|
|
97up-list-digest Tuesday, January 19 1999 Volume 02 : Number 014 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1997 and Newer Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe 97up-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: FTE 97up - CrewCab rearseat? Re: FTE 97up - 1999 F150 Tranny Re: FTE 97up - 1999 F150 Tranny Re: FTE 97up - CrewCab rearseat? Re: FTE 97up - CrewCab rearseat? FTE 97up - Re: Oil change Re: FTE 97up - Re:First oil change Re: FTE 97up - SD 250 V10 Arrived! First impressions. Re: FTE 97up - 1999 F150 Tranny FTE 97up - Re: 98 Ford Explorer - Front end squeal Re: FTE 97up - SD 250 V10 Arrived! First impressions. Re: FTE 97up - 1999 F150 Tranny Re: FTE 97up - 1999 F150 Tranny Re: FTE 97up - Re:First oil change Re: FTE 97up - CrewCab rearseat? RE: FTE 97up - Re: 98 Ford Explorer - Front end squeal Re: FTE 97up - Re:First oil change Re: FTE 97up - Re:First oil change FTE 97up - FTE T-shirts are ready! FTE 97up - non SOF? Re: FTE 97up - non SOF? Re: FTE 97up - non SOF? Re: FTE 97up - 1999 F150 Tranny Re: FTE 97up - 1999 F150 Tranny Re: FTE 97up - CrewCab rearseat? Re: FTE 97up - non SOF? Re: FTE 97up - non SOF? Re: FTE 97up - non SOF? Re: FTE 97up - non SOF? Re: FTE 97up - non SOF? FTE 97up - first oil change Re: FTE 97up - non SOF? FTE 97up - Re: Re:First oil change FTE 97up - Re: Re: Ford Explorer Gas Mileage ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 06:46:30 -0800 From: Gene Ball Subject: FTE 97up - CrewCab rearseat? It's my understanding that my rearseat on my Super Duty Crew Cab, should lift up or fold foward? If it does, I can't figure it out? Anyone know how? Where is the lever? I can't seem to find it in my owners guide? Thanks Gene == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 07:36:16 -0600 From: "Union Auto" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - 1999 F150 Tranny The 4R100 is not available in the F-150. I've been told the case is to large. The lightning uses a special E4OD with some of the 4R100 parts in it. Horsepower isn't an important factor in transmissions. Torque is what causes the need for a bigger transmission. The E40D should more than handle the power, and the 4R70w with some common sense should do fine, also. If you want the E4OD you can get it with California emissions (I've also heard that Flareside Supercabs might get the E40D). Nathan - -----Original Message----- From: Rick Heis To: 97up-list Date: Sunday, January 17, 1999 2:38 PM Subject: Re: FTE 97up - 1999 F150 Tranny >At 08:04 AM 1/16/99 -0600, you wrote: > >Nathan, > >My next questions, (1) Can you when you order a new 1999 F150 5.4 SC SB >XLT order the 4R100 tranny? I eventually plan on upgrading the 5.4 >engine, after about 10,000 miles, to about 350 horsepower and 'think' the >beefier tranny would be better with the increase in HP and torque. (2) >What other items would have to be upgraded/changed with other components >(axles, drivetrain, etc) to make this 4R100 happen? (3) Or is it a simple >swap to 'special order' the 4R100? (4) What Ford trucks have the 4R100 >either as standard or available as an option. (5) What would you >reccommend, is the 4R70w adequate OR should I opt for the stronger 4R100 >tranny? > > >Thanks a million, > >Rick Heis > >>The F-150 with the 5.4L comes with the 4R70W (except with California >>Emissions, then E4OD). The 4R100 is basically an E4OD on steroids. I think >>the case is slightly bigger and all the internal parts are stronger to >>handle the extra torque of the Diesel this year. The E4OD is a stout >>transmission and can handle lots of torque itself. The 4R70W is a good >>transmission (haven't had to change any yet), but is different than the >>E4OD. It is slightly smaller and seems to "eat" less power than the E4OD >>making trucks with this tranny seem more responsive. It doesn't have the >>ability to handle as much torque as the E40D but can still handle quite a >>bit. The owner of the local transmission shop prefers this transmission in >>his truck due to snow plowing use. He says it can handle repeated >>forward-reverse shifts better. >> >>Nathan Bernard >> >> >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 08:27:45 -0600 (CST) From: "Douglas R. Floyd" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - 1999 F150 Tranny Just curious... what is the best way to squeeze 350 horses out of the 5.4? - -- Douglas R. Floyd "Cannot tell if this is true, or a