|
|
Return-Path: Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 04:00:44 -0600 (MDT) From: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest To: fordtrucks80up-digest Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #101 Reply-To: fordtrucks80up Sender: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest fordtrucks80up-digest Wednesday, September 10 1997 Volume 01 : Number 101 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 And Newer Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks80up-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: If you don't mind me asking? $ on F350 crew PS [Mitch Biarsky PowerStroke vs 460 vs Triton V10 [Mitch Biarsky Re: Ford V-8 [Ezekial ] Re: PowerStroke vs 460 vs Triton V10 [Ken Miller Upgrades to '92 F-150 302 [Lehmandp Re: a warning [ERI302 1996 350 Dually ["Jim Lohse" ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 09 Sep 1997 23:08:06 -0400 From: Mitch Biarsky Subject: If you don't mind me asking? $ on F350 crew PS Chris, SHOP AROUND!!!! I was at my local Ford dealer last week in NJ and he quoted me $500.00 over the dealers invoice for a F350 crew cab PS loaded. The sticker price was close to 36K, and he was willing to sell for $500 over invoice, about 32K. It's just like shopping for a car, do your homework up front, negotiate a fair profit over the dealers invoice and be willing to WALK AWAY. Mitch (waiting for the '99s) '86 F250 4x4 > Date: Mon, 08 Sep 1997 17:16:38 -0700 > From: cfoye > Subject: If you don't mind me asking? $ on F350 crew PS > > Hey Guys, > > Well, I'm getting more serious about getting the powerstroke and even went > down to a local dealer who has a few of the 97 f350 crew powerstrokes on > the lot. They were willing to show me the invoice but, were very unwilling > take any offers lower than $1500 under invoice. I have done my homework > and do know the invoice price. I basically want all the options XLT, pd, > pw, cruise, a/c etc. So, if you don't mind me asking? What price over > invoice did people with the same truck get theirs at? I want to know if > they will really budge on the price. > > Thanks alot, > > Chris > ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 09 Sep 1997 23:16:28 -0400 From: Mitch Biarsky Subject: PowerStroke vs 460 vs Triton V10 Hi all, I've been following this thread for the past couple of weeks, and it's quite apparrent that the Powerstroke outperforms the 460 (mpg, top end speed, torque, etc). I'm waiting for the '99 F350 to become available and have read on numerous internet sites the the Triton V10 will be an available engine choice. The V10 is currently available in Fords fullsize vans. Does anyone have any performance figures for this engine, and how it compares to the Powerstroke??? Thanks, Mitch '86 F250 4x4 ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 09 Sep 1997 22:51:28 -0500 From: Ezekial Subject: Re: Ford V-8 I know Ford made a 360 and the other variety of engines but I was refering to the standard today. Like through the sixties there were more sizes of engines than you can name. Thanx. - -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- | Ezekial | 66 Mustang Fastback, 88 F-150 | ezekial |----Ezekials Cove: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.galstar.com/~derrick/index.html ------| |--- Phantom Chat: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.galstar.com/~derrick/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?az=live_chat ---| --------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 09 Sep 1997 21:31:28 From: Ken Miller Subject: Re: PowerStroke vs 460 vs Triton V10 Mitch, There is a write up in September Issue of Trailer Life, pp 44, on the V10 in a van, pulling a 28 foot travel trailer. It says in that article, 265 hp and 410 ft-lbs of torque. I was not impressed, 10.4 mpg towing, 14.0 mpg solo. MK ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 01:33:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Lehmandp Subject: Upgrades to '92 F-150 302 No problems, just some news! Several months ago, I mentioned plans to upgrade my '92 F-150 302 with Ford Motorsport components. The mods were to begin with the Mass Air conversion kit. However, during the road-test, it was discovered that the computer in the Mass Air kit would not communicate with the E4OD, so they put the original computer and wiring harness back on. BTW, in so doing, they also fixed a problem with the #6 injector wiring. It was never wired correctly from the factory! Current condition of the project: [all eight cylinders ], GT-40 alumninum heads, 1.6 ratio roller rockers, GT-40 intake manifolds, 65mm throttle body, 19 lb/hr fuel injectors, Borla stainless headers, Edlebrock RPM series cat-back exhaust, stock cam, stock catylitcs, stock bottom-end, stock computer. For responsibilities sake; I've added cross drilled front rotors and "extreme performance" pads. I almost had the anti-sway bars on, but they sent the wrong parts. :-( Stock engine is rated 185HP Results: I'm under the impression that the little engine is currently putting out between 300-320HP. Too soon to tell on the fuel consumption, but so far it looks consistant with previous 14-17mpg. (I'll have to get it on the highway -- and stop peeling out, for the good numbers! BTW, all time best as stock was 21mpg with 235/75/15 tires and 3.55 gears. I've had 31" tires for several years--getting the afore mentioned 14-17mpg.) The performance "envelope" is roughly equivalent to my wife's [stock] '93 Thunderbird 302. Future: I still want the Mass Air conversion to best optimize all of these new components. We're looking into the 5.8L H.O. (Lightning) kit w/E4OD control. Will have to change the cam to change the timing so it matches the H.O. engine. Expecting 340-360HP. This should put the performance envelope close to a stock '91 Mustang GT I once owned! Not too bad for a 3-ton 4x4! Just having fun with a paid-off Ford! - -David ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 02:07:35 -0400 (EDT) From: ERI302 Subject: Re: a warning WHAT IS A HOAX MAY I ASK??? ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 01:44:47 -0700 From: "Jim Lohse" Subject: 1996 350 Dually I have a 1996 Ford Dually, 2wd, 460, Trailer and Tow package. Recently my towing limits just change to haulling a 11'3" Lance Camper 3,500lbs. I have on order Firestone air springs and compressor for the rear. I have been told that if this is now my upper limit for towing that I can remove one rear leaf spring to soften the ride. If this is true, which leaf..... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|