and > meet you half way options of getting your vehicle. They've sold to people > as far away as Alaska. I found them on the internet, here's the site: > > http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.usauto.com/fordtrucks7/SuperCab.htm > > or call 1-888-8DUALLY > > I recommend them, because I hate the whole auto purchase process, and was > being dicked around by Auto-by-tel dealers locally, when I found this place. > It was a completely smooth and simple transaction. Definitely the best auto > purchase experience of my life. > > > > > > > I have decided that a new (or very slightly used) F250 V-10 Crew 4x4 > > Short Box is my next vehicle of choice. I am looking for a FORD dealer > > that will work with me over the phone or the web and deliver as promised > > for a competitive price. I hope to make my purchase sometime before 1999 > > runs out. > > > > A Dodge loving friend told me that Dave Smith Motors in Kellogg, ID will > > beat any Dodge dealer's price nationwide. Many folks in town who can't > > get a Boise dealer to deal simply use these guys. In fact, these guys > > recommend on their web site for their customer's to fly into town to be > > picked and sent home that day in a new rig as ordered. I am assuming > > that a FORD dealer of this genre is somewhere to be found. > > > > With some of the hurt happening in the farmlands there has got to be a > > dealer willing to be extra competitive. I figure I can fly wherever in > > the contiguous 48 states and drive the unit home. Any recommendations? > > -- > > MjS > > >> > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > > > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 12:21:27 EST From: RSnovi Subject: Re: FTE 97up - speed limiter(long and off topic). In a message dated 99-02-24 09:49:03 EST, you write: no kidding man i hear that insurance comanys are geting richer because of JAP junk and other matchbox cars with sheetmetal, everyone in my family drives either a soild foreign car or a truck/suburban because be dont want to be the one going to the hospital. We just hop out and go dam, i need a new bumper and grill. RS yea, I know about the chips.. but since its a 6 cyl, if i had wanted more "performance" i woulda kicked in for the v-8. i dont mind the 5500 rpm rev limiter, i just dont like the top speed limiter. the truck is a 2wd, 275/60vr17 shod shortbed, running with the tow package. it handles VERY nice. was hoping NOT to put the chip in, as it voids the factory warranty. disabling a speedo sensor will void the warranty on that sensor.. but the computer chip will void the whole thing. >Remember, the energy received in a >crash increases as the [square] of velocity (a 60 MPH crash gives you 4 >times the "pain" of a 30 MPH crash, everything else being equal). i kinda figured someone would feel obliged to kick in the safety speech. crashing at 100 is equally abhorent to me as crashing at 70. either way, im in the hospital and with these federally mandated "crumple zones" the truck is totaled. when i was a kid 15 years ago, i got in an accident at 65 in my '73 eldorado convertable. i WAS wearing my seatbelt, but some putz felt obliged to park his (transam/camaro?) in the fast lane of the highway, lites off, and walk home.. or at least try to.. he was drunk. well long comes me after a hockey game, and for whatever reason i didnt even see the car (no i wasnt drinking). hit it at speed.. didnt even tap the brakes... anyways 1/4 mile later when i stopped, the other car was unrecognizable. I suffered bruised hips, a muscle pull in my back, and a bruised chest from hitting the hulahoop sized steering wheel. was in hospital for 3 hours and released. the car was towed to my parents house, where a week later i had fixed it. needed front end clip, radiator, fan, fanclutch. no frame damage, no major mechanical damage. got the front end from some pimp-mobile in a salvage yard, costed $600. todays cars and trucks are designed to fold on impact, probably saving lives, but definately improving the economy of insurance companies, and body shops. ============== >> == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 11:50:09 -0600 From: "Christopher T. Patrick" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - speed limiter(long and off topic). At 12:21 PM 2/24/99 EST, you wrote: >In a message dated 99-02-24 09:49:03 EST, you write: > > >no kidding man i hear that insurance comanys are geting richer because of JAP >junk and other matchbox cars with sheetmetal, everyone in my family drives >either a soild foreign car or a truck/suburban because be dont want to be the >one going to the hospital. We just hop out and go dam, i need a new bumper >and grill. its funny, tho.. because 3 years ago in my '96 honda civic coupe, i was stopped in one of those "bi -directional turning lanes" when some bimbo decide she was gonna avoid traffic