|
|
Return-Path: Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 03:50:19 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest To: fordtrucks80up-digest Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V2 #18 Reply-To: fordtrucks80up Sender: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest fordtrucks80up-digest Sunday, January 11 1998 Volume 02 : Number 018 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 And Newer Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks80up-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: holley [adam rupert ] Tonneau covers [johnmck [none] ["Gary Snook" ] Re: Tonneau covers [Allan Goldarbit ] Re: Banks TransCommand??? 2nd request [Lehmandp ] heat stove ["Casey Vandor" ] Re: Tonneau covers [Gardner ] Re: Axle codes for a Ranger [Gardner ] Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V2 #17 ["Greg & Lori Jacobs" Re: Banks TransCommand??? 2nd request [Jim Lujan ] Re: heat stove [bmrickman ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 06:13:48 -0800 (PST) From: adam rupert Subject: holley Hey guys I am enjoying this list! I just got a sweet deal on an e-150 raised roof action conversion van, really like that van, there is no way the kids can kick me in the back anymore! I had to wade in on this holley issue, numerous times I have had derivability problems like you describe Mike. May I suggest getting the small edelbrock carb, although slightly more complex than the holley they cold start better and there is no gas below a gasket this stops all leaks. Plus with one of these you cant over carborate since everything functions on vacuum, I am very pleased after using two of these on different vehicles. Just curious how much of an improvement were the performance mods on that big six? I hear they really respond to headers and free flowing exust. Adam In colorado springs sends Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 08:37:44 -0500From: Mike Johnson Subject: Re: Carburator Problems??? Holley86 f150 with the 300 cid engine, with a holley 4 barrel 390 cfm,Offenhauser intake ,header, duel exhaust.Thanks for everyones info on this problem.I never had this problem until a good year after I installed the newparts,the truck ran great, it had lots of power and good acceleration, noproblems at all.I did have an intake leak at the head during the summmer and the problemdidn't developeat that time, could this have done something to the carb?My truck did backfire sometimes becouse of the leak. But I fixed thatproblem.I put in a new power valve and cleaned the carb about a month ago and itdidn't help.I haven't changed the accelerator pump.With all the problems people seem to have with Holley Carbsmaybe I should try a different brand.Any suggestions on an alternative carb for my truck?Mike Johnsonmikej _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 11:03:25 EST From: johnmck Subject: Tonneau covers I have a 97 F-150 XLT, SC, 2 wheel drive, 4.2L, Automatic Trans. I'm thinking about puting on a hard tonneau cover. Would like to hear from others as to which brand to buy and any gain/loss in MPG after they installed a hard tonneau cover. Now I'm getting 17 MPG city and 19.5 MPG hwy. Thanks, John. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 21:14:14 -0600 From: "Gary Snook" Subject: [none] Well, Lets see. If we have a 38K sticker, and a 30K sticker, 4th grade math can get you 8K profit right there, provided someone is STUPID enough to pay sticker (I am sure it happens hundreds of times daily!). I wouldn't have to think TOO HARD to believe Ford makes another 2K at the factory end. Again, another .02 no, 8K worth! Gary ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 12:01:14 -0500 From: Allan Goldarbit Subject: Re: Tonneau covers John R. McKee wrote: > > I have a 97 F-150 XLT, SC, 2 wheel drive, 4.2L, Automatic Trans. I'm > thinking about puting on a hard tonneau cover. Would like to hear from > others as to which brand to buy and any gain/loss in MPG after they > installed a hard tonneau cover. Now I'm getting 17 MPG city and 19.5 MPG > hwy. > Thanks, John. > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > | List removal instructions on the website. | > +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ Put a Fastback tonneau cover on my 97 Ranger last year. It is a clamp on mount that I have had asolutely no problems with. It sits flush and my gas mileage increased about 2 mpg over just the open bed after putting it on. I got it from California Concepts for a real low price. Al Goldarbit ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 13:17:41 EST From: Lehmandp Subject: Re: Banks TransCommand??? 2nd request In a message dated 98-01-09 15:42:08 EST, Rex Edmiston writes: > Truck has 95K miles - a daily driver to from work > Truck REALLY works when towing a 4K lb inboard ski boat/trailer and > all the stuff needed for a week in the boonies. > Hi Rex, I've heard good things about the Banks TransCommand. Cost about $300. Just had my '92 E4OD rebuilt by an independant trans builder. The trans had 65k miles and was slipping and blowing shifts, but too late to save with the TransCommand. My trans would have lasted longer if I hadn't "tweaked" the motor... At your mileage, I'd start shopping for a good independant trans builder. They can do things to improve your transmission the dealer cannot do! Figure about $2k for a thorough job. And definitly go for the external trans cooler. I've heard about the factory's integrated engine radiator / trans cooler getting plugged or collapsing and failing after about 100k miles and then there's no hope for the