Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 18:34:42 -0600 (MDT)
X-Sender: zeb
To: fordtrucks80up, fordtrucks80up
From: zeb (Lamar Zabielski)
Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #155
Sender: owner-fordtrucks80up
Reply-To: fordtrucks80up

Hi Ken,

Here is 155, I could go thru my mail and compile 156 if you want.



Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 03:50:23 -0600 (MDT)
From: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest (fordtrucks80up-digest)
To: fordtrucks80up-digest
Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #155
Reply-To: fordtrucks80up
Sender: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest

fordtrucks80up-digest Thursday, October 9 1997 Volume 01 : Number 155

Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 And Newer Trucks Digest
Visit our web site:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe, send email to:
with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send
email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the
In this issue:

Re: F350 general questions [alanh (The Hepburn)]
Re: Limited Slip Stuff... [PhilDyson]
1988 FLOOR MATS [Rich Lobrovich ]
Re: F350 general questions ["Ryan Penner" ]
Re: A Tale Of Rusty Trucks [Ducks4jim]
Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #153 [Randy Kindler ]
Re: 1988 FLOOR MATS [Midwest96]
Re: K&N KIT FOR 4.0L 93 RANGER ["Jerry Dean" ]
Re: Limited Slip Stuff... [Calvin Ford ]
Re: Mazda B4000 ["Jim Bielecki" ]
ADMIN: Sticker design ready, now goes to press. [Ken Payne
Re: 98 Rangers...and then some ["Jim Bielecki"
Price? [Dinga15]
Re: Price? [helotie (Mark A Helotie)]
Re: Price? [Todd Metzger ]
resetting odometer [Michael Ruth ]
Re: vanir throttle body [KSMIKE]
Power Stroke Defined [Ken Miller ]
E4OD automatic transmission ["Harold P. Balitski"



Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 15:12:13 -0700
From: alanh (The Hepburn)
Subject: Re: F350 general questions

> I've been watching the mailing list archives for a while, but decided
> I'd have to actually post to find answers to some of my VERY-NOVICE
> questions. Please gimmie a hand! I need to pull a 40' 5th, and my
> toyota just ain't gonna cut it. How much would you expect a trailer
> like this to weigh?

That's hard to say; definitely over 10,000 lb, and somewhere between there
and 20,000 lb depending on a lot of factors.

> I'm looking in the 1988 to 92 range, because I understand 88 is when the
> Powerstroke 7.3 was introduced, right?

Actually I think '88 is when the Navistar engine went from 6.9L up to
7.3L. The Powerstroke didn't happen until '94 or so. Between then there
was a "pseudo-Powerstroke" which was a non-turbo version, but it was only
offered until the Powerstroke came up.

> I'd prefer a crew cab, which means I'm looking at an F350 no matter what
> (in that year range), right?

Right; I don't think Ford made the Crew Cab available in the F250 line.

> My questions are: when people are talking about axles, what does HD mean?
> Is this the abbv. for a solid axle, rather than an "independant suspension"
> type axle? Do all F350s have a solid axle? And for the 4x4 models, were
> manually locking hubs available / standard?

I think all F350's came with full floating rear axles; the front was either
a live axle for 4WD or twin I beam for 2WD. I'm not sure what is meant by
HD, but it's probably Heavy Duty.

> Also, I'd prefer not to get the "doolie" type setup. But this increases
> my towing weight capacity, right? By how much?

Actually, the duallie option will lower the towing capacity, by the weight
of the extra wheels. And duallies weren't available with 4WD anyway.

> Another: I've owned diesels before, and love them! the 7.3 Power Stroke
> is a must. Do they all have turbo, or was that an option? And I've heard
> nightmare stories about cavitation. Is there a way to test for this?
> What are good things to look at when considering purchasing a ford with
> the navistar engine?

Well, there was a period of about 2 years when a non-turbo "Powerstroke"
was available, but once Navistar released the real thing, that's all
that was available. For the '99 models, they're adding an aftercooler.
Cavitation doesn't need to be a nightmare. If the owner did his job
right and kept the wetting agent in the coolant, then cavitation erosion
won't be a problem. To check for that, you can get test materials from
Navistar which are similar to litmus paper. So long as the concentration
of wetting agent is correct, then there shouldn't be a problem.

> And: if I tow a 5th, I assume I'll want the "towing package" additions?
> What are those? Just a larger radiator, or is it something more?

The towing package I think is just the wiring pigtails. The F350 already
has the big cooling system and stuff. Someone more knowledgeable will
be able to jump in here.

Alan Hepburn | |
National Semiconductor | DON'T TREAD ON ME |
Santa Clara, Ca | |
alanh | |


Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 18:43:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: PhilDyson
Subject: Re: Limited Slip Stuff...

In a message dated 97-10-08 11:29:46 Pianofxr (Andrew T
Vincitore) wrote:
>Wait a minute... I thought a limited slip rear would move power to the
>wheel with traction ESPECIALLY when one wheel was stuck. Would'nt that be
>the whole point? If it does'nt then I won't be investing in a changeover.
>Can anyone clarify this? Is the Detroit locker type the only kind that will
>do this? What are the disadvantages of something like that? I guess there
>is alot of misconceptions out there ( or maybe just here)!



>92 F-250 2WD Piano truck

There is a limit to the amount of power that a limited slip diff. can move
over to the wheel with the greatest traction. I can't remeber what it is but
it is different from the posi-track units. The detroit locker is niether, it
mechanically connects the wheels like a spool so that one wheel can't turn
without the other. It will only disconnect a wheel when going around a
corner, when the outside wheel takes the longer path and spins faster than
the inner wheel. The over-running wheel unlocks from the drive train and
makes a clicking noise untill the inner wheel catches up with it.
Here is the problem, when coming out of a turn the outer wheel is still
unlocked, when power is applied it only goes to the inner wheel and the
vehicle will pull to the outside untill the over-running wheel locks back in,
sometime violently. This undesireable "steering" effect is more pronounced
in a short wheel base truck. I had to take it out of my full size Bronco
because I felt it was too dangerous.
Lockers are also sensitive to tire diameter and to set them up properly you
forget about tire pressure. You air them up using a yard stick to measure
their diameter. Unequal tire diameters will fool the diff into believing it
is in a turn and will be partially unlocked all the time. This will be more
troublesome in a vehicle with a stick shift. It might steer to the ditch
everytime you up or down shift.
Lockers are best off road and if you want to ride around town, stick to a
long wheel base truckEnd of fordtrucks80up-digest V1
Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Visit our web site:

+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+

To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts

Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are not registered, click here to register.
If you are already registered, you can login here.

If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.

Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.