and drive down the lane.. well she was looking over her shoulder when she hit me head on doing 30-35 mph. TOTALED her plymouth laser.. crunched up to the windshield.. crumple zones and all. my honda required a new bumper skin. her airbag deployed, and mine didnt.. neither of us were hurt. stupid cops called it a no fault accident, and claimed failure to yeild on both of us, since it was a bi-directional lane, and a head on collision. ive wondered since then how a stopped car can fail to yeild.... ========================================== http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.877pcparts.com http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.inlink.com/~cpatrick http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.jeepthing.com || CHRIS PATRICK | || \ 360 ci ______| _||___\____ Th400 (|==== |_____| ___ | |] SOA (>| = \___________/ = \____|= 4"lift *** '84 CJ-8 *** Dana44 ** **'98 F150 ** ** 35"x16.5 ** ** ** ** BOGGERS *** *** ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 14:47:37 -0500 From: Jean Marc Chartier Subject: Re: FTE 97up - speed limiter(long and off topic). "Christopher T. Patrick" wrote: > > At 09:55 PM 2/23/99 -0500, you wrote: > >I believe some of the after market chips you can plug into your computer > >wiring harness (takes just 20 minutes or so) will not only add a little > >"kick" but re-set the speed limiter to a higher number > > yea, I know about the chips.. but since its a 6 cyl, if i had wanted more > "performance" i woulda kicked in for the v-8. i dont mind the 5500 rpm rev > limiter, i just dont like the top speed limiter. the truck is a 2wd, > 275/60vr17 shod shortbed, running with the tow package. it handles VERY nice. > was hoping NOT to put the chip in, as it voids the factory warranty. > disabling a speedo sensor will void the warranty on that sensor.. but the > computer chip will void the whole thing. > http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.877pcparts.com > http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.inlink.com/~cpatrick > http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.jeepthing.com || > CHRIS PATRICK | || \ > 360 ci ______| _||___\____ > Th400 (|==== |_____| ___ | |] > SOA (>| = \___________/ = \____|= > 4"lift *** '84 CJ-8 *** > Dana44 ** **'98 F150 ** ** > 35"x16.5 ** ** ** ** > BOGGERS *** *** > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html Chris, The chip will not void the warranty. Only if you get one that bumps up the rev limiter and you grenade the engine or the clutch, or something in the drive line that could not handle the increased rpm. The Dealer where I got my truck sells Jet Chips. Regards Jean Marc Chartier == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 13:07:45 -0700 From: "Don Lewoniuk" Subject: FTE 97up - fan clutch failure Anyone experience problems with the fan? When it's cold (-15 C / 5 F) I get strange sounds from under the hood. One's a metallic clicking right at startup. The other cycles on & off while driving. Sounds like a power steering pump complaining eventhough your travelling in a straight line. Started after Ford replaced the crankshaft damper. My mechanic thinks it the fan clutch, sounds to me like a typical power steering pump bearing gone bad, and started after the damper was replaced. Go figure. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 14:22:22 -0600 From: "Christopher T. Patrick" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - speed limiter(long and off topic). >Chris, > > The chip will not void the warranty. Only if you get one >that bumps up the rev limiter and you grenade the engine or >the clutch, or something in the drive line that could not >handle the increased rpm. The Dealer where I got my truck >sells Jet Chips. specific dealers MAY honor the warranty.. but according to ford, modifying the computer will void the warranty on the powertrain. either way, its like the hypertech chip i put in my 'vette, the dealer said yea, we will honor the warranty... but first we charge you to return it to factory stock.... ========================================== http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.877pcparts.com http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.inlink.com/~cpatrick http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.jeepthing.com || CHRIS PATRICK | || \ 360 ci ______| _||___\____ Th400 (|==== |_____| ___ | |] SOA (>| = \___________/ = \____|= 4"lift *** '84 CJ-8 *** Dana44 ** **'98 F150 ** ** 35"x16.5 ** ** ** ** BOGGERS *** *** ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 15:25:18 -0500 From: GEORGE CROLL Subject: FTE 97up - 99 SD fuel gauge way off Filled up my 99 F-250 SD, regular cab longbed.for the third time. The fuel light was on and the gauge read less than 1/8th tank. It only took 28 gallons to fill. My reading of the literature says that