|
|
97up-list-digest Monday, December 21 1998 Volume 01 : Number 316 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1997 and Newer Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe 97up-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: FTE 97up - Re: Oil Filtration / Jean Marc Chartier FTE 97up - Jan 99 Car & Driver F-150 Test FTE 97up - Re: Jan 99 Car & Driver F-150 Test Re: FTE 97up - 4.6 Rough idle FTE 97up - Re: Chevy vs. Ford FTE 97up - explorer list Re: FTE 97up - Re: Chevy vs. Ford FTE 97up - 99 SD V-10 A/T Slimmy Shifting Re: FTE 97up - 99 SD V-10 A/T Slimmy Shifting FTE 97up - SuperDuty V-10 Re: FTE 97up - 99 SD V-10 A/T Slimmy Shifting ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 08:57:04 -0800 From: Rod Loewen Subject: FTE 97up - Re: Oil Filtration / Jean Marc Chartier Well, now, I don't know what the oil analysis cost. The invoices go directly to the head office and the maintenance department likes to see them as they indicate the need for work on the engine and down time in the future which can be planned and budgeted for. I mentioned that I don't do it on my own truck. On small engines that use 16 litres or less why not just put in fresh oil instead of paying for a sample and waiting for the results? I can't see the value on doing it with my PSD unless I suspect problems like contamination or something. With large engines that use two or three barrels of oil, the price consideration is a slightly bigger factor. The real issue is downtime. These engines are drivers moving product and downtime equals lost revenue, even short periods for oil changes. Oil is cheap, downtime is not. My truck has lots of stopped time for me to service it. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 11:20:20 -0500 From: Mark Lee Subject: FTE 97up - Jan 99 Car & Driver F-150 Test See http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.caranddriver.com/ for Jan 99 test of F-150 for those who are interested... == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 11:25:01 -0500 From: Mark Lee Subject: FTE 97up - Re: Jan 99 Car & Driver F-150 Test Sorry, forgot to mention...click "road tests" at top of C&D home page.... Mark Lee wrote: > > See http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.caranddriver.com/ > for Jan 99 test of F-150 for those who are interested... == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 13:04:21 -0600 From: "Mike Fairleigh" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - 4.6 Rough idle Is it consistently rough? If so, I'd take it in. Be aware that everything about the engine's performance - idle speed, mixture, timing, etc. - are computer-controlled and adjusted constantly. So, it can idle a bit rougher occasionally than at other times, depending on temperature, humidity, etc. But if it's always rough, then maybe you've got a loose/damaged vacuum line or defective component. Mike Fairleigh mikef ...Always remembering their sacrifices. - -----Original Message----- From: Chris Sykes To: 97up-list Date: Friday, December 18, 1998 2:55 PM Subject: FTE 97up - 4.6 Rough idle >I recently purchased a 1998 XLT Supercab 4.6L (Romeo)Automatic, LS 3.55. >The thing that concerns me is that it seems to vibrate a lot when it is >idling. It is a bigger engine than I'm used to but it also feels like a >not so consistent vibration. I thought perhaps it was idling too low. >When sitting with the transmission in drive and at a full stop the idle >speed is consistently between 600 and 650 RPM. Is this what it should be? >When I test drove a 99 it seemed to me that when I climbed in I couldn't >tell that the engine was running because it was so smooth, I guess I >expected the same thing in my 98. > Any thoughts or comments would be greatly appreciated! Thanks. > Chris Sykes > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 13:23:23 -0600 From: "Union Auto" Subject: FTE 97up - Re: Chevy vs. Ford The shocks aren't a big advantage, but the F-150 had All season tires (all terrain's can be had without the Off Road, although the Off Road's ATS Wranglers would be even better) where the Chevy Z71 had all terrain's and this gave it a big off road advantage. Nathan - -----Original Message----- From: RAMWORKER To: 97up-list Date: Saturday, December 19, 1998 2:27 PM Subject: Re: FTE 97up - LD vs. SD >Hi David, > > The last time I looked, the Ch*vy Z71 package only consisted of Bilstein >shocks and a skidplate or two. How those items could be much of an edge in >off-road performance is beyond me. > However, regarding the quarter mile race, I'm not too surprised. After 10,000 >miles on the companies' '98 F150 XL 4.6L automatic 3.55 rear end, I have to >say that I and others that drive this and our '97 2500 5.7L Vortec 3.73 rear >end are quite impressed, particularly considering the 69 ci smaller engine. >Most drivers feel the F150 will take the Ch*vy off the line, and at highway >speeds, our opinions become somewhat split. That means they are very close at >highway speeds and only a direct race (very unlikely) will decide this. > > Best Regards, > Robert > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 14:50:30 -0600 From: "Parker Brooks" Subject: FTE 97up - explorer list hey all, a while back a guy was telling us that