|
|
Return-Path: Date: Mon, 8 Dec 1997 03:50:21 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest To: fordtrucks80up-digest Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #255 Reply-To: fordtrucks80up Sender: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest fordtrucks80up-digest Monday, December 8 1997 Volume 01 : Number 255 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 And Newer Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks80up-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: gas prices [tfam engine break-in [Danny Gaudenti ] Re: engine break-in ["Scott C. Pollins" ] Re: CD changer [Dave Armbruster ] 87 Ranger bed ruined [Nathan Heid ] Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #253 [Randy ] Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #254 [Randy ] Re: CD changer ["R.L.H.O." ] Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #253 ["R.L.H.O." ] Fuel Injectors [bill gibson ] Re: CD changer [silent.bob Re: CD Changer [silent.bob Re: CD changer [silent.bob AM Radio Interference [johnmck Re: engine break-in [george cummings ] Question for the Lightning owners [Ken Payne ] Re: Fuel Injectors ["Ryan Penner" ] need 302 5.0 parts [Michael Ruth ] Re: Question for the Lightning owners [Bob ] Re: Fuel Injectors [bill gibson ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 09:40:42 -0800 From: tfam Subject: gas prices I was in St.Joseph, Mo. for a job last week, the company E-250 was running low so I pulled into the Phillips 66, found 88 octane for 1.03/gal. (the 300 I 6 preferes 88 or above, knocks pretty bad on 87 octane.) The same station had 87 octane for .98/gal. An independet station next to the `66` had 87 oct. for .97/gal. That company van has a 34 gallon tank, wish I had two of them in my F-250hd (97). Propane fuel was mentioned, I am interested in a dual fuel setup, Who supplies parts/kits, what does it cost, do they have them for the f.i. engines, and does ford still honor the warranty on the engine after any such conversions? thankyou.L.D. in K.C. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 09:07:08 From: Danny Gaudenti Subject: engine break-in What is the best way to break-in a new engine? I'm asking because we have a '98 F150 on order (scheduled delivery: "week of 12-7-97") and I want to treat it right for the beginning of it's life. I don't mind a little inconvenience at first if it will be good for the life of the engine. I looked at an owner's manual at the dealer and it just says "vary engine speed". The owner's manual for the car the F150 is replacing (which I didn't buy new) says: Drive moderately during the first 300 miles. After 50 miles, speeds up to 50 or 60 MPH are desirable. While cruising, brief full-throttle accelerations contribute to a good break-in. My wife's '85 Camry owner's manual: Do not drive over 55 MPH. Maintain engine speed between 2000 and 4000 RPM. Avoid full-throttle starts. Do not drive slowly in high gear. Vary engine speed. Do not tow. Does any of the above apply to the truck? Am I being too cautious? Should I just drive it and not worry about a formal break-in? Thanks for any help, Dan ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 12:22:37 -0500 From: "Scott C. Pollins" Subject: Re: engine break-in Dan, That is a good question and one I have asked for years with no satisfactory answer. One school of thought is the term "break-in" is a relic that has been around from the early days of production automobiles. When engines began to be mass produced machining technologies were not as advanced as they became in the mid-70's. Therefore, modern day engines do not need a rigorous/scheduled break in period as they did in the past. With current computerized machining and the coupled with statistical process control much closer tolerances can be held in production and an engine needs little time to break in. I still believe that using common sense with a new engine and a early oil change (shortly after the first 1000 miles) is perhaps an effective method for you new vehicle Congratulations on your new truck and good luck with it! Scott At 09:07 AM 12/7/97, you wrote: > >What is the best way to break-in a new engine? I'm asking because we have >a '98 F150 on order (scheduled delivery: "week of 12-7-97") and I want to >treat it right for the beginning of it's life. I don't mind a little >inconvenience at first if it will be good for the life of the engine. > >I looked at an owner's manual at the dealer and it just says "vary engine >speed". The owner's manual for the car the F150 is replacing (which I >didn't buy new) says: Drive moderately