|
|
Return-Path: Date: Sun, 21 Dec 1997 03:50:26 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest To: fordtrucks80up-digest Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #273 Reply-To: fordtrucks80up Sender: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest fordtrucks80up-digest Sunday, December 21 1997 Volume 01 : Number 273 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 And Newer Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks80up-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: Warning Chime ["Bob Leifer" ] Re: weight for snow [Michael Melson ] Re: Recommended Weight for Snow Traction. ["Jeffrey Hansen" Re: Recommended Weight for Snow Traction. ["Roy Preston" Re: weight for snow ["Joe Merchak" ] Re: ADMIN: Who wants to be on the Ranger/Bronco II/Explorer list? [ILuvTr] Need 2.9L heads or repair tips [Hayden Griffin ] Re: Recommended Weight for Snow Traction. ["maxfli" ] Small Truck List [KNBD87D re: "Suburban" [KNBD87D Re: Ford "Suburban" [KNBD87D Wierd Bolts [Mad Poodle ] Shifter Knob [Mad Poodle ] Shifter Knob [Mad Poodle ] Wierd Bolts [Mad Poodle ] Shifter Knob [Mad Poodle ] Re: "Suburban" [Shadorite ] Re: Shifter Knob [Primusdrmr ] Re: int. wiper relay: 92 F150 [Lehmandp ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 08:13:54 -0500 From: "Bob Leifer" Subject: Re: Warning Chime J/C, Maybe it is standard starting on the 97. My Ranger is a 97 XLT with the 864 package and the auto trans. There is no old style slight switch to be seen anywhere! I know what they look like; all previous vehicles I ever owned had that type that stuck out from the body waiting for the door to press it in. - -----Original Message----- From: Midwest96 To: fordtrucks80up Date: Friday, December 19, 1997 3:37 PM Subject: Re: Warning Chime >In a message dated 97-12-19 00:30:51 EST, you write: > > .........................---------------+ ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 09:10:38 -0800 From: Michael Melson Subject: Re: weight for snow fordtrucks80up-digest wrote: I can't speak for Bob, but I think what he was trying to say was, that it is dangerous to carry unsecured loads in adverse conditions. You say you have never had a problem w/ the weight you use, I would also bet you have never lost control of your truck w/ the extra weight in the back. Let's take a look at a hypothetical situation, if you suddenly went into a spin due to black ice, or some other adverse cond, and when you regained control (if you regained control) you were heading for a snow bank, w/ no hope of stopping in time, what do you think the weight in the back would do when the truck goes from 45 mph to a dead stop in a matter of seconds? Do you think the weight will come to a dead stop just as fast? If you do, I suggest you take a physics class. As a member of a first aid squad, I can guarentee you first hand, this is not the case. I can introduce you to a fellow that had his chest crushed and his face put through a windshield, all from an 80 lbs bag of rock salt that became a flying projectile due to an accident. Sorry to be so long winded in my response, but I'll never forget cutting that guy out of his truck. THe bottom line is this: Always secure your load. Spend a few bucks on some tie down straps, you'll be glad you did. Message I responded to: > I dont agree with Bob. I have a 93 Ranger XLT with a 3.0 and 4 speed > auto > and BFgoodrich LT tires. I have a long bed with a high rise > fiberglass cap. > I have been adding 100lb since I bought it in 93. The truck now has > 90K > miles and I have no problems with it. > > So you know what I use, I bought 2 50LB bags of kitty litter. I put a > 2X4 > behind the wheel wells and I put the bags between the 2X4 and the tail > gate. > The truck has been though many heavy snow storms without any problems. > > Message from Bob Ford: > >Put what ever weight your head can tolerate when it (the weight) > comes > >ripping through the back of the cab after you have hit something or > nailed > >the brakes to avoid hitting something. > > > >Don't do this. Manufactures don't design for these unscheduled loads. > > > > >Sorry, but you asked for it! > > > >Happy headache, > >Bob Ford - -- Mike '90 F-150 '67 Shelby GT 500 wannabe Ponyboy's Garage- '64 1/2-'68 Mustang parts http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://home.earthlink.net/~ponyboy428/ I'm always looking for '67-8 Shelby and Mustang fastback specific parts. Also 428 CJ specific parts, let me know what you have. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 09:10:35 -0500 From: "Jeffrey Hansen" Subject: Re: Recommended Weight for Snow Traction. If one believed "Bob Ford", then pickup trucks are not designed to carry any load? He wrote ... >>Don't do this. Manufactures don't design for these unscheduled loads. Obviously, this is incorrect. A half-ton pickup is designed to haul a half ton, or 1000 pounds. It is not an "unscheduled" load in the least, it's what a truck is designed to do. While certain loads could indeed come crashing into the operator, bags of sand placed over the back wheels, secured in the bed with 2x4's or what have you is not in any danger of shifting in any sort of accident. I drive my '88 Ranger XLT here in Ohio, where the snow hangs around for awhile, melts, then comes back. I don't carry weight in the bed, and every time it snows and the rear end slips around, I curse myself for not carrying any weight. Maybe I'm just a masochist. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 09:42:29 -0500 From: "Roy Preston" Subject: Re: Recommended Weight for Snow Traction. Joe; Personnaly, I like "SAND BAGS". Some places even load it into 70 lb. tube style bags that will lay either over or around the wheel wells! - ---------- > From: Joe Merchak > To: fordtrucks80up > Subject: Re: Recommended Weight for Snow Traction. > Date: Friday, December 19, 1997 10:14 PM > > I dont agree with Bob. I have a 93 Ranger XLT with a 3.0 and 4 speed auto > and BFgoodrich LT tires. I have a long bed with a high rise fiberglass cap. > I have been adding 100lb since I bought it in 93. The truck now has 90K > miles and I have no problems with it. > > So you know what I use, I bought 2 50LB bags of kitty litter. I put a 2X4 > behind the wheel wells and I put the bags between the 2X4 and the tail gate. > The truck has been though many heavy snow storms without any problems. > -----Original Message----- > From: bthomas > To: fordtrucks80up > RandalDGazdecki > Date: Friday, December 19, 1997 2:23 PM > Subject: Re: Recommended Weight for Snow Traction. > > > > > > > >Put what ever weight your head can tolerate when it (the weight) comes > >ripping through the back of the cab after you have hit something or nailed > >the brakes to avoid hitting something. > > > >Don't do this. Manufactures don't design for these unscheduled loads. > > > >Sorry, but you asked for it! > > > >Happy headache, > >Bob Ford > > > > > >______________________________ Reply Separator ____________________________ > >_____ > >Subject: Recommended Weight for Snow Traction. > >Author: RandalDGazdecki > >Date: 12/19/97 6:43 PM > > > > > > > > > >I have a 91 Ranger, 2wd, 5speed, 3.0L V6 and I want to know how > >much weight I should put in the back for optimum snow traction > >and minimal loss of power and mileage? I have brand new Dunlop > >Radial Rover All-terrain tires on it (LT27x8.50R14). Anybody > >have experience with testing to see how much weight is needed? > >I don't have a limited slip diff, just the stock 3.45 axle > >ratio. > >Randy G > >K.O.T.C.C. > >randaldgazdecki > >"Heart of the N.S.S.N!!" > >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer > >--------------+ > >| Send posts to fordtrucks80up > >| > >| List removal instructions on the website. > >| > >+----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com > >-----------------+ > > > > > >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ > >| Send posts to fordtrucks80up > >| List removal instructions on the website. | > >+----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ > > > > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > | List removal instructions on the website. | > +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 09:42:51 -0500 From: "Joe Merchak" Subject: Re: weight for snow my weight is secured...... - -----Original Message----- From: Michael Melson To: fordtrucks80up Date: Saturday, December 20, 1997 9:04 AM Subject: Re: weight for snow >fordtrucks80up-digest wrote: > > I can't speak for Bob, but I think what he was trying to say was, that >it is dangerous to carry unsecured loads in adverse conditions. You say >you have never had a problem w/ the weight you use, I would also bet you >have never lost control of your truck w/ the extra weight in the back. >Let's take a look at a hypothetical situation, if you suddenly went >into a spin due to black ice, or some other adverse cond, and when you >regained control (if you regained control) you were heading for a snow >bank, w/ no hope of stopping in time, what do you think the weight in >the back would do when the truck goes from 45 mph to a dead stop in a >matter of seconds? Do you think the weight will come to a dead stop just >as fast? If you do, I suggest you take a physics class. > > As a member of a first aid squad, I can guarentee you first hand, this >is not the case. I can introduce you to a fellow that had his chest >crushed and his face put through a windshield, all from an 80 lbs bag of >rock salt that became a flying projectile due to an accident. > > Sorry to be so long winded in my response, but I'll never forget >cutting that guy out of his truck. THe bottom line is this: Always >secure your load. Spend a few bucks on some tie down straps, you'll be >glad you did. > >Message I responded to: > >> I dont agree with Bob. I have a 93 Ranger