|
|
Return-Path: Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 03:50:25 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest To: fordtrucks80up-digest Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #248 Reply-To: fordtrucks80up Sender: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest fordtrucks80up-digest Tuesday, December 2 1997 Volume 01 : Number 248 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 And Newer Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks80up-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: Driving lights [YEAGS15962 ] Will my truck start the morning after y2k? 1/2 [zeb Will my truck start the morning after y2k? 2/2 [zeb Best in snow [Cactus Jack ] ADMIN: Web site & User Submissions [Ken Payne ] Re: Gas prices. ["Douglas Aldridge" ] Re: Chevron Gasoline [Paul Laughlin ] Re: Driving lights [Midwest96 Ranger Supercab Noise Problem [ANTHONY RIFICI ] Re: fm modulater cd players????? [Filip M Gieszczykiewicz Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #247 [Randy ] Re: Chevron Gasoline [Midwest96 Re: Chevron Gasoline [Thundercraft ] Re: 2.3 problem [HELOJMPR ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 1997 21:05:11 EST From: YEAGS15962 Subject: Re: Driving lights check out downs ford for an airdam with foglights. Its the same as the stx airdam foglight combo. www.downsford.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 1 Dec 1997 19:26:36 -0700 (MST) From: zeb Subject: Will my truck start the morning after y2k? 1/2 I sent this earlier, but the list must have rejected the size, so here it is in two parts. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D This came, without an URL, to another list I'm on. What year did Ford start using chips? Is my truck going up in value? Zeb 88 F250 x-cab 4WD with an 88 7.3 from a Calif F350 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Gary North's Y2K Links and Forums=20 Summary and Comments (feel free to mail this page)=20 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Category:=A0 Noncompliant_Chips Date:=A0 1997-12-01 12:05:34 Subject:=A0 Diesel Locomotives and Cars: Forced Maintenance Chips Comment:=A0 This lengthy interview is very thought-provoking. The man interviewed is a data specialist with the state of Iowa's Department of Transportation.=20 I regard some of this information as unconfirmed. I do think it would= behoove us to do what we can to seek further evidence, pro or con, regarding his statements.=20 I have posted elsewhere in this category a state of Texas posting that an estimated one-quarter of all post-1984 fire engines will not start on Jan.= 1, 2000. The forced maintenance chips are the problem.=20 * * * * * * * *=20 THE YEAR 2000 AND EMBEDDED CHIPS=20 Interview with Paul French, Tuesday, November 4, 1997 by Paul Dorr, director of Rescue The Perishing, P.O. Box 115, Ocheyedan, IA 51354. eMail RTP Paul French=20 Executive Officer, Data Services Division, Iowa Department of= Transportation, Ames, Iowa (Accounting Degree from Univ. of Iowa, Minor in Data Processing and is the past Director of Data Processing for another division of the= State of Iowa.=20 Q. Mr. French, my name is Paul Dorr and I'm director of Rescue The= Perishing. RTP is a public interest group located in Ocheyedan. I write a newsletter that goes to our constituents covering moral issues, social and sometimes economic issues. The last six months I've been spending sometime looking= into this Y2k...(laughter by French)...mess. I was wondering if I could have a brief interview with you and what you might know about it?=20 A. I have no problem with that but I am curious, how did you get my name?=20 Q. I learned of you through the state of Iowa's Information Technology Services (ITS) newsletter and have been reading some of your comments in there, on the Year 2000 computer problem.=20 A. Most of the Y2k stuff that you'll see in the ITS Newsletter ends up= coming from me. My assignment is to coordinate the DOT's handling of the Y2k problem.=20 Q. It seems as if the mainframe problem is serious enough, but this embedded chip problem seems to seriously compound it.=20 A. Very much so. For example. If you are sitting in an office some place right now, it will have a fire alarm in it, perhaps it has a light system in it that might be set on timers, it might have an automated heating and air conditioning system and all of those have embedded chips in them and most of those won't work. As a matter of fact one major heating and air conditioning company that has their systems in literally millions of buildings, including a lot of government buildings, have yet to build a system that will work. Although they won't tell you that until you get to the absolute top [of the company]. Then you have vehicles...Quite honestly GM's top people have said that cars won't start, come Y2k.=20 Q. Who did you hear that from?