|
|
Return-Path: Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 03:50:19 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest To: fordtrucks80up-digest Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V2 #19 Reply-To: fordtrucks80up Sender: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest fordtrucks80up-digest Monday, January 12 1998 Volume 02 : Number 019 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 And Newer Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks80up-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: K&N Replacement Air Filters [Jim Orson ] Heat Stove... [yhtlines Re: Tonneau covers [Randy ] '97 powerstroke block heater [Nathaniel Ingersoll Re: K&N Replacement Air Filters [Randy ] Re: '97 powerstroke block heater [Jim Lujan ] '97 powerstroke block heater [Jim Lujan ] glasspacks, exhaust; attn Lubster [Randy ] Re: K&N Replacement Air Filters [FastRngXLT ] 4.10s and 3.73s 7.5" [silent.bob Re: Tonneau covers [Penqiun ] Bed Cover and Mat [David ] RA drop brackets...... [IamGoode ] RA drop brackets ["Jeff Wey" ] K&N for a Powerstroke? [Lt 4x4 ] Re: K&N for a Powerstroke? [Sheldon Belinkoff ] Re: Heat Stove... [Filip M Gieszczykiewicz ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 06:42:37 -0600 From: Jim Orson Subject: K&N Replacement Air Filters I ran across the K&N replacement air filters in the local truck store. I have a 97 Ranger 4.0L and have a couple of questions. The advantage of not having to replace paper elements is clear, however, how about the performance issue? Does the K&N filter improve performance? Is it noticeable or just theoretical? Also, how about cost? The truck store wants $45 for the Ranger filter and another $10 for the cleaning kit and oil. Is that the going rate? Thanks! Jim Orson... ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 07:53:17 From: yhtlines Subject: Heat Stove... Casey wrote asking about if it was ok to remove the heat stove on his truck....type/motor unspecified. My 83 Calif carbed V6 Ranger would not run safely with out the tube installed and the damper solenoid operable. THis motor depended on that warm air when coming down to idle, after the choke opened, or it would die. At the worst moment. (Some very interesting experiences and a lot of money spent at the dealer to find the problem--they couldn't, I did). On high vacuum, ie idle, the solenoid correctly opens the damper. These solenoids are Dave Lampert ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 15:38:28 -0800 From: Randy Subject: Re: Tonneau covers John R. McKee wrote: > > I have a 97 F-150 XLT, SC, 2 wheel drive, 4.2L, Automatic Trans. I'm > thinking about puting on a hard tonneau cover. Would like to hear from > others as to which brand to buy and any gain/loss in MPG after they > installed a hard tonneau cover. Now I'm getting 17 MPG city and 19.5 MPG > hwy. > Thanks, John. john, I have never installed a tonneau cover on my trucks, so can't help there. But, I received a catalog on Ford truck accs. I must have ordered it over the 'net, because it has a local cusomizing shop sticker on the back, but I know I didn't get it from there. Anyway the cover says 'The authority on Ford pickup truck accessories'. They have a new Lund hard tonneau for your truck. It looks, like a hard tonneau and a Lund fastback cab extender combined, plus has a rear wing/spoiler. The picture shows the whole tonneau lifting up from the rear. This thing looks REALLY COOL. The cab extender is for real, if you have a rear slider there's a carpeted shelf and a rear window. It must keep the full bed capacity length under the shelf, I'm guessing. I will say it is by no means inexpensive thought at $1400 for short bed and $1500 for LB!!!! I'm sure you didn't have that kind of money in mind, but if you're interested let me know, I'll at least give you the # to my local shop, maybe they can help. Later, Randy ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 11:34:53 -0800 From: Nathaniel Ingersoll Subject: '97 powerstroke block heater Stupid question time - Where is the plug for the block heater? Thanks. ningersoll ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 15:44:56 -0800 From: Randy Subject: Re: K&N Replacement Air Filters Jim Orson wrote: > > I ran across the K&N replacement air filters in the local truck store. I > have a 97 Ranger 4.0L and have a couple of questions. > > The advantage of not