97up-list-digest Wednesday, September 23 1998 Volume 01 : Number 222

Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1997 and Newer Trucks and Vans
Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe, send email to:
majordomo ford-trucks.com
with the words "unsubscribe 97up-list-digest" in the body of the
In this issue:

Re: FTE 97up - Dual exhuast systems
FTE 97up - '99 F150 questions
FTE 97up - Re: 97up A/C performance
FTE 97up - Re: Looking to buy an F-350



Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 22:52:41 -0500
From: "Anthony Trantham"
Subject: Re: FTE 97up - Dual exhuast systems

I hope I am sending this the right way. I just joined a day ago and really
like what I have seen so far.

Keep it up!!

I will have to agree with David. I have the same system on my '92 F-250
351W minus a cat and love it. In fact I would never own another truck that
was a gas burned without this system.

Hope this helps,

>I have duals on my '97 F-150 4X4, it has a 4.6L. I have a converter after
>muffler (which is a flow master) into duals. I also put on some crome
>Its not terrible loud but when the rpms hit 2,500 and above you can really
>hear my Triton kicking. From behind ideling it sounds tough--its not too
>and its not too quiet. Definitly put a 2 chamber flowmaster on it if
>== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html


Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 22:52:37 -0500
From: "Sven Setterdahl"
Subject: FTE 97up - '99 F150 questions

Hello all,

My latest new vehicle "craving" is a '99 F150 XLT Ext. cab 4x4 w/ the 5.4L.
From what I've found, the 3.55 and 3.73 axles are both available w/ limited
slip. Can I get either one w/ the 5.4? Is there enough of a difference to
matter which axle to go with (mileage or performance)? With the extra power
in the new engine, I was thinking the 3.55 would be a nice compromise for a
couple extra miles per tank of gas. Questions is how many extra mile would
that be? I'd probably go with the 3.73 unless I could get an extra few
miles per gallon w/ the 3.55.

The only other thing I'm wondering about is the tonneau cover. Are they
anything special, or is it a plain black cover that look like all the rest?
Is $170 a decent price for a soft cover or would I be better off finding a
good aftermarket one? I've been away from the trucks for a while so I
haven't watched prices on accessories.



== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html


Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:16:57 EDT
From: SSeeplane aol.com
Subject: FTE 97up - Re: 97up A/C performance

'98 F-150 4.6L SC
A/C chills cab down in 5 minutes at Max recirc......runs on lowest fan set=
all day in the Ms summer heat (recirc mode)... makes big puddles in the
parking lot (which is probably more a function of ambient relative humidit=
than a/c efficiency)

just my 2=A2

Steve S. (the other one)

== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html


Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 02:37:38 -0400
From: Lee Haefele
Subject: FTE 97up - Re: Looking to buy an F-350

> I am looking to buy a 1999 F-350 Crew Cab, SRW, LWB with the 7.3 L Diesel
> and 4-Speed Automatic. Would anyone who owns a similar truck take a few
> moments to discuss their personal experience with this type of truck? I am
> interested in the good, as well as the bad. Would someone explain what the
> PTO and Idle Control options could be used for?

I have 99 F-350 DRW XLT Supercab 4X4 Cab-chassis 163" WB, V-10, auto. I
run a fleet of 6 F-350s others are 89-97, have had GM, Mitsubishi in
past, the Ford F-350 is best design, plus offers options not avail
elsewhere such as Supercab 4X4, 15,000 gvw 4X4. Mine has utility body &
aerial lift, it is permanently loaded to about 10,500, gets about 9
mpg. Very nice driving & quiet. V-10 engine is not as powerful as my
old 460, but not bad. 40-20-40 XLT seat is reasonably comfortable,
about 1000% better than prev Ford or GM. Truck chassis is very rugged
construction, but pickup model has lighter springs & frame rails, even
with same GVW, this I don't understand. Engine oil & trans coolers are
impressive. 4 wheel disc brakes work well with Hydro-Boost as supplied
with Diesel, poorly with heavy loads if supplied with vacuum boost. The
longer wheelbase units take about a football field to turn around. PTO
& idle control would be used to power a transmission mounted hydraulic
pump such as used to run a wrecker or dump body. Note: high idle is
req'd to run PTO from auto transmission.
I see some posts where owners want to carry slide in campers that put
the gross weight over 9,000 on SRW. I have had SRW 9,000+ lb
trucks...DUMB IDEA...they never drive well, plus, if you blow a tire it
will roll over & kill everybody, and, at this weight you DO have more
tire failures.
Lee Haefele
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html


End of 97up-list-digest V1 #222

+------ Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1997 and Newer Trucks and Vans ------+
| Send posts to 97up-list....

To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts

Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are not registered, click here to register.
If you are already registered, you can login here.

If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.

Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.