|
|
Return-Path: Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 20:15:52 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest To: fordtrucks80up-digest Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #226 Reply-To: fordtrucks80up Sender: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest fordtrucks80up-digest Tuesday, November 18 1997 Volume 01 : Number 226 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 And Newer Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks80up-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: RE: Four door Ranger [tgstoner FW: Internet Virus ALERT! [Brian Pynn ] Re: FW: Internet Virus ALERT! [alanh Re: FW: Internet Virus ALERT! [Thom Cheney ] Re: FW: Internet Virus ALERT! ["John D. Bowne" ] re: 2.3 to 2.9 swap [KNBD87D Need Info ["Bryan Jordan" ] Re: Need Info [cdkelly voltage reg [hsherman ] I have a question vaccum booster 1980 f-150 [IMATOOLMAN Re: Internet Virus ALERT! ["Ned" ] RE: Internet Virus ALERT! ["Albasha, Ned" ] Re: radius arm bushings [Bakend Re: Need Info ["Froggy" ] Re: Need Info [Thom Cheney ] Re: Need Info [bthomas Q: On Radius arms (length) [IamGoode Re: voltage reg ["David J. Baldwin" ] Re: Floor [Midwest96 Re: Internet Virus ALERT! [Midwest96 gas mileage [Psnowball 300 I6 Oil Pan Removal - Help! [Pengy67 ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 10:37:09 -0500 From: tgstoner Subject: RE: Four door Ranger On Mon, 17 Nov 1997 KNBD87D > If anyone else has looked at the 4 door Ranger at the web site > mentioned earlier, what do you all think? ************************** Josh, I've been a Ranger driver for six years now ('92 , '94, and '96) and have had a Super Cab version for the last two years. I started following all of the "spy shots" of the 4-door version from the day that I first saw one, thinking that it should be my next truck. I too really like the way that it looks. Recently however, I found that I can lease a loaded F-150 for the same monthly payment that I've been paying on the '96 Ranger. With a SuperCab F-150, I get a fairly good sized, "real" back seat, and still have a 6-1/2 foot box (Flareside). Plus it will cost me less to insure the F-150. Since that 4-door Ranger appears to have a bed that appears to be only about 5-1/2 feet long, I'd be trading load space for interior space. And, although Ford is talking about production plans in South America and Asia, they haven't yet said much about when the 4-door Ranger will be available to us here in North America. With the F-150 I'm just getting more space all the way around. Of course I'll be using more gasoline to move the F-150 around, but I'm willing to pay that price. Two weeks ago I ordered a 4-wheel drive F-150 Lariat Super Cab, and I'm anixously awaiting its arrival. Tom Stoner Ann Arbor, MI 1996 Ranger XLT Super Cab 1996 Taurus LX tgstoner ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 09:13:20 -0800 From: Brian Pynn Subject: FW: Internet Virus ALERT! Info at bottom... > ---------- > From: Brian Pynn > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 1997 8:36 AM > To: Louis Hopcraft; Dinah Brennan > Subject: FW: Internet Virus ALERT! > > > > ---------- > From: BEABE > Sent: Monday, November 17, 1997 12:57 PM > To: lrobertson > Shirley-Ann_Wagenaar > Subject: Internet Virus ALERT! > > Hi! Just keeping you in the loop re a new Internet Virus. > You may want to forward this around your companies. > Betty. > --------------------------( Forwarded letter 1 follows > )--------------------- > Date: Monday, 17 November 1997 12:22pm PT > To: MLISD > From: DONEL > Subject: PLEASE READ NOW > > please read down to the letter which describes a virus. you should > also be in > touch with your customers to advise them as well. > > i expect there will be more direction on this shortly. > > thanks,,,,doug > --------------------------( Forwarded letter 2 follows > )--------------------- > Date: Monday, 17 November 1997 11:53am PT > To: MLASDMG > From: PABAR > Subject: PLEASE READ NOW > > fyi... > --------------------------( Forwarded letter 3 follows > )--------------------- > Date: Monday, 17 November 1997 11:30am PT > To: MLMVDALL, SICHOW > From: BRAUG > Subject: PLEASE READ NOW > > Fyi, > --------------------------( Forwarded letter 4 follows > )--------------------- > Date: Monday, 17 November 1997 11:28am PT > To: MLCSS-DFP > From: SUSCH > Subject: NEW VIRUS ON INTERNET. > > --------------------------( Forwarded letter 2 follows > )--------------------- > Date: Monday, 17 November 1997 8:49am PT > To: MLHD > From: JECOO > Subject: NEW VIRUS > > FYI.... > > WARNING!!! If you receive an e-mail titled "JOIN THE CREW" DO NOT > open it! It will erase EVERYTHING on your hard drive! Send this > letter out to as many people you can....this is a new virus and not > many people know about it! This message was received this morning > from IBM, and the Army National Guard, please share it with anyone > that might access the Internet. > > Regards, > Jerry Cooling > IBM Services > 661-2747 > > > ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 09:31:36 -0800 From: alanh Subject: Re: FW: Internet Virus ALERT! C'mon people; almost all the reported "internet viruses" are just hoaxes, and the only way anything gets spread by them is when you start forwarding them to every place you've ever heard of. The actual "virus" is the message itself showing up in mailboxes worldwide. Reading your mail does not erase your hard drive; you need to run an executable to do that, and I don't know of any mail readers that automatically run executables. With that in ind, here's something I picked up somewhere a while back that some might find amusing, and others find alarming: - ------------------------------ NEW, important information on the "Badtimes" virus (not to be confused with the "Goodtimes" virus!!). ********** This just in : NEW VIRUS WARNING If you receive an e-mail with a subject line of "Badtimes," delete it immediately WITHOUT reading it. This is the most dangerous E-mail virus yet. It will completely re-write your hard drive. Not only that, but it will scramble any disks that are even close to your computer. It also demagnetizes the strips on all your credit cards, reprograms your ATM access code, screws up the tracking on your VCR and uses subspace field harmonics to scratch any CDs you try to play. It will recalibrate your refrigerator's coolness setting so all your ice cream melts and your milk curdles. It will give your ex-boy/girlfriend your new phone number. This virus will mix antifreeze into your fish tank. It will drink all your soda and leave dirty socks on the coffee table when you are expecting company. It will hide your car keys when you are late for work and interfere with your car radio so that you hear only static while stuck in traffic. When executed, "Badtimes" will also give you nightmares about circus midgets. It will replace your shampoo with Nair and your Nair with Rogaine. "Badtimes" will give you Dutch Elm disease and brown patch. If the "Badtimes" mail message is opened in a Windows 95 environment it will leave the toilet seat up and leave your hairdryer plugged in dangerously close to a full bathtub. It will not only remove the forbidden tags from your mattresses and pillows, but it will also refill your skim milk with whole milk. It is insidious and subtle. It is dangerous and terrifying to behold. It is also a rather interesting shade of mauve. These are just a few signs. Be afraid. Be very, very afraid. - --- Alan Hepburn | | National Semiconductor | DON'T TREAD ON ME | Santa Clara, Ca | | alanh ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 09:56:51 -0500 From: Thom Cheney Subject: Re: FW: Internet Virus ALERT! not again.... I've been getting crap about this alleged virus for the past 2 years. Everyone in unison.... "BOGUS BOGUS BOGUS....." - -- Thom Cheney Early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 10:02:37 -0800 From: "John D. Bowne" Subject: Re: FW: Internet Virus ALERT! Come on folks, This is an urban legend, in all of its various forms. There is no way that reading an email message can do this. Executing an attachment is a different story, but not reading a piece of email. johnbo At 09:13 AM 11/18/97 -0800, you wrote: >Info at bottom... > >> ---------- >> From: Brian Pynn >> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 1997 8:36 AM >> To: Louis Hopcraft; Dinah Brennan >> Subject: FW: Internet Virus ALERT! >> >> >> >> ---------- >> From: BEABE >> Sent: Monday, November 17, 1997 12:57 PM >> To: lrobertson >> Shirley-Ann_Wagenaar >> Subject: Internet Virus ALERT! >> >> Hi! Just keeping you in the loop re a new Internet Virus. >> You may want to forward this around your companies. >> Betty. >> --------------------------( Forwarded letter 1 follows >> )--------------------- >> Date: Monday, 17 November 1997 12:22pm PT >> To: MLISD >> From: DONEL >> Subject: PLEASE READ NOW >> >> please read down to the letter which describes a virus. you should >> also be in >> touch with your customers to advise them as well. >> >> i expect there will be more direction on this shortly. >> >> thanks,,,,doug >> --------------------------( Forwarded letter 2 follows >> )--------------------- >> Date: Monday, 17 November 1997 11:53am PT >> To: MLASDMG >> From: PABAR >> Subject: PLEASE READ NOW >> >> fyi... >> --------------------------( Forwarded letter 3 follows >> )--------------------- >> Date: Monday, 17 November 1997 11:30am PT >> To: MLMVDALL, SICHOW >> From: BRAUG >> Subject: PLEASE READ NOW >> >> Fyi, >> --------------------------( Forwarded letter 4 follows >> )--------------------- >> Date: Monday, 17 November 1997 11:28am PT >> To: MLCSS-DFP >> From: SUSCH >> Subject: NEW VIRUS ON INTERNET. >> >> --------------------------( Forwarded letter 2 follows >> )--------------------- >> Date: Monday, 17 November 1997 8:49am PT >> To: MLHD >> From: JECOO >> Subject: NEW VIRUS >> >> FYI.... >> >> WARNING!!! If you receive an e-mail titled "JOIN THE CREW" DO NOT >> open it! It will erase EVERYTHING on your hard drive! Send this >> letter out to as many people you can....this is a new virus and not >> many people know about it! This message was received this morning >> from IBM, and the Army National Guard, please share it with anyone >> that might access the Internet. >> >> Regards, >> Jerry Cooling >> IBM Services >> 661-2747 >> >> >> >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ >| Send posts to fordtrucks80up >| Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request >+----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ > > ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 13:18:43, -0500 From: KNBD87D Subject: re: 2.3 to 2.9 swap Bob, You would want a new tranny to match the power of the 2.9. Probably a new driveshaft as well as engine and tranny mounts. Is your 2.3L an EFI or Carburated? That will also make a difference. If carburated, why don't ya drop in a 5.0L instead? Josh ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 19:47:35 +0100 From: "Bryan Jordan" Subject: Need Info Okay Guys, I'm new on the list. I am located in Germany with the Military. I want to buy a Ford ranger 4X2, either new or 1 yr old, but can't find any detailed tech info concerning engines on the net. Even Ford Motor Co shows mostly pictures. Site is slow as a Chevy. I don't want to modify the engine for more HP until the warranty is over. I need an engine that can maintain 100 mph at no more than 4,000 - 4500 rpm for 6 hrs (the time it takes from Heidelberg to Berlin). Monthly trips to see my 10 yr old daughter. Will the 2.3 L do it? Also, why is the 3.0 L V6 mentioned on the rangercom site as being the "least popular"? What kind of gas mileage does the 4.0L get. Any comments on engine reliability, etc are appreciated. Thanks, Bryan ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 14:35:58 -0500 From: cdkelly Subject: Re: Need Info The 2.3 as well as the other rangers all top out at 105!(speed limiter)I have had my 2.3 hit 105 twice once in fourth gear...but would not recommend running it at the speed for 6 hours a day...go with the 4.0 the 3.0 SUCKS! As weak as the 2.3 and uses as much gas as the 4.0, the 3.0 is a waste of time. I think the 3.0 is a Mazda motor and the 2.3 and 4.0 are ford motors. Well good luck! On Tue, 18 Nov 1997 19:47:35 +0100 "Bryan Jordan" writes: >Okay Guys, > >I'm new on the list. I am located in Germany with the Military. I >want to >buy a Ford ranger 4X2, either new or 1 yr old, but can't find any >detailed >tech info concerning engines on the net. Even Ford Motor Co shows >mostly >pictures. Site is slow as a Chevy. > >I don't want to modify the engine for more HP until the warranty is >over. I >need an engine that can maintain 100 mph at no more than 4,000 - 4500 >rpm >for 6 hrs (the time it takes from Heidelberg to Berlin). Monthly trips >to >see my 10 yr old daughter. > >Will the 2.3 L do it? Also, why is the 3.0 L V6 mentioned on the >rangercom >site as being the "least popular"? What kind of gas mileage does the >4.0L >get. Any comments on engine reliability, etc are appreciated. > >Thanks, > >Bryan >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer >--------------+ >| Send posts to fordtrucks80up >| >| Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request >| >+----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com >-----------------+ > ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 14:07:50 -0600 From: hsherman Subject: voltage reg I understand that there is a voltage reg for the instruments on an 85 for van. Can someone tell me how this device functions? What is it's output voltage? How is the output voltage maintained? Thanks in advance, hsherman ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 15:30:51 -0500 (EST) From: IMATOOLMAN Subject: I have a question vaccum booster 1980 f-150 How can I tell if my vacuum booster is bad? My brake pedal doesn't come all the way back up after braking, the last 1" or so I have to use my foot to pull it back up. When I pull up on the pedal a vacuum sound is heard coming from the rear of the booster near the brake pedal rod going into the booster assembly. The brakes drag a little before I pull back up on the pedal, I've tried to adjust the rod to the master cylinder but it made it worse Do you think It could be that my booster is bad everything else is new in the system Thanks Tony Matsik ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 15:54:05 -0500 From: "Ned" Subject: Re: Internet Virus ALERT! NO WAY!! I cant believe that people would make a program that would do that. By the way, I heard yesterday that they changed the spelling of "GULLIBLE" in the dictionary. You all should check it out. - -----Original Message----- From: Brian Pynn To: 'Ford Trucks List' ; 'Fordnatics' Date: Tuesday, November 18, 1997 12:15 PM Subject: FW: Internet Virus ALERT! >Info at bottom... > >> ---------- >> From: Brian Pynn >> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 1997 8:36 AM >> To: Louis Hopcraft; Dinah Brennan >> Subject: FW: Internet Virus ALERT! >> >> >> >> ---------- >> From: BEABE >> Sent: Monday, November 17, 1997 12:57 PM >> To: lrobertson >> Shirley-Ann_Wagenaar >> Subject: Internet Virus ALERT! >> >> Hi! Just keeping you in the loop re a new Internet Virus. >> You may want to forward this around your companies. >> Betty. >> --------------------------( Forwarded letter 1 follows >> )--------------------- >> Date: Monday, 17 November 1997 12:22pm PT >> To: MLISD >> From: DONEL >> Subject: PLEASE READ NOW >> >> please read down to the letter which describes a virus. you should >> also be in >> touch with your customers to advise them as well. >> >> i expect there will be more direction on this shortly. >> >> thanks,,,,doug >> --------------------------( Forwarded letter 2 follows >> )--------------------- >> Date: Monday, 17 November 1997 11:53am PT >> To: MLASDMG >> From: PABAR >> Subject: PLEASE READ NOW >> >> fyi... >> --------------------------( Forwarded letter 3 follows >> )--------------------- >> Date: Monday, 17 November 1997 11:30am PT >> To: MLMVDALL, SICHOW >> From: BRAUG >> Subject: PLEASE READ NOW >> >> Fyi, >> --------------------------( Forwarded letter 4 follows >> )--------------------- >> Date: Monday, 17 November 1997 11:28am PT >> To: MLCSS-DFP >> From: SUSCH >> Subject: NEW VIRUS ON INTERNET. >> >> --------------------------( Forwarded letter 2 follows >> )--------------------- >> Date: Monday, 17 November 1997 8:49am PT >> To: MLHD >> From: JECOO >> Subject: NEW VIRUS >> >> FYI.... >> >> WARNING!!! If you receive an e-mail titled "JOIN THE CREW" DO NOT >> open it! It will erase EVERYTHING on your hard drive! Send this >> letter out to as many people you can....this is a new virus and not >> many people know about it! This message was received this morning >> from IBM, and the Army National Guard, please share it with anyone >> that might access the Internet. >> >> Regards, >> Jerry Cooling >> IBM Services >> 661-2747 >> >> >> >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ >| Send posts to fordtrucks80up >| Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request >+----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ > ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 16:10:13 -0500 From: "Albasha, Ned" Subject: RE: Internet Virus ALERT! Hi Ya ALL I'll clear all this out A virus is a program. To infect your machine this program must be executed. So the number one item on the misinformation list about viruses is that reading a mail message can infect your computer. This is NOT true. If I hear one more good intentioned warning about the "Good Times" virus or any other virus I think I'll scream, or possibly do something even more violent! "looking" at a program (I.e. reading the message), cannot infect your machine any more than looking at the source code of program can execute it. Now, having said that, there is one caveat to be aware of. Some programs, such as Microsoft Word, can be set to automatically execute a startup macro when a document is loaded. It is possible for a virus to be imbedded in a macro, in which case reading the document can cause the macro to be executed and possibly damage your machine. However, with any autoexecute function disabled there is no danger in reading e-mail messages. I hope this clear everything. Ned -----Original Message----- From: Ned [SMTP:ned Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 1997 3:54 PM To: fordtrucks80up Subject: Re: Internet Virus ALERT! NO WAY!! I cant believe that people would make a program that would do that. By the way, I heard yesterday that they changed the spelling of "GULLIBLE" in the dictionary. You all should check it out. -----Original Message----- From: Brian Pynn To: 'Ford Trucks List' ; 'Fordnatics' Date: Tuesday, November 18, 1997 12:15 PM Subject: FW: Internet Virus ALERT! >Info at bottom... > >> ---------- >> From: Brian Pynn >> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 1997 8:36 AM >> To: Louis Hopcraft; Dinah Brennan >> Subject: FW: Internet Virus ALERT! >> >> >> >> ---------- >> From: BEABE >> Sent: Monday, November 17, 1997 12:57 PM >> To: lrobertson >> Shirley-Ann_Wagenaar >> Subject: Internet Virus ALERT! >> >> Hi! Just keeping you in the loop re a new Internet Virus. >> You may want to forward this around your companies. >> Betty. >> --------------------------( Forwarded letter 1 follows >> )--------------------- >> Date: Monday, 17 November 1997 12:22pm PT >> To: MLISD >> From: DONEL >> Subject: PLEASE READ NOW >> >> please read down to the letter which describes a virus. you should >> also be in >> touch with your customers to advise them as well. >> >> i expect there will be more direction on this shortly. >> >> thanks,,,,doug >> --------------------------( Forwarded letter 2 follows >> )--------------------- >> Date: Monday, 17 November 1997 11:53am PT >> To: MLASDMG >> From: PABAR >> Subject: PLEASE READ NOW >> >> fyi... >> --------------------------( Forwarded letter 3 follows >> )--------------------- >> Date: Monday, 17 November 1997 11:30am PT >> To: MLMVDALL, SICHOW >> From: BRAUG >> Subject: PLEASE READ NOW >> >> Fyi, >> --------------------------( Forwarded letter 4 follows >> )--------------------- >> Date: Monday, 17 November 1997 11:28am PT >> To: MLCSS-DFP >> From: SUSCH >> Subject: NEW VIRUS ON INTERNET. >> >> --------------------------( Forwarded letter 2 follows >> )--------------------- >> Date: Monday, 17 November 1997 8:49am PT >> To: MLHD >> From: JECOO >> Subject: NEW VIRUS >> >> FYI.... >> >> WARNING!!! If you receive an e-mail titled "JOIN THE CREW" DO NOT >> open it! It will erase EVERYTHING on your hard drive! Send this >> letter out to as many people you can....this is a new virus and not >> many people know about it! This message was received this morning >> from IBM, and the Army National Guard, please share it with anyone >> that might access the Internet. >> >> Regards, >> Jerry Cooling >> IBM Services >> 661-2747 >> >> >> >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer - --------------+ >| Send posts to fordtrucks80up | >| Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request >+----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com - -----------------+ > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer - --------------+ | Send posts to fordtrucks80up | | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com - -----------------+ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 16:22:25 -0500 (EST) From: Bakend Subject: Re: radius arm bushings In a message dated 97-11-17 11:00:09 EST, you write: Date: 97-11-17 11:00:09 EST From: Iguannna Sender: owner-fordtrucks80up Reply-to: fordtrucks80up To: fordtrucks80up In a message dated 97-11-17 06:11:35 EST, you write: Subject: Radius Arm Bushings >> The bushings are not all that hard to replace and boy do they make a difference! Mine is a 1987 so may not be the same, but I changed them in about 4 hours. You do need to remove the coil springs, but don't need any compressor tool or any thing special. Just get the front blocked up solid with the wheels off the floor. Remove the center nut that holds the spring (support the wheel as it will fall down) and remove the spring. Next remove the nut on the radius arm and push the axle forward (watch close at the brake lines and etc.) until it comes out of the bushings. Reassemble with new bushings and sit back, relax, and enjoy!!! It is a tough job but well worth it in the long run. Almost drives like those pricey new ones now. Dennis ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 16:29:43 -0500 From: "Froggy" Subject: Re: Need Info Bryan, There's not a production ranger on the market that will run 100mph fro six hours, I don't care what motor you put in it. I was in Germany and our US vehicles are not designed for that environment. If I were going to buy a ranger though, don't buy anything except the 4.0 with the lowest (numerical) gear ratio you can find. That will keep your rpm's down, create less wear and tear, and provide reasonable gas mileage. Remember, a factory built truck is not designed for high speed; you may also want to consider adding a topper or something to add a few hundred pounds to increase the rear weight and provide a little extra traction/stability at higher speeds. I have a 4.0 in my ranger, and while it is plenty fast (100mph plus), I wouldn't dare run it more than an hour or so at that speed....Good luck...froggy USAF Retired!! - ---------- > From: Bryan Jordan > To: fordtrucks80up > Subject: Need Info > Date: Tuesday, November 18, 1997 1:47 PM > > Okay Guys, > > I'm new on the list. I am located in Germany with the Military. I want to > buy a Ford ranger 4X2, either new or 1 yr old, but can't find any detailed > tech info concerning engines on the net. Even Ford Motor Co shows mostly > pictures. Site is slow as a Chevy. > > I don't want to modify the engine for more HP until the warranty is over. I > need an engine that can maintain 100 mph at no more than 4,000 - 4500 rpm > for 6 hrs (the time it takes from Heidelberg to Berlin). Monthly trips to > see my 10 yr old daughter. > > Will the 2.3 L do it? Also, why is the 3.0 L V6 mentioned on the rangercom > site as being the "least popular"? What kind of gas mileage does the 4.0L > get. Any comments on engine reliability, etc are appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Bryan > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request > +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 13:42:29 -0500 From: Thom Cheney Subject: Re: Need Info Hey Bryan, I recently purchased a '97 Ranger. I bought the 4.0 l V-6. Since my truck is a super-cab 4X4, I would not choose to get a smaller motor. In fact, I think this engine could be squeezed for another 10-20 hp and be about right. Gas mileage is not as good as the 2.4 liter Toyota motor I had last, but then I wasn't hauling around this much weight & components. Performance was also not anywhere near the Ranger. I think I have seen about 22mpg. on an 180 mile trip over a mountain pass. I'll get a better estimate next week when I do the I-5 run down through Oregon to No. Calif. I hope to see at least 24 mpg, if I can keep my foot out of it (wishful thinking?). I know you are more concerned about gas prices in Europe, but I don't think you will be as happy with the 2.3 liter. I cannot offer any advice on the 3.0, I am unfamiliar with it. Other than the additional hp, the reason I opted for the 4.0 was the fact that Ford has built a