|
|
Return-Path: Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 17:21:36 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest To: fordtrucks80up-digest Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V2 #82 Reply-To: fordtrucks80up Sender: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest fordtrucks80up-digest Tuesday, March 3 1998 Volume 02 : Number 082 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 - 1996 Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks80up-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: FW: Leveling Coils [John Cassis ] Pinging & engine temp. [Michael_Skerrett RE: Pinging & engine temp. ["Chapman, David P" ] RE: Fuel line fittings ["Beaman, James" ] More on coils!!! [John Cassis ] Re: looking for a hood? [Robert Kennedy ] Navistar Lifter Question [Sheldon Belinkoff ] eec-iv chips ["bradley teich" ] Mileage improvment report... [David McDonald ] RE: Backfire Problem [tfmf211 RE:CARB ICING [tfmf211 Re: Mileage improvment report... [JSCF250 ] F250HD [Jonathan Everly ] RE: Mileage improvment report... ["Beaman, James" ] Venting at Ford [ACMERCG ] Gas [John Cassis ] Re: Venting at Ford [JSCF250 ] Re: Mileage improvment report... [David McDonald ] RE: Venting at Ford [Nathan Sipes ] Re: Venting at Ford [Joe Maleski ] Re: Mileage improvment report... [David McDonald ] wiring question? [Macormick ] RE: Venting at Ford [Sean Winters ] RE: Venting at Ford ["Rio, Tony" ] Re: wiring question? [JSCF250 ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 06:54:39 -0600 From: John Cassis Subject: FW: Leveling Coils - ---------- From: John Cassis Sent: Monday, March 02, 1998 4:04 PM To: 'Ford Trucks 80 & Up' Subject: Leveling Coils Brice, On my 93' heres what I did -=20 Superlift Softride - 2 1/2" Lift Coils Superlift Camber Bushings (must do this to align the truck with the = taller coils) Rancho RS5000 Shocks (need at least 2 new shocks ie. the old ones will = be to short) The coils, camber bushings, and 2 shocks were about $220. I had them = installed for $250 at Off-Road Unlimited in Houston (281-558-1600). When I did mine I went with 4 new shocks and a steering stabalizer for = another $70 installed - well worth the money. The shop I mentioned = before basically will level Rangers out for $500 - the back shocks and = the steering stabalizer were recomended but not necessary. I think I = spent a total of about $600 going the route I went. If I new how I would = send you a picture so you could get an idea of what it will look like. = Anyway hope this is of some help if you have any more questions about = this feel free to e-mail me personaly at: cassis John Cassis 93' Ranger STX 4x4 3.0/5-speed ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 09:19 -0500 (EST) From: Michael_Skerrett Subject: Pinging & engine temp. A little correction for mine. I started running premium from the first tank I put in the truck. I get the pinging when I go to the floor with it towing when not using premium. So could be my computer is used to thehigher octane and doesnt like it when I try to change. John The computer remembers the last 80 drive sessions. If you want to change to lower octane and have the computer remember the new settings you could probably run a tank of 87 through to get the octane stable. On the second full tank remove power from the computer for at least 5 minutes to clear its memory. Any less than 5 minutes and the old settings will remain. I did this by disconnecting the battery (of course then I had to reset all my radio channels, sigh....). The Chilton's manual I have recommends a mix of driving for the first 15-20 sessions, between highway and city. This will let it better average all the sensor parameters. I would ensure that all the basics are in order before starting this, like timing, plugs, wires, cap & rotor, et al. Couldn't hurt and may save you $.25 per gallon. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 09:48:59 -0500 From: "Chapman, David P" Subject: RE: Pinging & engine temp. Hey - thanks to everyone for all the information on this topic. Over the next week I'll be checking the various suggestions and I'll let everyone know what happens. Dave C. > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael_Skerrett > [SMTP:Michael_Skerrett > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 1998 9:19 AM > To: fordtrucks80up > Subject: Pinging & engine temp. > > > A little correction for mine. I started running premium from the > first > tank I put in the truck. I get the pinging when I go to the floor > with > it towing when not using premium. So could be my computer is used > to > thehigher octane and doesnt like it when I try to change. > > John > > The computer remembers the last 80 drive sessions. If you want > to > change to lower octane and have the computer remember the new > settings > you could probably run a tank of 87 through to get the octane > stable. > On the second full tank remove power from the computer for at > least 5 > minutes to clear its memory. Any less than 5 minutes and the old > > settings will remain. I did this by disconnecting the battery (of > > course then I had to reset all my radio channels, sigh....). The > > Chilton's manual I have recommends a mix of driving for the first > > 15-20 sessions, between highway and city. This will let it > better > average all the sensor parameters. I would ensure that all the > basics > are in order before starting this, like timing, plugs, wires, cap > & > rotor, et al. > > Couldn't hurt and may save you $.25 per gallon. > > +--------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 - 1996 > ----------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > | > | List removal instructions on the website. > | > +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com > -----------------+ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 09:14:51 -0600 From: "Beaman, James" Subject: RE: Fuel line fittings Rob Sweed wrote in part: > Let me throw my two cents into the gas mileage debate. I had a wrecker > service using GM*'s with 454's and 350's. The lowest mileage I ever got > was 7 > mpg. This new (to me) F-150 (I'll never own a Gen > again, > long story) just started getting 7-8 mpg. > no caps joe gave you some good advice on repacing the O2 sensor and giving it a tuneup. I'd like to add one more possibility. The mileage on my '92 F250, 5.8EFI dropped to under 10 a few months ago and then eventually quit running. The problem was finally traced to a failed fuel pressure regulator. The regulator apparently had been going bad for awhile and was accompanied by a bad smell from the converter. The engine began running so rich that it flooded the catalytic converter with unburned fuel. Fortunately the problem was identified before I spent $700 replacing the converter I thought was bad. Your didn't mention if the check engine light was coming on or not. I would be surprised if it was not. You might pull the computer codes and see what they say. Post them to the group and maybe we can help give you a diagnosis. Also, I think there is a gauge you can buy to check the fuel pressure and compare it against the spec. Good luck. James Beaman james.beaman Houston, Texas ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 09:13:13 -0600 From: John Cassis Subject: More on coils!!! Bryce, I forgot, as someone just stated get your headlights re-adjusted. I also = went to 8" wide wheels and run 31"X10.5" BFG All terrains. I've got = plenty of room to acomodate 32"X11.5", but I wanted the clearence = between the wheel well and the tires. If you do any off-roading you know = its kind of useless to stuff a tire in just because it fits and have no = clearence for the tire to travel up and down. Anyway I hope this pointed = you in a good direction. John Cassis 93' Ranger STX 4x4 3.0/5-speed ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 07:38:57 -0800 From: Robert Kennedy Subject: Re: looking for a hood? James Duff Enterprises in Sequim, Washnigton is a great source of Ford/Bronco/Bronco II aftermarket accessories... hope this helps. Bob At 01:01 PM 3/2/98 -0500, you wrote: >Does anyone know where i could get a performance hood for my 87 F-150, >im looking for like a fiberglass cowl induction hood just for looks. So >if anyone knows of any companies it would be greatly apreciated. Thanks. >+--------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 - 1996 ----------------+ >| Send posts to fordtrucks80up >| List removal instructions on the website. | >+----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ > ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 08:38:59 -0800 From: Sheldon Belinkoff Subject: Navistar Lifter Question I understand that the 7.3 engine uses roller lifters. Is this correct? - -- SCB belinkoff ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 09:43:32 PST From: "bradley teich" Subject: eec-iv chips is there a manufacturer that makes a 'drop in' chip for improving the performance of my 94 bronco's 351? also, would a performance exhaust system affect that addition? ______________________________________________________ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 11:24:29 -0800 From: David McDonald Subject: Mileage improvment report... Hiya, I recently added a Gibson cat back, MSD6a and a K&N filter charger to my '90 F250 4x4 351 5spd. The MSD came with helically wound spark plug wires, but the coil wire was to short when I took the first mileage test, so the MSD was getting some interference and cutting the truck off a 5100 RPM (higher than I normally go, but I was told by MSD that the interference was across the RBM band, I just noticed it when it stopped the engine :). Ok, before I did any mods I drove from Evergreen to Pueblo (along the front range in Colorado) and got 11 mpg trip with the mods (and the wrong coil wire) and got 14 MPG. I just had the truck up in Summit county yesterday, Drove from Evergreen up I-70 thru the tunnel to Breckenridge, Dillon, Frisco, and then back to Evergreen (day trip just to have some fun). It was all miles on pavement, no snow busting (I'm not equipped for solo winter 4 wheelin). I got 10 MPG. I would have expected about 9 from past trips. I looked in the Haynes Manual for my truck