|
|
Return-Path: Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 17:45:45 -0600 (MDT) From: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest To: fordtrucks80up-digest Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #142 Reply-To: fordtrucks80up Sender: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest fordtrucks80up-digest Thursday, October 2 1997 Volume 01 : Number 142 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 And Newer Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks80up-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: When do 98 (or 99??) new design F250/350 crew cabs hit the streets? [] '99 F-250 & 350 [Scott MacButch ] Re: When do 98 (or 99??) new design F250/350 crew cabs hit the streets? [] 1999 F250/F350 prototype photos from a list member [Ken Payne 1999 F250/F350 photos - whoops! [Ken Payne ] Re: Winches [Thom Cheney ] Re: Winches [John Yee ] exh. manifold gasket [MFlem94890 Re: 1999 F250/F350 photos - whoops! [MD Wayment ] Re: '92 F250 Fuel Problem [Todd M ] ordering window for 1997's [KNBD87D Re: 1999 F250/F350 photos - whoops! [John Yee ] Re: 1999 F250/F350 photos - whoops! [Ken Payne ] 1997 F350 PowerStroke [Jan Campbell ] Re: 1997 F350 PowerStroke [Ken Payne ] Re: 1997 F350 PowerStroke [Ken Payne ] 1999 F-250 HD+ specs [KNBD87D Re: 1999 F-250 HD+ specs [Kent Premo ] [none] [Timothy P Fagrey ] F-250 Snow Plow Info [KNBD87D Re: 1999 F-250 HD+ specs [KNBD87D Re: 2.73 to 4.10 gears in a 2.3L Ranger ["Lare/Eric" ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 08:34:00 -0700 From: alanh Subject: Re: When do 98 (or 99??) new design F250/350 crew cabs hit the streets? > My local dealer told me out here in Calif I could order right now a new > design 98 F250 HD Crew Cab for delivery in Jan 98. Is he wrong or just > blowing smoke? He probably wants me to buy his old crew cabs I bet. > Hope someone has good poop out there! Hi all; I've been lurking here for a while, and thought I'd jump in with what I've heard about the new trucks. According to the sales staff at Mission Valley Ford in San Jose, Ca Ford will be building the current models up through the end of the year. In January they convert over to the new design, and trucks will start showing up at dealers in March or April. I drop by the dealer about once a month to bug them for more information because I'm interested in the new F550. From what I've heard they will be available in short bed, long bed, flat bed, utility bed, standard cab, extended cab, crew cab, 2WD, 4WD, and any combination of the above. The F550 will have a tow rating as high as 19K lb. I guess I should put some biographical stuff here: I own a 1990 F350 Crew Cab Duallie Diesel that spends a lot of time pulling a 30 ft Wilderness fifth wheel. It's got about 115K miles on the clock, and we've had the E4OD tranny rebuilt once (right before the warranty ran out) and it's getting close to needing it again, thus the desire to see the new F550 hit the dealers! - --- Alan Hepburn | | National Semiconductor | DON'T TREAD ON ME | Santa Clara, Ca | | alanh ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 09:43:59 -0600 From: Scott MacButch Subject: '99 F-250 & 350 Re: Michael Ruth mentioned that the '99 PS will be "tweaked" slightly for the upcoming new trucks. Might want to check out the "Jasons Power Stroke" webb page, as fellow there states one of his sources told him that Navistar is supposed to have an intercooler and waste gated turbo-charger for '99 - which to my way of thinking is much more than a mere "tweak" of the current PS - I guess we will have to just stay tuned. Scott macs ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 08:59:47 -0700 From: "Laura Dale" Subject: Re: When do 98 (or 99??) new design F250/350 crew cabs hit the streets? >From what I learned this week, Ford is redesigning the Heavy Duty truck line and it will continue to manufacture the 1997's until the 1999 model can be released. The release for the 1999 model can't happen until after January of 1998. There will be no 1998 model of the F-250 or F-350 as we know them. They will continue to be made as 1997's. You can still order a 1997 throughout 1998 - Ford will continue to make them, they are just skipping a "year" here. The changes to the 1999 have a lot to do with the body style - less squared off from what I was told, but not as severe as the light duty model. That's all I know at this point. My good friend is a fleet manager in Norco and she told me because we are looking to replace our 1989 F-250 7.3L Diesel. Anyone