giant heaping s**tload of them & they must have figured out how to do it right by now! My friend has an early Explorer & he says that everything else has fallen apart on the truck except the engine. Good luck in your decision. Have fun on the autobahn!! - -- Thom Cheney Early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 18:49:34 -0500 From: bthomas Subject: Re: Need Info Why would anyone want to jeopardize the safety of themselves or others by trying to run a Ranger at 100 mph (regardless of engine size) for more then two minutes at a time (if at all). You will just be in the way and the locals will soon figure out that you are just another American that doesn't have a clue as to what it really takes to drive in Europe. Sorry, but you asked for it. ______________________________ Reply Separator ____________________________ _____ Subject: Need Info Author: bryanjor Date: 11/18/97 7:47 PM Okay Guys, I'm new on the list. I am located in Germany with the Military. I want to buy a Ford ranger 4X2, either new or 1 yr old, but can't find any detailed tech info concerning engines on the net. Even Ford Motor Co shows mostly pictures. Site is slow as a Chevy. I don't want to modify the engine for more HP until the warranty is over. I need an engine that can maintain 100 mph at no more than 4,000 - - 4500 rpm for 6 hrs (the time it takes from Heidelberg to Berlin). Monthly trips to see my 10 yr old daughter. Will the 2.3 L do it? Also, why is the 3.0 L V6 mentioned on the rangercom site as being the "least popular"? What kind of gas mileage does the 4.0L get. Any comments on engine reliability, etc are appreciated. Thanks, Bryan +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer - --------------+ | Send posts to fordtrucks80up | | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com - -----------------+ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 19:10:33 -0500 (EST) From: IamGoode Subject: Q: On Radius arms (length) Is any one aware of various radius arm lengths? Do xlt explorers and rangers come with a diffrent length than standard? I am looking for a way to compensate for caster with 2in over stock springs.....Sean ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 18:15:57 -0600 From: "David J. Baldwin" Subject: Re: voltage reg hsherman wrote: > > I understand that there is a voltage reg for the instruments > on an 85 for van. > Can someone tell me how this device functions? > What is it's output voltage? > How is the output voltage maintained? There are a few different types of regulators, but the type in your van is probably what they call a "linear" regulator. Typically, it is an IC (integrated circuit) which has an internal precision voltage reference. It has an output device that functions as a "valve" to supply current from the ignition (battery) to the output. An amplifier compares the output voltage to the reference voltage, and adjusts the current through the "valve" (a transistor) to match the two voltages. Regulators are available off-the-shelf from any electronics components supply. Common voltages are 5V, 12V, and 15V. There are also adjustable ones that you can set to whatever you want. What is the output voltage of the regulator in your panel? I don't know. I don't know if a service manual would provide that info either. Maybe someone else on the list has some knowledge of this. If it is supplying logic ICs, it's probably 5V. It may be a dual regulator with 5V and 12V. Please don't confuse this regulator with the "voltage regulator" for the charging system--it is completely different. - -- Best Regards, Dave Baldwin Dallas, TX - -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 20:18:30 -0500 (EST) From: Midwest96 Subject: Re: Floor In a message dated 97-11-18 05:07:22 EST, you write: Just out of curiosity how much would it have cost for the new floor (vynle....I know I spelled that wrong)? I'm sory to here how it fit though. I have the carpet and am constantly getting it filthy and have been considering the floor like you've got. It would'nt be such a hassel to keep clean. Have you tried adding some velcro to the part of the floor that pulls up? Maybe a couple of strips of velcro would hold it down..... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|