to see if I could advance the timing, and I've got the type that not only doesn't require timing, but CAN'T be adjusted. It's the ignition system that starts with a 'T' but I don't recall their acronym for it. Anyway, I got a 3 MPG (best case) improvment by spending $800, so I figure It'll take 2400 highway miles to recoup the cost . That's not bad, but from what the manufacturer's claimed and what Truck Performance Center told me on the phone, I should be running closer to 18 MPG. If I had it to do over again, I wouldn't spend the $. There's a small seat of the pants improvment, and it makes more noise now. If I used it more as a street truck than a 'Snowplow and hauling' truck I prolly would, but for my uses, I think the negatives outweigh the positives. I'll leave the stuff on there, cuz I can't return it now, but I'm a bit disappointed by the whole package. Just one man's opinion, don't get yer underoos in a knot if you disagree. Dave McDonald '90 F250 4x4 351 5spd (The blue beast) Gibson Cat Back MSD 6A K&N filter charger Big ugly snowplow mount ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 14:25:46 +0000 From: tfmf211 Subject: RE: Backfire Problem >Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 10:40:43 EST >From: WindWaiver >Subject: backfire problem > >In a message dated 98-03-01 05:53:09 EST, you write: > >> >I have an 85 f250 5.8L w/ auto trans that has a backfire problem, when i >decelerate i get a fire out of the exhaust, small pop only when i run it=20 above >about 1700 rpm, if i let off slowly it doesn't do it. About ready to take= =20 it >to the ford house and let them attempt the repair. I had the same problem with my '68! I found that I had pinholes in my exhaust manifold. My truck runs a little rich and when I rev'ed the engine above a certain RPM my truck would cackle and backfire. The extra fuel blowing out the exhaust port mixed with the air through the holes in the manifold would ignite and cause the truck to back fire. I've since put on headers and the problem is gone and the truck has a nice backlog sound to it now when the motor decelerates. No more cackling and backfiring. My fuel economy and power has increased dramatically to since adding the headers. Hope this helps! -Ted=20 ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 14:32:17 +0000 From: tfmf211 Subject: RE:CARB ICING >Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 15:53:39 -0700 >From: "Smeins, Larry" >Subject: RE: CARB ICING > >Carb icing can be a real problem. I've experienced it most when temps >were in the 30 to 40 degree range and humidity was high, like in a wet >spring snow storm. You mention the 6 cylinder header so I assume you >don't have the stock exhaust manifold. Make a sheet metal "stove" on >the header near the head that funnels into a 2 to 3 inch tube. Get a >closed air filter housing with a thermostatically controlled air snout >with warm air inlet. You should be able to find one in a junk yard. >Pipe the new stove to the warm air inlet of your new air filter housing. >Either hook up the thermostatic control or block the flap closed when >driving under icing conditions. When summer comes and icing isn't a >problem put the open filter back on and enjoy the better breathing but >in winter use the closed and heated filter. It will flow better than a >big carb full of ice. BTDT. > >Larry Ditto! Some of the guys on the 61-79 list were having the same kinds of problems. To my knowledge this was the only true fix to the problem. -Ted=20 ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 15:07:01 EST From: JSCF250 Subject: Re: Mileage improvment report... hey dave, you spent too much money on everything, i bet you ordered that package that they advertise. i have a 89 f-250 with a 351w and a c-6. im getting about 8 mpg city and 12 hwy. i just recently installed a cat back system a flowmaster muffler and a 3" tailpipe for 130 bucks at my local muffler shop. alot of the muffler shops carry performance mufflers and will do the work cheaper that buying the advertised catbacks. i bought a k&n filter (just installed today) for 38 bucks at autozone. i dont know how much you paid for that msd but i hope it wasnt 4 or 500 bucks. anyway dont feel bad about the investment you made to your truck, its a work truck and it will pay itself off. i haul a trailer(i do swimming pool resurfacing) and i do hauling with mine, and that truck can have anything it wants, why? because IT MAKES MONEY FOR ME . i have not found out how much my mpg improved but when i know i will post it.hey try changing your 02 sensor, i know someone in the club that did that and he improved his mpg by 4 mpg. my total package with the catback, the 02 sensor, and the k&n filter cost me about 210 bucks. but i dumped so much more into that truck. to me its worth it. well good luck bud. and keep on truckin. joe ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 15:14:40 +0000 From: Jonathan Everly Subject: F250HD Hello, I have a 1987 F250hd with a 351w. I am looking to get as much torque out of it as I can. The guy that had the truck befor me towed a race car with it. He