want one? - ---------- > From: The Hepburn > To: fordtrucks80up > Subject: Re: When do 98 (or 99??) new design F250/350 crew cabs hit the streets? > Date: Thursday, October 02, 1997 8:34 AM > > > My local dealer told me out here in Calif I could order right now a new > > design 98 F250 HD Crew Cab for delivery in Jan 98. Is he wrong or just > > blowing smoke? He probably wants me to buy his old crew cabs I bet. > > Hope someone has good poop out there! > > Hi all; I've been lurking here for a while, and thought I'd jump in > with what I've heard about the new trucks. According to the sales staff > at Mission Valley Ford in San Jose, Ca Ford will be building the current > models up through the end of the year. In January they convert over to > the new design, and trucks will start showing up at dealers in March or > April. I drop by the dealer about once a month to bug them for more > information because I'm interested in the new F550. From what I've > heard they will be available in short bed, long bed, flat bed, utility bed, > standard cab, extended cab, crew cab, 2WD, 4WD, and any combination > of the above. The F550 will have a tow rating as high as 19K lb. > > I guess I should put some biographical stuff here: I own a 1990 F350 > Crew Cab Duallie Diesel that spends a lot of time pulling a 30 ft > Wilderness fifth wheel. It's got about 115K miles on the clock, and > we've had the E4OD tranny rebuilt once (right before the warranty ran > out) and it's getting close to needing it again, thus the desire to see > the new F550 hit the dealers! > > --- > > Alan Hepburn | | > National Semiconductor | DON'T TREAD ON ME | > Santa Clara, Ca | | > alanh | > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request > +-- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ --+ ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 12:12:54 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: 1999 F250/F350 prototype photos from a list member http://www.ford-trucks.com The 1980+ list will really appreciate this since it seems to be the hot topic right now..... but all the lists are being notified. A list member who lives near the Ford testing grounds saw the F250/F350 prototype in a local parking lot at night. Most of the hood area is concealed with plastic and the two photos are grainy since its night. However, the grill shots do show a "meaty" looking front end on this short bed crew cab. Follow the link on our home page. I didn't skrink down the pictures for the web site. That way you can see as much detail as possible since this is a night shot and its very difficult so see much. Before anyone jumps down my throat for displaying these... these pictures are not "spy shots". Had Ford not wanted this truck to be seen they wouldn't have driven it to a department store. I will not show spy shots on the site as I believe in not letting Ford's competition know what they have planned. These photos just confirm a little of what Ford showed on their truck that's been displayed at the auto shows. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 12:26:13 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: 1999 F250/F350 photos - whoops! http://www.ford-trucks.com Sorry about that, I forgot to post the first picture (the one with the grill shot). Web site should now properly display both! Ken ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 07:45:07 -0500 From: Thom Cheney Subject: Re: Winches BigDogF250 > > I've also heard about winches that run off the motor , they hook into the > transfer case or something like that, PTO (Power Take Off) winch. Best and usually most powerful.... also most expensive because of the excitement involved in adding the trnasfer case & routing the drive around engine & steering components. TC ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 10:35:32 -0700 From: John Yee Subject: Re: Winches >PTO (Power Take Off) winch. Best and usually most powerful.... also >most expensive because of the excitement involved in adding the >trnasfer case & routing the drive around engine & steering components. Transfer cases with PTO output can be found on Dodge 3500 and is an option on the 2500 (HD transfer case). I can't find any references to PTO transfer cases on the '97 Ford HD F250 or F350, or super duty for that matter. I do know that Super Duty's can get them, cause i've seen Tow trucks that have them. But I don't know if it is a ford option, or a "tow truck builder" option. There was a rumor (or was it a wish) that the 1999 HD trucks may have a PTO