|
|
Return-Path: Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 23:59:18 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest To: fordtrucks80up-digest Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #251 Reply-To: fordtrucks80up Sender: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest fordtrucks80up-digest Wednesday, December 3 1997 Volume 01 : Number 251 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 And Newer Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks80up-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Tire Chains ["jlohse" ] www.FordRanger.com / 93 F150 [silent.bob Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #246 ["David J. Baldwin" ] [none] [greg.medert Re: Tire Chains [D Robertson ] Re: Chevron Gasoline [Midwest96 Aerodynamics, the sequel [alanh [none] [Mark Ponsford ] Request for info [Mark Ponsford ] Re: [Eric W Sneed ] re: www.FordRanger.com / 93 F150 [KNBD87D Re: Aerodynamics, the sequel [Thom Cheney ] ABS light on '94 Explorer [Jeffrey Jue ] Transmission Temperature [Kjetil Grytnes ] Re: 2.9L Durability [charles rogers ] Re: Aerodynamics, the sequel [Ken Payne ] Whats going on here??? ["The Lublin Family" ] Re: Chip [YIASCA Re: Aerodynamics, the sequel [YIASCA Re: Aerodynamics, the sequel [YIASCA Re: Aerodynamics, the sequel [Chad Royse ] Re: Chip [YEAGS15962 ] Re: Ignition Question(4.0L) [YEAGS15962 ] Re: 2.9L Durability [ILuvTruks ] Re: Ranger Supercab Noise Problem [Dave Armbruster lowering shackles Q's [Luke Wells ] : Whats going on here??? >Brakes [bmrickman Re: lowering shackles Q's [YIASCA ] lowering shackles ["Jeff Wey" ] Just some info for the group [Randy ] Powerstroke pics ["Steve Ford_Man" ] RE: Aerodynamics, the sequel ["Beaman, James" ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 03:21:43 -0800 From: "jlohse" Subject: Tire Chains This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01BCFF9A.945CFDE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I recently bought a 96 Super Cab 350 dually. The dealer had me sign a = waiver concerning the use of tire chains and possible damage to the rear = fenders. Question? 1. Does the use of tire chains cause damage to the fenders? =20 2. If so, is their a resolve or something I can do to?=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01BCFF9A.945CFDE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable http-equiv=3DContent-Type> I recently bought a 96 Super Cab 350 = dually. The dealer had me sign a waiver concerning the use of tire = chains=20 and possible damage to the rear fenders. Question? 1. Does the use of tire chains cause damage to = the=20 fenders? 2. If so, is their a resolve or something I = can do=20 to? - ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01BCFF9A.945CFDE0-- ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 10:13:37 EST From: silent.bob Subject: www.FordRanger.com / 93 F150 www.ford ranger. com finally got moved to a co-located machine at my ISP. I went ahead and took out Java fade due to problems with other browsers and added a couple of new things which include perl scripts in my last update. Also, my 93 F150 ABS light started flashing, and would stay completely on at times then sometimes wouldn't come on at all. Could this be a bad sensor, or are my anti-lock brakes failing?? .---. .----------- / \ __ / ------ / / \(..)/ ----- ////// ' \/ ` --- http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.FordManTed.com (Mustang Shop) //// / // : : --- http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.FordRanger.com (Ranger Site) // / / /` '-- (now T1 co-located!!) // //..\ =======UU====UU===[silent.bob '//||\` ''`` ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 09:52:13 -0600 From: "David J. Baldwin" Subject: Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #246 Bill Funk wrote: > > > From: Chris Brooks > > Subject: F-150 Performance > > > > I own a 92 F150 4x4, I've got a 3" body lift running 33x12.5's, the > > truck has a 302, 4 speed auto, and 3.55 gears. ... and the performance off road > > is not the greatest. > Unless you are a racer, you want torque, not horsepower, for your > off-roading. Best bang-for-the-buck fix will be to go to 4.10's. As for > the exhaust, a 3" cat back system will do you fine, because you > shouldn't be looking for high RPMs. The intake shouldnt need much, > except to use a K&N filter, kept clean. > Now, if you want to get serious, transplant a 460 in there... > > Bill Funk ... oh yeah: replace that 302 with something with a longer stroke. The 351 comes to mind, too. You could go with the 460, but the swap may be