longbed trucks like mine have 38 gallon tanks and supercab shortbed trucks have 29 gallon tanks. Am I wrong or do I have 10 gallons left in my truck when the fuel light comes on and the gauge reads >1/8th. I'll probably complain to Ford either way. George Croll == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 17:27:43 -0500 From: "Todd E." Subject: Re: FTE 97up - 99 SD fuel gauge way off That sounds about right, 10 gallons in reserve. It is done that way, in case you are towing something large, you'll be getting say 8 miles per gallon, and 10 gallons should be able to get you to a gas station, even if you're stuck in traffic somewhere. I've noticed very similar readings on my SD 250 V-10. Complain if you want, it will get you absolutely nowhere though. - -----Original Message----- From: GEORGE CROLL To: 97up-list Date: Wednesday, February 24, 1999 5:24 PM Subject: FTE 97up - 99 SD fuel gauge way off >Filled up my 99 F-250 SD, regular cab longbed.for the third time. The fuel light was on and the gauge read less than >1/8th tank. It only took 28 gallons to fill. My reading of the literature says that longbed trucks like mine have 38 gallon >tanks and supercab shortbed trucks have 29 gallon tanks. Am I wrong or do I have 10 gallons left in my truck when >the fuel light comes on and the gauge reads >1/8th. I'll probably complain to Ford either way. > >George Croll >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 16:49:19 -0600 From: Todd Styles Subject: RE: FTE 97up - 99 SD fuel gauge way off My 'low fuel' light came on today. Took 25 gallons to fill up the 29 gal tank. Todd, '99 F250SD,SC,SB,PSD,6-SPEED,4x2,3.73. BTW, I've got ~1800 miles and I'm averaging 18.5 MPG empty. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 17:55:19 -0600 From: "Christopher T. Patrick" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - 99 SD fuel gauge way off At 03:25 PM 2/24/99 -0500, you wrote: >Filled up my 99 F-250 SD, regular cab longbed.for the third time. The fuel light was on and >the gauge read less than >1/8th tank. It only took 28 gallons to fill. My reading of the literature says that longbed >trucks like mine have 38 gallon >tanks and supercab shortbed trucks have 29 gallon tanks. Am I wrong or do I have 10 gallons >left in my truck when >the fuel light comes on and the gauge reads >1/8th. I'll probably complain to Ford either way. my f-150 comes on a little less than a quarter tank. ========================================== http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.877pcparts.com http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.inlink.com/~cpatrick http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.jeepthing.com || CHRIS PATRICK | || \ 360 ci ______| _||___\____ Th400 (|==== |_____| ___ | |] SOA (>| = \___________/ = \____|= 4"lift *** '84 CJ-8 *** Dana44 ** **'98 F150 ** ** 35"x16.5 ** ** ** ** BOGGERS *** *** ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 17:10:10 -0800 From: "Neil Plocek" Subject: FTE 97up - Signal mirrors I was in a glass store today and saw a display for aftermarket signalized mirrors. There are mirrors available for many vehicles, unfortunately none yet for my Super Duty! Bummer! Here is the link if you would like to see if there is a mirror for your vehicle. http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.kwmuth.com/Default.htm == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 20:37:06 -0500 From: "Keith Veren" Subject: FTE 97up - SuperDuty 3" Front Spring Replacement Lift Kit Got the F-350 back tonight. Wow! The Tuff Country (www.tuffcountry.com) front lift kit is great, I am very pleased!! My truck is the SuperDuty F-350 / XLT / 4X4 / V-10 / SuperCab / SRW / Longbed / Snowplow Package / Tow Package / Off-Road Package and now, with the new front spring pack, the thing sits level and looks much, much taller. Because I have an 850 pound Fisher Plow, the representative at TuffCountry recommended that I get the F2355 Springs (heavier, originally for the F-250/350 with the diesel) rather than the F-2354 (lighter, originally for the gas engines). The springs have a nice positive arch, and they really look good, they match the appearance, number of leaves and arch of the rear springs so things look equal. Also go the LL264 shock absorbers all around. As I was driving home, I really noticed the difference in ride, and to my surprise I actually thought the handling was much better. When I went over dips and bumps and even a little bit of washboard, the truck did not (as I feared) "bang" or "jostle and rattle" like one would expect stiffer springs to do; rather, I felt a very firm, solid, smooth and noiseless compression/decompression (or, as some like to put it, a vertical positive and negative acceleration/deceleration action). The only thing I have to think about now is getting out the floor jack and raising my plow