option. Anyone know? Another question: Does anyone know if the 1999 HD trucks will have a 3:73 axle ratio option? The reason I ask is that every 1997 ford truck (LD trucks and Vans) that has a Triton engine also has a 3:73 option (as well as 4:10). EG: the 97 vans have 3:55 and 4:10 option on the PowerStroke, but the V10 has 3:73 and 4:10's. I'm *guessing* that the 1999 HD trucks will have the option, but have not got around to a dealer to verify it. thanks, - -john ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 14:55:31 -0400 (EDT) From: MFlem94890 Subject: exh. manifold gasket I have a 1988 F250 king cab long bed, Had a ford dealer work on my truck, comes to find out, they didn't put a exh.manifold gasket on it. I've heard you don't really need one, is this true, ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 12:21:17 -0700 From: MD Wayment Subject: Re: 1999 F250/F350 photos - whoops! ummm.....er.....got any better ones than that? Can't see a darn thing at night. Ken Payne wrote: > http://www.ford-trucks.com > > Sorry about that, I forgot to post the first picture (the one > with the grill shot). Web site should now properly display both! > > Ken > > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request > +-- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ --+ - -- MD Wayment ,------- Humans /`------- Chimpanzees ____________________________________/`-------- Slugs \ `-------- MD WAYMENT mailto:mwayment - -- ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 02 Oct 97 12:03:05 -0800 From: Todd M Subject: Re: '92 F250 Fuel Problem There are a couple TSB's related to fuel flow problems on these trucks listed on www.alldata.com Todd ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 15:34:47, -0500 From: KNBD87D Subject: ordering window for 1997's Ordering window for 1997 close of Oct. 6. Or near that day. 460's are not available anymore...can NOT be ordered. Josh KNBD87D ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 11:59:12 -0700 From: John Yee Subject: Re: 1999 F250/F350 photos - whoops! At 12:21 PM 10/2/97 -0700, you wrote: >ummm.....er.....got any better ones than that? Can't see a darn thing at >night. Complain, complain. :-) if you haven't seen these: - - Try the October Trailer life (hardcopy); they're not online yet. - - http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.motortrend.com/june97/tt/tt_f.html On the 3rd of 3 pages. - - or the Powerforce: www.FordUnleashed.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 15:58:06 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: Re: 1999 F250/F350 photos - whoops! At 12:21 PM 10/2/97 -0700, you wrote: >ummm.....er.....got any better ones than that? Can't see a darn thing at >night. > >Ken Payne wrote: > Unfortunately, in addition to them being night photos the scanner at my former employer wasn't very good. I'm planning on taking the pics to Kinkos this weekend and scanning them at 600 dpi. Maybe they'll turn out better. Ken ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 17:43:22 -0400 From: Jan Campbell Subject: 1997 F350 PowerStroke Recently purchased a new 1997 F350 PowerStroke, the truck had no window sticker on it listing equipment, etc. Does anyone know some way that I can get a copy or a duplicate? The dealer tells me they don't know. Amazing, isn't it? Any suggestions on oil and filters? Thanx. Matt Campbell ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 17:38:20 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: Re: 1997 F350 PowerStroke At 05:43 PM 10/2/97 -0400, you wrote: >Recently purchased a new 1997 F350 PowerStroke, the truck had no window >sticker on it listing equipment, etc. Does anyone know some way that I >can get a copy or a duplicate? The dealer tells me they don't know. >Amazing, isn't it? Any suggestions on oil and filters? > >Thanx. > >Matt Campbell Sounds like the dealer is pulling a fast one. Its against Federal law for new vehicles to not have the window sticker listing the options and MSRP. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 17:39:00 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: Re: 1997 F350 PowerStroke At 05:43 PM 10/2/97 -0400, you wrote: >Recently purchased a new 1997 F350 PowerStroke, the truck had no window >sticker on it listing equipment, etc. Does anyone know some way that I >can get a copy or a duplicate? The dealer tells me they don't know. >Amazing, isn't it? Any suggestions on oil and filters? > >Thanx. > >Matt Campbell Also, try emailing cacinfo situation. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 18:02:54, -0500 From: KNBD87D Subject: 1999 F-250 HD+ specs Anyone interested in 1999 truck options, I GOT THEM Write me if you want some additional info. NO, I don't have any prices, but I do have ordering options. These are all called 1999 Super Duty F-Series. F-250 and F-350 Engine choices: 5.4L V8, 5 speed manual OD (standard) 5.4L V8, electronic Auto 6.8L V10, 5 speed manual 6.8L V10, Auto 7.3L Diesel, 6 speed manual OD, yes 6 Speed 7.3L Diesel, Auto 5.4L and 7.3L gear ratios are 3.73 or 4.10 6.8L gear ratios are 3.73 or 4.30 limited slip is available Snow Plow Package is available: HD front springs HD battery HD Alternator XL, XLT, or Lariat packages offerd PTO (power take off) opening optional with auto tranny F-450 is 15000# GVWR: Cab Chassis 6.8L V10, 5 speed manual OD (standard) 6.8L V10, Auto 7.3L, 6 speed Manual OD 7.3L, Auto 4x2 or 4x4 reg cab or crew cab F-550 is 17500# GVWR reg cab or crew cab 4x2 or 4x4 6.8L, Auto (standard) 7.3L, 6 speed Manual OD 7.3L, Auto or 19000# GVWR-4x2 only Any more questions, please e-mail me at KNBD87D Josh ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 17:11:16 -0500 From: Kent Premo Subject: Re: 1999 F-250 HD+ specs Josh, I'm sure you will be a very popular fellow. If you can, please provide more about the F-250 options with regard to cab/beds, especially as they relate to the availability of the snow plow prep package. The 1997 250 light duty doesn't allow snow plow prep with super cab. Should I have any reason to hope that the 1998 250 "super duty" will? I haven't looked much into the 1997 250HD offerings since I'm keen on the restyling. Kent At 06:02 PM 10/2/97 -0500, you wrote: >Anyone interested in 1999 truck options, I GOT THEM Write me if you >want some additional info. NO, I don't have any prices, but I do >have ordering options. These are all called 1999 Super Duty F-Series. > > >F-250 and F-350 Engine choices: >5.4L V8, 5 speed manual OD (standard) >5.4L V8, electronic Auto >6.8L V10, 5 speed manual >6.8L V10, Auto >7.3L Diesel, 6 speed manual OD, yes 6 Speed >7.3L Diesel, Auto > > >5.4L and 7.3L gear ratios are 3.73 or 4.10 >6.8L gear ratios are 3.73 or 4.30 >limited slip is available > >Snow Plow Package is available: >HD front springs >HD battery >HD Alternator >XL, XLT, or Lariat packages offerd >PTO (power take off) opening optional with auto tranny > >F-450 is 15000# GVWR: >Cab Chassis >6.8L V10, 5 speed manual OD (standard) >6.8L V10, Auto >7.3L, 6 speed Manual OD >7.3L, Auto >4x2 or 4x4 >reg cab or crew cab > >F-550 is 17500# GVWR >reg cab or crew cab >4x2 or 4x4 >6.8L, Auto (standard) >7.3L, 6 speed Manual OD >7.3L, Auto >or 19000# GVWR-4x2 only > > >Any more questions, please e-mail me at KNBD87D > >Josh >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ >| Send posts to fordtrucks80up >| Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request >+-- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ --+ > > ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 16:02:10 -0700 From: Timothy P Fagrey Subject: [none] Steven/James/Charles/Mark, I have a F150 4.9L six and wrote in awhile back about the tank problem = and also a ruff running issue. Most of this was solved by calling into=20 Ford and gave them the VIN to scan for recalls - They found three and = fixed them for free. One recall had to do with a fuel pressure = regulator, another ignition switch and the last one I did not verify.=20 Hope this helps someone. you wrote: I know that this has been mentioned on this list before, but I really = paid no attention to the responses because it wasn't relevant to me. Now that I = have to help a friend out with this problem, I will pay more attention. The truck is an 87 F-150 2wd 4.9L with the dual gas tanks. The problem = is thatthe truck always gets its gas from the front tank, no matter what position the switch is in. The switch does cause the gauge to register = the appropriate reading for the tank it's set to. It has been like this for about 2 years. I believe that, before this, the truck would draw from = the front until empty and then begin drawing from the rear, with the switch remaining in the front position, which also doesn't sound like it was = working correctly. Any suggestions on where to start here? The back tank has = been full for most of this time (I don't know why my friend never drained it) = and it's a shame to see that capacity go to waste. Thanks in advance, Todd Todd, I have a 4.9L 6 1990 F150 2wd and have a somewhat same problem - when one tank is empty, I