he intended to start a explorer list. i wrote him back just recently (just got the message), and it's a bad email address. didn't know if anyone had any news about it, or how to join. any info would be appreciated. thanks, parker == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 18:01:47 EST From: BigFords1 Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Re: Chevy vs. Ford The F-150 had shorter tires than the Dodge And Chevy. That's what I meant to say the first time. David == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 19:24:29 -0800 From: "Matt Bailey" Subject: FTE 97up - 99 SD V-10 A/T Slimmy Shifting I recently purchased a 99 SD V-10 the 4 speed A/T. I really like the truck except for one thing, I don't like the way it swifts, much too soft, it really sliiiiiiides into gear. When your cruising around 40 mph and then accelerate hard, it will shift down the way it should but once it gets into 2nd gear it almost feels like it's slipping for a couple of seconds then it starts to pull away real hard. Has anyone else experience this? Is there anyway to adjust the way it shifts? I would like to have it shift like my old Chevy almost bang into gear. I know the clutches in this new 4 speed trany can't last too long if it continues to shift this way. Mattb == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 23:53:51 -0500 From: "Keith Veren" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - 99 SD V-10 A/T Slimmy Shifting I have the same truck as you, mine shifts better now that I have "trained" it. Play around with manually shifting from low to 2nd to drive while taking off from a light, also turn the overdrive off for a while and try different combinations of up and downshifting. You really can train it somewhat, but to get it to "bang" into the next gear you will probably need an aftermarket chip. Keith - -----Original Message----- From: Matt Bailey To: Ford Truck Mailing List Date: Sunday, December 20, 1998 10:20 PM Subject: FTE 97up - 99 SD V-10 A/T Slimmy Shifting >I recently purchased a 99 SD V-10 the 4 speed A/T. I really like the truck >except for one thing, I don't like the way it swifts, much too soft, it >really sliiiiiiides into gear. When your cruising around 40 mph and then >accelerate hard, it will shift down the way it should but once it gets into >2nd gear it almost feels like it's slipping for a couple of seconds then it >starts to pull away real hard. Has anyone else experience this? Is there >anyway to adjust the way it shifts? I would like to have it shift like my >old Chevy almost bang into gear. I know the clutches in this new 4 speed >trany can't last too long if it continues to shift this way. > >Mattb > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 23:59:36 -0500 From: "Keith Veren" Subject: FTE 97up - SuperDuty V-10 Has anyone yet put a K&N filter (or Generation II K&N Filter and Airbox) and Borla or gibson Cat-Back on the V-10 SuperDuty? I did both to my 5.4L Expedition and am happy with the sound and performance so far. Still looking for aftermarket goodies for the V-10 (4X4) F-350, but some vendors, eg., Performance Products, do not yet carry anything for the '99 SuperDuties. Keith P.S. Has anyone tried the spray on bedliners I have seen advertised?? I have a regular bedliner and am wondering if the spray on type will provide sound deadening and prevent surface rust. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 22:20:27 -0800 From: "Matt Bailey" Subject: Re: FTE 97up - 99 SD V-10 A/T Slimmy Shifting Thanks for the advice, I didn't realize that the trany needed training like the engine. I will try some manual shifting and see if it makes any difference, the truck only has 700 miles on it as of today so maybe it's still trainable. Mattb - -----Original Message----- From: Keith Veren To: 97up-list Date: Sunday, December 20, 1998 9:02 PM Subject: Re: FTE 97up - 99 SD V-10 A/T Slimmy Shifting >I have the same truck as you, mine shifts better now that I have "trained" >it. Play around with manually shifting from low to 2nd to drive while >taking off from a light, also turn the overdrive off for a while and try >different combinations of up and downshifting. You really can train it >somewhat, but to get it to "bang" into the next gear you will probably need >an aftermarket chip. > > >Keith > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Matt Bailey >To: Ford Truck Mailing List >Date: Sunday, December 20, 1998 10:20 PM >Subject: FTE 97up - 99 SD V-10 A/T Slimmy Shifting > > >>I recently purchased a 99 SD V-10 the 4 speed A/T. I really like the truck >>except for one thing, I don't like the way it swifts, much too soft, it >>really sliiiiiiides into gear. When your cruising around 40 mph and then >>accelerate hard, it will shift down the way it should but once it gets into >>2nd gear it almost feels like it's slipping for a couple of seconds then it >>starts to pull away real hard. Has anyone else experience this? Is there >>anyway to adjust the way it shifts? I would like to have it shift like my >>old Chevy almost bang into gear. I know the clutches in this new 4 speed >>trany can't last too long if it continues to shift this way. >> >>Mattb >> >>== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|