less straightforward. Almost anything has a longer stroke than a 302 (4" bore / 3" stroke). - -- Best Regards, Dave Baldwin Dallas, TX - -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: 03 Dec 97 10:54:00 (-0500) From: greg.medert Subject: [none] - --UNS_gsauns2_2753835959 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 01 Dec 1997 10:23:18 -0800 From: "Chad Royse (Netcom)" Subject: Power Rear Window Hey everyone, I've seen Power Rear Sliding Windows in some of the conversion packages in the Cincinnati area. Mark III and Eclipse both offer it. I believe that C.R. Lawrence is the actual Power Rear Sliding Window manufacturer. Has anyone ever heard of these before and know if you can get them in an aftermarket kit? I really don't want an entire conversion, just the window. A SuperCab is just to far to reach!! Thanks, Chad ------------------------------ Chad, you are correct. C.M. Lawrence is the manufacturer of these power sliding windows. They are located in Atlanta, Ga. Phone number is 770-696-3445. May be 404 area code. The kit price for sells for $257 which includes switches, window and all accessories. Not sure about the actual wire itself. This is a walk up price, over the counter, direct to the public. They said the window can be installed in about 20 minutes with the wiring taking the most time. I'm sure shipping would be extra. I called two camper shell, LEER, CRICKET dealers, conversion etc. places they wanted $350 plus installation. This is one time that the manufacturer is cheaper. The full size pickup window was the same price. They said it was because they sell so many more than the Rangers. Hope this helps. greg.medert Atlanta, GA - --UNS_gsauns2_2753835959-- ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 11:51:21 -0500 From: D Robertson Subject: Re: Tire Chains I'm only speculating on this but I bet they are concerned that if the chain comes loose and whips around, it will tear through the fiberglass fender. Dave ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 11:55:44 -0500 (EST) From: Midwest96 Subject: Re: Chevron Gasoline In a message dated 97-12-03 07:44:02 EST, you write: they can advertise that they provide the fuel for testing. Paul in Portland OR >> Actually the web site says the companies pay to have it trucked up. Craig ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 09:04:36 -0800 From: alanh Subject: Aerodynamics, the sequel Hi all. I think we're all pretty much convinced that running with the tailgate up allows for a bubble of air to form in the bed, helping the aerodynamics of our trucks. Now let me put a fly in the ointment: how does that bubble perform in the presence of objects in the bed? Let's put a couple of suitcases up against the cab - does the bubble get disturbed? Now put a fifth wheel hitch in the middle of the bed. Is the bubble disturbed, or destroyed? I have to believe that the fifth wheel hitch will definitely mess up the bubble, but will it mess it up enough that the air flow is changed, or can the bubble still form well enough to keep the airflow going over the gate? - --- Alan Hepburn | | National Semiconductor | DON'T TREAD ON ME | Santa Clara, Ca | | alanh ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 09:31:26 -0700 From: Mark Ponsford Subject: [none] I've noticed that a number of requests going to the 80&up Ford mailing list are people searching for codes and info on gear ratios, drive train specifications and such. I was thinking that it would be handy if this commonly sought after info was available on the web somewhere. Alot of the info people are searching for is in the User Guides that come with your truck. Whats not there is usually found in the sales brochures. So, what I'm proposing to do is to collect as much of this info as I can and make it available from my web site. I'm not sure what would be the best way to collect this info, but I think the easiest way for me would be to have everyone use my '88 info as a template and have you modify it for what ever year Ford truck ('80 and later) you happen to have (or if you only have published info). Return the modified .html document via email to the address below with subject as "ford truck info". I'll post the results to http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://uviclib.uvic.ca/staff/mponsford/ford_trucks_info/default.html. cheers, - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mark Ponsford Phone: (250) 721-7397 Email: mponsfor ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 09:36:20 -0700 From: Mark Ponsford Subject: Request for info Ooops, forgot to include