switch over to the other one. The gauge registers = full after=20 switch over but the tank gauge declines rather quickly to the level of = the original=20 tank - I then switch back and the first tank reads full. I then proceed = to use the=20 fuel from the second tank. It seems as though the empty tank fills from = the full one. Anyone with some clues? Tim, Date: Wed, 1 Oct 1997 13:17:24 -0500 From: Steven McCullough Subject: RE: '92 F250 Fuel Problem=09 James, Had the exact same problem on a 1990 F150 - I mean exactly. Basically, your fuel pump is dying, mine just got worse and worse until it quit - while it still works, you should suck that tank dry now while you can if you plan on dropping the tank, although I found it much easier to lift off the bed and replace both=20 at the same time (when the second one was dying of course) Steven McCullough Houston, TX also - - -----Original Message----- From:Beaman, James [SMTP:james.beaman Sent:Wednesday, October 01, 1997 8:36 AM To:'fordtrucks80up Subject:'92 F250 Fuel Problem I have been experiencing a problem using fuel from the front tank of my'92 F250. The symtoms are these: when I am using the rear tank and switch to the front tank while driving, the engine will stop if I don't switch back in time. However, if I repeat this drill enough, it will eventually begin running from the front. Sometimes it takes longer than other times. After I get it switched over, I can switch it back and forth with no problem unless I leave it on the rear tank too long (probably over an hour). Likewise, if I have been driving on the front tank and park, it will not start on the front tank unless I come back to it within an hour or so. Is my fuel pump going out or does this sound like a priming problem? Anyone experienced or heard of anything like this? James Beaman james.beaman Houston, Texas ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 19:26:18, -0500 From: KNBD87D Subject: F-250 Snow Plow Info Kent, The 1999 F-250 Super Cav will allow the snow plow package. It consists of a HD battery, HD alternator, and HD front springs. If you are wondering the capacity, it is as follows: 5.4L or 6.8L V10 only, not recommeded with diesel in any wheelbase EXCEPT regular cab. 100 lb. max of permanently attached hardware 680 lb. max of removable plow and ahardware 780 lb. max combined plow and permantenly attached hardware Cab and box: Can have supercab with a shortbox or a longbox Any other questions, I am happy to assist you. Josh KNBD87D ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 19:44:12, -0500 From: KNBD87D Subject: Re: 1999 F-250 HD+ specs John, - -4.30 ratio IS available with the V10 - -I am not sure yet if the body styles will be staged through out the year. I HOPE NOT. That would make for some unhappy customers and dealers - -I do not know when the dealers will get the tow guides and brochures I will announce the towing capacities as soon as I find out - -you can ask me as many questions as you'd like. I can help you. Josh ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 19:42:20 -0400 From: "Lare/Eric" Subject: Re: 2.73 to 4.10 gears in a 2.3L Ranger I went with 4.10's with 31" (soon to be 32") tires on my '94 Splash Ext. Cab with the 4.0 L. The truck originally came with 3.27's and 235/75 tires. I'm slightly lower in final gearing than stock (about 10 to 12% - depending on tire pressure) and I've actually noticed very little change in my gas mileage. I drive about 50% hi-way, 20% city, and 30% moderate off-road. Hope this helps, Eric S. - ---------- > From: Silent . Bob > To: fordtrucks80up fordnatics > Subject: 2.73 to 4.10 gears in a 2.3L Ranger > Date: Tuesday, September 30, 1997 11:00 AM > > > A friend of mine that works for Ford knew that I wanted to put some new > 3.45's or 3.73's rear end gears in my truck. Well last night he called > me and told me that he could get me a whole rear end that came out of a > Windstar that had 4.10's and had less than 30,000 miles on it for $150. > He said that the reason why the took the rear end out was because the > owner kept complaining about it and the dealership basically sold him a > new rear end when all it really needed was to be shimed. (that's how guys > like me get parts cheap). > > Anyway, its a pretty good deal and I could swap the gears and sell the > rear end and get my money back, but Im not so sure about going with 4.10 > gears in my truck. > > My question is, how much more gas am I going to be sucking if I go from.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|