trans no matter how strong or tricked your trans is... Good luck! - -David :-) ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 11:14:25 -0900 From: "Casey Vandor" Subject: heat stove I recently put on a new tube for the heat stove on my engine. Before putting it on the engine ran fine, after putting it on, it ran really rough so I took it off. Could this be because the manifold is leaking CO and I am just pumping that into the engine so there isn't enough oxygen? I guess I can live without the heat stove if that is the case, but what was the purpose of it for a new engine? Was it to send hot air into the carb like carb heat on airplanes? Casey ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 15:49:11 -0500 From: Gardner Subject: Re: Tonneau covers John R. McKee wrote: > > I have a 97 F-150 XLT, SC, 2 wheel drive, 4.2L, Automatic Trans. I'm > thinking about puting on a hard tonneau cover. Would like to hear from > others as to which brand to buy and any gain/loss in MPG after they > installed a hard tonneau cover. Now I'm getting 17 MPG city and 19.5 MPG > hwy. > Thanks, John. > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > | List removal instructions on the website. | > +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ I got my tonneau cover from A.R.E..they have a variety of them, but the one I got for 94 ranger has lines to match the ones in the hood! Comes prepainted too!(even matched). ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 15:59:37 -0500 From: Gardner Subject: Re: Axle codes for a Ranger FastRngXLT wrote: > > Does anyone know where I can obtain a list of axle codes. I need to know what > the gear ratio on axle code 84. > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > | List removal instructions on the website. | > +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ I will look for you tonight...I have a book at home with them in it! ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 14:01:53 -0800 From: "Greg & Lori Jacobs" Subject: Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V2 #17 I don't know if the year or other details matter, but I looked up code 84 in a 1991 Ranger Truck Shop Manual. That manual lists the following: Code | Conventional/Limited Slip | #Capacity | Ratio - -----+---------------------------+-----------+------ 84 | Conventional | 2750 | 3.45 > >Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 20:53:59 EST >From: FastRngXLT >Subject: Axle codes for a Ranger > >Does anyone know where I can obtain a list of axle codes. I need to know what >the gear ratio on axle code 84. > ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 15:50:56 -0700 From: Jim Lujan Subject: Re: Banks TransCommand??? 2nd request Rex, I installed my Banks Transcommand about 3 months ago on my '97 F350 PS 4x4. Install was a snap. It took about 30 minutes. When I installed, the truck had about 10K miles on it. Shifting is definitely crisper, especially under load. I also noticed that when shifting into reverse, the tranny doesn't hesitate like it did before. Basically, the Transcommand senses "load" on the transmission, and increases the hydraulic pressure on the clutches. This reduces clutch slippage, and therefore less wear and tear on the tranny. It also creates the "crispness" in the shifts. I bought mine from Diesel Injection Services (as well as my Banks StageII kit). They have great prices on Banks products. Here is a pointer specifically for the Transcommand. http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.dieselpage.com/transcmd2.htm You might also want to check out The Drive Train Page. They talk about rebuilding tranny's, costs, and specific issues related to particular transmissions (like the E40D). With 95K miles on your truck, you may be looking at a rebuild for your tranny, and while you are at it, you might beef it up. http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thegrid.net/thedrivetrainpage/ Best of luck! -Jim- '97 F350 PS 4x4 CCab LB ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 17:34:17 -0600 From: bmrickman Subject: Re: heat stove On Sat, 10 Jan 1998 11:14:25 -0900 "Casey Vandor" writes: >I recently put on a new tube for the heat stove on my engine. Before putting it on the engine ran fine, after putting it on, it ran really rough so I took it off. Could this be because the manifold is leaking CO and I am just pumping that into the engine so there isn't enough oxygen? I guess I can live without the heat stove if that is the case, but what was the purpose of it for a new engine? Was it to send hot air into the carb like carb heat on airplanes? >Casey >+-------------- Aircraft only use carb heat in icing conditions to keep the carb from icing up (that would be bad). The stove pipe is to provide for a faster warm up period and keep intake air temp at approx 100 deg F. this is on my 81 F100 anyway. Chase vacuum lines and you can sometimes figure out what they do (but not always why).I wouln't worry about the engine breathing CO, I don't see it happening. Sounds like maybe yours is either restricted (the metal shroud on the exhaust collapsed?) or the thermoswitch is telling the air valve in the cleaner to take full heat. The switch is in the aircleaner box. This is only a guess, "actual results may vary". :-) Hypothetically, (big word for a redneck huh?) if someone needed to pass a visual inspection you could have everything installed and plug up the line to the vacuum motor with, oh lets say, a small ball bearing? And yes, all other things being equal, cooler air makes more power than.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|