XLT with a 3.0 and 4 speed >> auto >> and BFgoodrich LT tires. I have a long bed with a high rise >> fiberglass cap. >> I have been adding 100lb since I bought it in 93. The truck now has >> 90K >> miles and I have no problems with it. >> >> So you know what I use, I bought 2 50LB bags of kitty litter. I put a >> 2X4 >> behind the wheel wells and I put the bags between the 2X4 and the tail >> gate. >> The truck has been though many heavy snow storms without any problems. >> >> Message from Bob Ford: >> >Put what ever weight your head can tolerate when it (the weight) >> comes >> >ripping through the back of the cab after you have hit something or >> nailed >> >the brakes to avoid hitting something. >> > >> >Don't do this. Manufactures don't design for these unscheduled loads. >> >> > >> >Sorry, but you asked for it! >> > >> >Happy headache, >> >Bob Ford > > > >-- > Mike >'90 F-150 >'67 Shelby GT 500 wannabe >Ponyboy's Garage- '64 1/2-'68 Mustang parts > http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://home.earthlink.net/~ponyboy428/ > I'm always looking for '67-8 Shelby and Mustang fastback specific >parts. > Also 428 CJ specific parts, let me know what you have. > > >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ >| Send posts to fordtrucks80up >| List removal instructions on the website. | >+----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ > ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 10:19:40 EST From: ILuvTruks Subject: Re: ADMIN: Who wants to be on the Ranger/Bronco II/Explorer list? In a message dated 97-12-18 22:58:10 EST, you write: > kpayne ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 10:30:44 +0500 From: Hayden Griffin Subject: Need 2.9L heads or repair tips Can anyone tell me a good, reasonably priced source for heads for the 2.9 in my 89 Bronco II? I believe the right one is cracked. I haven't figured out for sure about the left one yet. Ford wants $540 each for bare heads. Or are there good repair methods if I can locate the crack(s) and they're accessible? Any leads gratefully accepted. Hayden griffin ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 09:52:47 -0600 From: "maxfli" Subject: Re: Recommended Weight for Snow Traction. Unscheduled load, that the most ridiculous thing Ive ever heard, do you thing the manufacturer made trucks just to look good. Their made to haul stuff. Adding weight in the rear of a empty truck to gain snow traction is a benefit, not a safety hazard as long as you use your head about what you put in the back. A couple or three bags of sand in the back can help on those snowy roads as long as you dont drive like a mad man and think your invincible because of the extra traction you have gained. A couple extra hundred pounds of weight in the back should do fine, good luck and be careful. Brad - -----Original Message----- From: bthomas To: fordtrucks80up RandalDGazdecki Date: Friday, December 19, 1997 1:22 PM Subject: Re: Recommended Weight for Snow Traction. > > >Put what ever weight your head can tolerate when it (the weight) comes >ripping through the back of the cab after you have hit something or nailed >the brakes to avoid hitting something. > >Don't do this. Manufactures don't design for these unscheduled loads. > >Sorry, but you asked for it! > >Happy headache, >Bob Ford > > >______________________________ Reply Separator ____________________________ >_____ >Subject: Recommended Weight for Snow Traction. >Author: RandalDGazdecki >Date: 12/19/97 6:43 PM > > > > >I have a 91 Ranger, 2wd, 5speed, 3.0L V6 and I want to know how >much weight I should put in the back for optimum snow traction >and minimal loss of power and mileage? I have brand new Dunlop >Radial Rover All-terrain tires on it (LT27x8.50R14). Anybody >have experience with testing to see how much weight is needed? >I don't have a limited slip diff, just the stock 3.45 axle >ratio. >Randy G >K.O.T.C.C. >randaldgazdecki >"Heart of the N.S.S.N!!" >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer >--------------+ >| Send posts to fordtrucks80up >| >| List removal instructions on the website. >| >+----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com >-----------------+ > > >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ >| Send posts to fordtrucks80up >| List removal instructions on the website. | >+----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 13:38:59, -0500 From: KNBD87D Subject: Small Truck List Hi, I want to stay on both lists. Josh Tenney KNBD87D ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 13:59:31, -0500 From: KNBD87D Subject: re: "Suburban" George buddy, take it easy. Nobody on this list is "stupid." Before saying that people are stupid, you may want to read up on info a bit more. The expedition competes with the tahoe, not the suburban. Ford has designed a truck called the "Crew Wagon" that will compete with the suburban. The name is not set in stone and neither is the truck. It actually has SIX doors. 