a subject on the first post >I've noticed that a number of requests going to the 80&up Ford mailing list >are people searching for codes and info on gear ratios, drive train >specifications and such. I was thinking that it would be handy if this >commonly sought after info was available on the web somewhere. Alot of the >info people are searching for is in the User Guides that come with your >truck. Whats not there is usually found in the sales brochures. > >So, what I'm proposing to do is to collect as much of this info as I can >and make it available from my web site. > >I'm not sure what would be the best way to collect this info, but I think >the easiest way for me would be to have everyone use my '88 info as a >template and have you modify it for what ever year Ford truck ('80 and >later) you happen to have (or if you only have published info). Return the >modified .html document via email to the address below with subject as >"ford truck info". I'll post the results to >http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://uviclib.uvic.ca/staff/mponsford/ford_trucks_info/default.html. > >cheers, > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >- >Mark Ponsford >Phone: (250) 721-7397 > >Email: mponsfor ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 10:06:57 -0800 From: Eric W Sneed Subject: Re: greg.medert > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 01 Dec 1997 10:23:18 -0800 > From: "Chad Royse (Netcom)" > Subject: Power Rear Window > > Hey everyone, > > I've seen Power Rear Sliding Windows in some of the conversion > packages in the Cincinnati area. Mark III and Eclipse both offer it. > I believe that C.R. Lawrence is the actual Power Rear Sliding Window > manufacturer. > > Has anyone ever heard of these before and know if you can get them in > an aftermarket kit? I really don't want an entire conversion, just > the window. A SuperCab is just to far to reach!! > > Thanks, > Chad > > ------------------------------ > > Chad, you are correct. C.M. Lawrence is the manufacturer of these > power sliding windows. They are located in Atlanta, Ga. Phone number > is 770-696-3445. May be 404 area code. The kit price for sells for You can find this item in 4 west catalog, the one shown in this catalog is made by power slider. You can reach them at 909-824-0024. I dont know if they have a web site. > $257 which includes switches, window and all accessories. Not sure > about the actual wire itself. This is a walk up price, over the > counter, direct to the public. They said the window can be installed > in about 20 minutes with the wiring taking the most time. I'm sure > shipping would be extra. I called two camper shell, LEER, CRICKET > dealers, conversion etc. places they wanted $350 plus installation. > This is one time that the manufacturer is cheaper. The full size > pickup window was the same price. They said it was because they sell > so many more than the Rangers. Hope this helps. > > greg.medert > Atlanta, GA ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 13:23:01, -0500 From: KNBD87D Subject: re: www.FordRanger.com / 93 F150 Bob, I have the same problem with my '98 Ranger right now with 4 wheel ABS. As I am writing, it is getting fixed under warranty, too :-) Somedays the light comes on and stays on, some days it wouldn't. I brought it to work (a Ford Heavy Truck dealership) and had a mechanic look at it. Believe it or not, but he told me that the retainer clips or bolts that hold the ABS sensors at each front wheel were MISSING! Does your truck have 4 wheel ABS? If yes, it may be a bad sensor or something so you will want it checked out. If it is rear ABS only, I couldn't tell ya what the problem is. From what I understand, the rear Anti-lock part of the brake system is controlled in the rear axle. I am not sure, but that is what I heard. Josh ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 09:54:30 -0800 From: Thom Cheney Subject: Re: Aerodynamics, the sequel The Hepburn wrote: > > Hi all. > > I think we're all pretty much convinced that running with the > tailgate up allows for a bubble of air to form in the bed, helping > the aerodynamics of our trucks. Now let me put a fly in the > ointment: how does that bubble perform in the presence of > objects in the bed? Let's put a couple of suitcases up against > the cab - does the bubble get disturbed? Now put a fifth wheel > hitch in the middle of the bed. Is the bubble disturbed, or > destroyed? I have to believe that the fifth wheel hitch will > definitely mess up the bubble, but will it mess it up enough that > the air flow is changed, or can