about 3 inches so I can drive into the mounting brackets!!! (we expect snow here in Massachusetts tomorrow). By the way, do not try to install the TuffCountry springs yourself unless you are a good mechanic and have a helper because the springs are very heavy and installation requires drilling out brackets and re-mounting the sway bar and the tracking bar, if you mess-up, your safety could be compromised. Besides, after installation, the front-end must be re-aligned so this is one job I left to my dealership. By the way, my dealer was very happy to install the kit and said do not worry about voiding any the Ford "bumper-to-bumper warrantee because they installed it. I have had my dealer (Acton Ford) install all kinds of aftermarket stuff on all three of our vehicles (F-350 / Expedition / Explorer) and they stand by the installation and vehicle warrantee if they install it. I think most dealers would do the same (Nathan?). Keith == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 18:09:33 PST From: "Frank Spor" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - EPA Amen Bud.. As I said once already, All the nice people that "absolutely" Have to be able to get to the Mall, regardless of the weather are going to be really shocked, when gas gets back to a buck and a half a gallon, and they all want to sell their hardly used, never been scratched 4x4 "gas hogs", and find out that there are no buyers......I lived it in 1974, with a 3/4 T chevy van, and 1979, with a 3/4 T chevy van. Waiting in line until a 5000 to 7000 pound truck runs out of gas, and having to push it to the pump is a lot more than "most" of these people will want to live with. Think about that BEFORE you shell out the $25000.00 Plus that it is going to cost to move your boat to the launch ramp 2 times a year. Corporate Average Fuel Economy is here to stay.... Emissions standards (which really ARE good for us air breathing Mammals) are too. Freedom to choose is a good thing.....But it like any other decision should be made carefully. By all means get what you need..... Frank ______________________________________________________ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 17:07:24 -0900 From: Perry Klein Subject: Re: FTE 97up - SuperDuty 3" Front Spring Replacement Lift Kit At 08:37 PM 2/24/99 -0500, you wrote: >Got the F-350 back tonight. Wow! The Tuff Country (www.tuffcountry.com) >front lift kit is great, I am very pleased!! My truck is the SuperDuty Were you driving with or without the plow on when you took it home? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 22:14:36 EST From: Alevinson Subject: FTE 97up - Tire Mileage What kind of tire mileage is "normal" for a 3/4 ton 4x4 driven on mostly highways? I have 63,000 so far and think I can get at least 5000-10000 more without taking any chances. I am pretty happy with this since they are the original tires. What do you all think? Alex Levinson alevinson == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 22:18:31 -0500 From: Brad Ridgway Subject: FTE 97up - After Market Air Filter Opinions Do the claims for such products hold true to those who have them Mainly: 1) increased miages 2) more HP??? Recommendations? What about the chips? I know this has to have come across here before but I'm a very newbie!!! Thanks! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 22:41:18 -0500 From: "Keith Veren" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - SuperDuty 3" Front Spring Replacement Lift Kit Without. I removed the plow before taking it into the dealer (Fisher "Minute-Mount" System), it is fairly easy to take off (and a little harder to put on!). The dealer had to remove part of the plow frame temporarily to install the springs. I plan to put the plow on tomorrow morning. Will let you know if the extra weight makes a difference. Keith - -----Original Message----- From: Perry Klein To: 97up-list Date: Wednesday, February 24, 1999 9:12 PM Subject: Re: FTE 97up - SuperDuty 3" Front Spring Replacement Lift Kit >At 08:37 PM 2/24/99 -0500, you wrote: >>Got the F-350 back tonight. Wow! The Tuff Country (www.tuffcountry.com) >>front lift kit is great, I am very pleased!! My truck is the SuperDuty > >Were you driving with or without the plow on when you took it home? > > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 22:46:56 -0500 From: Jean Marc Chartier Subject: Re: FTE 97up - speed limiter(long and off topic). "Christopher T. Patrick" wrote: > > >Chris, > > > > The chip will not void the warranty. Only if you get one > >that bumps up the rev limiter and you grenade the engine or > >the clutch, or something in the drive line that could not > >handle the increased rpm. The Dealer where I got my truck > >sells Jet Chips. > > specific dealers MAY honor the warranty.. but according to ford, modifying > the computer will void the warranty on the powertrain. either