instaled a shift improver kit a high rpm carb and a mild carb. The truck has all the horespower I could want but it is in a high rpm range. The low end torque is a little laking. I was told that the mild cam moved the torque up in the rpm range. I would like to get some more torque to turn the 38 in tires i am putting on it with out losing the horsepower that i already have. a gear reduction to match the tires is also in the plans. Any thoughts on this would be greatly apresiated. Thanks Jake ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 14:18:37 -0600 From: "Beaman, James" Subject: RE: Mileage improvment report... David McDonald wrote in part: > I recently added a Gibson cat back, MSD6a and a K&N filter > charger to my '90 F250 4x4 351 5spd. > > Anyway, I got a 3 MPG (best case) improvment by spending $800, so > I figure It'll take 2400 highway miles to recoup the cost . > I calculate the break even mileage to be about 37,319 miles using a price of $1.10 per gallon. The formula I used is X/11 + $800/price of gas in dollars = X/14 where X is the number of miles to break even. X will actually be a negative number. > If I had it to do over again, I wouldn't spend the $. > I just have to wonder how much improvement you would have seen if you had just installed a new stock distributor and new stock plug wires. I am assuming the 11 mpg you were getting before the MSD was with old, worn out wires, etc. I am considering upgrading to an MSD distributor and wires and would like to know what difference it would make over new stock components but don't want to spend the time and money to buy, install and try out the stock just to surplus them later. Since others on the net who have made the upgrades are probably in the same boat I am, I don't think alot of the comparison numbers posted are realistic since they compare new aftermarket to old stock hardware. Unless of course they upgraded a new stock ignition system which was installed shortly before they bought the vehicle. Has anyone done this? James Beaman james.beaman Houston, Texas ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 15:40:48 EST From: ACMERCG Subject: Venting at Ford I have a serious problem... I cannot neglect my truck. When something needs to be fixed I fix it. When something is worn I replace it. I treat my vehicles too good. My girlfriend says that I treat them better than her. Shes probally right. Latest is a leaking rear tank in the F-150. I removed it and brought it to a repair guy to have it fixed. He calls me up today and tells me that it will have to be replaced because the tank is filled with pinholes where the straps are. Apparently the sealant that Ford used deteriates over time and departs from the truck. What replaces it is water and eventually rots out the bottom of the tank. So the new tank is gonna cost me $125. I'm pretty fed up with this truck. It has given me nothing but problems since I got it. One of the only good things that I can say is that it looks WAY better than any of my friends trucks, including my buddy with the new Tahoe. This truck is my first venture into Fords and probally be my last. The ad might look like this: Just venting, no flames please..... Joe acmercg 92' F-150 XLT 4X4 NITE 5.0 AUTO P/S P/B P/W P/L Cruise, Lumbar Dynomax Cat Back, K&N Filtercharger Tek Style bed cover, Lund Grille Screens Hella 550's, Alarm, 63K, IMMAC Any takers? ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 14:35:54 -0600 From: John Cassis Subject: Gas Cant remember who gave the suggestion on disconnecting the battery then = switching to regular unleaded, but thanks for the advice but I'd rather = just run premium. No offence intended and dont flame me here, I just = think its better gas. John Cassis 93' Ranger STX 4x4 3.0 - stock 2 1/2" Lift (front end only) 8" Wheels & 31's Raven Truck Top ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 16:08:16 EST From: JSCF250 Subject: Re: Venting at Ford HEY JOE DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT I PUT IN TO MY 89 F-250, I OWNED IT ABOUT 6 MONTHS here we go: air pump, fan belt, clutch fan, water pump, hoses, heavy duty thermostat, new radiator,distributor shaft sator, new cap, rotor, plugs, wires, fuel & air filters, oil pan gasket, valve cover gaskets, & overhead gasket, air by-pass valves, exhaust system, map sensor, 02 sensor, intake manifold gaskets, new coil, 4 shocks, tad solenoid, tab solenoid, and a few others that i cant think of right now, thank god the c-6 was just rebuilt when i bought it also the ac was retrofitted, and new front calipers , rotors and brakes. and that is just mechanical, not to mention all the other dress up items i put in it. but when i drive it i have peace of mind, i know what i have invested in that truck, and how dependable it will be. sometimes you have to spend a little, but if you say you have the baddest truck around,( and i had alot of vehicles like that) than i think its worth the investment. good luck buddy. joe jscf250 ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 14:51:00 -0800 From: David McDonald Subject: Re: Mileage improvment report... JSCF250 