the bubble still form well enough > to keep the airflow going over the gate? Recent (last weekend) trip to California: Half bed full of luggage, gifts and food. Covered with cheasy blue tarp because I haven't scraped up enough to get a decent tonneau cover. Bubble was definitely not present. Blue tarp wanted to flop all over the place. Trip home: load significantly reduced in mass (at least in the bed...belch.....). Tarped area was now 1/4 of bed (with ends tucked under nicely). Mileage did not significantly increase. My conclusion: Smooth "bubble" originates in front half of bed right behind the cab. Under normal cicumstances the airflow over the cab drops back down somewhere around the back half of the bed. With the cushion of air swirling in the bed, this airflow continues over the tailgate before it gets turbulent. If normal semi-swirly (am getting too technical here?) cushion of air doesn't have the room to establish itself, turbulence over the back half of the bed is more pronounced. Stay tuned... next summer I'll take the truck east to Idaho & by then I should have the tonneau installed. Full report then. or... maybe we talk Ken into building a wind tunnel for the subscribers of this list to try out our wacky aerodynamic theories on. What do you say Ken!?!?!?! TC ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 13:19:43 -0600 From: Jeffrey Jue Subject: ABS light on '94 Explorer For some reason, I noticed that the ABS light on my '94 4x2 Explorer = comes on intermittently. I know that the brakes work fine, minus the = ABS controller, but does anyone have any suggestions as to the cause of = my problem. I know that others have had the same problem on the '94, = but I don't know what their diagnosis was. Jeffrey L. Jue http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www2.netdoor.com/~guardian guardian http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www2.msstate.edu/~lj4 lj4 ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 20:32:04 -0800 From: Kjetil Grytnes Subject: Transmission Temperature From: Kjetil Grytnes, Norway I am driving an 91 E350 with 7.3L Diesel Engine, and is interested to monitor the transmission temperatur while driving. There is already a tempereture sensor in the transmission, sending a signal to the transmission computer. Does anyone have any idea how to use this signal for monitoring transmission temperatur, or is there any other good solution to this problem? It should be possible to measure the voltage signal, but it is not linear, as far as I know. As far as I know, the temperature in the transmission is critical, and I am often pulling a trailer. Thanks for any help. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 12:07:57 -0800 (PST) From: charles rogers Subject: Re: 2.9L Durability - ---TONYG1401 > > I have a 2.9 in my Mercury Cougar XR7 can you tell me about the engine? A > mech at work has told me of this engine can any one share info with me > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer - --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up | > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request > +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com - -----------------+ > That's the same engine I have in my 86 ranger. Basically, Ive found it to be a reliable engine. However I have been warned that sometimes this engine(depending on the year) will tend to warp the right head. Mine has not done that yet. Knock on wood. Good luck with it. _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 15:38:16 -0500 From: Ken Payne Subject: Re: Aerodynamics, the sequel - -snip- > >Stay tuned... next summer I'll take the truck east to Idaho & by then I >should have the tonneau installed. Full report then. > >or... maybe we talk Ken into building a wind tunnel for the subscribers >of this list to try out our wacky aerodynamic theories on. What do you >say Ken!?!?!?! > Somehow I don't think we could get enough donations and advertisers to cover the expense! :) Mechanically we shouldn't have any problems though.... Ken ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 15:13:19 -0500 From: "The Lublin Family" Subject: Whats going on here??? Hi all: My 81 F-150 for the most part anyway has been a decent truck. I bought it in May and got all the bugs straightened out but one. The one bug I did not get straightened out was When you hit the brakes, the pedal has the firmness of a truck with power brakes, but stops like a truck with manual brakes. Also when you hit the brake pedal the idle slows down a bunch. I also noticed that when it runs, it sounds like