during the first 300 miles. After >50 miles, speeds up to 50 or 60 MPH are desirable. While cruising, brief >full-throttle accelerations contribute to a good break-in. My wife's '85 >Camry owner's manual: Do not drive over 55 MPH. Maintain engine speed >between 2000 and 4000 RPM. Avoid full-throttle starts. Do not drive >slowly in high gear. Vary engine speed. Do not tow. > >Does any of the above apply to the truck? Am I being too cautious? Should >I just drive it and not worry about a formal break-in? > >Thanks for any help, > >Dan > >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ >| Send posts to fordtrucks80up >| List removal instructions on the website. | >+----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ > > ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 10:43:35 -0700 From: Dave Armbruster Subject: Re: CD changer > >Do you know whether the cables needed comes with the changer package or >not? > >Thanks again, > >Rodrigo I didn't think to ask them that, but for $400 I would hope that they could see fit to throw in a cable, particularly since it's probably not "standard", thus widely avaliable. Although, by the same token, they've already got you if you want to do a factory-look upgrade, so whats another $10? BTW, the changer fits well into the compartment between the bucket seats, if you've upgraded from the split bench. I saw a '97 Explorer with the changer. The changer was sitting parallel with the doors, along the passenger's side of the console, with roughly half the console still available for storage. The inside looked a little different than mine. I didn't notice exactly why, but I don't think it had the slots for cassettes that mine has, which would be useless with the changer in there anyway. Dave ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 14:16:34 -0500 From: Nathan Heid Subject: 87 Ranger bed ruined Last night I was stopped at the bottom of a hill in my 87 Ranger when I struck by a 92 Ranger. The 92's front corner hit my rear corner. The bumper is buckled into the drivers side rear of the bed which is buckled out at the weel well. the bed was shoved into the cab corner and then bounced back but not to it's normal place. The floor of the bed is buckled such that the tailgate doesn't open more than a third. The other driver is at fault and insured but I have some concerns about repairs. I belive the bed and tailgate are ruined. This truck is rust free(in Ohio!) and in mint condition so I don't want to part with it. If the bed has to be replaced, where on earth is anybody going to find a 10 year old Ranger bed that isn't rusty or beat to hell? i don't think there should be much frame damage if any, since the impact to the bumper was outboard of the bumper's attach point. The bumper and body seem to have absorbed the impast. Has anyone else had to make similiar repairs? What kind of cost estimites can I expect? What should I look out for? Used parts???? ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 15:42:00 -0800 From: Randy Subject: Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #253 ********** > > Date: Sat, 6 Dec 1997 07:17:14 -0200 > From: "R.L.H.O." > Subject: CD changer > > I'd like to buy a Ford CD changer for my 97 Ranger XLT Std. Cab. > Is it the original Ford CD changer the only one compatible with the > Stereo/Cassete player that comes with the > car ? I wouldn't want to lose its CD functions ! > > Any help? Any idea about prices or/and where to find it? > > Thanks all. > > Rodrigo Heitzmann > Rod, I would recommend calling the tech guys at Crutchfield (800-955-3000, very helpful). It's a mail order electronics company, w/mostly car and home audio. They have a webpage, but I don't know that it'll do you much good (crutchfield.com). They have some stuff for Ford factory stereo systems like a special wiring harness to install aftermarket stereos into autos w/Ford premium sound systems. They have adapter face plates to install stereos into the new Ford Taurus w/the climate control cut-outs and graphics. If there's an aftermarket CD changer that can hook directly w/your Ford unit, they'll know about it. Later, Randy ********** ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 16:25:07 -0800 From: Randy Subject: Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #254 ********** > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 6 Dec 1997 12:10:43 EST > From: Midwest96 > Subject: Re: Brakes > > In a message dated 97-12-06 11:04:42 EST, you write: > > > the limit for max. dia.; I replaced both drums, all hardware (except for > the wheel cylinders), and put aftermarket pads on (performance friction > maybe - can't really recall) - 59,000 miles now on truck w/ not even the > hint of similar symptoms. > > Eric S. >> > > Eric, > > Thanks for the info, but I'm really really new at this, could you expand a > little bit. How would I go about changing hardware, what do I buy how much. > My truck is 30,400 so I would guess same problem. Again, thanks > > Craig (Midwest96 > Craig, going into something like brake work 'blind' is not a good idea. Drum brakes are a pretty simple concept that works great. I would recommend a shop manual before you start. It'll more than pay for itself w/you doing this one job yourself. Chilton makes manuals for all types of vehicles, check w/your local parts store and get the one that's MOST SPECIFIC to your vehicle (by narrowing years and models included in one manual). Also, buy a brake tool kit for yourself and some brake cleaner. While drum brake work CAN be done without such a kit, it does make it much easier. One last thing. I have, over the years, learned one thing about drum brake work; always do only ONE SIDE AT A TIME. Remove both drums from the truck, this way if you didn't lay your parts out correctly on the shop floor, or you forgot which way the pads and springs and adjusters went together you always have a reference point. Hope this is your first step on the road to fixing your own truck. Take care, Randy > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 06 Dec 1997 12:59:00 -0500 > From: Nathan Heid > Subject: Re: Automotive Propane Availability > Nat, I see you attend Case. I too am from the Cleveland area. Enjoying the snow? hehe. Did you get your Tribe tickets? > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 6 Dec 1997 15:57:17 -0500 > From: "The Lublin Family" > Subject: Ranger woes. > > Hi all. > > Well Mom's Ranger is up to it again. It is making a clunking noise coming > from the back of the truck. I thought it was a U-joint going bad, but I > tested them and they have no play in them. Any suggestions on where it > Could be coming from? > > THanks a bunch. > > Chris "Lube" Lublin > Chris, are you sure they have no 'play' in them. If they do, it may not be very much. Troubleshooting time; when does the clunking occur? When shifting in to gear, or from one gear to another? Do you have ANY new vibrations at higher speeds. Check those joints again, especially the rear. If you look close, do you see any shiny metal near the base of the u-joint cups? While I don't believe in 'shotgun' troubleshooting, if you've done all your homework and still have two or three different things that could be causing a problem, start with the 'cheapest' (or most easy to work on). If you just can't figure it out, it wouldn't hurt to change that $10 u-joint (besides it's easy to do and would need replaced eventually, anyway). If you need any help on how to do it just let me know. Randy > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 6 Dec 1997 16:04:45 -0500 > From: "The Lublin Family" > Subject: 85 F-150 Lighting troubles. > > Hi all. > > I have a 85 F-150 I bought a few months ago. I originally bought it for a > parts truck for my 81 F-150. Well it turns out the '85 is in better > shape than the 81 so I got it running and she runs pretty good. I hope to > drive this truck soon. I am in the process of getting the bugs worked > out. There is one hurdle that I am stuck on. For lighting all that I > have are the emergency flashers and a right turn signal. I also have dash > lights when I turn on my head lamps. That is all I have for lights. The > heater blower motor and radio dont work either. Does anybody have any > ideas on what I should check for? Thanks a ton. > > Chris "Lube" Lublin. > > lublin > Speaking of troubleshooting time! Always start with the simple, stupid stuff (you know, the stuff you're SURE isn't causing the problem). The fusebox is a good place to start. Are the fuses there? Are they blown? Are they the RIGHT SIZE? Let's assume for now those answers are yes, no and yes, respectively. How about the light bulbs themselves? You didn't say if the dash lights come on with the parking lights (first stop [click] on switch), but do they? Always make sure the bulbs that are in their respective sockets are the ones that are SUPPOSED to be there. Remember, you have no idea what the guy before you was thinking, and he could have thrown in one that just 'fit'. I once bought a Trans Am and 'all' the parking lights (and dash) came on dimly when the brake pedal was pushed. Upon checking, I found that the guy had put in a single filament (GM1156?) bulb where a dual filament (GM1157?) was