wrote: > > hey dave, you spent too much money on everything, i bet you ordered that > package that they advertise. No, I don't think it was a package deal.... Gibson $269 (Mandrell bent 3", not as loud as Flowmaster) K&N filter charger $163 (Not the drop in filter, it's the cone) MSD 6a $249 (came with new Spark Plug wires) $714 delivered, plus new plugs, dist. cap and rotor = about $800. I called around Denver, and couldn't find any prices to beat those. > it.hey try changing your 02 sensor, i know someone in the club that did that > and he > improved his mpg by 4 mpg. Yep, gonna do that soon... hope it helps. > > joe Dave McDonald ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 14:14:28 -0700 From: Nathan Sipes Subject: RE: Venting at Ford I have a 89 ford F-250 with a 460 and it has been the most trouble free truck that I have had. The only real problem I ever had was that under dealership warranty they rotated the tires and ran them down with an impact gun so when I got a flat I had a bitch of a time getting them off. Nathan Sipes > -----Original Message----- > From: JSCF250 [SMTP:JSCF250 > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 1998 2:08 PM > To: fordtrucks80up > Subject: Re: Venting at Ford > > HEY JOE DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT I PUT IN TO MY 89 F-250, I OWNED IT > ABOUT 6 > MONTHS here we go: air pump, fan belt, clutch fan, water pump, hoses, > heavy > duty thermostat, new radiator,distributor shaft sator, new cap, rotor, > plugs, > wires, fuel & air filters, oil pan gasket, valve cover gaskets, & > overhead > gasket, air by-pass valves, exhaust system, map sensor, 02 sensor, > intake > manifold gaskets, > new coil, 4 shocks, tad solenoid, tab solenoid, and a few others that > i cant > think of right now, thank god the c-6 was just rebuilt when i bought > it also > the ac was retrofitted, and new front calipers , rotors and brakes. > and that > is just mechanical, not to mention all the other dress up items i put > in it. > but when i drive it i have peace of mind, i know what i have invested > in that > truck, and how dependable it will be. sometimes you have to spend a > little, > but if you say you have the baddest truck around,( and i had alot of > vehicles > like that) than i think its worth the investment. > good luck buddy. > > joe jscf250 > +--------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 - 1996 > ----------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > | > | List removal instructions on the website. > | > +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com > -----------------+ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 13:18:59 -0800 From: Joe Maleski Subject: Re: Venting at Ford I don't know where you live but I have an OEM rear tank from a '94 F-250HD sitting in my garage, unused. You can have it for free if you come and pick it up. I live in San Jose, CA. Quit your griping - at least you have a girlfriend! :) Joe >I have a serious problem... I cannot neglect my truck. When something needs >to be fixed I fix it. When something is worn I replace it. I treat my >vehicles too good. My girlfriend says that I treat them better than her. >Shes probally right. > Latest is a leaking rear tank in the F-150. I removed it and brought it >to a repair guy to have it fixed. He calls me up today and tells me that it >will have to be replaced because the tank is filled with pinholes where the >straps are. Apparently the sealant that Ford used deteriates over time and >departs from the truck. What replaces it is water and eventually rots out the >bottom of the tank. So the new tank is gonna cost me $125. I'm pretty fed up ************************************ Joe Maleski Santa Clara, CA 1994 F-250HD SuperCab 4X4, 460/5-spd mailto:jmaleski ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 15:05:00 -0800 From: David McDonald Subject: Re: Mileage improvment report... Beaman, James wrote: > I calculate the break even mileage to be about 37,319 miles using a price of > $1.10 per gallon. The formula I used is X/11 + $800/price of gas in dollars > = X/14 where X is the number of miles to break even. X will actually be a > negative number. > I'm gonna have to take another look at my calcs, I think yer right... which is even worse news :( > I just have to wonder how much improvement you would have seen if you had > just installed a new stock distributor and new stock plug wires. I am > assuming the 11 mpg you were getting before the MSD was with old, worn out > wires, etc. > James Beaman > james.beaman > Houston, Texas > The 11 mpg was just after a tuneup of new plugs dist. cap and rotor, air filter (stock) and fuel filter. I didn't replace the wires at that point (although I prolly should have). The truck was at about 65K miles then, 75K now. I suppose I should have made one mod at a time to see the difference on each one individually, but I had the parts, I had the time, so they all went on at once :) Dave McDonald ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 17:52:27 EST From: Macormick Subject: wiring question? I've got a 94 Ranger that I just put a