dream." -- Die Krupps == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 10:22:34 -0500 From: "Todd E." Subject: Re: FTE 97up - CrewCab rearseat? The SuperCab rear seat folds forward. I don't think the Crew Cab seat folds forward. In the SuperCab, all you do is lift up on the rear of the bottom seat, and pull a little strap to release the back of the seat for folding down. >It's my understanding that my rearseat on my Super Duty Crew Cab, >should lift up or fold foward? If it does, I can't figure it out? >Anyone know how? Where is the lever? >I can't seem to find it in my owners guide? >Thanks Gene > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 10:40:31 -0500 From: Dorn Hetzel Subject: Re: FTE 97up - CrewCab rearseat? In my SD F-350 Crew Cab, the rear seat folks forward, which is a good thing, because the jack is stored behind it :) I forget where the level is but I'll look later today. -Dorn On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 10:22:34AM -0500, Todd E. wrote: > The SuperCab rear seat folds forward. I don't think the Crew Cab seat folds > forward. In the SuperCab, all you do is lift up on the rear of the bottom > seat, and pull a little strap to release the back of the seat for folding > down. > > > > >It's my understanding that my rearseat on my Super Duty Crew Cab, > >should lift up or fold foward? If it does, I can't figure it out? > >Anyone know how? Where is the lever? > >I can't seem to find it in my owners guide? > >Thanks Gene > > > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > > > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 09:48:23 -0600 From: "Dan Prescher" Subject: FTE 97up - Re: Oil change Rick, the owner's manual for my F-350 PSD recommends first oil change at 5,000 unless you're on a tough duty schedule such as off-roading, city delivery or extreme dust, in which case the recommendation is 3,000. >I ordered my F-250 SC SD PSD on September 2 and picked it up on Jan. 7. >So far I have no complaints. When talking to my salesman the other day, >he reminded me to bring it in at 5000 miles for my free first oil >change. I said that would be my second or third change. He told me >that Ford issued a bulletin saying that the oil shouldn't be changed >before 5000 miles to allow everything to "seat". I've never run a new >vehicle for more that 1500 miles before the first change. >Has anyone else heard of this bulletin? When are you folks changing >your oil for the first time? Any answers will be greatly appreciated. > >Rick Kane == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 11:21:34 EST From: BFunk33 Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Re:First oil change While most of this is right, I *have* seen people ruin engines by using synthetic oil too soon. Synthetic oils (the 100% stuff, not the blends) is too slippery, and won't allow the rings to seat properly. What happens then is, the engine will start to smoke at about 20-30k miles, and this will be attributed to a "bad engine > from the factory; after all, the best oil was used." 100% synthetic shouldn't be used for the first 6k miles, at least, to give the rings a chance to seat. Bill ORIGINAL MESSAGE: From: dhmccla Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Re:First oil change Alan, I personally think its all BS and agree with Union Auto. Every service department will tell you something different. That factory installed oil is no different than any other major brand oil you can buy at any major auto store. I changed my first oil at 1700 miles (after 3 months) with 10w-30 Mobil 1 and specifically asked if there was a problem with using Mobil 1 and the answer was absolutely no problem. Those days of a "break-in" oil are long over. Never knew anyone to void a warranty or ruin an engine > changing the oil more often than recommended either. You are on a good schedule now for oil changes, keep it up. Dave >> ==================================================== == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 10:20:54 -0600 From: "Charles Abraham" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - SD 250 V10 Arrived! First impressions. That's great news Dick, glad to here you got your truck and it's a keeper! Your right about Lariat's taking longer, I just checked with my dealer and still no VIN number on mine (ordered Sept. 30th, '98). Did you end up getting the ESOP or not? I been surprised by some recent posts