|
|
Return-Path: Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 04:01:03 -0600 (MDT) From: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest To: fordtrucks80up-digest Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #111 Reply-To: fordtrucks80up Sender: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest fordtrucks80up-digest Sunday, September 14 1997 Volume 01 : Number 111 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 And Newer Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks80up-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: UNDERDRIVE PULLEYS FOR NEWER 2.3's [Chris Kelly ] Re: Automotive Home Pages [zeb Re: Ruff Idle-Poor Gas Mileage [Lehmandp Re: 302 truck (4X) sump specification [Lehmandp Clutch Thanks ["Mark J. Salvetti" ] Re: 302 truck (4X) sump specification ["Mark J. Salvetti" Re: Automotive Home Pages [Jerad Heffner ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 20:10:49 -0400 From: Chris Kelly Subject: UNDERDRIVE PULLEYS FOR NEWER 2.3's This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - --------------6BD5726A11C2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have seen questions about this before now we can have something done about it. Unorthodox racing is willing to make them if I can get 10 people to put a deposit down! Please read the attachment, and if interested send me e-mail and if I get enough responses I will call them up! I will let you know when we get enough people! Chris - --------------6BD5726A11C2 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: Received: from emout02.mail.aol.com by NetGSI.com (8.7.5/-A/UX-AMR-1.0) id OAA27951; Sat, 13 Sep 1997 14:34:56 -0400 From: TBIRDPWR Received: (from root by emout02.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id OAA18391 for cdkelly Sat, 13 Sep 1997 14:34:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 14:34:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: To: cdkelly Subject: Re: 94 ranger Status: O X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 Chris, We are pretty sure that pulley is different from the early 2.3L's like the turbo cars. If some one can send us a pulley and you can get atleast 10 owners to put deposits down we can make you all a unit. Cost should be about $120 each, since it is very limited production. You'll have a choice of black, clear, red or blue anodizing. Give me a call at 888-PULLEYU, 9-5 EST to discuss the project. Thanks for your interest, Shawn Debeaumon President Unorthodox Racing Inc. - --------------6BD5726A11C2-- ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 19:03:52 -0600 (MDT) From: zeb Subject: Re: Automotive Home Pages At 05:58 PM 9/13/97 -0500, fordtrucks80up >I don't know if I am allowed to do this or not, but here I go anyway. Okay, me too, What's your home address, URL address, that is. Would like to visit it. zeb 88 F250 S-Cab 7.3 4wd stick > >I have a personal home that I am revamping and enlarging the content of, >and I invite ANYONE to send me some links of their own pages or of >excellent pages by other people, as long as the page is AUTOMOTIVE >RELATED. I want a more complete automotive listing, and I will have >several categories. > >If you have a link you wish to send, DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE, as it >will send it to everyone on the list. Instead use this link: >mailto:jjay >browser or mail client, please use jjay >the subject line. > >I appreciate it. Note: it does NOT have to be Ford related, but if it is, >hey, all the better!!! > >Thanx >Jerad Heffner >'84 Ranger 4x4 > >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ >| Send posts to fordtrucks80up >| Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request >+-- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ --+ > ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 21:23:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Lehmandp Subject: Re: Ruff Idle-Poor Gas Mileage In a message dated 97-09-13 14:48:23 EDT, you write: It has always had a ruff idle and poor mileage, 11 mpg. There also seems to be a miss at highway speeds. But it has the get and go when I need the power. I have replaced the fuel and air filters and also the O2 sensor. I even took in to a Ford dealer and had the fuel pressure checked and also the injectors cleaned and checked. Additionally, they hook up a computer troubleshooting system and we drove around to isolate the problem. No luck...no fault codes. Everything was within computer spec? The truck is very dependable, never had any problems mechanically, except brakes. I do have a problem with peeling paint, but that's another subject. Does anyone have any suggestions on what I might try next...short of selling it? All comments are appreciated. Thanks, Bill Coates >> Bill, >From my recent experience with a rough idle, you might take the time to double check the wiring at each injector with the engine wiring diagram! Another thing, lift the hood in low light and see if you can see leakage in the spark plug wires while the engine is running. You might see blue arcs -- which means time for new wires. - -David Lehman ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 21:23:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Lehmandp Subject: Re: 302 truck (4X) sump specification In a message dated 97-09-13 15:59:33 EDT, you write: We've got a recently purchased 88 F150 302 4X. I'm asking if this is a five or six qt sump on this motor. My Ranger 4x had a larger off road sump, I believe, and this f150 indictes a quart low with five qts in it. THere may be an issue with the 'dip' stick, but I want to make sure it doesn't take six qts before I go off. My 2X F150 takes five qts. (And no, I don't have the ability to compare the two right now!). Dave Lampert >> Dave Lampert, My '92 F150 5.0L requires six quarts to show full on the dip stick, too. Hope I'm not doing anything wrong... - -David Lehman ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 21:28:40 -0400 From: "Mark J. Salvetti" Subject: Clutch Thanks Just wanted to thank everyone that helped me with advice on my = clutch/hydraulics replacement. It's finally done! The last bit of advice I asked for was clutch slave bleeding. Turns out = I was bleeding it fine, and the reason my pedal was not coming all the = way back up and the clutch was not releasing was the adjustment on the = new master cylinder linkage. The original unit had no adjustment, and I = thought I had the new one set up per the instructions. Turned out I still had too much play. I made the actuating rod longer = by a few turns, and now the truck shifts beautifully with no clutch = slippage. Thank you everyone! Mark 1986 F-150 2WD, 5.0L ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 21:33:52 -0400 From: "Mark J. Salvetti" Subject: Re: 302 truck (4X) sump specification >We've got a recently purchased 88 F150 302 4X. I'm asking if this is a = five or six qt sump on this motor. My Ranger 4x >had a larger off road = sump, I believe, and this f150 indictes a quart low with five qts in it. = THere may be an issue with the >'dip' stick, but I want to make sure it = doesn't take six qts before I go off. My 2X F150 takes five qts. (And = no, I don't have >the ability to compare the two right now!).=20 >Dave Lampert Dave, what year is your 2X F150? My 1986 2WD with the 5.0L takes six = quarts with a filter change. No special options, and that's also what = my owner's manual says it should take. Mark 1986 F-150, 2WD, 5.0L ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 23:47:05 -0500 From: Jerad Heffner Subject: Re: Automotive Home Pages Current page is up at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.ticz.com/~jjay/ It's not as good now as it has been, and there are several HTML errors that I just haven't bothered fixing, but this next one will be the granddaddy of them all (of all of my pages [and that's quite a few!]) Jerad Lamar Zabielski wrote: > At 05:58 PM 9/13/97 -0500, fordtrucks80up > >I don't know if I am allowed to do this or not, but here I go anyway. > > Okay, me too, What's your home address, URL address, that is. > > Would like to visit it. > > zeb > 88 F250 S-Cab 7.3 4wd stick > > > > >I have a personal home that I am revamping and enlarging the content of, > >and I invite ANYONE to send me some links of their own pages or of > >excellent pages by other people, as long as the page is AUTOMOTIVE > >RELATED. I want a more complete automotive listing, and I will have > >several categories. > > > >If you have a link you wish to send, DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE, as it > >will send it to everyone on the list. Instead use this link: > >mailto:jjay > >browser or mail client, please use jjay > >the subject line. > > > >I appreciate it. Note: it does NOT have to be Ford related, but if it is, > >hey, all the better!!! > > > >Thanx > >Jerad Heffner > >'84 Ranger 4x4 > > > >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ > >| Send posts to fordtrucks80up > >| Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request > >+-- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ --+ > > > > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|