4 regular size doors, but two small ones, like F150 supercabs have so you can reach the very back seat. I am very excitied to see the truck, but not too excitied to see the price. George, please refrain from calling people stupid unless you are a rocket scientist yourself and know everything about everything. Thank you. Josh KNBD87D ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 14:01:05, -0500 From: KNBD87D Subject: Re: Ford "Suburban" The engine will be the V10 or power stroke. I don't know the axle ratios yet. Josh ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 23:01:33 EST From: Mad Poodle Subject: Wierd Bolts Sorry, this is probally old....... >This isn't a question but an observation; what the heck is it with the >fasteners on this truck? It seems like it is about 10% metric and 90% SAE. >I'll find a brake line on one side of the vehicle SAE and on the other side it >is metric. Weird. For awhile the manufacturers tried what was termed "iso-metric" hardware. I have air compressors and generators that have such oddities as a bolt with a 10mm head, and the nut on it is 7/16". Drives me wild trying to tear them down in the field :-) Scott 92 Bronco, 351 93 F250 SC, 351 98 F150, 284 ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 23:02:20 EST From: Mad Poodle Subject: Shifter Knob Does anyone know how to get the knobs off the end of the 5-speeds > shifter? > Is it pressed on? Do you need a special tool to get it off? If its > pressed > on - does anyone know the size of the press fit? End of lever is knurled, and knob is pressed on..... If you have a good grip, you can just twist the snot out of it, and the knob will strip out and come off. Try it after a rough day at the office, it seems to work better ;-) Scott 92 Bronco, 351 93 F250 SC, 351 98 F150, 284 ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 23:03:05 EST From: Mad Poodle Subject: Shifter Knob Does anyone know how to get the knobs off the end of the 5-speeds > shifter? > Is it pressed on? Do you need a special tool to get it off? If its > pressed > on - does anyone know the size of the press fit? End of lever is knurled, and knob is pressed on..... If you have a good grip, you can just twist the snot out of it, and the knob will strip out and come off. Try it after a rough day at the office, it seems to work better ;-) Scott 92 Bronco, 351 93 F250 SC, 351 98 F150, 284 ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 23:03:29 EST From: Mad Poodle Subject: Wierd Bolts Sorry, this is probally old....... >This isn't a question but an observation; what the heck is it with the >fasteners on this truck? It seems like it is about 10% metric and 90% SAE. >I'll find a brake line on one side of the vehicle SAE and on the other side it >is metric. Weird. For awhile the manufacturers tried what was termed "iso-metric" hardware. I have air compressors and generators that have such oddities as a bolt with a 10mm head, and the nut on it is 7/16". Drives me wild trying to tear them down in the field :-) Scott 92 Bronco, 351 93 F250 SC, 351 98 F150, 284 ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 23:02:50 EST From: Mad Poodle Subject: Shifter Knob Does anyone know how to get the knobs off the end of the 5-speeds > shifter? > Is it pressed on? Do you need a special tool to get it off? If its > pressed > on - does anyone know the size of the press fit? End of lever is knurled, and knob is pressed on..... If you have a good grip, you can just twist the snot out of it, and the knob will strip out and come off. Try it after a rough day at the office, it seems to work better ;-) Scott 92 Bronco, 351 93 F250 SC, 351 98 F150, 284 ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 23:05:44 EST From: Shadorite Subject: Re: "Suburban" Hey All, What I have seen at the Ford Texas test track is a 6 door suburban based on the new heavy duty series line up. Looks a little weird but plenty of space. It haas the four dours of the crew cab but 2 smaller suicides bight behind them. from what I have seen it has the basic tail gate/window in back. Ford! The best never rest. Josh ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 23:06:36 EST From: Primusdrmr Subject: Re: Shifter Knob In a message dated 97-12-20 23:05:19 EST, you write: Date:97-12-20 23:05:19 EST From:MadPoodle Sender:owner-fordtrucks80up Reply-to:fordtrucks80up To:fordtrucks80up-digest Does anyone know how to get the knobs off the end of the 5-speeds > shifter? > Is it pressed on? Do you need a special tool to get it off? If its > pressed > on - does anyone know the size of the press fit? End of lever is knurled, and knob is pressed on..... If you have a good grip, you can just twist the snot out of it, and the knob will strip out and come off. Try it after a rough day at the office, it seems to work better ;-).... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|