indicating that the ESOP failed at temps below zero. On the limited-slip in two wheel drive, when the right rear drive wheel > began to spin (or vice-a-versa), power transferred to the other wheel and kept the truck going in the snow? If your get a chance to test it on ice, let me know how it behaves. Very good letter; you covered most of the issues on the minds of us still waiting. However, you didn't say if you got the elusive rubber gaskets on the bottom, inside edges of the doors, or only the holes? And don't forget to report your gas mileage. Thanks, Charles. Dick Dorff wrote: > Hi all, > > Our SD F250 CC SB XLT 4x4 V10 Auto TTP Hitch (& Chrome Step Bumper, > Privacy Glass, Deep Wedgewood Blue over Silver, Denim Int.) arrived at > the dealer last Friday, Jan 8, 1999. Order was placed Oct. 27 and order > was pulled Nov. 24, 1998, so that makes 10.5 weeks. Dealer said Lariats > are still taking longer. Test drove it on Saturday, and paid for and > took delivery on Monday. It's been parked there since until I can get > the factory mud flaps installed (now "List"ing for $20/pr at the > dealer), and perhaps do some undercoating. It's snowed or rained every > day here in Mass since we've got it so I want to do any rust prevention > stuff before it gets caked with salt and sand. Oh the pain; it looks > so nice, and drives great, and wants to be driven. > > In case anyone's interested... > > Test drove it last Saturday and it seemed great; no vibrations at any > speed (yet), accelerates and cruises down the highway like a dream, even > at 80mph or so. The ride is slightly smoother than I remember from test > drives. I suspect that might be the difference of the extra weight of > the Crew Cab, hitch, and perhaps the front stablizer bar, while the test > drives were of SuperCabs. Could entirely be imagination, or just being > slightly more used to it by now though. > > Fortunately there some snow the night before the acceptance test drive. > So I found an unplowed parking lot with 4-5" of snow still, and the > limited slip 3.73 seems to have a marked affect in rear wheel-only > traction. 4 wheel drive, well, what's there to say, even with the > default General Grabber All Seasons (235/85) traction is great. I'm > hoping they'll get us through the first Winter, and I'll then look for > some Winter tires and rims, and keep the originals as 3-seasons. > Braking seemed fine in the snow, using non-ABS braking methods, since it > has the rear ABS only. Probably would prefer the 4WABS; maybe next > time. > > Best of all, though not a complete surprise, it fits in the garage! If > driveway approach was level, there'd be about 1-2" of height clearance > in our 9x7'doors. Since driveway slopes up to the garage quite a bit, > the entire crew cab roof is in the door before the back wheels get even > close to garage level. Leaves about 6" of clearance at the closest. > Yessssss! There's about 2' total clearance in length. Can just walk > around both sides if the difference is split. Folded both TT mirrors in > so width isn't a problem. Should be able to get away with just folding > one in. With both out, truck width about exactly matches door opening > width. That's actually one major reason I opted for the TT mirrors: > the truck is skinnier with one TT mirror folded in than with both std. > mirrors out. The TT mirrors fold in with surprisingly little effort, > the bigges hassle is just lowering the window. A retracting/telescoping > kit would be ideal. > > It looks awesome; though I'd have preferred the more distinguished > truck look provided by the all Lt. Prarie Tan, the wife's choice of Dp > W. Blue over Silver gives it a longer, less tall appearance. Has a bit > of a 'b*rb*an look, though on steroids, more tastefully done, and a bed > instead of the cover. The colors still look sharp though. > > More to come, though also not necessarily fascinating. Thanks for all > the help everyone. > > Dick Dorff > 99 F250 SD CC SB XLT V10 4x4 3.73ls TT Hitch Privacy. > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 12:32:26 -0500 From: Dick Dorff Subject: Re: FTE 97up - 1999 F150 Tranny You can't order the E40D/4R100 on an F150; the 4R70W is the only automatic offered. Consider a '99 F250 Light Duty; it also has the new 5.4l, but has the E40D, which internally is the same as the 4R100. Dick Dorff 99 F250 SD CC SB XLT 4x4 V10 3.73ls TT > ------------------------------ > Sun, 