called for (parking/brake light). The problem was the that the single filament connection point on the bulb bridged the gap between the double connectors in the socket on the car causing a short. By the way that was a great bargaining point for me (I didn't tell him about the light bulb) Is the radio factory or aftermarket. If it's not factory, pull it out and inspect the wiring for any disconnections. If the blower motor is like my '87 (no A/C) it's located on the right - passenger side (always left and right is while sitting in the driver's seat) and is very easily accessible. Pull it out and put some juice to it (all the while keeping your fingers out of it). Hope you get that worked out, Randy '87 F-250 4x4HD > ------------------------------ ********** ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Dec 1997 06:51:50 -0200 From: "R.L.H.O." Subject: Re: CD changer That's it Dave ! Thanks a lot. - ---------- > From: Dave Armbruster > To: fordtrucks80up > Subject: Re: CD changer > Date: Domingo, Dezembro 07, 1997 03:43 > > > > >Do you know whether the cables needed comes with the changer package or > >not? > > > >Thanks again, > > > >Rodrigo > > I didn't think to ask them that, but for $400 I would hope that they could > see fit to throw in a cable, particularly since it's probably not > "standard", thus widely avaliable. Although, by the same token, they've > already got you if you want to do a factory-look upgrade, so whats another > $10? > > BTW, the changer fits well into the compartment between the bucket seats, > if you've upgraded from the split bench. I saw a '97 Explorer with the > changer. The changer was sitting parallel with the doors, along the > passenger's side of the console, with roughly half the console still > available for storage. The inside looked a little different than mine. I > didn't notice exactly why, but I don't think it had the slots for cassettes > that mine has, which would be useless with the changer in there anyway. > > Dave > > > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > | List removal instructions on the website. | > +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Dec 1997 06:53:43 -0200 From: "R.L.H.O." Subject: Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #253 Thank you Randy. I'll do that. - ---------- > From: Randy > To: fordtrucks80up > Subject: Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #253 > Date: Domingo, Dezembro 07, 1997 09:42 > > ********** > > > > Date: Sat, 6 Dec 1997 07:17:14 -0200 > > From: "R.L.H.O." > > Subject: CD changer > > > > I'd like to buy a Ford CD changer for my 97 Ranger XLT Std. Cab. > > Is it the original Ford CD changer the only one compatible with the > > Stereo/Cassete player that comes with the > > car ? I wouldn't want to lose its CD functions ! > > > > Any help? Any idea about prices or/and where to find it? > > > > Thanks all. > > > > Rodrigo Heitzmann > > > Rod, I would recommend calling the tech guys at Crutchfield > (800-955-3000, very helpful). It's a mail order electronics company, > w/mostly car and home audio. They have a webpage, but I don't know that > it'll do you much good (crutchfield.com). They have some stuff for Ford > factory stereo systems like a special wiring harness to install > aftermarket stereos into autos w/Ford premium sound systems. They have > adapter face plates to install stereos into the new Ford Taurus w/the > climate control cut-outs and graphics. If there's an aftermarket CD > changer that can hook directly w/your Ford unit, they'll know about it. > > Later, Randy > > ********** > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > | List removal instructions on the website. | > +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 14:52:01 -0800 From: bill gibson Subject: Fuel Injectors - -- Greetings My old diesel (85 6.9)is hammering a bit from 1 cylinder .It's probably the injector.Can I get by with a single replacement injector or do you need to do all 8 ? Needless to say the dealer says all 8. Cheers Bill Gibson L ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 15:37:41 -0600 From: silent.bob Subject: Re: CD changer On Sat, 6 Dec 1997 07:17:14 -0200 "R.L.H.O." writes: >I'd like to buy a Ford CD changer for my 97 Ranger XLT Std. Cab. >Is it the original Ford CD changer the only one compatible with the >Stereo/Cassete player that comes with the >car ? I wouldn't want to lose its CD functions ! > >Any help? Any idea about prices or/and where to find it? > >Thanks all. > >Rodrigo Heitzmann No. I have a Sony 10 disk changer with a 4 channel amp, all of this with the stock radio in my 95 