way, its > like the hypertech chip i put in > my 'vette, the dealer said yea, we will honor the warranty... but first we > charge you to return it to factory stock.... > ========================================== > http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.877pcparts.com > http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.inlink.com/~cpatrick > http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.jeepthing.com || > CHRIS PATRICK | || \ > 360 ci ______| _||___\____ > Th400 (|==== |_____| ___ | |] > SOA (>| = \___________/ = \____|= > 4"lift *** '84 CJ-8 *** > Dana44 ** **'98 F150 ** ** > 35"x16.5 ** ** ** ** > BOGGERS *** *** > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html Chris, I have been down this road before about if the chip voids or not the warranty. If you feel it does then by all means do not purchase a chip. It is unfortunately the only way that I know of to up the speed limiter. If you find another plausible solution please share it with me. Kindest regards Jean Marc Chartier == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 19:55:32 -0800 From: "Matt Bailey" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Lifting the F-250 SD I've seen both the 4" National Spring's and the Tuff Country . Not impressed with any Tuff Country products. Our local Four Wheel Parts Performance Center sells all major brands, if you purchase National Springs you have to use Pro Comp panhard bar relocation brackets and extended swaybar drop links, the only thing is the spring pack has 10 leafs, it's a very nice spring pack but seems a bit much, the one truck I've seem with these springs installed is a PSD CC LB with a Warn 12000lb winch mounted with a semi hidden winch mount. The owner says it rides great but it seems a little stiff to me. I also have a 99 SD SC LB V-10 and have done some research on AM wheels. So far Weld seems to be about the only one making wheels for this goofy bolt pattern. I was talking to the manager of a local Les Schwab Tire Store about wheels, he informed me that Ultra will be making wheels that look similar to the 5 spoke style premium wheels that are available from Ford for the duallies. The Ultra's are supposed to run about $125 each which is about half the cost of the Weld's. Hope this helps Mattb - -----Original Message----- From: GEORGE CROLL To: 97up-list Date: Tuesday, February 23, 1999 6:30 AM Subject: FTE 97up - Lifting the F-250 SD >Anyone out there lifted their SD. currently several aftermarket kits are available including Pro Comp (4" lift with dual >shock option, about 1000) Tuff country ( I think they have a 4" lift for about 600) Superlift (4 and 6" with a multiple >shock option I think) National Spring is making springs but I don't have any idea of what they cost. I have heard great >things about National but I have heard they are really expensive. I even think Rancho might have one. Has anyone >tried any of these lifts and if so how do they ride. I want to get a 4" lift which does not alter my stock ride >substantially and which retains decent steering. I am also interested in who makes wheels which will fit the new SD >trucks as there are not many out there. Does Weld make SD wheels now? > >Finally why are there not more 16 inch rims available. 16.5 inch rims are much more common for larger trucks but >they don't have safety beads so you really can't air down with confidence on a 16.5 in wheel. Does anyone know >of a good 16 inch wheel and 35 in tire combination for the SD trucks. I don't want swampers, MT baja belteds or >bogggers on my truck as they wear out too fast but I would like a good looking tire. any suggestions? Looks good >and wears good to boot with respectable off road abilities. > >Thanks >George >99 F-250 SD V-10 >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 21:27:04 -0800 From: JJ Thomas Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Signal mirrors I sent an Email to see if they will offer them for SD's. I think the mirrors are great. At 17:10 02/24/99 -0800, you wrote: >I was in a glass store today and saw a display for aftermarket signalized >mirrors. There are mirrors available for many vehicles, unfortunately none >yet for my Super Duty! Bummer! Here is the link if you would like to see >if there is a mirror for your vehicle. > >http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.kwmuth.com/Default.htm > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 00:59:53 EST From: RSnovi Subject: Re: FTE 97up - After Market Air Filter Opinions In a message dated 99-02-24 22:30:16 EST, you write: K&N 5-10 RWHP approx avg. , but no more filter to buy and a tad bit of mileage maybe. Chips seem to be popular of lately but i really dont reccomend them. RS Do the claims for such products hold true to those who have them Mainly:.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|