=20 A. I heard that from the GM people themselves. We have a group here in central Iowa, limited to twenty major employers, and these twenty have been meeting on a monthly basis for many months now. We pool our thoughts and problems, ideas...and information that we've gathered together with= companies like Farm Bureau, IMT Insurance, Principal Insurance, City of Des Moines, Polk County, State of Iowa, Pioneer Hi-Bred and so on (we have maybe 250,000 employees among ourselves). We've agreed that on most things we won't hurt ourselves by leaving the room and saying `hey we heard from company XYZ....such and such information.' The only thing I can say is that that information (on GM's cars not starting) came out of that user group meeting.= =20 It's also been confirmed. I spoke at a conference. There were 1,300 people= at the conference. I finished speaking and several people came up to me afterwards, like a representative from the rail industry saying there are chips that will stop the diesels (in train engines) on 12/31/1999. It just stops it. The chip is designed to stop a motor when a certain parameter has been exceeded in time and service. The chips designed for the diesel think that at the end of 12/31/99 that it's been almost a hundred years since the diesel's been serviced and it shuts it off. You have these in train engines, trucks, tugboats, and so on. It's all so perfectly sound and logical, yet never having given a thought to the fact that there is a two digit space being used on those chips and when those two digits go from 99 to 00...what'll happen?=20 Q. What can one do with embedded chips?=20 A. As a practical matter, unless you are yourself an embedded chip engineer or have access to alot of money or to engineers, what can you do? You have= to make a list of things that might cause a problem - we've done that at the= DOT and we have about 12,000 items just ourselves - then you go to the manufacturers of those and use whatever clout, negotiating, whatever else= you can do, to try to get the manufacturer to at least tell you that they will work on 1/1/2000. Have them put it in writing so you can walk away knowing that the fire alarm system in this building will work and I have a letter in my file from the company that made it that says they will.=20 Q. I am hearing that the large majority of those who send out such letters= to manufacturers are receiving little to nothing for responses.=20 A. Our central Iowa users group sent out about 300 and got about 40= responses back.=20 Q. Out of those 40 letters, were they very substantive responses?=20 A. No! So we started making phone calls. And over the phone some major companies would say to you, "we'll tell you this over the phone, but we= won't put it in writing." Others say, "Our legal counsel says we are not to talk about this."=20 Yet, one of the members of our users group, a major company is just about finished. They have in fact received close enough to a 100% response on embedded chips that they are comfortable with it.=20 Q. How are they getting responses where others won't?=20 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 1 Dec 1997 19:26:41 -0700 (MST) From: zeb Subject: Will my truck start the morning after y2k? 2/2 Q. How are they getting responses where others won't?=20 A. The clout of having 40,000 employees and all the money and size that that brought. Meaning, "Either you make it compliant or tell us in writing that= it is compliant or we are no longer buying from you. And if it is not compliant at this moment, put it in writing when it will be.=20 Q. The Institute of Electrical Engineers of England says that the industry manufactured 7 billion embedded chips in 1996, that an unknown percent of them are doing date-sensitive tasks, (they are estimating 5-15%), but no one knows where they are for sure, so you have to inventory them all.=20 A. That's it exactly. A good example is washing machines. Who would have thought washing machines would have a problem? Some of them are automated enough now that they are touch pad sensitive to the heat off of your finger. They are very definitely time challenged (different minutes for different wash cycles). Which of those are going to work and which of those aren't.= The manufacturers=92 themselves don't know.=20 Q. As Iowans we need those DOT trucks out there moving snow. Are your trucks going to be sensitive? Do they have the same diesel motors you are talking about?=20 A. Unfortunately, we used to think we were behind times because we would= look at the age of our inventory, a lot of our trucks are 8, 10, 12 years old.=20 Q. (Laughter) So now you are ahead of the curve!=20 A. Now all of a sudden that is one of the better things that happened to us. (Laughter) Who would have thought? ...typical Iowa conservativeness, you try to get that extra year or two out of that big orange truck, all of a sudden you realize it's a stick shift, it doesn't have any automation on the thing at all and that it's going to get by as long as you don't replace it with a new automated one. Q. And you are saying that out of your user group came high level information that GM is=85.=20 A. ...when I spoke on the embedded chips at the Year 2000 conference in San Francisco - and as I said there were 1,300 people at that conference - after the meeting several came up to me and identified themselves as representatives of the companies in the Big 3 (auto manufacturers). One of them asked, "What company were you talking about?" I responded that, "I= can't really say, I don't want to be sued, but my middle initial begins with a G." Two of them chuckled and said, "We are from Ford, and we have the same problem."