it has a vacuum leak. What I am wondering is, could the power brake booster be bad? The truck has a 300 Six. Will the Power Booster from a '82 E-100 van fit the '81 F-150? Any suggestions are greatly appreciated Thanks. Chris "Lube" Lublin ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 16:27:16 -0500 (EST) From: YIASCA Subject: Re: Chip check out SUPERCHIPS www.superchips.com/ tell them Dave Temple sent you from KY! Thanks Dave ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 16:32:01 -0500 (EST) From: YIASCA Subject: Re: Aerodynamics, the sequel I did some comparisons with my truck when i first bought the ranger and it got better MPG with the tailgate down then with the gate up and was quicker in the 0-60mph its proven fact if you want better than that buy a bed cover! Dave ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 16:33:43 -0500 (EST) From: YIASCA Subject: Re: Aerodynamics, the sequel Hate to bust your BUBBLE.....sorry had to reply like that! Truck MPG and 0-60MPH speed is decreased with tailgate in up postion! sorry Dave--the Bubble buster--- ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 17:33:13 -0800 From: Chad Royse Subject: Re: Aerodynamics, the sequel I have had similar results to Dave. YIASCA > I did some comparisons with my truck when i first bought the ranger and it > got better MPG with the tailgate down then with the gate up and was quicker > in the 0-60mph > > its proven fact if you want better than that buy a bed cover! > > Dave > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request > +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ - -- Chad _________________________________________________________________ Pursuant to US Code Title 47, Ch.5, Sub-ch.II, Sect.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem meet the definition of a telephone fax machine. Pursuant to Sect.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment, punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation. Any unsolicited commercial E-mail sent to this address is subject to a fee in the amount of $500US per occurance. E-mailing denotes acceptance of these terms. _________________________________________________________________ !! O I would rather be... \O/ _O _O #=\ ___ __ _ _ __#__\#_\#____H_ \ | _ \__ _ / _| |_(_)_ _ __ _ _ ( : \ \ : )(\ | / _` | _| _| | ' \/ _` | //~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|_|_\__,_|_| \__|_|_||_\__, |~~~~~ || |___/ New River - 1995, 1996, 1997 Fall Gauley - 1997 x-StRe ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 18:05:03 EST From: YEAGS15962 Subject: Re: Chip If your looking for a chip a would recommend calling JET performance. They make performance chips for just about everything. Expect to spend from 2-3 hundred dollars on it. I bought one for my 93 ranger and it makes a difference. You can get the 1-800 number from any car or truck magazine. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 18:02:50 EST From: YEAGS15962 Subject: Re: Ignition Question(4.0L) If you wanna improve performance start with a free flowing exhaust. Changing the throttle body helps but only if the exhaust is less restrictive. I also recommend a K&N air filter and a high performance chip. I have added all of these to my 93 ranger with a 4.0 liter and it makes a difference. Bob Yeager ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 22:00:43 EST From: ILuvTruks Subject: Re: 2.9L Durability So what do you want to know about it? Anything special. In a message dated 97-12-03 18:03:08 EST, you write: > I have a 2.9 in my Mercury Cougar XR7 can you tell me about the engine? A > mech at work has told me of this engine can any one share info with me ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 3 Jan 1997 20:22:30 -0700 From: Dave Armbruster Subject: Re: Ranger Supercab Noise Problem I had a noise from my rear window about 3 or so months after buying the truck. Turned out that the seals that run up and down the vertical frame members of the sliding window had begun to deteriorate, allowing the sliding piece of glass to rattle around in it's frame. My dealer replaced the whole rear window, because there are little or no individual parts available for the window assembly. The only thing that we could really determine is that *maybe* the glass cleaner had caused it, it was replaced under warranty just the same. Dave '97 Ranger S/C 4x4 >I own a 1994 Ranger Supercab that has developed a rather obnoxious = >squeak from the super cab portion of the truck. The squeak occurs when = >I hit a bump or turn corners or any other action that causes the cab to = >sustain a torsional load. I have pretty much isolated the squeak to be = >coming from the sliding rear window. It seems as though the window = >frame is rubbing up against the cab body and causing the squeak. I was = >just about ready to have the window removed and re-installed when I put = >300 lbs. of gravel in the bed to prepare for winter. The extra weight = >has completely cured the squeak. This revelation is making me = >re-evaluate where the squeak was coming from. I am no longer 100% sure = >that it is the window. However it is also possible that the weight = >allow my rear suspension to move more, thus reducing the torsional load = >on the cab enough to cause the window not to squeak. =20 >As you can see this has been really bothering me. Several local Ford = >dealers have told me that they have never heard of this problem in a = >Ranger. Glass dealers tell me that this is a problem in S10s, but not in = >Rangers (S10 rear window assemblies are completely different so the S10 = >fix may not work). Have you ever heard of this type of problem in a = >Ranger before? If so, what is causing the squeak and how do I fix it? = >I need to do this quickly as the weather is getting colder in Ohio and I = >don't know how many good days I will have left to try and fix it. =20 >Any help or suggestions will be greatly appreciated. > >Thanks, >Tony Rifici ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 22:46:55 -0500 From: Luke Wells Subject: lowering shackles Q's How hard is it to put on 2" lowering shackles on a 96 for Ranger Splash thanks ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 16:01:56 -0600 From: bmrickman Subject: : Whats going on here??? >Brakes Hi all: My 81 F-150 for the most part anyway has been a decent truck. I bought it in May and got all the bugs straightened out but one. The one bug I did not get straightened out was When you hit the brakes, the pedal has the firmness of a truck with power brakes, but stops like a truck with manual brakes. Also when you hit the brake pedal the idle slows down a bunch. I also noticed that when it runs, it sounds like it has a vacuum leak. What I am wondering is, could the power brake booster be bad? The truck has a 300 Six. Will the Power Booster from a '82 E-100 van fit the '81 F-150? Any suggestions are greatly appreciated Thanks. Chris "Lube" Lublin +-------------- I drove for about a year with my 81 F100's brake pedal hissing at me until once when I was slowing down the booster decided to suck the pedal to the floor and wouldn't release. Went and bought a master cylinder and booster assy from AutoZone for about $125 and considered myself lucky. P.S. often the reason the booster fails is that the master cylinder leaks out the input shaft and contaminates the diaphrams in the booster so be careful if you just change the booster. Don't know about interchangeability of van stuff. Brian Rickmanbmrickman 91 Exp 4X4 EB 81 F100 2wd 351w AOD ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 00:19:39 EST From: YIASCA Subject: Re: lowering shackles Q's the ones where you have to drill out the factory studs? It was a bitch for me took me 7hrs and I have good tools......really didn't know what i was doing but worked great! 2" lower shackles? ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 00:26:56 -0500 From: "Jeff Wey" Subject: lowering shackles Luke, they are fairly easy to install.First unbolt the rear of the springs remove old shackles,install new ones.rebolt and retorque.It helps to have a couple of friends to help,I usually put a jack under the pumpkin and use it to line up the holes.You may need to put shims in to prevent drive line woes(torn up u-joints),they are fairly cheap just loosen ubolts and place under the axle.Any question feel free to e-mail me direct Jeff jwey ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 Dec 1997 01:33:03 -0800 From: Randy Subject: Just some info for the group For any who might be interested. My latest copy of 4x4 Power magazine (petersens publishing, the same guys who do 4x4 and Off-road) has some sources for old truck restoration parts. If you have access to it at your local bookstand it's the Jan '98 issue. They have Ford sources ranging from '26 to '96. And a Bronco section, too. Some have websites, too. Just thought I'd put this up for anybody w/project trucks. If anyone is interested and CAN'T obtain a copy locally, e-mail me and I'll give ya some more info. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 21:55:14 PST From: "Steve Ford_Man" Subject: Powerstroke pics.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|