moonvisor on and I need to find the wire for the parking lights. I really don't want to take my dash apart to get to a wire I'm not much of a mechanic. There are so many wires running around in that thing it makes me sick trying to figure them out. Is there any place on the net that has diagrams for it. I have it hooked into the instrument panel fuse now but I don't like it because the visor can dim with the panel. Matt ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 17:01:18 -0600 From: Sean Winters Subject: RE: Venting at Ford Here here. I couldn't agree more. I paid $800 for my truck (82 stepside) and have probably spent another $1200 getting it "like I want it". It was barely roadworthy when I purchased it, but had a new motor. With that as a foundation, I was able over the last year to have a fun hobby, learn a great deal about things that interest me, and save the $17K that I was ready to spend on a new truck (never mind the recurring insurance costs associated with full coverage on a new vehicle). And it is merely a paint job away from being complete! Do I have a truck equal to the new one? Not even close. Does it do what I need it to do and did I have a great time making that way? You betcha. Can I get in it and not worry about breaking down? You bet. Do I have more pride in my truck than a lot of people who own a newer truck? MmmHmm. Lets see. Back to that equal to a new one question... Just my $.02 Sean Winters > -----Original Message----- > From: JSCF250 [SMTP:JSCF250 > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 1998 3:08 PM > To: fordtrucks80up > Subject: Re: Venting at Ford > > HEY JOE DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT I PUT IN TO MY 89 F-250, I OWNED IT > ABOUT 6 > MONTHS here we go: air pump, fan belt, clutch fan, water pump, hoses, > heavy > duty thermostat, new radiator,distributor shaft sator, new cap, rotor, > plugs, > wires, fuel & air filters, oil pan gasket, valve cover gaskets, & > overhead > gasket, air by-pass valves, exhaust system, map sensor, 02 sensor, > intake > manifold gaskets, > new coil, 4 shocks, tad solenoid, tab solenoid, and a few others that > i cant > think of right now, thank god the c-6 was just rebuilt when i bought > it also > the ac was retrofitted, and new front calipers , rotors and brakes. > and that > is just mechanical, not to mention all the other dress up items i put > in it. > but when i drive it i have peace of mind, i know what i have invested > in that > truck, and how dependable it will be. sometimes you have to spend a > little, > but if you say you have the baddest truck around,( and i had alot of > vehicles > like that) than i think its worth the investment. > good luck buddy. > > joe jscf250 > +--------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 - 1996 > ----------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > | > | List removal instructions on the website. > | > +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com > -----------------+ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 17:21:54 -0600 From: "Rio, Tony" Subject: RE: Venting at Ford Hey guys... Let me just say every truck is different I have an '94 F150 6cyl. with 83,000. So far i've put in a new u-joint and a starter solenoid. That's the only stuff I've replaced with the exception of 1 set of tires and other "consumables" I have to say I've been very happy with all my Fords, trucks or passenger vehicles. I've never owned anything else, and just went and bought a new another since I was so happy with the past ones.... '80 Fairmont Futura Sedan (36k, replaced Radiator) '94 F150 (83k, replaced u-joint & starter solenoid) 85 Crown Victoria (79k when sold in '94, replaced radiator and water pump) 82 Crown Victoria (110k when sold in '90, replaced radiator, starter) '89 Probe (55k when sold last week, replaced computer and elec. dash) '95 Explorer Eddie Bauer (31k, rack-pinion replaced under warrenty) Tony Rio Allstate Enterprise Help Center PRC Analyst \ Integration Owner Trio1 (W) 847.402.9386 > -----Original Message----- > From: JSCF250 [SMTP:fordtrucks80up > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 1998 3:08 PM > To: JSCF250 > Subject: Re: Venting at Ford > > HEY JOE DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT I PUT IN TO MY 89 F-250, I OWNED IT > ABOUT 6 > MONTHS here we go: air pump, fan belt, clutch fan, water pump, hoses, > heavy > duty thermostat, new radiator,distributor shaft sator, new cap, rotor, > plugs, > wires, fuel & air filters, oil pan gasket, valve cover gaskets, & > overhead > gasket, air by-pass valves, exhaust system, map sensor, 02 sensor, > intake > manifold gaskets, > new coil, 4 shocks, tad solenoid, tab solenoid, and a few others that > i cant > think of right now, thank god the c-6 was just rebuilt when i bought > it also > the ac was retrofitted, and new front calipers , rotors and brakes. > and that > is just mechanical, not to mention all the other dress up items i put > in it. > but when i drive it i have peace of mind, i know what i have invested > in that .... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|