Ranger. silent.bob 95 Ranger 2.3L, SVO OHC http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.FordRanger.com (Ranger Site) http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.FordManTed.com (Mustang Site) ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 15:59:31 -0600 From: silent.bob Subject: Re: CD Changer On Sun, 07 Dec 1997 01:40:11 -0900 Bob writes: >Ive got a 95 F-150 Extd cab with the 40/20/40 seat, and I have my >Pioneer CDX-M30 under the middle (console) seat. It barely sticks out >the front so its not real noticable to would-be thieves. It doesnt >get >smashed if anyone sits there, and hardly ever skips a beat. > >My problem was I couldnt find a place to put my amp once I took that >space up. It sticks out from under the rear bench, and other than >that, >there is nowhere I could find to mount it. > >Hope this helps, Well, depending on how big your amp is (size, not watts) You can place it in the drivers side rear seat well. Other then that, there really isn't any other place that is as good as that. silent.bob 95 Ranger 2.3L, SVO OHC http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.FordRanger.com (Ranger Site) http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.FordManTed.com (Mustang Site) ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 15:37:07 -0600 From: silent.bob Subject: Re: CD changer On Fri, 5 Dec 1997 15:43:57 -0600 "Grady Byram" writes: >No answers, further question on this topic. I have a 95 F150 ext. >cab. >Has anybody found a location within the this cab style where a changer >can >be installed without taking up too much space and still allowing the >rear >bench to fold down. > >I wish it could be placed under the middle of the front seat (I've got >the >40/20/40 seats). I have my Sony 10 disk changer in a vertical upright position where you load the 10 disk cartridge from the top, placed between the two seats. Pro: You can use the seats and Ext. Cab space. Con: (if you have it) Use of the cargo net on the cab wall is limited. And you have to be a little bit more careful about dust, dirt, and sand getting into your changer. silent.bob 95 Ranger 2.3L, SVO OHC http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.FordRanger.com (Ranger Site) http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.FordManTed.com (Mustang Site) ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 19:01:35 EST From: johnmck Subject: AM Radio Interference I have a 97 F-150 with AM/FM cassette stereo. I get a lot of "noise" interference on the AM band down near the low end of the scale around 550 AM. It only happens when I press the brake pedal or use the turn signal. Questions: 1. Does this happen to any of you? 2. Is this normal? 3. Is there anything which can correct it other than not listening to 550 AM? I haven't gone to the dealer yet. I wanted to wait until I heard from all you out in Ford Land. TIA, John ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 18:58:04 -0600 From: george cummings Subject: Re: engine break-in Danny Gaudenti wrote: > > What is the best way to break-in a new engine? I'm asking because we have > a '98 F150 on order (scheduled delivery: "week of 12-7-97") and I want to > treat it right for the beginning of it's life. I don't mind a little > inconvenience at first if it will be good for the life of the engine. > > I looked at an owner's manual at the dealer and it just says "vary engine > speed". The owner's manual for the car the F150 is replacing (which I > didn't buy new) says: Drive moderately during the first 300 miles. After > 50 miles, speeds up to 50 or 60 MPH are desirable. While cruising, brief > full-throttle accelerations contribute to a good break-in. My wife's '85 > Camry owner's manual: Do not drive over 55 MPH. Maintain engine speed > between 2000 and 4000 RPM. Avoid full-throttle starts. Do not drive > slowly in high gear. Vary engine speed. Do not tow. > > Does any of the above apply to the truck? Am I being too cautious? Should > I just drive it and not worry about a formal break-in? > > Thanks for any help, > > Dan > > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > | List removal instructions on the website. | > +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ Who cares? When I test drove my truck, I ran everybit of the rpms that it could do. I drove it very hard the first 2000 miles. My truck didn't finally break in untill it reached 15,000 miles. Now it runs very good, and yes I do keep the oil changed often and take care of it. Everybody treats their car differently. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 21:18:06 -0500 From: Ken Payne Subject: Question for the Lightning owners Somebody on one of the newsgroups claims the Lightning has a Thunderbird rear-end. I find this hard to believe. But never having crawled under one (or paid much attention to the axle when I behind one) I need the facts from some owners. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 19:28:23 -0700 From: "Ryan Penner" Subject: Re: Fuel Injectors - -----Original Message----- From: bill gibson To: ford trucklist Date: Sunday, December 07, 1997 2:48 PM Subject: Fuel Injectors >-- Greetings > My old diesel (85 6.9)is hammering a bit from 1 cylinder .It's >probably the injector.Can I get by with a single replacement injector or >do you need to do all 8 ? > Needless to say the dealer says all 8. > > Cheers > Bill Gibson > How were you able to find out which one was bad? ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 22:02:49 -0500 From: Michael Ruth Subject: need 302 5.0 parts Hi! My fathers 1993 F-150 (75k) took a turn for the worse yesterday. All of a sudden it had a loud knocking, lost oil pressure and started shaking then it sounded like the inside of the engine started self destructing. Obviously he shut it off right away. He is very religous about oil changing, so I know it's not from bad oil sludging up the pump. Has anyone had this happen? Tomorrow we will pull filter and pan to investigate, but it's not locked up because it will restart but sound really bad. I need to know if there are any resonable place to get a block and necessary parts if the worse is there. How about Ford R and P? Any ideas???? Thanks! You may respond off list to: xplorit Mike P.S. I am in Baltimore, Maryland ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 20:28:42 -0800 From: Bob Subject: Re: Question for the Lightning owners Ken Payne wrote: > Somebody on one of the newsgroups claims the Lightning has > a Thunderbird rear-end. I find this hard to believe. But > never having crawled under one (or paid much attention to > the axle when I behind one) I need the facts from some > owners. > > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > | List removal instructions on the website. | > +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ Ken, I have a '94 Lightning and a while back there was some questions asked on the Lightning-list about the rear ends. Here's an attached post from Gary Siegel who was a powertrain engineer for the Lightning program. Hope this helps.... Bob '94 Crimson Lightning #767 **********Begin included message************ Subject: Re: Rear End Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 22:28:22 -0400 From: Gary Siegel Reply-To: Ford Lightning Discussion List To: LIGHTNING-L References: 1 , 2 keith wrote: > > Glen, > > What is different in the Lightning rear ends, just for info sake. Just > wondering. > Keith, The synthetic lube isn't required because of something different in the rear end... It's necessary because the engine is powerful enough to make it overheat during severe usage with standard axle lube in it... The axle also has probably 25-30 actual Engineering changes in its components because each time one was improved the forces (and failures) were transmitted to the next weakest part... None of these parts had shown any signs of weakness with any other powertrains before the Lightning... Some of them that I remember are the individual gears (machining and heat treat processes), bearings, gear housing (cooling fins cast into it), axle shafts (machining revisions, I think), and the axle tubes may be up-gauged too. The synthetic lube had a maximum operating temperature spec of 300 degrees F. or so, but the axles actually run at a max of about 275 degrees with it because of higher lubricity and greater film thickness. (Standard lube maxes out at around 250 degrees F, I think, but the actual temperatures were running well over 300 degrees until the lube broke down and the temps skyrocketed until the axle seized or something melted...) I hope that answered your question... Gary Siegel ----------------------------------- Searchable archives of past postings to LIGHTNING-L are available at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://listserv.american.edu/archives/lightning-l.html *******end included message******* - -- *** The ocean washes away all cares It holds at bay things life ensnares It gives us peace into the heart And brings good things till we depart *** ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 21:50:28 -0800 From: bill gibson Subject: Re: Fuel Injectors Ryan Penner wrote:.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|