=20 Q. Do you know what sort of date-sensitive tasks are in these newer cars?=20 A. GM engineer told me we should liken it to a Christmas tree, configured in the way when you unscrew one bulb the entire string of lights goes out. They have chips in them checking service time, chips logging service time so that you can take it into the dealer he can plug in the system and tell you that= 3 months and 2 days and 6 hours back, this particular piece failed and a secondary circuit had to be opened in order to let it=85etc. etc. So the= time segment of a chip is being challenged several different ways in cars. And he told me that 'the average car has over 100 chips in it.=92 And I've read= where one automotive engineer said that unless he had worked on that particular model, he would not be able to find where all the chips are located on a= car. Q. What kind of response are you receiving from the (ITS) newsletter or from your own colleagues? Outside of your central Iowa users group, are people taking you seriously? Is there a lot of denial?=20 A. Yes I think there is and also an of attitude of `oh gosh if it is that= big of a problem, they'll take care of it.' And they say `certainly they'll take care of it at their cost.' Let's be realistic now! When even Sony - who is this year's spokesman for the Japanese Industry Council (which by the way also includes the Japanese government) - says that they are behind the curve and they may not make it by the Year 2000. Meaning, if you buy a Sony TV in 1999 and it has all of the wizbang chips, 6-12 months later it might not work.=20 Q. So what do we do, take it back to Sony, sue all these companies, what are the ramifications here?=20 A. That is only limited by your imagination. You now have colleges that have law classes that have started to deal with just this issue. We had a big computer firm that came in here (DOT) and they offered us a two and three year warranty. We asked them, "Does that mean that if we buy this computer and it is not Year 2000 compliant that it will be made compliant under the warranty?" They left saying they were going to be talking to their legal counsel and that their warranty would state that it does NOT cover Year= 2000. Q. Do you have suggestions for my readers, what should they do?=20 A. The only approach I know of is what I am doing here at the Dept. of Transportation; first the most logical, is that you'd had better become= aware that this is a serious situation and not to have your head in the proverbial sand and not expect the company, out of the magnanimous generosity of their coffers is going to, Number 1 - find a solution and Number 2 - pay to fix= the solution. That's not going to happen! And second, you'd better make a list= of the stuff you have to deal with and especially the critical things like heating and air conditioning. I have one of the largest heating and air conditioning control systems in my home and we've (State of Iowa) got it in tons of buildings. This company may tell you that their equipment is compliant but...it is not! Then look around and see what else might have the same problems. You might have a car, a pickup, a heating and air= conditioning system, a computer, a home alarm system, a fire alarm system...what all do you have? The DOT is looking at traffic signals, automated generators, airport control systems and on and on. Once you've figured out what you've got, the only thing you can do is go to the manufacturer. How? Write, call, contact, harass.=20 Q. If everyone in the world starts to do that at the same time the manufacturers are going to be overwhelmed.=20 A. Wonderful, but at least they'll do something. I've talked to the Maytag engineers. Maytag says they have stopped making the automated ones and all= of theirs now has the internal technology of the 1950's (ie. springs) - they look pretty on the outside but there is no automation on the inside to fail. I pursued Whirlpool...several of their models may have chips that will fail.= =20 Q. Are you storing up any food or drilling an extra water well for you and your family? Like you say it's only limited to your imagination. Some of the consequences here could be...we don't know!=20 A. That's right! It may seem foolish now. I've read where some have said, `have people even considered the water?' Water is pumped and the pumps are generally run on systems that have embedded chips in them.=20 Q. I have written a letter to Governor Branstad and said to him that the Y2k program leaders that I have read are crying out for political and business leaders to stand up and say `this is a major problem that needs to be conquered and to then lead the people in their own organizations. And they should let the people know that this thing is real and do it before it's too late and we are all out of options.