17 Jan 1999 15:24:12 -0500, from Rick Heis: > > Nathan, > > My next questions, (1) Can you when you order a new 1999 F150 5.4 SC > SB XLT order the 4R100 tranny? I eventually plan on upgrading the > 5.4 engine, after about 10,000 miles, to about 350 horsepower and > 'think' thebeefier tranny would be better with the increase in HP and > torque. (2) What other items would have to be upgraded/changed with > other components (axles, drivetrain, etc) to make this 4R100 happen? > (3) Or is it a simple swap to 'special order' the 4R100? (4) What > Ford trucks have the 4R100 either as standard or available as an > option. (5) What would you reccommend, is the 4R70w adequate OR should > I opt for the stronger 4R100 tranny? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 12:35:32 -0500 From: Dick Dorff Subject: FTE 97up - Re: 98 Ford Explorer - Front end squeal A friend at work has a similar problem with his 98 Explorer and finally the dealer diagnosed it as a seal in the front hubs, or something to that effect (the technicals lost a little something on their way to my ear). Dealer said Ford knows of the problem and is still searching for a proper replacement seal. I think the FTE site maintains a "Small Ford Trucks" email list (Rangers, Explorers etc). There might be some more info in those archives, or available from some of those listmembers. Dick Dorff. > Sat, 16 Jan 1999 00:05:51 EST, TSTorres > > I live in the Chicago area, not a mechanic, and have a 98 Ford > Explorer XLT. Since it has gotten cold, around 25-35 degrees, I'm > hearing an occasional high pitched squeal in front driver side wheel > > area. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 12:48:03 -0500 From: Dick Dorff Subject: Re: FTE 97up - SD 250 V10 Arrived! First impressions. Hi Keith, I can understand your desire to raise the front, and I suspect it'll look quite sharp. For us, the only height mod we'll be doing would be to lower the rear a bit to fit a fifth wheel trailer. I'll wait until we purchase one to know exactly what the best height would be. Since the truck fits in the garage, there's one less reason to lower the back. Slightly improved access by the wife and kids to the cabin and bed remain a bit of a reason. The height required by the trailer will be the main factor (although they can be raised and lowered a bit too). It was really neat to see ours tower what seemed close to a foot over my brother's *b*rb*n when parked side by side this Sunday though . I've done some 4WD already, but haven't noticed the whine yet. I was sort of concentrating on everything, including just driving such a big vehicle, so whether or not I noticed it has little bearing on whether or not it's actually there. I expect some audible noise; the Bronco II has some. Not a valid comparison I'm sure, so I'll keep a more accutely tuned ear out next time. Keep me or the list apprised of the K&N and exhaust mods. I'll probably go those routes also. Most likely will do the K&N. I don't know if I'll be able to bring myself to remove a perfectly good condition section of exhaust though. Is the stock stainless? Is there hope of it ever rusting out? I live in Groton, work in Acton, drive through Sudbury every Sunday on the way to church in Framingham, and grew up in Ashland. - -Dick - ------------------------------ Fri, 15 Jan 1999 21:16:49 -0500, "Keith Veren": ... > Everything about the truck so far is perfect, however, > 1. I am planning to install the 3 inch lift kit from Tuff Country > (www.tuffcountry.com) in the Front (new springs w/positive arch, new > "U" bolts, etc.) to even it up a bit, and > 2. I am going to have the dealer check out what I think is a tad > excessive whine from the front differential when I am in 4- wheel drive > (high or low) and I go into "coast" or "float" mode (taking your foot > off the gas). That is the only issue I have with the truck as of > today. Does anyone with a similar set-up notice this kind of a > whine?? > Also, I will eventually want to install a K&N kit (when developed for > the V-10), a Borla Cat-back exhaust (I installed one on my '98 > Expedition XLT / 4X4 / 5.4L / 3.73LS / etc.) because it is a vast > improvement over stock. > Keith > PS, where in Mass are you? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 12:46:25 EST From: KWkM3 Subject: Re: FTE 97up - 1999 F150 Tranny automatic offered. Consider a '99 F250 Light Duty; it also has the new 5.4l, but has the E40D, which internally is the same as the 4R100. Dick Dorff 99 F250 SD CC SB XLT 4x4 V10 3.73ls TT >> The E4OD comes on 150's with California emissions. The 4R100 is not completely the same internally as the E4OD. It has stronger clutches and a different torque converter. Harry == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 12:51:05 -0500 From: "Keith Veren" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - 1999 F150 Tranny Dick, Why don't you just order a F-250 or 350 SuperDuty with the 5.4L or the V-10. It seems to me you want heavy-duty. That's what I did, and I love my F-350 4X4 SuperDuty V-10. Keith - -----Original Message----- From: Dick Dorff To: 97up Date: Monday, January 18, 1999 12:30 PM Subject: Re: FTE 97up - 1999 F150 Tranny >You can't order the E40D/4R100 on an F150; the 4R70W is the only >automatic offered. > >Consider a '99 F250 Light Duty; it also has the new 5.4l, but has the >E40D, which internally is the same as the 4R100. > >Dick Dorff >99 F250 SD CC SB XLT 4x4 V10 3.73ls TT > >> ------------------------------ >> Sun, 17 Jan 1999 15:24:12 -0500, from Rick Heis: >> >> Nathan, >> >> My next questions, (1) Can you when you order a new 1999 F150 5.4 SC >> SB XLT order the 4R100 tranny? I eventually plan on upgrading the >> 5.4 engine, after about 10,000 miles, to about 350 horsepower and >> 'think' thebeefier tranny would be better with the increase in HP and >> torque. (2) What other items would have to be upgraded/changed with >> other components (axles, drivetrain, etc) to make this 4R100 happen? >> (3) Or is it a simple swap to 'special order' the 4R100? (4) What >> Ford trucks have the 4R100 either as standard or available as an >> option. (5) What would you reccommend, is the 4R70w adequate OR should >> I opt for the stronger 4R100 tranny? >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 17:53:56 GMT From: alannorthstar Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Re:First oil change This goes 'round and 'round. Some new cars, high performance ones like Audis and StingRays come from the factory with synthetic oil in them. This tends to fly in the face of the concept of synthetic oil preventing the "seating" of the rings. It's probably something that was true back in the 50s and 60s, but isn't true with modern engines and modern metallurgy. Later, Alan On Mon, 18 Jan 1999 11:21:34 EST, you wrote: :While most of this is right, I *have* seen people ruin engines by using :synthetic oil too soon. :Synthetic oils (the 100% stuff, not the blends) is too slippery, and = won't :allow the rings to seat properly. What happens then is, the engine will = start :to smoke at about 20-30k miles, and this will be attributed to a "bad = engine > :from the factory; after all, the best oil was used." 100% synthetic = shouldn't :be used for the first 6k miles, at least, to give the rings a chance to = seat. :Bill : :ORIGINAL MESSAGE: : : : From: dhmccla : Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Re:First oil change :=20 : Alan, :=20 : I personally think its all BS and agree with Union Auto. Every service : department will tell you something different. That factory installed : oil is no different than any other major brand oil you can buy at any : major auto store. : I changed my first oil at 1700 miles (after 3 months) with 10w-30 = Mobil : 1 and specifically asked if there was a problem with using Mobil 1 and : the answer was absolutely no problem. Those days of a "break-in" oil : are long over. Never knew anyone to void a warranty or ruin an engine > : changing the oil more often than recommended either. : You are on a good schedule now for oil changes, keep it up. Dave >> :=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D :=3D=3D FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info = http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 10:03:36 -0800 From: "Neil Plocek" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - CrewCab rearseat? Gene, the latch is located on both sides of the seat back about 6-8 inches from the bottom. It is "NOT" very accessible. When you find it and tilt it forward , you should find a handy little box to store some accessories in. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 12:14:44 -0600 From: "Strukel, Mike".... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
© 1997-2009 Internet Brands, Inc., Please see our Terms of Use / Privacy Policy |