having to replace paper elements is clear, however, > how about the performance issue? Does the K&N filter improve > performance? Is it noticeable or just theoretical? > > Also, how about cost? The truck store wants $45 for the Ranger filter > and another $10 for the cleaning kit and oil. Is that the going rate? > > Thanks! > > Jim Orson... Jim, thru reading I see that K&N says that thru R&D, they have developed the filter to allow for maximum airflow thru the filter. Apparently the size and shape of the holes in the material have been very carefully designed to accomplish this. They are also larger the the 'holes' in the paper element, that's why you need the oil, so that smaller particles will 'cling' to the oil. I plan to install one, but haven't yet so I can't tell you if you're going to notice it. I've seen claims from anywhere from 5-30 hp increases! For $55 bucks even the minimum is worth the money. That is a comparable rate to what I have seen. Btw, if I put one on my 3.5 hp lawnmower will it become an 8.5? And if I then add a Splitfire plug will it add 5 more hp? Just kidding. Just trying to show that if you put the filter on a 100 hp motor, it is unlikely you are going to gain 30 hp, that may be why the descrepancies in hp gain. Later, Randy ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 12:44:34 -0700 From: Jim Lujan Subject: Re: '97 powerstroke block heater At 11:34 AM 1/11/98 -0800, Nathaniel Ingersoll wrote: >Stupid question time - >Where is the plug for the block heater? >Thanks. > >ningersoll It is usually tucked under the air intake on the driver's side, next to the second battery. It is tie-wrapped and attached to something under there. I don't remember exactly. It is on the fan side of the battery area, not the fenderwell side. Happy hunting! -Jim- '97 F350 PS 4x4 CCab LB ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 12:48:02 -0700 From: Jim Lujan Subject: '97 powerstroke block heater Oh, I forgot to add... Take a look at Jason Lester's PS Pages. He has a tip page on the Block Heater as well. http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.abol.com/users/jlester/tips/heater.htm ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 16:18:44 -0800 From: Randy Subject: glasspacks, exhaust; attn Lubster A few weeks ago I made the comment about how glass-pack mufflers can hinder your new exhausts peak performance. Chris Lublin wanted me to dig up the article that I read on that and let him know what it said, so here it is Chris and to all else who may be interested. It comes from a magazine that HotRod Car Craft produced called 200 power & performance secrets. I did not get permission to reproduce this, but as I see it, I'm just piquing others interest to buy the magazine and I'm not getting any personal gain from it whatsoever, except to know that I can help someone w/this info. The article is called Exhaust systems: myth vs. reality. Myth 1: Straight thru 'glasspack' mufflers outperform high perf 'turbo' mufflers because a noiser exhaust has less flow restriction: Adding plenum volume to the intake manifold helps overcome inlet tract restrictions by 'cushioning the blow'. Properly designed mufflers perform the same function on the exhaust side, effectively increasing plenum volume by providing an expansion chamber for the exhaust gases. Unfortunately, 'glasspacks' --the original high-performance muffler design--feature a single tube w/louvers and fiberglass packing. While they look effecient, the glasspack's straight-thru design doesn't allow for gas expansion. Glasspacks are further handicapped by hight internal turbulance (caused by the internal louvers) and a short life span (the fiberglass packing quickly deteriorates). The straight-through design is subject to reversion, which upsets the travel of the sound waves and restricts horsepower. Modern high-performance quiet mufflers use advanced accoustical technology to both control sound as well as to tune the exhaust pressure wave for improved performance. The result is a mellow-sounding muffler that also delivers superior performance. I don't want to write the entire article here but there is more on dual pipe crossover tubes and some other stuff. If interested e-mail me directly. There is also a chart showing which exhaust size is best for a certain hp range on a given motor: Pipe diameter Power (hp)SingleDual 200-3003.02.25 300-4003.52.5 375-4504.03.0 