=20 A. Yet in many respects the state is computer user no more than Pioneer Company or anyone else. It's nothing the State can fix, they have to shake the tree like any user.=20 Q. I read where Citicorp has come out and said they are falling behind on their Y2k compliance and that one area they are alarmed with is their telecommunications vendors are not telling them whether the chips on their telephone switching equipment are compliant or not. They said what they are seeing is that the vendors are playing chicken and that no one wants to expose their vulnerabilities to their competitors and to the marketplace and so they are all standing back and waiting for their competition to acknowledge before they do and thus very little is getting done, or very little substantive and Citicorp is concerned that their phone systems won't work. If banks don't have phone service, banks go down.=20 A. And from what our engineering folks have looked at things like (telecommunication) routers may not work.=20 Q. I was hoping that what I've been reading has been exaggerated, but you really are confirming most everything that is being said out there.=20 A. That's where we are at. My specific concern is trying to make sure that the DOT is as ready as we ever can be, but we are only going to be as ready as the companies making the things for us are.=20 Q. One of the issues being raised is if our ability to produce the seeds= that farmers need to plant to produce their crops is impaired, and we have very little open-pollinated seed anymore (it's all hybrid seeds that require the farmer to go back to the producer each year), and if the hybrids aren=92t there, we can't plant crops and then the food chain may be disrupted. Can= you say if Pioneer Hi-bred is on top of this, from what you are hearing?=20 A. As a practical matter, their awareness level is at the point where they asked for, and I gave them all the materials that I've used to take an inventory. And they are at the point of starting to look at what items that they have that are subject to embedded chips and are proceeding down the= same path that I am proceeding. I am at the point of contacting the companies= that make the stuff. Pioneer is at the point of beginning to count. They've= passed the threshold of awareness and they are starting to look at it.=20 Q. I appreciate your time to visit with me about this today.=20 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return to Category: Noncompliant_Chips Return to Main Categories Return to Home Page=20 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 01 Dec 1997 22:07:37 -0500 From: Cactus Jack Subject: Best in snow Anyone have any ideas what would be the best bet for snow? A fwd sedan with OEM tires in excellent shape but with 15k miles on them, or a 1987 Ranger 2wd with 200 to 300 ilbs of kitty litter in the bed and new, good quality snow tires? My cousin tells me the sedan becasue it's fwd. Our fleet manager at work sez the truck because the weight in the bed and the snow tires will give it equal traction to the fwd and the extra ground clearance would be the deciding factor. Any help would be appreciated. I don't want to buy tires if they won't do me any good. Thanks, R.P. " You may contemplate this, on the Tree of Woe" ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 01 Dec 1997 23:16:02 -0500 From: Ken Payne Subject: ADMIN: Web site & User Submissions 1. Voting on the site works great. 2. The survey script has proven to be so buggy once under load that it is unusable. It will be replaced by the end of the week. 3. The chat script works, but bugs have also turned up. A friend at work has written a Perl script that is supposed to work really well. It should be on line by Saturday. 4. I'm still working on a search engine for the archives. Also, I'm putting together a 67-79 disc brake upgrade FAQ. If you would like to contribute an article about anything you've done or any area of expertise you have, please let me know. We have a volunteer to help edit any submissions and I'll take the edited submission and format it for the web site. Original author will retain the copyright, not us. The submission can be about simple or complex items, any year and model. The idea is to give the site some robust content. Ken Admin ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 4 Jan 1980 05:22:39 -0500 From: "Douglas Aldridge" Subject: Re: Gas prices. I might have missed it, but I don't recall seeing Mass in the gas prices run down (which I'm finding most interesting, BTW.) Right now we're at a low of around $1.10 at the bargain place down the street, with $1.15 being average for the local pumps. Of course, if you gas up at Mobil in the 'burbs it'll cost you $1.25 or $1.30. And that would be cheap in CT! Douglas. - --------------------- Douglas Aldridge douglas http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.bertha.net - --------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 01 Dec 1997 05:25:50 -0800 From: Paul Laughlin Subject: Re: Chevron Gasoline Thundercraft wrote: > Absolutlely correct. Chevron does not market fuel in Michigan. The > fuel is trucked from Kentucky. > And they probably do it at cost or even less than cost, so that they can advertise that they provide the fuel for testing. Paul in Portland OR ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 1 Dec 1997 23:31:30 -0500 (EST) From: Midwest96 Subject: Re: Driving lights In a message dated 97-12-01 20:43:14 EST, you write: curious if it could be added? see ya, Brett '96 supercab 4x4 4.0 >> Did you mean factory or after-market? Both could be with no problems that I'm aware of, however, after seeing the discussions about Ford factory parts, I'd guess that you'd be better off financially with after markets. I'd also recomend either PIAA or Hella (which I believe are Ford standard on Ranger package), for fog/driving, because I beat my KC's to death after about 4 months. Craig (Midwest96 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 1 Dec 1997 23:57:09 -0500 From: ANTHONY RIFICI Subject: Ranger Supercab Noise Problem I own a 1994 Ranger Supercab that has developed a rather obnoxious = squeak from the super cab portion of the truck. The squeak occurs when = I hit a bump or turn corners or any other action that causes the cab to = sustain a torsional load. I have pretty much isolated the squeak to be = coming from the sliding rear window. It seems as though the window = frame is rubbing up against the cab body and causing the squeak. I was = just about ready to have the window removed and re-installed when I put = 300 lbs. of gravel in the bed to prepare for winter. The extra weight = has completely cured the squeak. This revelation is making me = re-evaluate where the squeak was coming from. I am no longer 100% sure = that it is the window. However it is also possible that the weight = allow my rear suspension to move more, thus reducing the torsional load = on the cab enough to cause the window not to squeak. =20 As you can see this has been really bothering me. Several local Ford = dealers have told me that they have never heard of this problem in a = Ranger. Glass dealers tell me that this is a problem in S10s, but not in = Rangers (S10 rear window assemblies are completely different so the S10 = fix may not work). Have you ever heard of this type of problem in a = Ranger before? If so, what is causing the squeak and how do I fix it? = I need to do this quickly as the weather is getting colder in Ohio and I = don't know how many good days I will have left to try and fix it. =20 Any help or suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Tony Rifici ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 1 Dec 1997 23:44:35 -0600 (CST) From: Filip M Gieszczykiewicz Subject: Re: fm modulater cd players????? You (Brett Gudgel) wrote: > Does anyone on the list have one of these, and if so do you know where > to plug in the antenna cable. I know it doesnt go directly to the > antenna or the radio direct, because those two go together to get fm > reception. Maybe I'm wrong about that, but I think there might be a box > somwhere that it would plug into, but I'm not sure. Greetings. Majority of the small ones you will see that look like an oversized lighter plug really suck. They are based on a discrete-parts oscillator and not only drift all over the dial but also have very poor temperature->frequency stability. In other words: if you have a digital radio, it will drift out of the preset and the stereo will go to hell. Best option is a Ramsey FM stereo transmitter kit. These are based on a chip designed for this purpose. If you get the crystal-based one, the frequency will be rock-solid. Unless you want to overpay, you'll need to provide a case... these kits run ~$29 and need some soldering (easy). The power output is enough so that ALL cars in a tunnel will "tune in" to what you're listening... ie. the longer and higher the antenna, the more "illegal" you are :-) This is how the university "pirate" stations get on the air. I don't know 'nuffin! :-) You can get this kit from a number of kit/electronics places: JDR Microdevices, part#EK-FMST100 $29.95... or #RK-FM10 $34.95 1-408-494-1400 (www.jdr.com) or Marlin P Jones, part#6598-RB $29.95 at 1-800-652-6733 (www.mpja.com) Of course, if you've never soldered anything in your life... this is probably not for you :-) Take care. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 02 Dec 1997 01:48:43 -0800 From: Randy Subject: Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #247 ***** > Date: 1 Dec 1997 19:23:42 -0500 > From: "Irvine Bruce" > Subject: Urgent questions > > I've got a few questions for the readership: > > 2. I remember reading in the digest about the fan clutch wars. I have the > third option; a solid coupling with a fan with flexible blades (stock). > (Don't have a fan cowling either.) Apparently the blades flatten with > increased RPM. I was wondering what would happen if I removed this fan and > coupling completely and installed an electric fan on the back or front of the > radiator? The reason why I am worried about this is because the flex fan is > really odd looking. It has 5 blades but they are spaced almost at random > around the fan. I am thinking that this does something to balance the > waterpump or something. The Helm manual doesn't mention this type of fan at > all. The