450-5504.53.5 550-6505.03.5 I figure that covers about all of us. Hope this is informative enough for you, Take care, Randy ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 17:30:45 EST From: FastRngXLT Subject: Re: K&N Replacement Air Filters In a message dated 1/11/98 7:44:56 AM Eastern Standard Time, jorson writes: have a 97 Ranger 4.0L and have a couple of questions. The advantage of not having to replace paper elements is clear, however, how about the performance issue? Does the K&N filter improve performance? Is it noticeable or just theoretical? Also, how about cost? The truck store wants $45 for the Ranger filter and another $10 for the cleaning kit and oil. Is that the going rate? Thanks! Jim Orson... >> Jim, I paid 40.00$ for my K&N, but I have a 3.0L V6 in my Ranger. I didnt noticed my K&N adding any power increases untill I put on my Flowmaster exuast. Brian ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 16:47:53 -0600 From: silent.bob Subject: 4.10s and 3.73s 7.5" How many teeth do the rings have on a 4.10 & 3.73 rings for a 7.5" rear end? Is there another way to I.D. the rings? silent.bob 95 Ranger 2.3L, SVO OHC http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.FordRanger.com (Ranger Site) http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.FordManTed.com (Mustang Site) ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 19:13:00 EST From: Penqiun Subject: Re: Tonneau covers Stay away from leer. Go with Century. I have leer on same truck. Doesnt fit as good as a Century ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 19:22:25 -0500 From: David Subject: Bed Cover and Mat I still have an Extang Saber tonno cover for sale for Ranger short bed. Looks new. All hardware included. I am now asking $140.00 (includes any shipping charges)I am also selling a Nymcord Bed mat and tail gate protector for a SB Ranger for $25.00. Send replies to:David ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 21:23:14 EST From: IamGoode Subject: RA drop brackets...... I have been getting cold responses everywhere I look for 2 inch RA drop brackets for my 92 Mazda Navajo (explorer). I understand they are not completely necesary, but I want to eliminate the excessive wear the bushings are currently experienceing. I am looking for any one who has built this type of thing regardless of the model to tell me of any pertinent facts to consider... I figure quarter inch plate and 2 inch square tubbing will be the stock I will work with putting the correction a bit over 2 inch but close enough, all grade 8 bolts... Other than that I was just gonna make it a straight drop, no forward or aft off set, is that OK? Thanks for any input....Sean ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 21:37:43 -0500 From: "Jeff Wey" Subject: RA drop brackets I have lowered several 2w.d. explorers. What are you wanting to know?? sources or do you want parts?? ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 23:42:53 EST From: Lt 4x4 Subject: K&N for a Powerstroke? I just bought a Powerstroke and was wondering if any one else has put a K&N filter in their truck. I talked to a PS mechanic at a Ford dealer and he said he was concerned that the power of the tutbo would pull some of the oil out of the filter, thu harming the turbo charger. Thanks, Jeff 97 350, CC, 4x4, PS ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 21:08:46 -0800 From: Sheldon Belinkoff Subject: Re: K&N for a Powerstroke? Lt 4x4 wrote: > I talked to a PS mechanic at a Ford dealer and he said he was concerned > that the power of the tutbo would pull some of the oil out of > the filter, thu harming the turbo charger. This fellow is wrong. Lot's of turbo-equipped Diesels use the K&N setup. Banks, for one. I've a K&N in my truck. Nope - the guy's just guessin' and guessin' wrong. - -- SCB belinkoff ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 00:31:31 -0600 (CST) From: Filip M Gieszczykiewicz Subject: Re: Heat Stove... You (yhtlines > Casey wrote asking about if it was ok to remove the heat stove on his > truck....type/motor unspecified. My 83 Calif carbed V6 Ranger would not run > safely with out the tube installed and the damper solenoid operable. THis > motor depended on that warm air when coming down to idle, after the choke > opened, or it would die. At the worst moment. (Some very interesting.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|