closest thing they show is a 4 bladed fan with a solid coupling just > like mine. The four bladed fan spaces its blades each 90 degrees apart. The > truck appears to cool just fine, so maybe I just ought to leave it alone, but > I am curious about how an electric fan would affect performance/MPG. Irvin, an assymetrical flex-fan is pretty common with mfgs. Ever look at the fan blades on an alternator? They're not uniform either. I personally don't know the reason, maybe to change the flow speed of air to make it cool better? I would also install a fan cowling. It doesn't seem like alot, but w/out the cowling it is very hard for a water-pump mounted fan to pull the air thru the radiator w/any effeciency at all. Do you do alot of slow speed driving or heavy hauling/towing during hot days? If so, an electric fan should be a consideration. The advantages are that it pulls alot more air thru at idle and low speeds, relieves engine of the power robbing pump mounted fan, and you won't have to get the cowl after all. But my two cents for now would have to be "if it ain't broke...." you know the rest. Take care, Randy > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 1 Dec 1997 20:15:36 -0500 > From: "michael walsh" > Subject: 1989 F-450(super duty) > > I have a 1989 F-super duty with a 460 ci gas engine. The puppy has been > burning oil since I drove off the lot. At first it was 1 Quart every > 800-900 miles and it's continued to get worse. Currently, I have 70,000 > miles on it and it sucks a quart every 100 miles.I've had the compression > checked and it's fine, power seems fine.The local dealerships all recomend > replacing motor with a new longblock. Could the problem be in the top end. > Do the 460's have a history of oil consumption.By the way the truck is just > fine in every other aspect. Anyboby have any advice. Much appreciated. > Mike, that sure is alot of oil! It seems to me, you'd almost have to see evidence of losing that much oil that fast. Does it smoke while driving? Does it have blue smoke coming out the exhaust every morning at start up? Do you have puddles in your driveway? Or do you have oil streaks running down the underside of the truck? Do you smell burnt oil at anytime while driving or being around the truck? When the dealership did the compression check, did they inspect the plugs for oil? All these things are important and can lead to different causes. For instance, smoke in the morning could indicate bad valve seals (valves are closed on compression check, so it wouldn't be detected). Any valves the engine leaves open when shut off would then leak oil into the cylinder only to be burned w/the fuel. Maybe it's a combination of things. A gasket could be leaking when the oil pressure is peaked during operation (a compression check would not have revealed this, either). At that rate you'd put in (per 15,000 mile average driving year [I don't care what the NADA book says avg is.]) about 150 qts. of oil into that truck. At a cost of about $16/case (try for a volume discount, hehe), that'd be about $200/year. I'm gonna guess that long block costs about $3,500 uninstalled. You do the math. It may be cheaper to try some other things first: valve cover gaskets, oil pan gasket, or other places the motor may be leaking from. Hope I could help, Randy ***** ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 01:30:52 -0500 (EST) From: Midwest96 Subject: Re: Chevron Gasoline 2 q's: Chevron trucks fuel up here just for testing? Why don't they market up here? Tx, Craig ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 01 Dec 1997 23:14:52 -0800 From: Thundercraft Subject: Re: Chevron Gasoline Midwest96 > 2 q's: > > Chevron trucks fuel up here just for testing? Nope. They only sell the gas. The auto makers truck it up themselves....taken from Chevrons Web pages at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.chevron.com/prodserv/techron/tech-unlead.html > Why don't they market up here? Good question. Mabe they have an interest in another oil company that markets in that area. As far as I know, they only market in one province (BC) in Canada. Why aren't they in oil rich Alberta? > > > Tx, > Craig > > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer > --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > | > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request > | > +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com > -----------------+ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 03:02:20 EST From: HELOJMPR Subject: Re: 2.3 problem I know of your problem by heart. Trust me, if you buy one part to resolve ignition problems on your Ranger, get a new TFI (Thick Film Integrated) ignition module. I would never recommend "shotgun" troubleshooting (replacing parts until you guess the right one) as it is both expensive and time consuming, but both myself and my neighbor have had identical problems which were solved by replacing this part. His is a '84 2.3 I-4, and mine was a '85 2.8 V-6. I went through 3 of these modules in a five year period. Heat, or rather extreme temperature changes.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|